Skip to main content

The Concept of Legal Convergence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Are Legal Systems Converging or Diverging?
  • 123 Accesses

Abstract

The concept of convergence of legal systems stands for a leading idea in the modern discipline of law. Whereas one could neo-romantically still perceive law as a Landesjurisprudenz, a sort of provincial and domestic study, it would be fair to maintain that, after the end of the Second World War, the concept of legal convergence of systems has become of paramount importance in the national, the regional and the international sphere. The discipline of law has, thus, effectively departed from its narrower and more nation-oriented roots post the 1648 Westphalian paradigm, albeit not always and not necessarily. Concurrently, the phenomenon of convergence of legal systems has had wide-ranging implications in the political, legal and economic life of the world’s modern republics. Even systems which would resist convergence projects initially, would eventually subscribe to such projects (contagion theory of legal systems). The magnificence of such a leading idea as the concept of legal convergence arises from no other reason than the fact that convergence is a multifaceted, multimodal and flexible phenomenon. Convergence of legal systems can, therefore, occur either through centralised or decentralised modes (top-down and bottom-up legal convergence). Close to this, one would be reminded that a thing is beautiful, in that it partakes in beauty itself. And a system tends to benefit from a convergence circle, in that convergence is something that tends to come with benefits for systems that partake in such a circle. Indeed, in its ideal form, the concept of legal convergence can be either an organic self-perfecting, self-evolving reality or a constantly updated centrally designed project. The Platonic ideal of the one effectively amounts to nothing else but a yearning for simplicity, as Merryman put it, our world frequently presenting us with a rather chaotic, disorderly and perplexing state of affairs in so many aspects of human existence. Law, traditionally, despite its formalist and modernist credentials, has added to this rather chaotic world with its nationalist and inward-looking deviations. Almost any of Kafka’s works would readily point to this direction. The chapter recognises that there were times when law would be a synonym to the nation (and vice versa); yet, the new world legal and economic architecture that arose out of the ashes of a bloodstained and torn humanity more than seventy years ago was actually engineered on the premises of international legal and political cooperation. Finally, against the background of the economic and financial crisis, that is with us for more than a decade now, this contribution explores the essence of the idea of legal convergence by recognising amongst other things the relation of legal convergence to economic convergence in the industrial world. It further attempts to assess the feasibility of genuine legal convergence projects by referring to leading examples of legal harmonisation in Europe and the world and by exploring the theory of legal transplants, the theory that acts as the cornerstone of the modern legal convergence thesis. The chapter concludes on the need for the greater democratic legitimacy of convergence projects, especially when it comes to ones that would not be the result of organic decentralised growth but of central design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Markesinis (2000); van Hoecke (2000), p. 9.

  2. 2.

    Platsas (2017), p. 245.

  3. 3.

    Ibid.

  4. 4.

    Weatherill (2020), p. 266.

  5. 5.

    Platsas (2017), p. 7.

  6. 6.

    Markesinis (1994).

  7. 7.

    Zweigert and Kötz (1998), p. 15.

  8. 8.

    Merryman (1981), pp. 364–365.

  9. 9.

    See de Witte (2014), p. 464.

  10. 10.

    Legrand (1996), p. 60.

  11. 11.

    Cf. Legrand (1996), p. 60.

  12. 12.

    Micheler (2009), p. i.

  13. 13.

    Arvind (2010), p. 79.

  14. 14.

    Arvind (2010), p. 78.

  15. 15.

    Cf. Coffee (1999), p. 650.

  16. 16.

    Coffee (1999), p. 650.

  17. 17.

    Gilson (2000), p. 11; Gilson (2001), p. 337; Gilson (2010), p. 137.

  18. 18.

    E.g. Coffee (1999).

  19. 19.

    The Delaware effect, when it comes to US corporate laws, and the Californian effect, when it comes to US environmental laws, would be the classic examples here, i.e. when it comes to other US States taking legal standards of certain US States in certain areas into account.

  20. 20.

    Legrand (1996), pp. 62, 63, 64, 74–78, 79, 81.

  21. 21.

    E.g. González-Varela (2020).

  22. 22.

    Aristotle, Metaphysics, 8.1045a. All references to ancient texts are taken from such texts as these would be found in the Perseus Digital Library of Tufts University, unless otherwise stated.

  23. 23.

    Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, 5.7.

  24. 24.

    Cicero, De Republica, 3.22.33.

  25. 25.

    Aristotle, Metaphysics, 1.981.

  26. 26.

    Devereux (1986), p. 484 citing Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics.

  27. 27.

    Plato, Republic, 596a.

  28. 28.

    Plato, Phaedo, 100c–d.

  29. 29.

    Markesinis (1994).

  30. 30.

    Kerr et al. (1960).

  31. 31.

    Head and Mayer (2021), pp. 44–45.

  32. 32.

    Duisenberg (2000).

  33. 33.

    See e.g. Deakin (2006), pp. 71–95.

  34. 34.

    Cf. Armour (2005).

  35. 35.

    As cited in Head and Mayer (2021), p. 23.

  36. 36.

    Head and Mayer (2021), p. 23.

  37. 37.

    E.g. see generally de Witte (2014), pp. 445–464 and in particular pp. 445–446.

  38. 38.

    See e.g. Hirsch (2021), pp. 1–27 for the recent proposals in Africa when it comes to the free movement of African people in the African continent.

  39. 39.

    Lähdesmäki et al. (2021), p. 183.

  40. 40.

    E.g. Farran (2020), p. 31.

  41. 41.

    The leading provision of EU law on subsidiarity would be Article 5(3) TEU. See also the TFEU Protocol No2 on the Application of the Principles of Subsidiarity and Proportionality.

  42. 42.

    The leading provision of EU law on proportionality would be Article 5(4) TEU. See also the TFEU Protocol No2 on the Application of the Principles of Subsidiarity and Proportionality.

  43. 43.

    Reinsch and Caporal (2021), p. 13.

  44. 44.

    Ibid., p. 14.

  45. 45.

    Ibid., p. 13.

  46. 46.

    On the two main schools of legal transplants, see Foster (2002), pp. 58–60.

  47. 47.

    Devereux (1986), p. 501 citing Plato, Statesman, 294a-c, 294d-295b, 295c-e, 296d-297b.

  48. 48.

    App no 5856/72 (ECtHR, 25 April 1978), Series A, No 26 (1979–80) 2 EHRR 1.

  49. 49.

    Ita and Hicks (2021), p. 74.

  50. 50.

    E.g. Leijten (2017).

  51. 51.

    Markesinis (2004), p. xi.

  52. 52.

    Platsas (2017).

  53. 53.

    E.g. Head and Mayer (2021), p. 24 citing Alesina A, Perotti R (2004) The European Union: A Politically Incorrect View. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18: 27–48.

  54. 54.

    E.g. for a recent discussion on certain terminological aspects of the legal harmonisation concept in the context of EU law and cross-border insolvency law, see Ghio (2020), p. 578.

References

  • Aristotle, Metaphysics, 1.981a, 8.1045a (Perseus Digital Library of Tufts University)

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, 5.7 (Perseus Digital Library of Tufts University)

    Google Scholar 

  • Armour J (2005) Who should make corporate law? EC Legislation versus Regulatory Competition. ECGI Working Paper Series in Law: Law Working Paper No. 54/2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvind TT (2010) The ‘transplant effect’ in harmonization. Int Comp Law Q 59:65–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicero, De Republica, 3.22.33 (De Republica, De Legibus, trans. Keyes CW, Loeb Classical Library (1928; reprint, 1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffee JC (1999) The future as history: the prospects for global convergence in corporate governance and its implications. Northwest Univ Law Rev 93:641–707

    Google Scholar 

  • de Witte B (2014) The European Union’s place among the international cooperation venues of its Member States. ZaöRV 74:445–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin S (2006) Is regulatory competition the future for European integration? Swedish Econ Policy Rev 13:71–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Devereux DT (1986) Particular and universal in Aristotle’s conception of practical knowledge. Rev Metaphys 39:483–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Duisenberg WF (2000) The Euro as a catalyst for legal convergence in Europe. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2000/html/sp000917.en.html

  • Farran S (2020) Legislating for customary land tenure: a comparative query. In: Donlan SP, Mair J (eds) Comparative law: mixes, movements and metaphors. Routledge, London, New York, pp 31–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster N (2002) Transmigration and transferability of commercial law in a globalised world. In: Harding A, Örücü E (eds) Comparative law in the 21st century. Kluwer Law International, The Hague, pp 55–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghio E (2020) International legal cooperation and the principle of harmonisation: lessons from cross-border insolvency. Revista Juris Poiesis 23:576–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson RJ (2000) Globalizing corporate governance: convergence of form or function. Columbia Law School, The Center for Law and Economic Studies Working Paper No. 174; Stanford Law School, John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No. 192: 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilson RJ (2001) Globalizing corporate governance: convergence of form or function. Am J Comp Law 49:329–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson RJ (2010) Globalizing corporate governance: convergence of form or function. In: Gordon JN, Roe MJ (eds) Convergence and persistence in corporate governance. Cambridge University Press, pp 128–158

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Varela JE (2020) The one over many principle of Republic 596a. Apeiron 53:339–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head K, Mayer T (2021) The United States of Europe. J Econ Perspect 35:23–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch A (2021) A strategic consideration of the African Union free movement of persons protocol and other initiatives towards the freer movement of people in Africa (Working Paper). South African Institute of International Affairs, pp 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Ita R, Hicks D (2021) Beyond expansion or restriction? Models of interaction between the living instrument and margin of appreciation doctrines and the scope of the ECHR. Int Hum Rights Law Rev 10:40–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr C, Dunlop JT, Harbison F, Myers CA (1960) Industrialism and industrial man. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lähdesmäki T, Mäkinen K, Čeginskas VLA, Kaasik-Krogerus S (2021) Conclusions: Europe’s lived space. In: Lähdesmäki T, Mäkinen K, Čeginskas VLA, Kaasik-Krogerus S (eds) Europe from below: notions of Europe and the European among participants in EU cultural initiatives. Brill, Leiden, Boston, pp 183–205

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Legrand P (1996) European legal systems are not converging. Int Comp Law Q 45:52–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leijten I (2017) Core socio-economic rights and the European Court of Human Rights. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Markesinis BS (1994) The gradual convergence. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Markesinis BS (2000) The Clifford chance millennium lectures: the coming together of the common law and the civil law. Hart Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Markesinis BS (2004) Comparative law in the courtroom and classroom: the story of the last thirty-five years. Hart Publishing, Oxford, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Merryman JH (1981) On the convergence (and divergence) of the civil law and the common law. Stanford J Int Law 17:357–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Micheler E (2009) Property in securities: a comparative study. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato, Phaedo, 100c–d (Perseus Digital Library of Tufts University)

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato, Republic, 596a (Perseus Digital Library of Tufts University)

    Google Scholar 

  • Platsas AE (2017) The harmonisation of national legal systems: strategic models and factors. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reinsch W, Caporal J (2021) A renewed global trade system. In: Goodman MP, Miller S (eds) Toward a new global trade framework. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), pp 12–19

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hoecke M (2000) The harmonisation of private law in Europe: some misunderstandings. In: van Hoecke M, Ost F (eds) The harmonisation of European private law. Hart Publishing, Oxford/Portland, pp 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherill S (2020) The fundamental question of minimum or maximum harmonisation. In: Garben S, Govaere I (eds) The Internal Market 2.0. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 261–284

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zweigert K, Kötz H (1998) An introduction to comparative law, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonios E. Platsas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Platsas, A.E. (2024). The Concept of Legal Convergence. In: Ghio, E., Perlingeiro, R. (eds) Are Legal Systems Converging or Diverging?. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38180-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38180-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38179-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38180-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics