Abstract
Evaluation is a key component of educational scholarship endeavors including projects such as curriculum development, program evaluation, and educational research. Paradigms are the conceptual frameworks that guide evaluation efforts in a logical and systematic manner. Some evaluation frameworks include Bloom’s taxonomy, Miller’s pyramid, Kirkpatrick’s four-step model, and evaluation component of the six-step approach to curriculum development. Evaluation is not what comes after all teaching and learning activities are completed. Instead, evaluation planning begins while developing the research questions and learning outcomes. Evaluation design and evaluation measures provide a blueprint for the rest of the scholarly effort and are used by peers to judge the rigor and credibility of the scholarship design and evaluation results. Overall, establishing a robust evaluation component is a crucial initial step to consider early when a health scholar is starting a new project. The evaluation design is central to building a compelling argument for the merits of a given scholarly project and its dissemination.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1970.
Krathwohl DR. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory Pract. 2002;41(4):212–8.
Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65(9):S63–7.
Kirkpatrick DL. The four levels of evaluation: measurement and evaluation. Alexandria: American Society for Training and Development; 2007.
Lindeman BM, Lipsett PA. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. In: Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Chen BY, editors. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2016. p. 121–67.
Varpio L, MacLeod A. Philosophy of science series: harnessing the multidisciplinary edge effect by exploring paradigms, ontologies, epistemologies, axiologies, and methodologies. Acad Med. 2020;95(5):686–9.
Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. London: Longman; 2001.
Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Chen BY, editors. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2016.
Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A. GPOWER: a general power analysis program. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1996;28:1–11.
Artino AR Jr, La Rochelle JS, Dezee KJ, Gehlbach H. Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide no. 87. Med Teach. 2014;36(6):463–74.
Messick S. Validity of psychological assessment: validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. Am Psychol. 1995;50(9):741.
Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med. 2006;119(2):e167–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Toy, S. (2023). Evaluation Paradigms. In: Fitzgerald, A.S., Bosch, G. (eds) Education Scholarship in Healthcare. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38534-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38534-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38533-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38534-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)