Skip to main content

Roadmapping for Strategic Alignment, Integration and Synchronization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Next Generation Roadmapping

Part of the book series: Science, Technology and Innovation Studies ((STAIS))

  • 295 Accesses

Abstract

Roadmapping is a flexible and powerful method for supporting strategic planning, which emerged from industrial practice more than 50 years ago. However, roadmapping has been largely ignored in mainstream business school research and teaching, attributed to its association with technology-intensive sectors. As a consequence, many general managers are not aware of the capability of roadmapping to address the strategic challenges they face, and the method lacks a clear theoretical base. Through empirical research, the general form of roadmapping has been identified, together with underpinning conceptualizations that enable its customization to any strategic context. This chapter sets out these general concepts from the perspectives of ‘roadmap as artefact’ and ‘roadmapping as process’, and relates them to mainstream management research. Two relevant research streams relating to ‘strategic fit’ are identified: ‘elements of strategic fit’ and ‘processes of strategic fit’. The relationships between roadmapping and the contributing management frameworks from each research stream are explored, focusing on the McKinsey ‘7S’ and ESCO frameworks for the former, and the Strategic Alignment Model (SAM) framework for the latter. This strengthens the theoretical basis of roadmapping and demonstrates the benefits of linking established roadmapping practice to management theory. Three key dimensions that underpin coherent strategy are identified and discussed: horizontal functional alignment, vertical hierarchical integration, and temporal synchronization, conceptualized as a 3×3×3 ‘strategy cube’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.kiplingsociety.co.uk/rg_elephantschild1.htm

References

  • Avison D, Jones J, Powell P, Wilson D (2004) Using and validating the strategic alignment model. J Strateg Inf Syst 13(3):223–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney J, Wright M, Ketchen DJ (2001) The resource-based view of the firm: ten years after 1991. J Manag 27(6):625–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer M (2002) Building organizational fitness in the 21st century. Division of Research, Harvard Business School

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper RG (2006) Managing technology development projects. Research-Technology Management 49(6):23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx I, Cool K (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Manag Sci 35(12):1504–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EIRMA (1997) Technology roadmapping - delivering business vision, European Industry Research Management Association, Working Group Report No. 52, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Fainshmidt S, Wenger L, Pezeshkan A, Mallon MR (2019) When do dynamic capabilities lead to competitive advantage? The importance of strategic fit. J Manag Stud 56(4):758–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerow JE, Thatcher JB, Grover V (2015) Six types of IT-business strategic alignment: an investigation of the constructs and their measurement. Eur J Inf Syst 24(5):465–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson JC, Venkatraman H (1993) Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Syst J 32(1):472–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson J, Venkatramen N (1992) Strategic alignment: a model for organizational transformation through information technology. In: Kochan T, Unseem M (eds) Transforming organisations. Oxford University Press, pp 97–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Heracleous L, Werres K (2016) On the road to disaster: strategic misalignments and corporate failure. Long Range Plan 49(4):491–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heracleous L, Heracleous LT, Wirtz J, Pangarkar N (2009) Flying high in a competitive industry: secrets of the world’s leading airline. McGraw-Hill Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilevbare I, Probert D, Phaal R (2013) A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice. Technovation 33:30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson TL (2006) Hoshin Kanri for the lean enterprise: developing competitive capabilities and managing profit. CRC Press (Taylor & Francis Group)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr C, Phaal R (2015) Visualizing roadmaps: a design-driven approach. Res Technol Manag 58(4):45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr C, Phaal R (2020) Technology roadmapping: industrial roots, forgotten history and unknown origins. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 155:119967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr C, Phaal R (2022) Roadmapping and roadmaps: definition and underpinning concepts. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 69(1):6–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr CIV, Phaal R, Probert DR (2013a) Roadmapping as a responsive mode to government policy: a goal-oriented approach to realising a vision. In: Moehrle MG, Isenmann R, Phaal R (eds) Technology roadmapping for strategy and innovation: charting the route to success. Springer, Berlin, pp 67–87

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr C, Farrukh C, Phaal R, Probert D (2013b) Key principles for developing industrially relevant strategic technology management toolkits. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 80(6):1050–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr C, Phaal R, Thams K (2017) Roadmapping as a platform for developing management toolkits: a collaborative design approach with the LEGO Group. 2017 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Park Y (2005) Customization of technology roadmaps according to roadmapping purposes: overall process and detailed modules. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 72(5):567–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luftman J, Brier T (1999) Achieving and sustaining business-IT alignment. Calif Manag Rev 42(1):109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes R, Rijsenbrij D, Truijens O (2000) Redefining business-IT alignment through a unified framework. Van Amsterdam/Cap …. https://dare.uva.nl/document/2/16054

  • Miles RE, Snow CC (1984) Fit, failure and the hall of fame. Calif Manag Rev 26(3):10–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray JY, Kotabe M (2005) Performance implications of strategic fit between alliance attributes and alliance forms. J Bus Res 58(11):1525–1533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natterman R, Anderl R (2013) The W-model - using systems engineering for adaptronics. Procedia Comput Sci 16:937–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park H, Phaal R, Ho J-Y, O’Sullivan E (2020) Twenty years of technology and strategic roadmapping research: a school of thought perspective. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 154:119965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phaal R, Muller G (2009) An architectural framework for roadmapping: towards visual strategy. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 76(1):39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phaal R, Farrukh C, Probert D (2004) Customizing roadmapping. Res Technol Manag 47(2):26–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phaal R, Simonse L, den Ouden E (2008) Next generation roadmapping for innovation planning. Int J Technol Intell Plan 4(2):135–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Phaal R, Farrukh CJP, Probert DR (2009) Visualising strategy: a classification of graphical roadmap forms. Int J Technol Manag = Journal International de La Gestion Technologique 47(4):286–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phaal R, Farrukh CJP, Probert DR (2010). Roadmapping for strategy and innovation: aligning technology and markets in a dynamic world. http://publications.eng.cam.ac.uk/430808/

  • Phaal R, O’Sullivan E, Routley M, Ford S, Probert D (2011) A framework for mapping industrial emergence. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 78(2):217–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1979) How competitive forces shape strategy. Harv Bus Rev 57(2):137–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1991) Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strateg Manag J 12(S2):95–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretorius MV, de Wet G (2000) A model for the assessment of new technology for the manufacturing enterprise. Technovation 20:3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe JS, Aaron DK, Sterle J, von Keyserlingk MAG, Irlbeck N, Maquivar M, Wulster-Radcliffe M, Jones C (2020) Moving online: roadmap and long-term forecast. Anim Front 10(3):36–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves M, Haanaes K, Sinha JK (2015) Your strategy needs a strategy: how to choose and execute the right approach. Harvard Business Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer FM, Ross DR (1990) Industrial market structure and economic performance. Houghton Mifflin

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheffield J (2005) Systemic knowledge and the V-model. Int J Bus Inf Syst 1(1/2):83–101

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2003) A performance-based roadmap to a permanent two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinayavekhin S, Phaal R (2019) Synchronization in strategic planning: a roadmapping framework. Int J Innov Technol Manag 16(06):1950044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinayavekhin S, Phaal R (2020) Improving synergy in strategic planning: enablers and synchronization assessment framework (SAF). Int J Innov Technol Manag 17(02):2050009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinayavekhin S, Thanamaitreejit T, Phaal R, Asatani K (2021) Emerging trends in roadmapping research: a bibliometric literature review. Tech Anal Strat Manag 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1979210

  • Voelpel SC, Leibold M, Tekie EB (2006) Managing purposeful organizational misfit: exploring the nature of industry and organizational misfit to enable strategic change. J Chang Manag 6(3):257–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman RH Jr, Peters TJ, Phillips JR (1980) Structure is not organization. Bus Horiz 23(3):14–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5(2):171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajac EJ, Kraatz MS, Bresser RKF (2000) Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: a normative approach to strategic change. Strateg Manag J 21(4):429–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sukrit Vinayavekhin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vinayavekhin, S., Phaal, R. (2023). Roadmapping for Strategic Alignment, Integration and Synchronization. In: Daim, T.U., Phaal, R., Meissner, D., Kerr, C. (eds) Next Generation Roadmapping. Science, Technology and Innovation Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38575-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics