Abstract
In 1859, Darwin proposed a solution for the tension between unity of type and conditions of existence that had shaped the growth of pre-evolutionary morphology. The theory developed in On the Origin of Species contemplated and integrated both ideas: the unity of type explained by common descent and the arrangement to the conditions of existence explained by natural selection. That integration, however, was not a presupposition of the argument developed there but rather its most important achievement. The compatibility between the requirements of the principle of the conditions of existence stressed by Georges Cuvier and the Unity of Type highlighted by Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire was, in fact, the main tour de force of Darwin’s work and maybe its main key of reading. However, despite this, it can also be said that the synthesis that Darwin proposes for the antithesis between unity of type and conditions of existence ends up tipping the balance a little in Geoffroy’s favor. He led us to consider nature as an austere demiurge that tended to work with the same materials, modifying them indefinitely in virtue of the new functions that came to them in virtue of different circumstances and minimizing the production of new structures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amundson, R. (2005). The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought. Cambridge University Press.
Bowler, P. (1996). Life’s splendid drama. Chicago University Press.
Buffon, G. (1753). L’Ane. In G. Buffon (Ed.), Histoire Naturelle Générale et Particulière (Tome IV, pp. 377–405). L’Imprimerie Royale.
Caponi, G. (2008). Georges Cuvier: Un Fisiólogo de Museo. UNAM-LIMUSA.
Caponi, G. (2011a). Compensation and correlation of the organs in Étienne Geoffroy-Saint Hilaire’s transmutationism. In J. Martínez-Contreraz & A. P. de Leon (Eds.), Darwin’s evolving legacy (pp. 100–110). Siglo XXI.
Caponi, G. (2011b). La Segunda Agenda Darwiniana. Centro Lombardo Toledano.
Caponi, G. (2020). The Darwinian turn in the understanding of biological environment. Biological Theory, 17, 20–35.
Coleman, W. (1964). Georges Cuvier: Zoologist. Harvard University Press.
Cuvier, G. (1801). Extrait d’un Ouvrage sur les Espèces de Quadrupèdes dont on a Trouvé les Ossements dans l’Intérieur de la Terre Adresse aux Savants et aux Amateurs des Sciences. Magasin Encyclopédique, 7me année (tome premier), 60–82.
Cuvier, G. (1805). Leçons d’Anatomie Comparée (Tome I). Baudouin.
Cuvier, G. (1809). Sur Quelques Quadrupèdes Ovipares Fossiles Conservés dans les Schistes Calcaires. Annales du Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle, 13, 401–437.
Cuvier, G. (1810). Rapport Historique sur les Progrès des Sciences Naturelles depuis 1789 at sur leur État Actuel. L’Imprimerie Impériale.
Cuvier, G. (1817). Le Règne Animal Distribué d’après son Organisation (Tome I). Deterville.
Cuvier, G. (1992). Recherches sur les Ossements Fossiles de Quadrupèdes [Discours préliminaire, 1812]. Flammarion.
Cuvier, G., & Valenciennes, A. (1828). Histoire Naturelle des Poissons (Tome I). Levrault.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species. Murray.
Darwin, C. (1877). The various contrivances by which orchids are fertilized by insects (2nd ed.). Murray.
Döhrn, F. (1975). Der Ursprung der Wirbelthiere und das Princip des Functionswechsles. Engelman.
Fischer, J.-L. (1993). L’Anatomie Transcendante et le Concept de Récapitulation chez Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire. In P. Mengal (Ed.), Histoire du Concept de Récapitulation (pp. 55–68). Masson.
Foucault, M. (1970). La situation de Cuvier dans l’Histoire de la Biologie. Revue d’Histoire des Sciences et leurs applications, 23(1), 49–60.
Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, É. (1796). Memoire sur les Rapports Naturelles des Makis-Lemur. L’Imprimerie du Magasin Encyclopédique.
Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, É. (1818). Philosophie Anatomique des organes respiratoires. Baillière.
Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, É. (1822). Philosophie Anatomique des Monstruosités Humaines. Chez l´Auteur.
Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, É. (1829). Cours de l’Histoire Naturelle des Mammifères. Pichon & Didier.
Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, É. (1833). Le Degré de Influence du Monde Ambiant pour Modifier les Formes Animales (pp. 63–92). Mémoires de l’Académie Royale de Sciences de Institut de France.
Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, I. (1847). Vie, Travaux et Doctrine scientifique d’Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire. Bertrand.
Goethe, J. (1837). Principes de Philosophie Zoologique par M. Geoffroy-St-Hilaire (suite et fin). In J. Goethe (Ed.), Oeuvres d’Histoire Naturelle (pp. 160–182). Cherbuliez. (Original work published 1832).
Gould, S. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Harvard University Press.
Grene, M. (2001). Darwin, Cuvier and Geoffroy: Comments and questions. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 23(2), 187–211.
Grene, M., & Depew, D. (2004). The philosophy of biology: An episodic history. Cambridge University Press.
Guillo, D. (2003). Les Figures de l’Organisation. PUF.
Guillo, D. (2007). Qu’est-ce que l’Évolution? Ellipses.
Huxley, T. (1893a). Criticism on the origin of species. In I. T. Huxley (Ed.), Darwiniana (pp. 80–106). Appleton. (Original work published 1864).
Huxley, T. (1893b). Evolution in biology. In I. T. Huxley (Ed.), Darwiniana (pp. 187–226). Appleton. (Original work published 1878).
Huxley, T. (1898). On the method of paleontology. In M. Foster & R. Lankester (Eds.), The scientific memoirs of Thomas Henry Huxley (Vol. I, pp. 432–444). Macmillan. (Original work published 1856).
Kant, I. (1987). Critique of judgment. Hackett. (Original work published 1790).
Kohn, D. (2009). Darwin’s keystone: The principle of divergence. In M. Ruse & R. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to the origin of species (pp. 87–108). Cambridge University Press.
Le Guyader, H. (1998). Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire: Un Naturaliste Visionnaire. Belin.
Limoges, C. (1970). L’Économie Naturelle et le Principe de Corrélation chez Cuvier et Darwin. Revue d’Histoire des Sciences et leurs applications, 23(1), 35–45.
Perrier, E. (1884). La Philosophie Zoologique avant Darwin. Félix Alcan.
Piveteau, J. (1961). Anatomie Compare des Vertébrés. In R. Taton (Ed.), La Science contemporaine I: le XIXe siècle (pp. 485–501). PUF.
Reiss, J. (2009). Not by design. California University Press.
Russell, E. (1916). Form and function. Murray.
Schmitt, S. (2006). Aux Origines de la Biologie Moderne. Belin.
Sober, E. (2008). Evidence and evolution. Cambridge University Press.
Waters, K. (2003). The arguments in the origin of species. In J. Hodge & G. Radick (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Darwin (pp. 116–137). Cambridge University Press.
Whewell, W. (1837). History of the inductive sciences (Vol. III). Parker.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Caponi, G. (2023). The Darwinian Not Too Strictly Balanced Arrangement Between Cuvier and Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire. In: Elice Brzezinski Prestes, M. (eds) Understanding Evolution in Darwin's "Origin". History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, vol 34. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40165-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40165-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-40164-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-40165-7
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)