Skip to main content

Uruguay: The Rise of a Monocentric Economy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Roots of Underdevelopment

Abstract

We explore the impacts of urban primacy on Uruguayan economic development, with a focus on the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. We argue that Montevideo’s primacy produced a dualistic economic geography (city-port/countryside) without intermediate towns of an even remotely comparable scale. The lack of a network of cities translated into physical infrastructure, notably through a dendritic railway design where would-be secondary towns were not connected to each other. Primacy became an obstacle to the development of a more diversified territorial division of labor and limited the emergence of new clusters, especially in sectors associated with industrialization. Such a monocentric economy was ill-suited for structural change, contributing to Uruguay’s mediocre twentieth-century growth record and its continued divergence from the world’s leading economies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Browning (1989) offers a geographer’s overview of the concept. For an introduction to the empirical research on ‘urban primacy’ in developing economies, see Overman and Venables (2005). The extensive economic literature on urbanization, urban concentration, and long-term development is reviewed in Davis and Henderson (2003).

  2. 2.

    The ‘rank-size rule’ suggests that city sizes within national economy are distributed in a lognormal fashion (the second city in a country should be half as large as the first and so on). For a discussion of the rank-size rule and urban hierarchy in economic history, largely in reference to Europe, see Wrigley (2004: 253–257) and de Vries (1984: 85–120).

  3. 3.

    The best single study of the genealogy of Montevideo’s primacy is Rial and Klaczko (1981). Readers not familiar with the major themes and trends of Uruguay’s economic history will find a concise and clear overview in Bértola (2008).

  4. 4.

    A recent history of Colonia do Sacramento under Portuguese rule (the Spanish gained definitive sovereignty over the town in the Treaty of San Ildefonso in 1777) can be found in Prado (2015: 13–33).

  5. 5.

    In the decades before the start of the independence revolution in the northern shore of the Plata (1811), Montevideo’s population rose to about 14,000; the other sizable settlements, also in the coastal south, were Colonia (5000) and Maldonado (3000) (Pollero 2016: 225; Gelman 1998: 246–247; Biangardi 2013: 25).

  6. 6.

    See, for a study that does find subnational fortunes persisting even since pre-colonial times in other Latin American cases, Maloney and Valencia Caicedo (2016).

  7. 7.

    For an authoritative review of this revisionist literature (known often as the ‘renaissance of rural history’ in Argentina and Uruguay), see Garavaglia and Gelman (1995). A recent overview focusing on Uruguay can be found in Moraes (2020).

  8. 8.

    An ‘agglomeration shadow’ appears when a major city ‘prevents’ new cities from emerging in its vicinity or existing ones from growing beyond a low threshold because it can effectively act as a cost-effective supplier of goods and services; see Fujita et al. (1999: 147).

  9. 9.

    Own calculations on the basis of the latest household survey microdata available (June 2020) (INE 2021).

  10. 10.

    For the structure of the Uruguayan railway network in 1913 and the evolution of the construction process, see the Uruguayan Statistical Yearbook for 1913–1914.

  11. 11.

    These stations were Bella Vista, Yatay, Sayago, Peñarol, and Colón.

  12. 12.

    In fact, a very high share of the passenger traffic in the Uruguayan railway system would probably consist of commuting trips between stations within Montevideo or its surrounding areas. Unfortunately, the absence of information about destination stations prevents from knowing the importance of those trips with any precision.

  13. 13.

    Within Latin America, the largest economies (Brazil and Mexico) as well as the other two southern cone countries (Argentina and Chile) also experienced early industrial growth during the First Globalization; see, for an overview, Bulmer-Thomas (2014: 117–151).

  14. 14.

    Detailed classifications of occupational data taken from the statistical appendix to Travieso (2020a). Previous estimates of occupational structure based on the 1908 census broadly coincide on this point; see Rama (1969), Klaczko (1979), and Rial (1981).

  15. 15.

    For two excellent empirical tests of ‘home market’ effects in explaining the within-country location of manufacturing, see Rosés (2003) and Davis and Weinstein (1999). These effects are of course related to the classic concept of ‘external economies of scale’: the cost savings achieved by firms producing in a large local economy (Vernon 1962).

  16. 16.

    The economic history literature on the New Zealand-Uruguay comparison is vast; for recent overviews, see Álvarez (2018) and Travieso (2020b: 272–277).

  17. 17.

    For a recent historical analysis of the key ideas and policies of batllismo (named after José Batlle y Ordóñez, president 1903–1907 and 1911–1915) see Caetano (2013); for a classic English-language study, see the trilogy by Vanger (especially Vanger 1980).

  18. 18.

    See Zubillaga (1977) for a historical overview of Uruguay’s administrative divisions and Rodríguez Miranda and Magri (2017) for a study of recent changes in the institutional framework for regional and local governments.

  19. 19.

    The birth of Flores (the last departamento to be founded) is emblematic: its territory was taken from the departamento of San José in 1885 by order of president Máximo Santos before leaving office; this resulted in the creation of a new Senate seat, which he then stood for and won (Pivel Devoto and Ranieri 1956: 356).

  20. 20.

    On the theoretical mechanisms linking rent-seeking and tariff protection with urban primacy, see Ades and Glaeser (1995) and Krugman and Elizondo (1996).

  21. 21.

    Population taken from 2011 census. For incomes: own calculations from household survey data from June 2020 (INE 2021); results are almost identical for household income and personal income. The coronavirus pandemic does not seem to have affected the mean income gap between the capital and the rest of the country.

References

  • Acevedo, E. (1934). Anales históricos del Uruguay [Tomo V]. Montevideo: Barreiro y Ramos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ades, A. F., & Glaeser, E. L. (1995). Trade and circuses: explaining urban giants. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1), 195–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez, J. (2018). Technological change and productivity growth in the agrarian systems of New Zealand and Uruguay (1870–2010). In V. Pinilla & H. Willebald (Eds.), Agricultural development in the world periphery (pp. 467–492): Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bénétrix, A. S., O’Rourke, K. H., & Williamson, J. G. (2017). Measuring the Spread of Modern Manufacturing to the Poor Periphery. In K. H. O‘Rourke & J. G. Williamson (Eds.), The Spread of Modern Industry to the Periphery Since 1871 (First edition. ed., pp. 13–29). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beretta Curi, A. (2014). Inmigración europea e industria: Uruguay en la región (1870–1915). Montevideo: Universidad de la República.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertino, M., Bertoni, R., & Tajam, H. (2005). Historia Económica del Uruguay, Tomo III: La economía del batllismo y los años veinte. Montevideo: Fin de Siglo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bértola, L. (1991). La industria manufacturera uruguaya 1913–1961: un análisis sectorial de su crecimiento, fluctuaciones y crisis. Montevideo: CIEDUR-Facultad de Ciencias Sociales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bértola, L. (2000). El crecimiento de la industria temprana en Uruguay. Ensayos de Historia Económica. Uruguay y la región en el mundo (1870–1990) (pp. 149–165). Montevideo: Trilce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bértola, L. (2008). An overview of the economic history of Uruguay since the 1870s. EH.net Encyclopedia. https://eh.net/encyclopedia/bertola-uruguay-final/.

  • Bértola, L., & Ocampo, J. A. (2013). El desarrollo económico de América Latina desde la independencia. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertoni, R. (2011). Energía y desarrollo: la restricción energética en Uruguay como problema (1882-2000). Montevideo: Universidad de la República.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biangardi, N. (2013). Una nueva área para la región. Poblamiento y crecimiento económico en Maldonado (1755–1814). Revista Uruguaya de Historia Económica, III(4), 11–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, S. T. (2022). The pastoral city-state: A metaphor for the geography of Uruguay. Journal of Latin American Geography, 21(1), 125–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, C. E. (1989). Urban primacy in Latin America. Yearbook. Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers, 15, 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer-Thomas, V. (2014). The economic history of Latin America since independence (third ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caetano, G. (2013). La república batllista. Montevideo: Banda Oriental.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christison, D. (1880). A journey to Central Uruguay. Proceedings of the Royal Geographical Society and Monthly Record of Geography, 2(11), 663–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CICRED. (1976). La población de Venezuela. Paris: CICRED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condliffe, J. B. (1930). New Zealand in the making: A survey of economic and social development. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. R., & Weinstein, D. E. (1999). Economic geography and regional production structure: an empirical investigation. European Economic Review, 43(2), 379–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. C., & Henderson, J. V. (2003). Evidence on the political economy of the urbanization process. Journal of Urban Economics, 53(1), 98–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, J. (1984). European Urbanization 1500–1800. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denoon, D. (1983). Settler capitalism: the dynamics of dependent development in the Southern Hemisphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DGE (Dirección General de Estadística, Uruguay). (1911). Censo General de la República Oriental del Uruguay en 1908. Montevideo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faroppa, L. A. (1969). Industrialización y dependencia económica. Montevideo: ARCA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrocarril Central del Uruguay. (1913). Itinerario de servicio para el uso y gobierno de los empleados de la empresa exclusivamente. Desde el 15 de Diciembre de 1913 hasta nuevo aviso. Peñarol: Imprenta F.C.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., & Thisse, J.-F. (2002). Economics of agglomeration: cities, industrial location, and regional growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., Krugman, P. R., & Venables, A. (1999). The spatial economy: cities, regions, and international trade. Cambridge, MA.; London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garavaglia, J. C., & Gelman, J. (1995). Rural history of the Rio de la Plata, 1600-1850: results of a historiographical renaissance. Latin American Research Review, 30(3), 75–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, J. (1998). Campesinos y estancieros: una región del Río de la Plata a fines de la época colonial. Buenos Aires: Libros del Riel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L. (1998). Are cities dying?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(2), 139–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González Posse, E. (2002). ‘El desarrollo local en Uruguay. Análisis y potencialidades.’ Montevideo: Universidad de la República, Documento de Trabajo de Rectorado nº17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, A. H. (1994). Aotearoa & New Zealand: a historical geography. Christchurch: Canterbury University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, E. (1973). Testing the von Thunen theory in Uruguay. Geographical Review, 63(4), 500–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herranz-Loncán, A. (2011). The role of railways in export-led growth: the case of Uruguay, 1870–1913. Economic History of Developing Regions, 26(2), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herranz-Loncán, A. (2014). Transport technology and economic expansion: the growth contribution of railways in Latin America before 1914. Revista de Historia Económica-Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History, 32 (2014), 1, pp. 13–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1977). A generalized linkage approach to development, with special reference to staples. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 25, 67–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • INE (Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Uruguay). (2021). Microdatos de la Encuesta Continua de Hogares Junio 2020. Montevideo. Available at: https://www.ine.gub.uy/encuesta-continua-de-hogares1.

  • Jacob, R. (1981). Breve historia de la industria en Uruguay. Montevideo: Fundación de Cultura Universitaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaczko, J. (1979). La población económicamente activa del Uruguay en 1908 y su incidencia en el proceso de urbanización. Documentos de Trabajo CIESU(18/79).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1995). Increasing returns, imperfect competition and the positive theory of international trade. In G. M. Grossman & K. Rogoff (Eds.), Handbook of international economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1243–1277).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P., & Elizondo, R. L. (1996). Trade policy and the third world metropolis. Journal of Development Economics, 49(1), 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd Prichard, M. F. (1970). An economic history of New Zealand to 1939. Auckland: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magri, A. J. (2011). Un quinquenio cargado de futuro: la descentralización y el ordenamiento territorial en Uruguay. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 24(28), 77–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, W. F., & Valencia Caicedo, F. (2016). The persistence of (subnational) fortune. The Economic Journal, 126(598), 2363–2401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariscal, E. V., & Sokoloff, K. L. (2000). Schooling, suffrage and the persistence of inequality in the Americas, 1800-1945. In S. H. Haber (Ed.), Political institutions and economic growth in Latin America: essays in policy, history, and political economy (pp. 159–218). Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez Díaz, N. (1987). Los ferrocarriles británicos en Uruguay. Desde sus orígenes hasta la crisis del 90. Montevideo: Ediciones del Nuevo Mundo, Cuadernos Uruguayos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Galarraga, J., Rodríguez Miranda, A., & Willebald, H. (2020). Patterns of regional income distribution in Uruguay (1872–2012): a story of agglomeration, natural resources and public policies. In M. Badia-Miró, D. Tirado-Fabregat, & H. Willebald (Eds.), Time and space: Latin American regional development in historical perspective. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millot, J., & Bertino, M. (1996). Historia Económica del Uruguay. Vol. II. 1860–1910. Montevideo: Fundación de Cultura Universitaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B. R. (2007a). International historical statistics: Africa, Asia & Oceania, 1750–2005. Basingstoke New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B. R. (2007b). International historical statistics: Europe, 1750–2005. Basingstoke New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B. R. (2007c). International historical statistics: The Americas, 1750–2005. Basingstoke New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraes, M. I. (2014). Mundos rurales (Nuestro Tiempo 16). Montevideo: IMPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraes, M. I. (2020). Agrarian history in Uruguay: from the “agrarian question” to the present. Historia Agraria, (81), 63–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, R. M. (1975). The development of urban systems in the Americas in the nineteenth century. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 17(1), 4–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oficina Central de Estadística. (1912a). Cuadros estadísticos del movimiento de pasajeros y de carga en la Red Central de los Ferrocarriles del Estado. Año 1912a. Santiago: Oficina Central de Estadística.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oficina Central de Estadística. (1912b). Estadística de los ferrocarriles de Chile en explotación. Año 1912b. Santiago: Oficina Central de Estadística.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overman, H. G., & Venables, A. J. (2005). Cities in the developing world. London School of Economics and Political Science, Centre for Economic Performance Discussion Paper No. 695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pivel Devoto, J. E. (1974). El arreglo de los campos. Montevideo: Medina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pivel Devoto, J. E., & Ranieri, A. (1956). Historia de la República Oriental del Uruguay (1830–1930). Montevideo: Medina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollero, R. (2016). Historia demográfica de Montevideo y su campaña (1757–1860). Montevideo: Universidad de la República.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prado, F. (2015). Edge of empire: Atlantic networks and revolution in Bourbon Rio de la Plata. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prates, S. (1976). Ganadería extensiva y población. Montevideo: CIESU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, J. M. (1998). Urban diversity and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(2), 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rama, G. (1969). El ascenso de las clases medias. Enciclopedia Uruguaya, 36, 102–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Real de Azúa, C. (1964). El impulso y su freno. Tres décadas de Batllismo y las raíces de la crisis uruguaya. Montevideo: Banda Oriental.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes Abadie, W., Bruschera, O. H., & Melogno, T. (1965). La Banda Oriental: pradera, frontera, puerto. Montevideo: Banda Oriental.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rial, J. (1981). La población uruguaya y el crecimiento económico-social entre 1850 y 1930: cambio demográfico y urbanización en un pequeño país. Montevideo: CIESU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rial, J. (1984). Uruguay. La génesis de un país urbano macrocefálico. Revista EURE-Revista de Estudios Urbano Regionales, 11(31).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rial, J., & Klaczko, J. (1981). Uruguay: el país urbano. Montevideo: Banda Oriental.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Miranda, A. (2005). Desarrollo y territorio en Uruguay. Una mirada desde la experiencia española en L'Alcoià. Nóesis. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 15(27), 189–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Miranda, A. (2014). Desarrollo económico y disparidades territoriales en Uruguay. Montevideo: PNUD Uruguay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Miranda, A. (2019). Dinámicas productivas regionales y sistema urbano nacional. In E. J. Martínez, M. Delgado, & R. Pedrosa (Eds.), Lógicas territoriales del Uruguay agroexportador (pp. 146–162). Montevideo: Ministerio de Vivienda, Ordenamiento Territorial y Medio Ambiente; Universidad de la República.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Miranda, A., & Magri, A. J. (2017). La fábula de los tres hermanos y el desarrollo territorial en su complejidad multinivel. Consideraciones sobre el caso uruguayo en el contexto latinoamericano. Cuadernos del CLAEH, 36(105), 77–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Weber, J. E. (2011). Nueva luz sobre viejos problemas: incidencia de la cuantificación en la historiografía sobre la industria temprana en Uruguay. América Latina en la historia económica, 36, 11–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Román, C., & Willebald, H. (2021). Structural change in a small natural resource intensive economy: switching between diversification and re-primarization, Uruguay, 1870–2017. Economic History of Developing Regions, 36(1), 57–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ros, F. J. (1912). Apuntes para el fraccionamiento administrativo de la República O. del Uruguay. Revista Histórica, IV, II(12), 740–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosés, J. R. (2003). Why isn't the whole of Spain industrialized? New economic geography and early industrialization, 1797–1910. The Journal of Economic History, 995–1022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala de Touron, L., de la Torre, N., & Rodríguez, J. C. (1967). Evolución económica de la Banda Oriental. Montevideo: Pueblos Unidos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapriza, G. (1978). Las leyes proteccionistas aduaneras y los inicios industriales de nuestro país (1870–1890). In A. Beretta Curi (Ed.), La industrialización del Uruguay 1870–1925. Cinco perpsectivas históricas. Montevideo: Fundación de Cultura Universitaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seminario, B. (2015). El desarrollo de la economía peruana en la era moderna: precios, población, demanda y producción desde 1700. Lima: Universidad del Pacífico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travieso, E. (2017). Railroads and Regional Economies in Uruguay, c. 1910. Revista Uruguaya de Historia Económica, VII(12), 30–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travieso, E. (2019). Cómo hacer una transición energética sin revolución industrial. Los usos de la energía moderna en Uruguay, 1902–1954. Montevideo: Facultad de Ciencias Sociales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travieso, E. (2020a). Resources, environment, and rural development in Uruguay, 1779–1913. (Ph.D.). University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travieso, E. (2020b). United by grass, separated by coal: Uruguay and New Zealand during the first globalization. Journal of Global History, 15(2), 269–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travieso, E. (2023). Soils, scale, or elites? Biological innovation in Uruguayan cattle farming, 1880–1913. Economic History Review, 76(2), 498–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1980). Patterns of urban and rural population growth. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanger, M. I. (1980). The model country: José Batlle y Ordoñez of Uruguay, 1907-1915. Hanover, N.H.: Published for Brandeis University Press by University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veiga, D. (1979). Regional development and population distribution in Uruguay. Montevideo: Centro de Informaciones y Estudios del Uruguay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon. R. (1962). Metropolis 1985. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. G. (1999). Real wages, inequality and globalization in Latin America before 1940. Revista de Historia Economica-Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History, 17(S1), 101–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley, E. A. (2004). Poverty, progress, and population. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zubillaga, C. (1977). Algunos antecedentes sobre acondicionamiento territorial en Uruguay (1611–1911). Cuadernos del CLAEH, 4, 37–62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfonso Herranz-Loncán .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Travieso, E., Herranz-Loncán, A. (2023). Uruguay: The Rise of a Monocentric Economy. In: Valencia Caicedo, F. (eds) Roots of Underdevelopment. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38723-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38723-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38722-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38723-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics