Skip to main content

Equivalent Circuit Modelling and Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practical Control of Electric Machines for EV/HEVs

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 1064))

Abstract

In this chapter, an equivalent circuit model is derived for analysis of the torque-slip characteristics and efficiency of induction machines. This model is not intended for transient dynamic analysis. A more representative model for dynamic analysis will be developed in the next chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Connection of the illustrated three-phase winding gives rise to a single pole-pair electric machine. However, three-phase motors are commonly configured with multiple pole pairs.

  2. 2.

    Three phases can be connected in either a Y or \(\varDelta \)  manner. Y connection is more widely used in automotive and is adopted in this book, but \(\varDelta \) connection also has its applications as it can produce a rather high power and starting torque.

  3. 3.

    Clockwise or anticlockwise rotation of the magnetic field depends on the configuration of phase winding arrangement. If two phases are swopped in space, or if the phase current excitation sequence is changed to ACB instead of ABC, the magnetic field will rotates in a clockwise direction.

  4. 4.

    This principle is generic for AC machines.

  5. 5.

    The notation of \(\omega _{r}\) is also often used in this book for simplicity sake.

  6. 6.

    Hereinafter, the stator speed is referred to as the stator flux rotating speed in this book.

  7. 7.

    Flux is the result of MMF and the magnetic reluctance of the corresponding magnetic path.

  8. 8.

    Here \(\omega _{re}\) is referred to as the electrical rotating speed of the rotor. \(\omega _{re} = N_p\omega _{r}\) as defined by Eq. (2.1).

  9. 9.

    The notations of I and \(I^*_r\) as the rotor current at the stator side will be used exchangeably in this section. It is also called the torque current later on.

  10. 10.

    This is only valid in the relatively high frequency range. Extra voltage is required to compensate the stator resistance loss (and etc.) to maintain the desired magnetic strength, and the therefore constant machine torque.

  11. 11.

    In this case, the maximum torque is achieved with the optimal slip under the constant phase voltage.

  12. 12.

    This method of boosting the phase voltage has an issue when the stator frequency is at or very close to zero. At that range, offset compensation is more effective than scaling compensation.

  13. 13.

    This is a rms value, which shall not be confused with the peak value used in the vector torque control in Chap. 6.

  14. 14.

    By the voltage control alone, the air-gap flux and torque current are coupled to derive the demanded machine torque. By contrast, the vector control decouples the air-gap flux and torque current to regulate torque.

  15. 15.

    Due to the numerical errors, the continuous current is not truly constant in the constant power region.

  16. 16.

    The use of the equivalent model as in Fig. 2.15 for phase diagram analysis is not recommended.

  17. 17.

    When using the magnitude instead of the rms value, the torque is given as \(T_{em}=3/2N_p \overline{\varPsi }_m \overline{I_r^*} \sin (\delta )\).

  18. 18.

    \(\times \) is the cross-product operation for vectors.

  19. 19.

    The copper loss here refers to the conductor loss irrespective of copper or aluminum rotor cage.

  20. 20.

    \({\displaystyle \langle \cdot ,\cdot \rangle }\) is the inner product operation for vectors.

  21. 21.

    IM motors have good efficiency at high speeds, attributed to a low core loss compared to the PM motors.

References

  1. Bose BK et al (2002) Modern power electronics and AC drives, vol 123. Prentice hall Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brittain J (1990) Thevenin’s theorem. IEEE Spectr 27(3):42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gundogdu T, Zhu ZQ, Chan CC (2022) Comparative study of permanent magnet, conventional, and advanced induction machines for traction applications. World Electric Veh J 13(8):137–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin WM, Su TJ, Wu RC (2011) Parameter identification of induction machine with a starting no-load low-voltage test. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 59(1):352–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Melkebeek JA (2018) Electrical machines and drives. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  6. Van der Merwe C, Van der Merwe F (1995) A study of methods to measure the parameters of single-phase induction motors. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 10(2):248–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Moons C, De Moor B (1995) Parameter identification of induction motor drives. Automatica 31(8):1137–1147

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Nam KH (2018) AC motor control and electrical vehicle applications. CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  9. Popescu M, Goss J, Staton DA, Hawkins D, Chong YC, Boglietti A (2018) Electrical vehicles–practical solutions for power traction motor systems. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 54(3):2751–2762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sen PC (2021) Principles of electric machines and power electronics. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  11. Toliyat HA, Levi E, Raina M (2003) A review of RFO induction motor parameter estimation techniques. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 18(2):271–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Trzynadlowski AM (2000) Control of induction motors. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuiwen Shen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shen, S., Chen, Qz. (2024). Equivalent Circuit Modelling and Analysis. In: Practical Control of Electric Machines for EV/HEVs . Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 1064. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38161-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38161-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38160-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38161-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics