Abstract
Semiotics, a transdisciplinary, interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary approach to formal learning environments captures the transnational, multicultural, virtual and physical worlds in which education transpires. Global, fast, reliable, accurate communications and demographic diaspora have stimulated cross-cultural interactions. People moving about through electronic space and geographic space have propagated cross-cultural interactions. Higher education has been well-suited to leverage these two factors – mobility across electronic space and geographic space- to attract learners from across borders and cultures, but the space is fraught with cultural assumptions inhibiting learning outcomes. Addressing semiotic design features directs learning environment design toward visual and socio-cultural appeal and using multiple modes for more than just instruction, they may enhance appeal and interest. Semiotics describes meaning-making as a tripartite process, semiosis. The semiosis process relates the learner’s filtering culture and experiences to the learning environment including the instructional content and context and the learner’s interpretation. A learner or observer derives knowledge and meaning from the learning environment as interpreted through their lived experiences and cultural values. For decades marketing researchers and practitioners have successfully used semiotic features such as message design, encoded content, metaphors, stories, and images to attract and enlist customer loyalty. Semiotics offers insights into leveraging a learner’s culture to design appealing instruction and into framing a transdisciplinary research framework.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beaudoin, M., Kurtz, G., Jung, I., Suzuki, K., & Grabowski, B. (2013). Online learner competencies: Knowledge, skills, and attitudes for successful learning in online settings (ibstpi Book Series). Information Age.
Bishop, M. J. (2014). Instructional message design: Past, present, and future relevance. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 373–383). Springer.
Bishop, M. J., Boling, E., Elen, J., & Svihla, V. (Eds.). (2020). Handbook of research in educational communications and technology: Learning design (5th ed.). Springer.
Boling, E., Gray, C. M., Modell, M. G., Altuwaijri, A., & Jung, J. (2014). Learners interpreting instructional images: Meaning-making and decision-making strategies. Journal of Visual Literacy, 33(2), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2014.11674716
Bonnycastle, D. (2005). Educational semiotics and instructional design. Educational Technology, 45(2), 35–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/44429199
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach (Vol. 722). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6_3
Campbell, C. (2019). Educating semiosis: Foundational concepts for an ecological edusemiotic. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 38(3), 291–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-018-9617-4
Conejo, F., & Wooliscroft, B. (2015). Brands defined as semiotic marketing systems. Journal of Macromarketing, 35(3), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146714531147
Cunningham, D. J. (1992). Beyond educational psychology: Steps toward an educational semiotic. Educational Psychology Review, 4, 165–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01322343
Cunningham, D. J. (1998). Cognition as semiosis: The role of inference. Theory & Philosophy, 8(6), 827–840. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354398086006
Cunningham, D. J., & Kehle, P. E. (2003). Cognitive semiotics in education. Recherches en Communication, 19(19), 35–56.
Danesi, M. (2011). Semiotics. In M. Ryan (Ed.), The encyclopedia of literary and cultural theory [online]. Wiley.
Deely, J., & Semetsky, I. (2017). Semiotics, edusemiotics, and the culture of education. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 49(3), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1190265
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The systematic design of instruction (8th ed.). Pearson.
Elhindi, Y. (2009). Metaphor. In S. Chapman & C. Routledge (Eds.), Key ideas in linguistics and the philosophy of language. Edinburgh University. https://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/edinburghilpl/metaphor
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21143
Gagné, R. (1965). The conditions of learning. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Gagné, R. (1985). The conditions of learning (4th ed.). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Gannon-Cook, R., & Ley, K. (2020). Engaging learners with semiotics. Sense/Brill.
Gannon-Cook, R., & Ley, K. (in press). Semiotic design for online learning environments. In A. Bilgari (Ed.), Open semiotics. Kimé.
Gargiulo, T. (2006). Power of stories. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 29(1), 4–8, 43.
Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). Survey of instructional development models (ED477517) (4th ed.). Syracuse University. https://eric.ed.gov
Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer.
Kinuthia, W. (2009). Reflecting on embedding socio-cultural issues into instructional design. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 3(4), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/17504970911004273
Lin, L., Atkinson, R., Savenye, W., & Nelson, B. (2016). Effects of visual cues and self-explanation prompts: Empirical evidence in a multimedia environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(4), 799–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.924531
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University.
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 43–71). Cambridge University. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.005
Mayer, R. E. (2019). Thirty years of research on online learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3482
Mayer, R. E. (2020). Searching for the role of emotions in e-learning. Learning & Instruction, 70, N.PAG. https://doi.org.uhcl.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.05.010
Mick, D. G. (1986). Consumer research and semiotics: Exploring the morphology of signs, symbols, and significance. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(2), 196–213.
Mick, D. G., Burroughs, J. E., Hetzel, P., & Brannen, M. Y. (2004). Pursuing the meaning of meaning in the commercial world: An international review of marketing and consumer research founded on semiotics. Semiotica, 152, 1–74.
Midtgarden, T. (2005). On the prospects of a semiotic theory of learning. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 37(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2005.00112.x
Nadin, M. (1988). Interface design: A semiotic paradigm. Semiotica, 69, 269–302.
Olteanu, A., Kambouri, M., & Stables, A. (2016). Predicating from an early age: Edusemiotics and the potential of children’s preconceptions. Studies in Philosophy & Education, 35(6), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-016-9526-3
Oswald, L. (2012). Marketing semiotics. Oxford University.
Pern, T. (2015). Imagination in Vico and Hobbes: From affective sensemaking to culture. Culture & Psychology, 21(2), 162–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X15575794
Pettersson, R. (2012). Introduction to message design. Journal of Visual Literacy, 31(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2012.11674702
Pikkarainen, E. (2014). Competence as a key concept of educational theory: A semiotic point of view. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 48(4), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12080
Pinson, C. (1988). Introduction to the double special issue on semiotics and marketing communication research. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 4(3), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(88)80002-8
Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part I: A history of instructional media. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504506
Reser, D., Simmons, M., Johns, E., Ghaly, A., Quayle, M., Dordevic, A. L., Dordevic, A. L., Tare, M., McArdle, A., Willems, J., & Yunkaporta, T. (2021). Australian aboriginal techniques for memorization: Translation into a medical and allied health education setting. PLoS One, 16(5), e0251710.A. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251710%0A
Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Tracey, M. W. (2011). The instructional design knowledge base: Theory, research, and practice. Routledge.
Saxena, M. (2011). Learner analysis framework for globalized e-learning: A case study. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 12(5), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i5.954
Seel, N. M. (1999). Educational semiotics: School learning reconsidered. Journal of Structural Learning and Intelligent Systems, 14(1), 11–28.
Seif, F. Y. (2016). Can design inquiry advance edusemiotics? Rethinking factual information and imaginative interpretation. Semiotica, 212, 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0122
Seif, F. Y. (2017). Transdisciplinarity of edusemiotics: Revealing mutual reciprocities between design and semiotics. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 13(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2017-0002
Shank, G. (1992). Educational semiotic: Threat or menace? Educational Psychology Review, 4(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01322344
Sobocińska, M. (2016). Premises and potential for the application of semiotics in marketing research. Oeconomia, 15(1), 123–132. https://aspe.sggw.edu.pl/article/view/408
Strand, T. (2013). Peirce’s rhetorical turn: Conceptualizing education as semiosis. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(7), 789–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00837.x
Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). When graphics improve liking but not learning from online lessons. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1618–1625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.026
Young, P. (2009). Instructional design frameworks and intercultural models. Information Science. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-426-2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ley, K., Gannon-Cook, R. (2023). Instructional Design and Semiotics. In: Hokanson, B., Exter, M., Schmidt, M.M., Tawfik, A.A. (eds) Toward Inclusive Learning Design. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37697-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37697-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-37696-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-37697-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)