Skip to main content

From Waste to Resource: A Patent Classification Analysis for End of Life Mosquito Nets Alternative Uses Identification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Towards a Smart, Resilient and Sustainable Industry (ISIEA 2023)

Abstract

The effects of current worldwide problems like climate change and environmental pollution must be taken into account while designing or redesigning goods or services. During this process, it is necessary to apply current techniques like the 3Rs recovery method and the circular economy concept to reduce waste and improve recycling, regeneration, and reusability. In this context, the article discusses a research carried out for a manufacturing company to address the potential for reusing end-of-life mosquito nets, which are hard to recycle, in order to lessen their environmental impact and open up new commercial options. To attain this, the best strategy for identifying new product applications has been chosen after being analyzed alongside other options found in the literature. The approach starts with identifying the functionalities of the product, from which the Cooperative Patent Classifications (CPCs) of the resulting patents are then retrieved and used as outward stimuli during the design process. The outcomes, in terms of generated ideas, are then reported in the conclusions, indicating the true efficacy of adopted strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kamp Albæk, J., Shahbazi, S., McAloone, T.C., Pigosso, D.C.A.: Circularity evaluation of alternative concepts during early product design and development. Sustainability. 12, 9353 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229353

  2. Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., Hekkert, M.: Conceptualizing the circular economy: an analysis of 114 definitions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 127, 221–232 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Okorie, O., Salonitis, K., Charnley, F., Turner, C., Moreno, M., Tiwari, A.: Digitisation and the circular economy: a review of current research and future trends. Energies 11, 3009 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/en11113009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Potting, J., Hekkert, M., Worrell, E., Hanemaaijer, A.: Circular Economy: Measuring Innovation in the Product Chain. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moreno, M., Rios, C., Rowe, Z., Charnley, F.: A conceptual framework for circular design. Sustainability. 8, 937 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., Ulgiati, S.: A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J. Clean. Prod. 114, 11–32 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bocken, N.M.P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., van der Grinten, B.: Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 33, 308–320 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Crowther, P.: Design for disassembly. BDP environment design guide (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smith, G.F.: Idea-generation techniques: A formulary of active ingredients. J. Creative Behav. 32, 107–134 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1998.tb00810.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zwicky, F.: The morphological approach to discovery, invention, research and construction. In: Zwicky, F., Wilson, A.G. (eds.) New methods of thought and procedure, pp. 273–297. Springer, Berlin (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-87617-2_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Gonçalves, M., Cardoso, C., Badke-Schaub, P.: What inspires designers? Preferences on inspirational approaches during idea generation. Des. Stud. 35, 29–53 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Beitz, W., Pahl, G., Grote, K.: Engineering design: a systematic approach. Mrs Bull. 71 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gadd, K.: TRIZ for Engineers: Enabling Inventive Problem Solving. John wiley & sons, Hoboken (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Tauqeer, M.A., Bang, K.E.: A novel systematic product ideation model using technology trends. Int. J. Innov. Sci. 12, 303–321 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-04-2020-0044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fantoni, G., Apreda, R., Dell’Orletta, F., Monge, M.: Automatic extraction of function-behaviour-state information from patents. Adv. Eng. Inform. 27, 317–334 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2013.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Srinivasan, V., et al.: Does analogical distance affect performance of ideation? J. Mech. Des. Trans. ASME. 140, 071101 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fiorineschi, L., Frillici, F.S., Gregori, G., Rotini, F.: Stimulating idea generation for new product applications. Int. J. Innov. Sci. 10, 454–474 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-09-2017-0099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Howard, T.J., Culley, S., Dekoninck, E.A.: Reuse of ideas and concepts for creative stimuli in engineering design. J. Eng. Des. 22, 565–581 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/09544821003598573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin, W.-G., Hou, L., Lai, R., Zhao, N., Wu, Y.: Method to aid product innovation by TRIZ, DSM and patent knowledge. Appl. Mech. Mater. 201–202, 825–828 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.201-202.825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Howard, T.J., Dekoninck, E.A., Culley, S.J.: The use of creative stimuli at early stages of industrial product innovation. Res. Eng. Design 21, 263–274 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-010-0091-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoon, J., Park, H., Seo, W., Lee, J.-M., Coh, B., Kim, J.: Technology opportunity discovery (TOD) from existing technologies and products: a function-based TOD framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 100, 153–167 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, H., Li, W., Li, Y.: A new computational method for acquiring effect knowledge to support product innovation. Knowl.-Based Syst. 231, 107410 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Geum, Y., Park, Y.: How to generate creative ideas for innovation: a hybrid approach of WordNet and morphological analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 111, 176–187 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Verhaegen, P.-A., D’hondt, J., Vertommen, J., Dewulf, S., Duflou, J.R.: Searching for similar products through patent analysis. Procedia Eng. 9, 431–441 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.131

  25. Verhaegen, P.A., Vandevenne, D., Duflou, J.R.: Systematically identifying reuse applications for supporting goods. In: TRIZ Future Conference (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dewulf, S.: Directed variation of properties for new or improved function product DNA – A base for connect and develop. Procedia Eng. 9, 646–652 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Google. https://www.google.com/?tbm=pts

  28. Espacenet – patent classification. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/cpc-browser

  29. Bacciotti, D., Borgianni, Y., Rotini, F.: An original design approach for stimulating the ideation of new product features. Comput. Ind. 75, 80–100 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Borgianni, Y., Maccioni, L., Pigosso, D.: Environmental lifecycle hotspots and the implementation of eco-design principles: does consistency pay off? In: Ball, P., Huaccho Huatuco, L., Howlett, R.J., Setchi, R. (eds.) KES-SDM 2019. SIST, vol. 155, pp. 165–176. Springer, Singapore (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9271-9_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Melani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Melani, M., Furferi, R., Rotini, F., Barbieri, L. (2023). From Waste to Resource: A Patent Classification Analysis for End of Life Mosquito Nets Alternative Uses Identification. In: Borgianni, Y., Matt, D.T., Molinaro, M., Orzes, G. (eds) Towards a Smart, Resilient and Sustainable Industry. ISIEA 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 745. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38274-1_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics