Abstract
In this research paper we describe the activities designed for a 5 day engineering design workshop using an educational robotics tool called SmartMotors. SmartMotors are low cost solutions to teach elementary and middle school students about robotics and Artificial Intelligence in under-resourced classrooms. In a few simple steps these motors can be trained by the users to run to various states corresponding to different sensor inputs. We believe that the low cost and trainable aspects of SmartMotors will reduce barriers of entry for both teachers and students in introducing robotics in classrooms and increase student access to robotics and engineering. In the summer of 2022, we used one of our prototypes to run a usability study in a workshop with ten middle school students aged 12–15. The students participated in an hour-long engineering design workshop for five days, and each day they received different prompts along with necessary scaffolding. The participating students had limited prior exposure to robotics and AI. By the end of the workshop, the students were able to train robots in group projects that reflected their individual interests. In this paper, we talk about the students’ journey, starting with building simple projects and subsequently gaining the skills and confidence to showcase diverse and complex designs. We will then discuss the affordances of the tool and explore the opportunities and limitations of SmartMotors in an engineering design workshop.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Khanlari, A., Mansourkiaie, F.: Using robotics for stem education in primary/elementary schools: teachers’ perceptions. In: 2015 10th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), pp. 3–7. IEEE (2015)
Williams, D.C., Ma, Y., Prejean, L., Ford, M.J., Lai, G.: Acquisition of physics content knowledge and scientific inquiry skills in a robotics summer camp. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 40(2), 201–216 (2007)
Ortiz, A.M.: Fifth grade students’ understanding of ratio and proportion in an engineering robotics program. Tufts University (2010)
Sahin, A., Ayar, M.C., Adiguzel, T.: Stem related after-school program activities and associated outcomes on student learning. Educ. Sci.: Theory Pract. 14(1), 309–322 (2014)
Okita, S.Y.: The relative merits of transparency: investigating situations that support the use of robotics in developing student learning adaptability across virtual and physical computing platforms. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 45(5), 844–862 (2014)
Ganesh, T., Thieken, J., Baker, D., Krause, S., Roberts, C., Elser, M., Taylor, W., Golden, J., Middleton, J., Kurpius, S.R.: Learning through engineering design and practice: implementation and impact of a middle school engineering education program. In: 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 15–837 (2010)
Bers, M.U.: The tangiblek robotics program: applied computational thinking for young children. Early Child. Res. Pract. 12(2) (2010)
Bruner, J.: Celebrating divergence: Piaget and vygotsky. Hum. Dev. 40(2), 63–73 (1997)
Piaget, J.: Genetic epistemology. trans. e. duckworth. 1970
Papert, S.A.: Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books (2020)
Butterworth, D.T.: Teaching c/c++ programming with lego mindstorms. In: Proceedings 3rd International Conferences on Robotics In Education (RiE2012) (2012)
Teachable Machine. https://teachablemachine.withgoogle.com. Accessed 31 Jan 2023
Cognimates. http://cognimates.me/home/. Accessed 31 Jan 2023
O’Connell, B.: The development of the paperbots robotics kit for inexpensive robotics education activities for elementary students. Ph.D. thesis, Tufts University (2013)
García-Saura, C., González-Gómez, J.: Low cost educational platform for robotics, using open-source 3d printers and open-source hardware. In: ICERI2012 Proceedings, pp. 2699–2706. IATED (2012)
Wio Terminal SmartMotors Placemats. https://smartmotors.notion.site. Accessed 31 Jan 2023
Seeed Studio. Get Started with Wio Terminal (2021). https://wiki.seeedstudio.com/Wio-Terminal-Getting-Started/. Accessed 31 Jan 2023
Willner-Giwerc, S., Hsin, R., Mody, S., Rogers, C.: Placemat instructions. Sci. Child. 60(3) (2023)
Willner-Giwerc, S., Danahy, E., Rogers, C.: Placemat instructions for open-ended robotics challenges. In: Robotics in Education: Methodologies and Technologies, pp. 234–244. Springer (2021)
Blikstein, P.: Digital fabrication and ‘making’ in education: the democratization of invention. FabLabs: Mach. Makers Inven. 4(1), 1–21 (2013)
Buchner, R., Wurhofer, D., Weiss, A., Tscheligi, M.: Robots in time: how user experience in human-robot interaction changes over time. In: Social Robotics: 5th International Conference, ICSR 2013, Bristol, UK, October 27-29, 2013, Proceedings 5, pp. 138–147. Springer (2013)
Eguchi, A.: Bringing robotics in classrooms. In: Robotics in STEM Education: Redesigning the learning Experience, pp. 3–31 (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dahal, M., Kresin, L., Rogers, C. (2023). Introductory Activities for Teaching Robotics with SmartMotors. In: Balogh, R., Obdržálek, D., Christoforou, E. (eds) Robotics in Education. RiE 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 747. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38454-7_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38454-7_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38453-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38454-7
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)