Skip to main content

Feed My Frankenstein: Mary Shelley’s Romantic Vegetarian Precedent

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Vegetarianism and Science Fiction

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature ((PSAAL))

Abstract

This chapter examines the works of Mary Shelley, exploring the Romantic notions of vegetarianism she embeds into science fiction from its beginning. It examines her classic novel Frankenstein (1818) as an intersection of the foundational Western myths of Prometheus and Genesis, beginning with an examination of the myths’ vegetarian associations within the Romantic Culture of late-eighteenth- and early-nineteenth-century English literature and their influential interpretation by Shelley’s husband, the poet Percy Shelley. An extended analysis of Frankenstein then shows how it associates animal cruelty with scientific hubris and how the novel’s famous creature first offers humanity the possibility of a (post-human) vegetarian utopia before descending into murderous carnism himself. It concludes by briefly exploring Shelley’s continuation of the ethical vegetarian theme in her second science fiction novel The Last Man, showing how science fiction’s vegetarian theme is rooted in Romantic archetypes that remain entrenched within the genre.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As St. Clair points out, “the notion that Mary Shelley was held back in the shadow of a famous and successful male author is an anachronistic casting back of modern presumptions,” the first edition of Frankenstein having made “more money than all P. B. Shelley’s works would fetch in his lifetime” (“Impact” 41, 43).

  2. 2.

    There is an inconsistency in the spelling of “De Lacey”/ “De Lacy” in Frankenstein’s 1818 edition. The 1831 edition uses “De Lacey” consistently.

  3. 3.

    Although God’s carnist covenant with Noah is acknowledged and enacted in Paradise Lost, his authorisation of carnism is not made explicit. Additionally, in Milton’s later poem Paradise Regained (1671), Satan tempts a starving Jesus Christ with “Meats by the Law unclean,” reminding him of humanity’s God-given “right” to “all Creatures,” although no meat-specific temptations occur during the corresponding verses of the Bible (Milton, Paradise Lost lines 2.324–325; cf. Matthew 4:1–11, Mark 1:12–13, Luke 4:1–13).

  4. 4.

    The Shelley/Medwin translation of Prometheus Bound (cited here) was published in 1832 and became widely influential, being only the second ever English translation of Aeschylus’s play, to which the Romantic image of Prometheus as a “hero and savior of men owes his character almost entirely” (Thorslev 113). Medwin also claims Milton drew “much of his inspiration” for Paradise Lost from Prometheus Bound in the translation’s introduction (Aeschylus v–vi footnote, see also 67–69, 73–74). Stuart, moreover, states that Medwin “converted to vegetarianism while resident in India,” although there is no evidence to support the claim (395).

  5. 5.

    Rowe attempts to reconcile the creature’s uncharacteristic speciesism by suggesting he may have found or stolen the dead hare from the Arctic community whose “store of winter food” he takes to feed his sledge dogs (Rowe 147n18; M. Shelley, Frankenstein 175). The creature’s own sustenance is then brought into question, however. Fruits and vegetables are “almost nonexistent in traditional Inuit diets,” which usually consist of “high concentrations of meat, fat, and fish,” suggesting there would be little for him to eat during the weeks-long chase besides meat (Searles 70–71).

  6. 6.

    For further analysis of Napoleon’s influence on Frankenstein, see Andrew M McClellan, “The Politics of Revivification in Lucan’s Bellum Civile and Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein,” Frankenstein and its Classics: The Modern Prometheus from Antiquity to Science Fiction, edited by Jesse Weiner, Benjamin Eldon Stevens, and Brett M. Rogers (Bloomsbury Academic, 2018), 68–73; and Fred V. Randel, “The Political Geography of Horror in Mary Shelley’s ‘Frankenstein.’” ELH 70, no. 2 (Summer 2003): 467–69.

  7. 7.

    Later theories of the four humours associated yellow bile with the element of fire, providing a further—though certainly incidental—Promethean coincidence (Jouanna 340n21, 346).

  8. 8.

    Percy Shelley misidentifies Michael as “Raphael” in the cited passage.

References

  • Adams, Carol J. The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegan Critical Theory, 25th anniversary ed. Bloomsbury Academic, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aeschylus. Prometheus Bound. Translated by Thomas Medwin [and Percy Shelley]. William Pickering, 1832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldiss, Brian W., and David Wingrove. Trillion Year Spree: The History of Science Fiction. Victor Gollancz, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, Philip. What Animals Mean in the Fiction of Modernity. Routledge, 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boddice, Rob. A History of Attitudes and Behaviours Toward Animals in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-century Britain: Anthropocentrism and the Emergence of Animals. Edwin Mellen Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branagh, Kenneth, dir. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. Written by Frank Darabont and Steph Lady. Tristar Pictures. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “A Tale for All Time.” Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein: The Classic Tale of Terror Reborn on Film, edited by Diana Landau, 9–10. Newmarket, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byron, Lord George Gordon (Baron Byron). Byron’s Letters and Journals: A New Selection. Edited by Richard Lansdown. Oxford University Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Cain, a Mystery. The Major Works, edited by Jerome J. McGann, 881–939. Oxford University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Darkness.” The Major Works, edited by Jerome J. McGann, 272–74. Oxford University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Don Juan. The Major Works, edited by Jerome J. McGann, 373–880. Oxford University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Life, Letters, and Journals of Lord Byron. Edited by Thomas Moore. John Murray, 1838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, Paul A. Creature and Creator: Myth-Making and English Romanticism. Cambridge University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheyne, George. An Essay on Regimen: Together with Five Discourses, Medical, Moral, and Philosophical: Serving to Illustrate the Principles and Theory of Philosophical Medicine, and Point Out Some of Its Moral Consequences, 2nd ed. C. Rivington, 1740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Prefatory Note to The Wanderings of Cain. The Poetical Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, edited by Derwent and Sara Coleridge, 146–47. D. Appleton, 1854.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Rime of the Ancient Mariner. The Complete Poetical Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, edited by Ernest Hartley Coleridge, vol. 1, 186–209. Oxford University Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Alice. “Feed My Frankenstein.” Written by Alice Cooper, Zodiac Mindwarp, Ian Richardson, and Nick Coler. On Hey Stooped! Epic, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Erasmus. Zoonomia, or The Laws of Organic Life, 3rd ed. 3 vols. J. Johnson, 1801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. The Animal That Therefore I Am. Edited by Marie-Louise Mallet, translated by David Wills. Fordham University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, William. Fleetwood: or, The New Man of Feeling. Richard Bentleigh, 1832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna J. When Species Meet. University of Minnesota Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, Thomas Jefferson. The Life Of Percy Bysshe Shelley, 2 vols. Edward Moxon, 1858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Richard. Shelley: The Pursuit. Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, Margaret. Bearing the Word: Language and the Female Experience in Nineteenth-Century Women’s Writing. University of Chicago Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, Junji. Frankenstein. Translated by Jocelyn Allan and Nick Mamatas. Viz Media, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouanna, Jacques. “The Legacy of the Hippocratic Treatise The Nature of Man: The Theory of the Four Humours.” Greek Medicine from Hippocrates to Galen, 335–59. Brill, 2012.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lambe, William. Reports on the Effects of a Particular Regimen on Scirrhous Tumours and Cancerous Ulcers. J. McCreery, 1809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanone, Catherine. “Monsters on the Ice and Global Warming: from Mary Shelley and Sir John Franklin to Margaret Atwood and Dan Simmons.” EcoGothic, edited by Andrew Smith and William Hughes, 28–44. Manchester University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWhir, Anne. “Teaching the Monster to Read: Mary Shelley, Education and Frankenstein.” The Educational Legacy of Romanticism, edited by John Willinksy, 73–92. Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, Anne K. Mary Shelley: Her Life, Her Fiction, Her Monsters. Methuen, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, Andrew. Literature, Culture and Society, 2nd ed. Routledge, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, John. Paradise Lost. Edited by John Leonard. Penguin, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Paradise Regained. Milton: The Complete Shorter Poems, 2nd ed. Edited by John Carey, 417–512. Routledge, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, Timothy. “Consumption as Performance: The Emergence of the Consumer in the Romantic Period.” Cultures of Taste/Theories of Appetite: Eating Romanticism, edited by Alison Winter and James Chandler, 1–17. Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Patrick D. “Environmentalism.” The Routledge Companion to Science Fiction, edited by Mark Bould, Andrew M. Butler, Adam Roberts and Sherryl Vint, 373–82. Routledge, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, John Frank. The Return to Nature, or A Defence of the Vegetable Regimen. T. Cadell and W. Davis, 1811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, John. The Cry of Nature, or an Appeal to Mercy and Justice, on Behalf of the Persecuted Animals. J. Johnson, 1791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peake, Richard Brinsley. Presumption, or The Fate of Frankenstein. Hideous Progenies: Dramatizations of Frankenstein from Mary Shelley to the Present, edited by Steven Earl Forry, 135–60. University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, David. Romanticism and Animal Rights. Cambridge University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petsche, Jackson. “An Already Alienated Animality: Frankenstein as a Gothic Narrative of Carnovorism.” Gothic Studies 16, no. 1 (2014): 98–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Richard. “The Writer’s Reasons for not Eating Animal Food.” The Medical and Physical Journal 26 (1811): 310–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece, Rod. Animals and Nature: Cultural Myths, Cultural Realities. University of British Columbia Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestman, Martin. Prometheus and Dr. Darwin’s Vermicelli: Another Stir to the Frankenstein Broth. Frankenstein and its Classics: The Modern Prometheus from Antiquity to Science Fiction, edited by Jesse Weiner, Benjamin Eldon Stevens and Brett M. Rogers, 42–58. Bloomsbury Academic, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Emelia. Reading Veganism: The Monstrous Vegan 1818 to Present. Oxford University Press, 2021.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Monstrous Vegan Narratives, Margaret Atwood’s Hideous Progeny.” Thinking Veganism in Literature and Culture, edited by Quinn, Emelia, and Benjamin Westwood, 149–73. Springer International Publishing, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabkin, Eric S. “Eat and Grow Strong: The Super-Natural Power of Forbidden Fruit.” Foods of the Gods: Eating and the Eaten in Fantasy and Science Fiction, edited by Gary Westfahl, George Slusser and Eric S. Rabkin: 21–38. University of Georgia, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritson, Joseph. An Essay on Abstinence from Animal Food, as a Moral Duty. Richard Phillips, 1802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Charles E., ed. Collected Tales and Stories with Original Engravings, by Mary Shelley. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfield, Leonora Cohen. From Beast-Machine to Man-Machine: Animal Soul in French Letters from Descartes to La Mettrie, 2nd ed. Octagon Books, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, Jean Jacques. Discourse on the Origins of Inequality (Second Discourse). The First and Second Discourses, edited by Roger D. Masters, translated by Roger D. Masters and Judith R. Masters, 77–181. St Martin’s Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Confessions of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, vol. 1. Translated by Edmund Wilson. Alfred A. Knopf, 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, Stephane. “‘Listen to Me’: Frankenstein as an Appeal to Mercy and Justice, on Behalf of the Persecuted Animals. Humans and Other Animals in Eighteenth Century British Culture: Representation, Hybridity, Ethics, edited by Frank Palmeri, 137–52. Ashgate, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, Henry Stephens, and William E. A. Axon. Prefatory Notice to A Vindication of Natural Diet, by Percy Bysshe Shelley. F. Pitman, J. Heywood and the Vegetarian Society, 1884. [Pagination added.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, Lyman Tower. “The Problem of the ‘Flawed Utopia’: A Note on the Costs of Eutopia.” Dark Horizons: Science Fiction and the Dystopian Imagination, edited by Rafaella Baccolini and Tom Moylan, 225–31. Routledge, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searles, Edmund. “Food and the Making of Modern Inuit Identities.” Food & Foodways: History & Culture of Human Nourishment 10, no. 1–2 (1 January, 2002): 55–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein, or The Modern Prometheus (1818 Text). Oxford University Press, 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. “The Heir of Mondolfo.” Mathilda and Other Stories, edited by Jenny DiPlacidi. Wordsworth, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Journals of Mary Shelley. Edited by Paula R. Feldman and Diana Scott-Kilvert, 2 vols. Oxford University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Last Man. Wordsworth, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Letters, 2 vols. Edited by Frederick L. Jones. University of Oklahoma Press, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Mrs. Shelley’s Note to Queen Mab.” The Complete Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, edited by Roger Ingpen and Walter Edwin Peck, vol. 1, 165–68. Ernest Benn, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Note on Prometheus Unbound.” The Complete Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, edited by Roger Ingpen and Walter Edwin Peck, vol. 2, 165–71. Ernest Benn, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Valperga, or The Life and Adventures of Castruccio, Prince of Lucca. Edited by Stuart Curran. Oxford University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, Percy Bysshe. Alastor. The Complete Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, edited by Roger Ingpen and Walter Edwin Peck, vol. 1, 177–97. Ernest Benn, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Laon and Cythna (The Revolt of Islam). The Complete Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, edited by Roger Ingpen and Walter Edwin Peck, vol. 1, 257–408. Ernest Benn, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Letters of Percy Bysshe Shelley. Edited by Frederick L. Jones, 2 vols. Clarendon Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “On Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus.The Complete Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, edited by Roger Ingpen and Walter Edwin Peck, vol. 6, 259–62. Ernest Benn, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “On the Vegetable System of Diet.” The Complete Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, edited by Roger Ingpen and Walter Edwin Peck, vol. 6, 335–46. Ernest Benn, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Prometheus Unbound. The Complete Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, edited by Roger Ingpen and Walter Edwin Peck, vol. 2, 171–262. Ernest Benn, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Queen Mab. The Complete Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, edited by Roger Ingpen and Walter Edwin Peck, vol. 1, 67–164. Ernest Benn, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “A Vindication of Natural Diet.” The Complete Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley. Edited by Roger Ingpen and Walter Edwin Peck, vol. 6, 3–22. Ernest Benn, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, Mary, and Percy Shelley. The History of a Six Weeks’ Tour Through a Part of France, Switzerland and Germany, and Holland. The Complete Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley. Edited by Roger Ingpen and Walter Edwin Peck, vol. 6, 83–143. Ernest Benn, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Peter. Animal Liberation, 3rd ed. Ecco, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slusser, George. “The Frankenstein Barrier.” Fiction 2000: Cyberpunk and the Future of Narrative, edited by George Slusser and Tom Shippey, 46–71. University of Georgia Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Andrew, and William Hughes. “‘Defining the EcoGothic.’ EcoGothic, 1–14. Manchester University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Colin. Vegetarianism: A History. Four Walls Eight Windows, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Clair, William. “The Impact of Frankenstein.” Mary Shelley in Her Time, edited by Betty T. Bennett and Stuart Curran, 38–63. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Godwins and the Shelleys: The Biography of a Family. Faber and Faber, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, Tristram. The Bloodless Revolution: A Cultural History of Vegetarianism from 1600 to Modern Times. W. W. Norton & Company, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorslev, Peter L. Jr. The Byronic Hero: Types and Prototypes. University of Minnesota Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vint, Sherryl. Animal Alterity: Science Fiction and the Question of the Animal. Liverpool University Press, 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Howard. The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh-Eating. University of Illinois Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollstonecraft, Mary. Elements of Morality, for the Use of Children. Joseph Robinson, 1811.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Original Stories from Real Life: With Conversations, Calculated to Regulate the Affections, and Form the Mind to Truth and Goodness, 2nd ed. J. Johnson, 1796.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. A Vindication of the Rights of Men, in a Letter to the Right Honourable Edmund Burke, Occasioned by his Reflections on the Revolution in France, 2nd ed. J. Johnson, 1790.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. A Vindication of the Rights of Women. Edited by Miriam Brody. Penguin, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bulleid, J. (2023). Feed My Frankenstein: Mary Shelley’s Romantic Vegetarian Precedent. In: Vegetarianism and Science Fiction. Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38347-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics