Abstract
This last chapter concludes with the thesis that we must not absolutize cultural differences, but at the same time avoid the currently highly fashionable tendencies to deny any boundaries between cultures. As mentioned in the chapter on methodology, while these boundaries certainly exist, they are by no means fixed, but rather dynamic and variable. Only on such a basis can we understand the specifically Chinese concept of humanism, and only in this way can it be integrated into the framework of a new global ethics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Antweiler, C. (2010). Pankulturelle Universalien Basis für einen inklusiven.
Kai, M., & Wenzel, C. (2016). Chinese perspectives on free will. In K. Timpe, M. Griffith, & N. Levy (Eds.), The Routledge companion to free will (pp. 374–388). Routledge.
Laozi. (n.d.). In Chinese text project, pre-Qin and Han. Retrieved August 10, 2021, from https://ctext.org/dao-de-jing
Schmidt-Glintzer, H. (2010). Chancen für einen globalen Humanismus im Kampf der Kulturen. In J. Rüsen (Ed.), Perspektiven der Humanität (pp. 131–149). transcript Verlag.
Xu, F. 徐復觀. (1987). Zhongguo renxing lun shi 中國人性論史 (The theory of human nature). Huadong shifan daxue chuban she.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rošker, J.S. (2023). Conclusion: Essentialist View of Human Self or Panhumanist Universalism?. In: Humanism in Trans-civilizational Perspectives. Emerging Globalities and Civilizational Perspectives. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37518-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37518-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-37517-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-37518-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)