Skip to main content

Exploring the Representation of Violence Against Women in Hotel Rwanda (2004) and The Greatest Silence: Rape in the Congo (2007)—A Gendered Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Remembering Mass Atrocities: Perspectives on Memory Struggles and Cultural Representations in Africa

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies ((PMMS))

  • 53 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter seeks to explore gendered filmography on genocide in Africa through two films; Hotel Rwanda (2004) and The Greatest Silence: Rape in the Congo (2008). It examines the representation of women in these two films coupled with interviews with Rwandan and Congolese refugees based on fieldwork conducted in suburbs of Sunnyside, Pretoria and Hillbrow, Johannesburg (South Africa). The study explores the multifaceted ways in which women’s experiences are remembered through gendered accounts that concretize representations of women as subjects of patriarchal memory. Traditionally, films tend to disfigure women’s representations where women’s bodies are portrayed and re-membered as domesticated beings, subject to the vagaries of masculinity, suffering mothers and sexual possessions/rewards of genocide agents. We situate this study within a phenomenological qualitative research framework. We employ the critical approach to film theory, meaning that theories on representation, feminism, production/text audience reception and discourse analysis are used to interpret the audio-visual language formation in both films. In-depth interviews anchored on snowballing sampling also draw on the associative imagery technique. The associative imagery technique is a qualitative tool with which researchers use carefully selected photographs or images to trigger participants’ responses to explain difficult behavioural and social concepts. In this study scenes within the movies were selected. Our analysis shows that, as film seeks to accurately remember and represent atrocities against women, it must not allegorize women, and instead it should consider that what is portrayed in the present both determines how these gross injustices are viewed and shapes future actions. Consequently, social construction of gendered memories of genocide should cogitate representing female victims of violence as agents of change, and disregard gender binaries and traditional politics of representing victimhood which tend to place males as not only perpetrators but saviours too, as well as carriers of the power of representation and that of the gaze.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adhikari, M. (2007). Hotel Rwanda: Too much heroism, too little heroism, too little history-horror? In V. Bickford-Smith & R. Mendelsohn (Eds.), Black plus white in color: African history on screen (pp. 279–330). James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (1979). Principles of biomedical ethics (1st ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergen, D. L. (2013). What do studies of women, gender, and sexuality contribute to understanding the Holocaust? In M. Goldenberg & A. H. Shapiro (Eds.), Different horrors, same hell: Gender and the Holocaust (pp. 16–37). University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard-Donals, M. (2006). An introduction to Holocaust studies. Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, G. (1998). Ordinary women in Nazi Germany: Perpetrators, victims, followers, and bystanders. In D. Ofer & L. J. Weitzman (Eds.), Women in the Holocaust (pp. 85–100). Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boris, Lenore L., (2015). “Hearing the Voices of HIV Positive Women in Kenya: Secondary Analysis of Interview Data Using Dialogic/ Performance Analysis”. Theses and Dissertations. 860. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/860

  • Brown, A. (2013). Screening women’s complicity in the Holocaust: The problems of judgement and representation. In J. Adams & S. Vice (Eds.), Representing perpetrators in Holocaust literature and film (pp. 69–90). Vallentine Mitchell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape. London: Penguin

    Google Scholar 

  • David, B., & Resnik, J. D. (2015). What Is Ethics in Research and Why Is It Important? National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis

  • De Vito, D., et al. (2000). Rape Characterised as Genocide. International Journal on Human Rights, (10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, L., Diane, C., & Welsch, J. (eds.). (1994). Multiple Voices in Feminist Film Criticism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elander, M. (2016). Visual representations of the genocide (Oxford research encyclopedias and criminal justice) (pp. 1–30). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.110

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorelli, L. (2015). A New Defense of Cinematic Realism. Film and Philosophy, 19, 54–74. https://doi.org/10.5840/FILMPHIL2015195.

  • Giannetti, L. D. (1992). Understanding Movies. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, H. (1991). Film and Reality. In Staples, D. E. (ed.) The American Cinema. Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinks, R. (2016). Representing genocide. The Holocaust as paradigm? Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. H. (2005). The Right to Life, Genocide and the Problem of Bystander State. In John K. Roth (Ed.), Genocide and Human Rights: A Philosophical Guide (pp. 265–276). Palgrave-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. (1992). The accusatory space. In G. Dent & M. Wallace (Eds.), Black popular culture (pp. 95–98). Seattle: Bay Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, I. (2015). Ordinary Women, as Perpetrators in European Holocaust Films. In I. Schutte & I. D. Popescu (Ed.), Revisiting Holocaust Representation in the Post-Witness era. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathuthu, M. (2021). Subversive Verses: How Ndebele Musicians Counter-Framed the State Propaganda on The Gukurahundi Genocide. Journal of Literary Studies, 37(3), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/02564718.2021.1959763

  • Neubauer, B. et al. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(18). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2

  • Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstone, R. A. (2012). History on film/film on history. Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. W. (1994). Women and genocide: Notes on an unwritten history. Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 8(3), 315–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G. (1969). Language and Silence Essays 1958–1966. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steven Spielberg, John Williams, John Williams, and John Neufeld. Schindler’s List . USA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarr, C., & Rollet, B. (2001). Cinema and the Second Sex: Women’s Filmmaking in France in the 1980s and 1990s. Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Zoonen, L. (1994). Feminist Media Studies. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallimann, I., Dobkowski, M., & Rubenstein, R. L. (1987). Genocide and the Modern Age: Etiology and Case Studies of Mass Death. Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, Z. (2016). Wartime Rape and the Need for Reparations. Sexual Violence Research Initiative, April 11, http://www.svri.org/blog/wartime-rape-andneed-reparations#_ftn8

  • Waxman, Z. (2006). Writing the Holocaust: Identity, Testimony, Representation. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, E. James. (2009). Regarding the Pain of Women: Questions of Gender and the Arts in Holocaust Memory. PMLA, 124(5), 1778–1786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zylberman, L., & Sanchez-Biosca, F. B. (2018). Reflections on the significance of images in genocide studies: Some methodological considerations. Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal, 12(2), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ngwenya, B., Ngwenya, M. (2024). Exploring the Representation of Violence Against Women in Hotel Rwanda (2004) and The Greatest Silence: Rape in the Congo (2007)—A Gendered Perspective. In: Ndlovu, M., Tshuma, L.A., Mpofu, S. (eds) Remembering Mass Atrocities: Perspectives on Memory Struggles and Cultural Representations in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39892-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics