Skip to main content

You’re Faulty But I Like You: Children’s Perceptions on Faulty Robots

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Robotics in Education (RiE 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 747))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 218 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents a study conducted in a United Kingdom primary school with the Maqueen BBC micro:bit robot. The purpose was to explore whether easy-to-fix hardware issues affected the children’s perception of the robot or their enjoyment of the session, and whether the children could cope with these failures and/or repair them. As with any piece of technology, robots break down and are in regular need of reparation, but this technical issue could be a disadvantage in a classroom setting, as it might impact the children’s enjoyment and confidence in their abilities to carry out the given task; potentially this could deter teachers from using this technology. 128 children participated in this study, aged 7–12 years old (M\(=\)9,18; SD\(=\)1,061). While children did perceive robots to be faulty less times than the faults were present in the robots, they did consider themselves capable of solving these issues and enjoyed doing so. Their perception of a faulty robot also did not impact significantly in their enjoyment nor in their consideration of the robot as a machine or a friend.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anwar, S., Bascou, N.A., Menekse, M., Kardgar, A.: A systematic review of studies on educational robotics. J. Pre-Coll.E Eng. Educ. Res. (J-PEER) 9(2), 2 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baxter, P., Ashurst, E., Read, R., Kennedy, J., Belpaeme, T.: Robot education peers in a situated primary school study: personalisation promotes child learning. PloS One 12(5), e0178126 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Benitti, F.B.V.: Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: a systematic review. Comput. Educ. 58(3), 978–988 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Broadbent, E., Feerst, D.A., Lee, S.H., Robinson, H., Albo-Canals, J., Ahn, H.S., MacDonald, B.A.: How could companion robots be useful in rural schools? Int. J. Soc. Robot. 10, 295–307 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chalmers, C.: Robotics and computational thinking in primary school. Int. J. Child-Comput. Interact. 17, 93–100 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang, C.W., Lee, J.H., Chao, P.Y., Wang, C.Y., Chen, G.D.: Exploring the possibility of using humanoid robots as instructional tools for teaching a second language in primary school. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 13(2), 13–24 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chevalier, M., Riedo, F., Mondada, F.: How do teachers perceive educational robots in formal education? A study based on the Thymio robot. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 1070(9932/16), 1–8 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. van Ewijk, G., Smakman, M., Konijn, E.A.: Teachers’ perspectives on social robots in education: an exploratory case study. In: Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference, pp. 273–280 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fagerlund, J., Häkkinen, P., Vesisenaho, M., Viiri, J.: Computational thinking in programming with scratch in primary schools: a systematic review. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 29(1), 12–28 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Good, J.: Learners at the wheel: Novice programming environments come of age. Int. J. People-Oriented Program. (IJPOP) 1(1), 1–24 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lakatos, G., Wood, L.J., Zaraki, A., Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., Amirabdollahian, F.: Effects of previous exposure on children’s perception of a humanoid robot. In: Social Robotics: 11th International Conference, ICSR 2019, Madrid, Spain, November 26–29, 2019, Proceedings 11, pp. 14–23. Springer (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maloney, J., Resnick, M., Rusk, N., Silverman, B., Eastmond, E.: The scratch programming language and environment. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. (TOCE) 10(4), 1–15 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moraiti, I., Fotoglou, A., Drigas, A.: Coding with block programming languages in educational robotics and mobiles, improve problem solving, creativity & critical thinking skills. Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol. 16(20) (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moreno-León, J., Robles, G.: Code to learn with scratch? a systematic literature review. In: 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 150–156. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moros, S., Wood, L., Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., Castro-González, Á.: Programming a humanoid robot with the scratch language. In: Robotics in Education: Current Research and Innovations, vol. 10, pp. 222–233. Springer (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rossi, A., Moros, S., Dautenhahn, K., Koay, K.L., Walters, M.L.: Getting to know kaspar: effects of people’s awareness of a robot’s capabilities on their trust in the robot. In: 2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sáez-López, J.M., Román-González, M., Vázquez-Cano, E.: Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: a two year case study using “scratch’’ in five schools. Comput. Educ. 97, 129–141 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Scaradozzi, D., Sorbi, L., Pedale, A., Valzano, M., Vergine, C.: Teaching robotics at the primary school: an innovative approach. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 174, 3838–3846 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Serholt, S., Barendregt, W., Leite, I., Hastie, H., Jones, A., Paiva, A., Vasalou, A., Castellano, G.: Teachers’ views on the use of empathic robotic tutors in the classroom. In: The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 955–960. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Serholt, S., Barendregt, W., Vasalou, A., Alves-Oliveira, P., Jones, A., Petisca, S., Paiva, A.: The case of classroom robots: teachers’ deliberations on the ethical tensions. Ai Soc. 32, 613–631 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. UK-RAS Network: Uk festival of robotics - uk-ras network (2023). https://www.ukras.org.uk/robotics-week/. Accessed 29 Jan 2023

  22. Yesharim, M.F., Ben-Ari, M.: Teaching computer science concepts through robotics to elementary school children. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Educ. Sch. 2(3) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sílvia Moros .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Moros, S., Wood, L. (2023). You’re Faulty But I Like You: Children’s Perceptions on Faulty Robots. In: Balogh, R., Obdržálek, D., Christoforou, E. (eds) Robotics in Education. RiE 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 747. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38454-7_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics