Abstract
The concept of convergence of legal systems stands for a leading idea in the modern discipline of law. Whereas one could neo-romantically still perceive law as a Landesjurisprudenz, a sort of provincial and domestic study, it would be fair to maintain that, after the end of the Second World War, the concept of legal convergence of systems has become of paramount importance in the national, the regional and the international sphere. The discipline of law has, thus, effectively departed from its narrower and more nation-oriented roots post the 1648 Westphalian paradigm, albeit not always and not necessarily. Concurrently, the phenomenon of convergence of legal systems has had wide-ranging implications in the political, legal and economic life of the world’s modern republics. Even systems which would resist convergence projects initially, would eventually subscribe to such projects (contagion theory of legal systems). The magnificence of such a leading idea as the concept of legal convergence arises from no other reason than the fact that convergence is a multifaceted, multimodal and flexible phenomenon. Convergence of legal systems can, therefore, occur either through centralised or decentralised modes (top-down and bottom-up legal convergence). Close to this, one would be reminded that a thing is beautiful, in that it partakes in beauty itself. And a system tends to benefit from a convergence circle, in that convergence is something that tends to come with benefits for systems that partake in such a circle. Indeed, in its ideal form, the concept of legal convergence can be either an organic self-perfecting, self-evolving reality or a constantly updated centrally designed project. The Platonic ideal of the one effectively amounts to nothing else but a yearning for simplicity, as Merryman put it, our world frequently presenting us with a rather chaotic, disorderly and perplexing state of affairs in so many aspects of human existence. Law, traditionally, despite its formalist and modernist credentials, has added to this rather chaotic world with its nationalist and inward-looking deviations. Almost any of Kafka’s works would readily point to this direction. The chapter recognises that there were times when law would be a synonym to the nation (and vice versa); yet, the new world legal and economic architecture that arose out of the ashes of a bloodstained and torn humanity more than seventy years ago was actually engineered on the premises of international legal and political cooperation. Finally, against the background of the economic and financial crisis, that is with us for more than a decade now, this contribution explores the essence of the idea of legal convergence by recognising amongst other things the relation of legal convergence to economic convergence in the industrial world. It further attempts to assess the feasibility of genuine legal convergence projects by referring to leading examples of legal harmonisation in Europe and the world and by exploring the theory of legal transplants, the theory that acts as the cornerstone of the modern legal convergence thesis. The chapter concludes on the need for the greater democratic legitimacy of convergence projects, especially when it comes to ones that would not be the result of organic decentralised growth but of central design.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Platsas (2017), p. 245.
- 3.
Ibid.
- 4.
Weatherill (2020), p. 266.
- 5.
Platsas (2017), p. 7.
- 6.
Markesinis (1994).
- 7.
Zweigert and Kötz (1998), p. 15.
- 8.
Merryman (1981), pp. 364–365.
- 9.
See de Witte (2014), p. 464.
- 10.
Legrand (1996), p. 60.
- 11.
Cf. Legrand (1996), p. 60.
- 12.
Micheler (2009), p. i.
- 13.
Arvind (2010), p. 79.
- 14.
Arvind (2010), p. 78.
- 15.
Cf. Coffee (1999), p. 650.
- 16.
Coffee (1999), p. 650.
- 17.
- 18.
E.g. Coffee (1999).
- 19.
The Delaware effect, when it comes to US corporate laws, and the Californian effect, when it comes to US environmental laws, would be the classic examples here, i.e. when it comes to other US States taking legal standards of certain US States in certain areas into account.
- 20.
Legrand (1996), pp. 62, 63, 64, 74–78, 79, 81.
- 21.
E.g. González-Varela (2020).
- 22.
Aristotle, Metaphysics, 8.1045a. All references to ancient texts are taken from such texts as these would be found in the Perseus Digital Library of Tufts University, unless otherwise stated.
- 23.
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, 5.7.
- 24.
Cicero, De Republica, 3.22.33.
- 25.
Aristotle, Metaphysics, 1.981.
- 26.
Devereux (1986), p. 484 citing Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics.
- 27.
Plato, Republic, 596a.
- 28.
Plato, Phaedo, 100c–d.
- 29.
Markesinis (1994).
- 30.
Kerr et al. (1960).
- 31.
Head and Mayer (2021), pp. 44–45.
- 32.
Duisenberg (2000).
- 33.
See e.g. Deakin (2006), pp. 71–95.
- 34.
Cf. Armour (2005).
- 35.
As cited in Head and Mayer (2021), p. 23.
- 36.
Head and Mayer (2021), p. 23.
- 37.
E.g. see generally de Witte (2014), pp. 445–464 and in particular pp. 445–446.
- 38.
See e.g. Hirsch (2021), pp. 1–27 for the recent proposals in Africa when it comes to the free movement of African people in the African continent.
- 39.
Lähdesmäki et al. (2021), p. 183.
- 40.
E.g. Farran (2020), p. 31.
- 41.
The leading provision of EU law on subsidiarity would be Article 5(3) TEU. See also the TFEU Protocol No2 on the Application of the Principles of Subsidiarity and Proportionality.
- 42.
The leading provision of EU law on proportionality would be Article 5(4) TEU. See also the TFEU Protocol No2 on the Application of the Principles of Subsidiarity and Proportionality.
- 43.
Reinsch and Caporal (2021), p. 13.
- 44.
Ibid., p. 14.
- 45.
Ibid., p. 13.
- 46.
On the two main schools of legal transplants, see Foster (2002), pp. 58–60.
- 47.
Devereux (1986), p. 501 citing Plato, Statesman, 294a-c, 294d-295b, 295c-e, 296d-297b.
- 48.
App no 5856/72 (ECtHR, 25 April 1978), Series A, No 26 (1979–80) 2 EHRR 1.
- 49.
Ita and Hicks (2021), p. 74.
- 50.
E.g. Leijten (2017).
- 51.
Markesinis (2004), p. xi.
- 52.
Platsas (2017).
- 53.
E.g. Head and Mayer (2021), p. 24 citing Alesina A, Perotti R (2004) The European Union: A Politically Incorrect View. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18: 27–48.
- 54.
E.g. for a recent discussion on certain terminological aspects of the legal harmonisation concept in the context of EU law and cross-border insolvency law, see Ghio (2020), p. 578.
References
Aristotle, Metaphysics, 1.981a, 8.1045a (Perseus Digital Library of Tufts University)
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, 5.7 (Perseus Digital Library of Tufts University)
Armour J (2005) Who should make corporate law? EC Legislation versus Regulatory Competition. ECGI Working Paper Series in Law: Law Working Paper No. 54/2005
Arvind TT (2010) The ‘transplant effect’ in harmonization. Int Comp Law Q 59:65–88
Cicero, De Republica, 3.22.33 (De Republica, De Legibus, trans. Keyes CW, Loeb Classical Library (1928; reprint, 1970)
Coffee JC (1999) The future as history: the prospects for global convergence in corporate governance and its implications. Northwest Univ Law Rev 93:641–707
de Witte B (2014) The European Union’s place among the international cooperation venues of its Member States. ZaöRV 74:445–464
Deakin S (2006) Is regulatory competition the future for European integration? Swedish Econ Policy Rev 13:71–95
Devereux DT (1986) Particular and universal in Aristotle’s conception of practical knowledge. Rev Metaphys 39:483–504
Duisenberg WF (2000) The Euro as a catalyst for legal convergence in Europe. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2000/html/sp000917.en.html
Farran S (2020) Legislating for customary land tenure: a comparative query. In: Donlan SP, Mair J (eds) Comparative law: mixes, movements and metaphors. Routledge, London, New York, pp 31–46
Foster N (2002) Transmigration and transferability of commercial law in a globalised world. In: Harding A, Örücü E (eds) Comparative law in the 21st century. Kluwer Law International, The Hague, pp 55–73
Ghio E (2020) International legal cooperation and the principle of harmonisation: lessons from cross-border insolvency. Revista Juris Poiesis 23:576–581
Gilson RJ (2000) Globalizing corporate governance: convergence of form or function. Columbia Law School, The Center for Law and Economic Studies Working Paper No. 174; Stanford Law School, John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No. 192: 1–34
Gilson RJ (2001) Globalizing corporate governance: convergence of form or function. Am J Comp Law 49:329–357
Gilson RJ (2010) Globalizing corporate governance: convergence of form or function. In: Gordon JN, Roe MJ (eds) Convergence and persistence in corporate governance. Cambridge University Press, pp 128–158
González-Varela JE (2020) The one over many principle of Republic 596a. Apeiron 53:339–361
Head K, Mayer T (2021) The United States of Europe. J Econ Perspect 35:23–48
Hirsch A (2021) A strategic consideration of the African Union free movement of persons protocol and other initiatives towards the freer movement of people in Africa (Working Paper). South African Institute of International Affairs, pp 1–27
Ita R, Hicks D (2021) Beyond expansion or restriction? Models of interaction between the living instrument and margin of appreciation doctrines and the scope of the ECHR. Int Hum Rights Law Rev 10:40–74
Kerr C, Dunlop JT, Harbison F, Myers CA (1960) Industrialism and industrial man. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Lähdesmäki T, Mäkinen K, Čeginskas VLA, Kaasik-Krogerus S (2021) Conclusions: Europe’s lived space. In: Lähdesmäki T, Mäkinen K, Čeginskas VLA, Kaasik-Krogerus S (eds) Europe from below: notions of Europe and the European among participants in EU cultural initiatives. Brill, Leiden, Boston, pp 183–205
Legrand P (1996) European legal systems are not converging. Int Comp Law Q 45:52–81
Leijten I (2017) Core socio-economic rights and the European Court of Human Rights. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Markesinis BS (1994) The gradual convergence. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Markesinis BS (2000) The Clifford chance millennium lectures: the coming together of the common law and the civil law. Hart Publishing, Oxford
Markesinis BS (2004) Comparative law in the courtroom and classroom: the story of the last thirty-five years. Hart Publishing, Oxford, Portland
Merryman JH (1981) On the convergence (and divergence) of the civil law and the common law. Stanford J Int Law 17:357–388
Micheler E (2009) Property in securities: a comparative study. Cambridge University Press
Plato, Phaedo, 100c–d (Perseus Digital Library of Tufts University)
Plato, Republic, 596a (Perseus Digital Library of Tufts University)
Platsas AE (2017) The harmonisation of national legal systems: strategic models and factors. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Reinsch W, Caporal J (2021) A renewed global trade system. In: Goodman MP, Miller S (eds) Toward a new global trade framework. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), pp 12–19
van Hoecke M (2000) The harmonisation of private law in Europe: some misunderstandings. In: van Hoecke M, Ost F (eds) The harmonisation of European private law. Hart Publishing, Oxford/Portland, pp 1–20
Weatherill S (2020) The fundamental question of minimum or maximum harmonisation. In: Garben S, Govaere I (eds) The Internal Market 2.0. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 261–284
Zweigert K, Kötz H (1998) An introduction to comparative law, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Platsas, A.E. (2024). The Concept of Legal Convergence. In: Ghio, E., Perlingeiro, R. (eds) Are Legal Systems Converging or Diverging?. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38180-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38180-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38179-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38180-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)