Abstract
WTO trade remedies are traditionally not seen as instruments to pursue green policy goals, with reference to the highly technical nature of the rules and the focus on economic considerations. Nonetheless, all disciplines of WTO law, including trade remedies, are put in the service of achieving goals of sustainable development. This chapter introduces the central issues of this thesis, an overview of its structure and its social and scientific relevance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Deputy Director-General Alan Wm. Wolff, The WTO must not continue as it is, 10 December 2020, WTO Newsroom, 10 December 2020, available at https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news20_e/ddgaw_10dec20_e.htm (last accessed 26 June 2023).
- 2.
Ibid.
- 3.
Preamble to the WTO Agreement, first recital.
- 4.
See Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, LT/UR/A-1A/3, 15 April 1994; Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, LT/UR/A-1A/9, 15 April 1994; Agreement on Safeguards, LT/UR/A-1A/8, 15 April 1994.
- 5.
See, for instance, Müller et al. (2009), para. I.04.
- 6.
Meléndez-Ortiz (2016), p. 11.
- 7.
- 8.
Rauscher (1994).
- 9.
Esty (1994), pp. 156–157. The author argues that punitive measures do not work when the standards of trade partners are low because of lack of information or lack of capacity to adopt environmental protection measures. In such cases, the policy recommendation must be to work together. This might well be different when low standards are a strategic choice, which cannot be seen as legitimate because of specific circumstances including climate, weather, population, economic needs, risk preferences, existing pollution levels, or other local influences. Trade penalties or trade duties may only be allowed in such cases.
- 10.
See GATT Secretariat, International Trade 1990-1991, Vol. 1, GATT Secretariat (Geneva 1992).
- 11.
Appellate Body report, United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, WT/DS58/AB/R, adopted 6 November 1998, para. 167–169.
- 12.
See, for instance, Rio Declaration, Principle 16.
- 13.
Sands and Peel (2018), p. 894.
- 14.
See, for instance, Rio Declaration, Principle 11.
- 15.
Kunz (2015), pp. 311–323.
- 16.
Matsushita et al. (2015), pp. 215–216.
References
Charnovitz S (1993) A taxonomy of environmental trade measures. Georgetown Int Environ Law Rev 6(1):1–46
Esty DC (1994) Greening the GATT. Trade, environment, and the future. Institute for International Economics, Washington
Kunz M (2015) Principle 11: environmental legislation. In: Viñuales JE (ed) The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. A commentary. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 311–323
Lothe S (2001) Contradictions between WTO and sustainable development? The case of environmental dumping. Sustain Dev 9:197–203
Matsushita M, Schoenbaum T, Mavroidis P, Hahn M (2015) The World Trade Organization, law, practice, and policy, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Meléndez-Ortiz R (2016) Enabling the energy transition and scale-up of clean energy technologies: options for the global trade system. E15 Expert Group on Clean Energy Technologies and the Trade System, Policy Options Paper
Müller W, Khan N, Scharf T (2009) EC and WTO anti-dumping law. A handbook, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Pauwelyn J (2013) Carbon leakage measures and border tax adjustments under WTO law. In: Prévost D, Van Calster G (eds) Research handbook on environment, health and the WTO. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham/Northampton, pp 448–506
Rauscher M (1994) On ecological dumping. Oxf Econ Pap 46(Suppl 1):822–840
Sands P, Peel J (2018) Principles of international environmental law, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Van Vaerenbergh, P. (2023). Introduction. In: Greening Trade Remedies. European Yearbook of International Economic Law(), vol 31. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38172-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38172-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38171-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38172-0
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)