Abstract
The Keystone flap allows one to close large soft tissue defects, even under an element of tension. The vascular supply comes from random perforators within the various dermatomal mark outs in the head and neck and this vascular source supports the subdermal plexus. Individual perforators are not itemised nor skeletonised and this surgical outline of the dermatome has been likened to a sympathectomy effect which produces a hypervascularity in the flap, again this supports reconstructive healing. Utilising these principles really is focusing back on the embryological mark outs of the dermatomes and this embryological basis is the basis for the vascular reliability on fascial island flaps.
Facial and smile lines are all respected which goes and contributes to the achievement of normal facial grimace and smile lines from the scalp, the forehead, nose and cheek and periorbital regions. These anatomical units are really dermatomal anatomical units in the Keystone application.
Plastic surgical textbooks have umpteen varieties of loco-regional flaps but that principle of islanding within the dermatomal precincts – which is sometimes only a dermal incision which is surgically closed in the reparative technique. Sometimes MAYO scissors allow the tissues to be stretched before the definitive closure and the subfascial units are thus stretched to facilitate dermal apposition while not disturbing the integrity of the contained vasculature. If there are elements of tensional lines in these closures, sometimes the realignment of the suture points will help to overcome this mild or temporary vascular impedance.
The single layer suture technique is the basis of its success when locking mattress sutures at the points of maximum tension are accompanied by remaining sutures to approximate the layers and the continuous nylon epidermal seal creates perfection in the healing wound margin. The wound dressing technique needs supervision where the continuous nylon is cut at 7 days and the tension sutures remain in up to 3 weeks to avoid rupture.
The Keystone allows one to bypass standard loco-regional flaps including the Limberg which when looked at schematically is not dissimilar to the Keystone design but amplified by the use of a total island and supported by the subdermal plexus.
The Keystone bypasses the need for nasal/ethmoidal reconstruction without layered grafting over a bony defect as the mucosal lining of the remnant becomes the alternative mucosal replacement (that is why we do not graft tonsillectomy as mucosa regenerates).
Case 5 is a modification of the Bezier unit and jointing the diagonals of any Keystone creates a V-Y island flap.
Closure of parotid defects uses the cervico submental C2, C3 dermatomes and blunt dissected up to the base of the sternomastoid which becomes the focus of the rotation of the Keystone with cervical fascia to close the parotid defect. The apical sutures near the apex of the parotid defect are the tension sutures to maintain the reconstruction which warrant a long-term insertion should premature removal allow the wound to breakdown.
Residual swelling reduces in time with the recovery of cutaneous nerve supply but the reliability of the technique to be used in irradiated tissue is one of the lifelines for the Keystone reconstruction.
The timeframes for operating are shorter and elderly patients are off the table within an expeditious timeframe, eliminating another co-factor of anaesthetic morbidity in a 90 year old.
The advantage of the Keystone in the lower lip reconstruction, a mucosal bridge transfer where the direct apposition may cause a disturbance in clinical outcome when hair bearing tissue at the mouth follows a vermilionectomy.
Thus, the Keystone has universal applications in most areas of the head and neck whatever the age group, even with the restrictions of irradiated tissue.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Haddad-Tame, et al. Reconstruction of the aesthetics units of the face with microsurgery: experience in five years. Microsurgery. 2000;20:211.
Gonzalez-Ulloa M. Restoration of the face covering by means of selected skin in regional aesthetic units. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 1956;1226(56):80036–2.
Gonzalez-Ulloa M, Stevens E. Reconstruction of the nose and forehead by means of regional aesthetic units. Br J Plast Surg. 1960;13:305–9.
Gillies H, Millard D. The principles and art of plastic surgery. London: Butterworth; 1957.
Zimany A. The Bi-lobed flap. Plast Reconstruct Surg. 1953;11(6):424–34.
Dufourmentel C. Closure of limited loss of cutaneous substance. So-called “LLL” diamond-shaped L rotation-flap. Ann Chir Plast. 1962;7:60–6.
Belt PJ, Emmett A. Local transposition flap repair of the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(3):732–7.
Barron J, Emmett A. Subcutaneous pedicle flaps. Br J Plast Surg. 1965;18:51–78.
Nordstrom RE, Devine JW. Scalp stretching with a tissue expander for closure of scalp defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;75:578.
Lee B, Bickel K, Levin S. Microsurgical reconstruction of extensive scalp defects. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1999;15:255.
Beasley N, et al. Scalp and forehead reconstruction using free revascularized tissue transfer. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6(1):16–20.
Lipa J, Butler C. Enhancing the outcome of free latissimus dorsi muscle flap reconstruction of scalp defects. Head Neck. 2003;26(1):46–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.10338.
TerKonda S. Concepts in scalp and forehead reconstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1997;30(4):519–39.
Behan F, et al. Island flaps including the Bezier type in the treatment of malignant melanoma. Aust N Z J Surg. 1995;65(12):870–80.
Dufourmentel. Stag-beetle flap. Sliding island flap with plasty in VY. Ann Chir Plast. 1970;15(4):344–7.
Behan F, et al. Oncologic clearance with preservation of reconstructive options: literature review and the 'delayed reconstruction after pathology evaluation (DRAPE)' technique. ANZ J Surg. 2012;82(11):780–5.
McGregor JC. A critical assessment of the biolbed flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1981;34:197.
Driscol BP, Baker SR. Reconstruction of nsasal alar defects. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001;3:91.
Burget GC, Menick FJ. Aesthetic reconstruction of the nose. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1994.
Balch C. Modification of cross-lip flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978;61(3):457–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Behan, F. (2023). Major Head and Neck Regions Using the Keystone Technique. In: Atlas of Keystone Reconstructive Technique in Melanoma Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39868-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39868-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-39867-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-39868-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)