Skip to main content

Power Consumption and Process Cost Prediction of Customized Products Using Explainable AI: A Case in the Steel Industry

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing: Establishing Bridges for More Sustainable Manufacturing Systems (FAIM 2023)

Abstract

Production shifted from a product-centered perspective (mass production of one article) to a customer-centered perspective (mass customization of product variants). It also happens in energy-intensive industries, such as steel production. Mass customization companies face a challenge in accurately estimating the total costs of an individual product. Furthermore, 20% to 40% of the costs related to steel products come from energy. Increasing the product variety can cause an inevitable loss of sustainability. This paper presents machine-learning approaches to improve the sustainability of the steel production industry. It is done by finding the most accurate way to predict the power consumption and the costs of customized products. Moreover, this research also finds the most energy-efficient machine mix based on the predictions. The method is validated in a steel manufacturing Small Medium Enterprise (SME). In this research, experiments were conducted with different machine learning models, and it was found that the most accurate results were achieved using regularization-based and random forest regression models. Explainable AI (XAI) is also used to clarify how product properties influence process costs and power consumption. This paper also discusses scenarios on how the prediction of costs and power consumption can assist production planners in performing workstation selection. This research improves the production planning of customized products by providing a trustable decision support system for machine selection based on explainable machine learning models for process time and power consumption predictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Altman, N.S.: An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression. Am. Stat. 46(3), 175–185 (1992)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Alvarez-Melis, D., Jaakkola, T.S.: On the robustness of interpretability methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.08049 (2018)

  3. Bhinge, R., Park, J., Law, K.H., Dornfeld, D.A., Helu, M., Rachuri, S.: Toward a generalized energy prediction model for machine tools. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 139(4) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, C., Liu, Y., Kumar, M., Qin, J.: Energy consumption modelling using deep learning technique-a case study of EAF. Procedia CIRP 72, 1063–1068 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, C., Liu, Y., Kumar, M., Qin, J., Ren, Y.: Energy consumption modelling using deep learning embedded semi-supervised learning. Comput. Ind. Eng. 135, 757–765 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, H., Covert, I.C., Lundberg, S.M., Lee, S.I.: Algorithms to estimate shapley value feature attributions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.07605 (2022)

  8. Chen, T., Shang, H., Bi, Q.: A prediction method of five-axis machine tool energy consumption with GBRT algorithm. In: 2019 IEEE 5th International Conference on Mechatronics System and Robots (ICMSR), pp. 34–39. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, X., Van Hillegersberg, J., Topan, E., Smith, S., Roberts, M.: Application of data-driven models to predictive maintenance: Bearing wear prediction at TATA steel. Expert Syst. Appl. 186, 115699 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Draper, N.R., Smith, H.: Applied Regression Analysis, vol. 326. Wiley, Hoboken (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Faraway, J.J.: Extending the Linear Model with R: Generalized Linear, Mixed Effects and Nonparametric Regression Models. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Friedman, J.H.: Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 1189–1232 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hoerl, A.E., Kennard, R.W.: Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 12(1), 55–67 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hrnjica, B., Softic, S.: Explainable AI in manufacturing: a predictive maintenance case study. In: Lalic, B., Majstorovic, V., Marjanovic, U., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds.) APMS 2020. IAICT, vol. 592, pp. 66–73. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57997-5_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Hömann, R.: The steel industry as an energy-intensive sector. https://en.stahl-online.de/index.php/topics/energy-and-environment/energy/: :text=The steel industry uses about, hours of electricity every year

  16. Kutschenreiter-Praszkiewicz, I.: Machine learning in SMED. J. Mach. Eng. 18(2), 31–40 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lampathaki, F., Agostinho, C., Glikman, Y., Sesana, M.: Moving from ‘black box’ to ‘glass box’ artificial intelligence in manufacturing with XMANAI. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mawson, V.J., Hughes, B.R.: Coupling simulation with artificial neural networks for the optimisation of HVAC controls in manufacturing environments. Optim. Eng. 22, 103–119 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pierleoni, P., Belli, A., Palma, L., Palmucci, M., Sabbatini, L.: A machine vision system for manual assembly line monitoring. In: 2020 International Conference on Intelligent Engineering and Management (ICIEM), pp. 33–38. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Quinlan, J.R.: C4. 5: Programs for Machine Learning. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Quinlan, J.R., et al.: Learning with continuous classes. In: 5th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 92, pp. 343–348. World Scientific (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rodríguez, I., Nottensteiner, K., Leidner, D., Durner, M., Stulp, F., Albu-Schäffer, A.: Pattern recognition for knowledge transfer in robotic assembly sequence planning. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 5(2), 3666–3673 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rožanec, J.M., et al.: STARdom: an architecture for trusted and secure human-centered manufacturing systems. In: Dolgui, A., Bernard, A., Lemoine, D., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds.) APMS 2021. IAICT, vol. 633, pp. 199–207. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85910-7_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Serin, G., Gudelek, M.U., Ozbayoglu, A.M., Unver, H.O.: Estimation of parameters for the free-form machining with deep neural network. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pp. 2102–2111. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tibshirani, R.: Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. Roy. Stat. Soc.: Ser. B (Methodol.) 58(1), 267–288 (1996)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Wicaksono, H.: An integrated method for information and communication technology (ICT) supported energy efficiency evaluation and optimization in manufacturing: knowledge-based approach and energy performance indicators (EnPI) to support evaluation and optimization of energy efficiency. Ph.D. thesis, Dissertation, Karlsruhe, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. worldsteel: Energy use in the steel industry. Technical report, worldsteel (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yoo, H., Park, D.: AI-based 3D food printing using standard composite materials. In: Data Science and Digital Transformation in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, pp. 123–135 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, C., Zheng, X.: Customization strategies between online and offline retailers. Omega 100, 102230 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zou, H., Hastie, T.: Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Stat. Methodol.) 67(2), 301–320 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hendro Wicaksono .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Aikenov, T., Hidayat, R., Wicaksono, H. (2024). Power Consumption and Process Cost Prediction of Customized Products Using Explainable AI: A Case in the Steel Industry. In: Silva, F.J.G., Ferreira, L.P., Sá, J.C., Pereira, M.T., Pinto, C.M.A. (eds) Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing: Establishing Bridges for More Sustainable Manufacturing Systems. FAIM 2023. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38165-2_135

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38165-2_135

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38164-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38165-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics