Skip to main content

Engaging the Flexibility Paradox: Working from Home and Work-Family Conflict Among Working Adults in South Africa

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Work-Life Balance in Africa

Abstract

Working from home is widely embraced by many workers and organisations as a useful strategy for achieving better work-life balance. As evidenced by the exigencies of the COVID-19 pandemic, working from home has become a new norm for many working adults, as flexible working arrangements continue to hold sway across many countries. That said, recent debates in the work-family literature suggest that home-based telecommuting presents a paradox whereby such work arrangements potentially increase workers’ experiences of work-family conflict, resulting in poor work-life balance. Drawing from retrospective secondary data on South African workers (n = 727) in the 2015 International Social Survey Programme, this study provides evidence of the relationship between working from home and work-family conflict. Our study results show that working from home during usual working hours increased work-to-family conflict (B = 0.150, p < 0.05) and family-to-work conflict (B = 0.166, p < 0.05) among individuals in paid employment after controlling for well-established sociodemographic variables (such as age, sex, years of schooling, weekly working hours). While the flexibility paradox has become a topical concern following the COVID-19 pandemic, this study underscores the pitfalls of working from home for workers’ work-family balance and the need to adopt working from home with some caution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrefa Busia, K. (2022). Married working women and work-family interface in urban Ghana: A holistic approach (PhD Thesis). Lingnan University. Retrieved from, https://commons.ln.edu.hk/otd/149/

  • Abrefa Busia, K., Arthur-Holmes, F., & Chan, A. H. N (2023). COVID-19’s silver linings: Exploring the impacts of work–family enrichment for married working mothers during and after the COVID-19 partial lockdown in Ghana. Journal of Family Studies, 29(4), 1923–1945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adisa, T. A., Aiyenitaju, O., & Adekoya, O. D. (2021). The work-family balance of British working women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 13(2), 241–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adisa, T. A., Antonacopoulou, E., Beauregard, T. A., Dickmann, M., & Adekoya, O. D. (2022). Exploring the impact of COVID-19 on employees’ boundary management and work–life balance. British Journal of Management, 33(4), 1694–1709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, A., Lethiais, V., Rallet, A., & Proulhac, L. (2016). Home-based telework in France: Characteristics, barriers and perspectives. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 92(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2012). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, C., & Lousã, E. P. (2021). Telework and work–family conflict during COVID-19 lockdown in Portugal: The influence of job-related factors. Administrative Sciences, 11(103), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annink, A., den Dulk, L., & Steijn, B. (2016). Work–family conflict among employees and the self-employed across Europe. Social Indicators Research, 126, 571–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardayfio-Schandorf, E. (2006). The family in Ghana: Past and present perspectives. In Y. Oheneba-Sakyi & B. K. Takyi (Eds.), African families at the turn of the 21st century (pp. 129–152). Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J. T. (2006). Making the leap. HR Magazine, 51(5), 80–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baard, N., & Thomas, A. (2010). Teleworking in South Africa: Employee benefits and challenges. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(1), Article #298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Dollard, M. F. (2008). How job demands affect partners’ experience of exhaustion: Integrating work-family conflict and crossover theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 901–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baruch, Y. (2000). Teleworking: Benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 15(1), 34–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauregard, T. A., & Henry, L. C. (2009). Making the link between work-life balance practices and organisational performance. Human Resource Management Review, 19(1), 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beutell, N. J. (2007). Self-employment, work-family conflict and work-family synergy: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 20(4), 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boell, S. K., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., & Campbell, J. (2016). Telework paradoxes and practices: The importance of the nature of work. New Technology, Work and Employment, 31, 114–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breaugh, J. A., & Farabee, A. M. (2012). Telecommuting and flexible work hours: Alternative work arrangements that can improve the quality of work life. In N. Reilly, M. Sirgy, & C. Gorman (Eds.), Work and quality of life (pp. 251–274). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, S., & Fox, M. (2011). Working from home: Leisure gain or leisure loss? In S. Cameron (Ed.), Handbook on the economics of leisure (pp. 128–152). Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Caulfield, B. (2015). Does it pay to work from home? Examining the factors influencing working from home in the Greater Dublin Area. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 3(2), 206–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, H. (2022). The flexibility paradox: Why flexible working leads to (self-)exploitation. Policy Press and Bristol University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, H., Seo, H., Forbes, S., & Birkett, H. (2020). Working from home during the Covid-19 lockdown: Changing preferences and the future of work. University of Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. M., Hislop, D., & Cartwright, S. (2016). Social support in the workplace between teleworkers, office-based colleagues and supervisors. New Technology, Work and Employment, 31(2), 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. H., & Moschler, J. J. (2009). The benefits and limitations of telecommuting. Defense AR Journal, 16(1), 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, K., & Tumagole, B. (2020, May 22). A pragmatic inquiry into employee’s lived experiences in relation to COVID-19 lockdown in South Africa. AfricArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31730/osf.io/m8jg4

  • Crandall, W., & Gao, L. (2005). An update on telecommuting: Review and prospects for emerging issues. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 70(3), 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felstead, A., & Henseke, G. (2017). Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well-being and work-life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32(3), 195–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felstead, A., Jewson, N., Phizacklea, A., & Walters, S. (2002). Opportunities to work at home in the context of work-life balance. Human Resource Management Journal, 12(1), 54–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GESIS (Ed.). (2017). ISSP 2015—Work orientations IV, Variable Report: Documentation release 2017/08/30, related to the international dataset Archive-Study-No. ZA6770 Version 2.1.0. Variable Reports 2017|23. Cologne: GESIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J., Blackwell, C., Dominics, P., & Demerath, N. (2002). Telecommuting in the 21st century: Benefits, issues, and a leadership model which will work. Journal of Leadership and Organisational Studies, 8(4), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, C., Wallace, L., & Spurgeon, P. (2013). An exploration of the psychological factors affecting remote e-worker’s job effectiveness, well-being and work-life balance. Employee Relations, 35, 527–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbrecht, M., & Lero, D. S. (2014). Self-employment and family life: Constructing work–life balance when you’re ‘always on’. Community, Work & Family, 17(1), 20–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E., Ferris, M., & Märtinson, V. (2003). Does it matter where you work? A comparison of how three work venues (traditional office, virtual office, and home office) influence aspects of work and personal/family life. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 63(2), 220–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, D. C., Chauhan, R. S., Soderberg, A. T., & Buckley, M. R. (2020). Paradigm shifts caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Organisational Dynamics, 50(4), 100804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, A. (2021). “Two hours extra for working from home”: Reporting on gender, space, and time from the Covid-field of Delhi, India. Gender, Work & Organisation, 28(S2), 405–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, A. (2022). Work-from/at/for-home: CoVID-19 and the future of work—A critical review. Geoforum, 128, 33–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISSP Research Group. (2017). International social survey programme: Work orientations IV—ISSP 2015. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA6770 Data file Version 2.1.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12848.

  • Jones, F., Burke, R. J., & Westman, M. (2006). Work-life balance: Key issues. In F. Jones, R. J. Burke, & M. Westman (Eds.), Work-life balance: A psychological perspective (pp. 1–9). Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63(1), 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, E. L., Moen, P., & Tranby, E. (2011). Changing workplaces to reduce work-family conflict schedule control in a white-collar organization. American Sociological Review, 76(2), 265–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, A., & Kramer, K. Z. (2021). Putting the family back into work and family research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 126. Article 103564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurland, N. B., & Bailey, D. E. (1999). Telework: The advantages and challenges of working here, there, anywhere and anytime. Organisational Dynamics, 28(2), 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott, Y., & Chung, H. (2016). Gender discrepancies in the outcomes of schedule control on overtime hours and income in Germany. European Sociological Review, 32(6), 752–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, S. (2006). Work and family conflict: Can home-based teleworking make a difference? International Journal of Organisation Theory and Behavior, 9(3), 307–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manochehri, G., & Pinkerton, T. (2003). Managing telecommuters: Opportunities and challenges. American Business Review, 27(1), 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mello, J. A. (2007). Managing telework programs effectively. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 19, 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munodawafa, M., & Zengeni, F. (2022). Working from home, care work and shifting gender roles for dual-career couples during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study of urban Zimbabwe. Agenda, 36(2), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palumbo, R. (2020). Let me go to the office! An investigation into the side effects of working from home on work-life balance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(6–7), 771–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petts, R. J., Carlson, D. L., & Pepin, J. R. (2020). A gendered pandemic: Childcare, homeschooling, and parents’ employment during COVID-19. Gender, Work and Organisation, 28(S2), 515–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purwanto, A., Asbari, M., Fahlevi, M., Mufid, A., Agistiawati, E., Cahyono, Y., & Suryani, P. (2020). Impact of Work from Home (WFH) on Indonesian teachers’ performance during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(5), 6235–6244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, M. M., Maynard, W. S., & McDevitt, J. R. (2003). Telecommuting: Managing the safety of workers in home office environments. Professional Safety, 48(4), 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, C., & Lewis, S. (2001). Home-based telework, gender, and the synchronisation of work and family: Perspectives of teleworkers and their coresidents. Gender, Work and Organisation, 8, 123–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L., Liu, T., & Wang, W. (2022). Working from home in urban China during the COVID-19 pandemic: Assemblages of work-family interference. Work, Employment and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170221080870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugwu, F. O., Enwereuzor, I. K., & Mazei, J. (2022). Is working from home a blessing or a burden? Home demands as a mediator of the relationship between work engagement and work-life balance. Applied Research Quality Life. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-022-10084-6

  • van der Lippe, T., & Lippényi, Z. (2020). Beyond formal access: Organisational context, working from home, and work–family conflict of men and women in European workplaces. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 383–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilhelmson, B., & Thulin, E. (2016). Who and where are the flexible workers? Exploring the current diffusion of telework in Sweden. New Technology, Work and Employment, 31(1), 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vyas, L., & Butakhieo, N. (2021). The impact of working from home during CoVID-19 on work and life domains: An exploratory study on Hong Kong. Policy Design and Practice, 4(1), 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, D. (2012). Work-life balance, travel-to-work, and the dual career household. Personnel Review, 41(6), 813–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, A. H., Cheung, J. O., & Chen, Z. (2020). Promoting effectiveness of ‘working from home’: Findings from Hong Kong working population under Covid-19. Asian Education and Development Studies, 10(2), 210–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwaku Abrefa Busia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Abrefa Busia, K., Agbadi, P., Mokomane, Z. (2023). Engaging the Flexibility Paradox: Working from Home and Work-Family Conflict Among Working Adults in South Africa. In: Ajonbadi, H.A., Mordi, C., Adekoya, O.D. (eds) Work-Life Balance in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38008-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics