Skip to main content

Should Androids Eat Electric Sheep? Philip K. Dick, Interspecies Empathy, and Animal Liberation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Vegetarianism and Science Fiction

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature ((PSAAL))

  • 155 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines the works of Philip K. Dick, highlighting the similarities between Dick’s frequent advocacy of animal ethics and the animal liberation movement of the 1970s. The analysis begins with an examination of Dick’s attitudes towards other animals in his early life and the frequent promotion of vegetarianism throughout his early short stories. It then turns to an extensive examination of Dick’s most famous and influential novel, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (1968), showing how the novel anticipated many fundamental arguments of the animal liberation movement while also continuing the Romantic themes established by Shelley. A comparison to Dick’s earlier novel Dr Bloodmoney (1965) is then conducted, elaborating on how similar explorations of speciesism and animal liberation were seeded and developed throughout Dick’s work. Lastly, it examines Dick’s late-life theological turn, showing how his life-long emphasis on empathy and animal ethics remained essential to his religious philosophies and experiences, which were themselves seemingly informed by science fiction’s vegetarian tradition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There is some confusion in both Anne and Philip K. Dick’s accounts of the argument about distinctions between hominid types, including Neanderthals, Homo sapiens, and that represented by the OH 5 fossil. They seem to be referring to only a single lineage in the original argument, although Dick makes distinctions between Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon subsets in his later conversations with Rickman (Own Words 92).

  2. 2.

    The name “Dick,” in English, corresponds to “Rick” as a short form of “Richard” (Room, italics removed). The correspondence suggests a potential connection between Dick and Deckard that anticipates his later identification with Horselover Fat and perhaps lends some credence to an identification between the opinions of Deckard and Dick’s own.

  3. 3.

    Adrian Tchaikovsky’s Arthur C. Clarke Award-winning novel Children of Time (2015) features a species of extra-terrestrial spiders who are accidentally transformed from “a species of solitary hunters into a society” by the introduction of empathy, suggesting a possible tribute to Dick, although Tchaikovsky’s spiders remain carnivorous, and even cannibalistic (590).

  4. 4.

    Neither vegetarianism nor carnism play a major role anywhere else in Sheldon’s writing, although she reportedly told McIntyre she was developing plot about a “chicken hatchery set in the asteroids, run by women in competition with a huge processed-foods corporation,” which never came to fruition (Phillips 284).

  5. 5.

    Known recipients of Dick’s Tagore letters include his literary agent Russel Galen, editors Ed Meskys and Lawrence Ashmead and authors Thomas M. Disch and Grania Davis (P. K. Dick, Letters 6:256–60; Locus, “Appreciations” 14; see also P. K. Dick, Exegesis 780–86).

  6. 6.

    Dick’s quotation of Deuteronomy does not seem to match any particular version of the Torah, including the Hertz translation he appeals to in the same letter.

References

  • Adams, Carol J. “An Animal Manifesto: Gender, Identity, and Vegan-Feminism in the Twenty-First Century.” Interview by Tom Tyler. Parallax 12, no. 1 (2006): 120–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Post-Meateating.” Animal Encounters, edited by Tom Tyler and Manuela S. Rossini, 47–72. Brill, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, Jeremy. Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Dover, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachel, Susan. Primate and Human Evolution. Cambridge University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. The Animal That Therefore I Am. Edited by Marie-Louise Mallet, translated by David Wills. Fordham University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques, and Élisabeth Roudinesco. “Violence Against Animals.” For What Tomorrow… A Dialogue. Translated by Jeff Fort, 62–76. Stanford University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, Anne R. Search for Philip K. Dick, 1828–1982: A Memoir and Biography of the Science Fiction Writer. The Edwin Mellen Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, Philip K. “Beyond Lies the Wub.” Beyond Lies the Wub, 27–35. Gollancz, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Confessions of a Crap Artist. Haughton Mifflin Harcourt, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Crack in Space. Mariner, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Divine Invasion. Mariner, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Del Rey, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Dr Bloodmoney. Gollancz, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Exegesis of Philip K. Dick. Edited by Pamela Jackson, Jonathan Lethem and Erik Davis. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Flow My Tears, the Policeman Said. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Human Is.” Second Variety, 329–42. Voyager 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Lies, Inc. Mariner, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Man in the High Castle. Penguin, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Man, Android and Machine.” The Shifting Realities of Philip K. Dick: Selected Literary and Philosophical Writings, edited by Lawrence Sutin, 211–32.Pantheon, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Man Whose Teeth Were All Exactly Alike. Gollancz, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Martian Time-Slip. Mariner, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Not by Its Cover.” We Can Remember It for You Wholesale, 228–37. Grafton, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Notes on Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?” The Shifting Realities of Philip K. Dick: Selected Literary and Philosophical Writings, edited by Lawrence Sutin, 155–66. Pantheon, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. A Scanner Darkly. DAW Books, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Selected Letters of Philip K. Dick. Edited by Don Herron, 6 vols. Underwood Books, 1991–2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Self-Portrait.” The Shifting Realities of Philip K. Dick: Selected Literary and Philosophical Writings, edited by Lawrence Sutin, 11–17. Pantheon, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Simulacra. Mariner, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Solar Lottery. Vintage, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. VALIS. Gollancz, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, Josephine. “Animal rights and Feminist Theory.” The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics: A Reader, edited by Josephine Donovan and Carol J. Adams, 58–86. Columbia University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, Josephine, and Carol J. Adams, eds. Introduction to The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics: A Reader, 1–20. Columbia University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heldreth, L. G. “The Cutting Edges of Blade Runner.” Retrofitting “Blade Runner”: Issues in Ridley Scott’s “Blade Runner” and Philip K. Dick’s “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?” edited by Judith Kerman. Bowling Green State University Popular Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, Joseph Herman. The Pentateuch and Haftorahs: Hebrew Text, English Translation and Commentary, 2nd ed. Soncino Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Fred. “A Cult Classic Restored, Again.” New York Times, 30 September, 2007. https://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/30/movies/30kapl.html.

  • Le Guin, Ursula K. “The Modest One.” The Language of the Night: Essays on Fantasy and Science Fiction, edited by Susan Wood, 175–78. G. P. Putnam’s Son, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Gwen and Sauter, Doris Elaine, eds. What if Our World is Their Heaven? The Final Conversations of Philip K. Dick. Gerald Duckworth, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locus. “Philip K. Dick Appreciations.” Locus 15, no. 5 (May, 1982): 11–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Harlan B. “‘Platonists’ and ‘Aristotelians.’” Introduction to Ethics and Animals, edited by Harlan B. Miller and William H. Williams. Humana Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, Andrew. Literature, Culture and Society, 2nd ed. Routledge, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, Alisa. “Ryan Gosling, Our Hero.” PETA, 12 September, 2011. https://www.peta.org/blog/ryan-gosling-hero/.

  • Parry, Jovian. Edible Subjectivities: Meat in Science Fiction. PhD thesis, York University, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Julie. James Tiptree, Jr.: The Double Life of Alice B. Sheldon. St. Martin’s Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, Tom. The Case for Animal Rights. University of California Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickman, Gregg. Philip K. Dick: In His Own Words. Long Beach, Fragments West/The Valentine Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Philip K. Dick: The Last Testament. Long Beach, Fragments West/The Valentine Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. To the High Castle Philip K. Dick: A Life 1928–1962. Fragments West/The Valentine Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Kim Stanley. The Novels of Philip K. Dick. UMI Research Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Room, Adrian, ed. Brewer’s Dictionary of Names. Helicon, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, Richard D. “Speciesism in the Laboratory.” In Defense of Animals: The Second Wave, edited by Peter Singer, 87–104. Blackwell Publishing, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, Joshua. “The Vegan and the Sovereign.” Critical Perspectives on Veganism, edited by Carla Jodey Castricano and Rasmus R. Simonsen, 203–23. Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Ridley, dir. Blade Runner. Warner Brothers, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Peter. Animal Liberation, 3rd ed. Ecco, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suvin, Darko. “Philip K. Dick’s Opus: Artifice as Refuge and World View.” Positions and Presuppositions in Science Fiction, 112–33. Macmillan, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Angus. “Electric Sheep and the New Argument from Nature.” Animal Subjects: An Ethical Reader in a Posthuman World, edited by Jodey Castricano, 177–94. Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tchaikovsky, Adrian. Children of Time. Tor, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth, Josh. “Do Androids Eat Electric Sheep?: Egotism, Empathy, and the Ethics of Eating in the Work of Philip K. Dick.” Lit: Literature Interpretation Theory 24, no. 1 (2013): 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villeneuve, Denis, dir. Blade Runner 2049. Warner Brothers, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vint, Sherryl. Animal Alterity: Science Fiction and the Question of the Animal. Liverpool University Press, 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Speciesism and Species Being in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?Mosaic 40, no. 1 (2007): 111–26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bulleid, J. (2023). Should Androids Eat Electric Sheep? Philip K. Dick, Interspecies Empathy, and Animal Liberation. In: Vegetarianism and Science Fiction. Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38347-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics