Skip to main content

Evaluation Paradigms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Education Scholarship in Healthcare
  • 383 Accesses

Abstract

Evaluation is a key component of educational scholarship endeavors including projects such as curriculum development, program evaluation, and educational research. Paradigms are the conceptual frameworks that guide evaluation efforts in a logical and systematic manner. Some evaluation frameworks include Bloom’s taxonomy, Miller’s pyramid, Kirkpatrick’s four-step model, and evaluation component of the six-step approach to curriculum development. Evaluation is not what comes after all teaching and learning activities are completed. Instead, evaluation planning begins while developing the research questions and learning outcomes. Evaluation design and evaluation measures provide a blueprint for the rest of the scholarly effort and are used by peers to judge the rigor and credibility of the scholarship design and evaluation results. Overall, establishing a robust evaluation component is a crucial initial step to consider early when a health scholar is starting a new project. The evaluation design is central to building a compelling argument for the merits of a given scholarly project and its dissemination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Krathwohl DR. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory Pract. 2002;41(4):212–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65(9):S63–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kirkpatrick DL. The four levels of evaluation: measurement and evaluation. Alexandria: American Society for Training and Development; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lindeman BM, Lipsett PA. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. In: Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Chen BY, editors. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2016. p. 121–67.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Varpio L, MacLeod A. Philosophy of science series: harnessing the multidisciplinary edge effect by exploring paradigms, ontologies, epistemologies, axiologies, and methodologies. Acad Med. 2020;95(5):686–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. London: Longman; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Chen BY, editors. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A. GPOWER: a general power analysis program. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1996;28:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Artino AR Jr, La Rochelle JS, Dezee KJ, Gehlbach H. Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide no. 87. Med Teach. 2014;36(6):463–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Messick S. Validity of psychological assessment: validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. Am Psychol. 1995;50(9):741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med. 2006;119(2):e167–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serkan Toy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Toy, S. (2023). Evaluation Paradigms. In: Fitzgerald, A.S., Bosch, G. (eds) Education Scholarship in Healthcare. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38534-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38534-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38533-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38534-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics