Skip to main content

What Do We Mean by ‘Industrial Agriculture’? The Example of the Irish Dairy Sector

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Paul B. Thompson's Philosophy of Agriculture
  • 59 Accesses

Abstract

The term ‘industrial’ agriculture is often used in academia, the media, and by campaigning groups to denote a type of agriculture that is undesirable. The term is often not defined, but has connotations of environmental damage, poor animal welfare and working conditions, corporate control and homogenous, soulless food. This paper explores the ambiguity of the term ‘industrial’ agriculture and asks why and in what context the term has use as an analytic concept, through the examples of pasture-based dairy sector in Ireland. The Irish dairy sector markets itself as the antithesis of industrial agriculture: small, family farms producing seasonal milk from grass, which is bought and sold by farmer cooperatives. This system is often contrasted with indoor dairy farming where cows do not graze which is framed by some campaigners and academics as polluting, cruel to animals, and disenfranchising for farmer. The situation is more complicated on closer analysis as the Irish dairy industry has undergone rapid and environmentally damaging expansion in recent years, within a pasture-based, family farm paradigm, which has threatened its public licence. The paper argues that when using the term ‘industrial agriculture’ and similar terms as an analytic concept, it is useful to focus on the values and governance regime underpinning a particular farm system as well as the physical infrastructure of the farming system, i.e., what the farm looks like. This builds on Paul Thompson’s work analyzing the philosophy and values underpinning developments within agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allaire, G., and S.A. Wolf. 2004. Cognitive Representations and Institutional Hybridity in Agrofood Innovation. Science Technology and Human Values 29 (4): 431–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243904265896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, J.D., and C.C. Hinrichs. 2011. Informal and Formal Mechanisms of Coordination in Hybrid Food Value Chains. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems and Community Development 1 (4): 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, R.J.F., Wilson, G.A. 2012. The Rejuvenation of Productivist Agriculture: The Case for ‘Cooperative Neo- Productivism’. In: Rethinking Agricultural Policy Regimes: Food Security, Climate Change and the Future Resilience of Global Agriculture (Research in Rural Sociology and Development, Vol. 18). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limite, pp. 51–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1057-1922(2012)0000018005

  • Carolan, M.S. 2005. Disciplining Nature: The Homogenising and Constraining Forces of Anti-Markets on the Food System. Environmental Values 14: 363–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIWF. n.d. Report on the Welfare of EU Dairy Cows. Surrey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapp, J. 2014. Financialization, Distance and Global Food Politics. Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (5): 797–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Climate Change Advisory Council. 2020. Annual Review 2020. Dublin: Climate Change Advisory Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • DAFM. 2010. Food Harvest Food Harvest 2020: A Vision for Irish Agro-Food and Fisherie. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Dublin. Available at: https://www.agriculture.gov.ie/media/migration/agri-foodindustry/foodharvest2020/2020FoodHarvestEng240810.pdf

  • Daugbjerg, C., and A. Swinbank. 2012. An Introduction to the ‘New’ Politics of Agriculture and Food. Policy and Society 31(4). Policy and Society Associates Ltd Partnership: 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.10.002.

  • Department of Agriculture Food and the Marine. 2021. Food Vision 2030. Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, E., B. Moran, J. Lennon, et al. 2019. Teagasc National Farm Survey 2018 Preliminary Results. Athenry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, T., T. Hennessey, and F. Thorn. 2015. The End of the Quota Era: A History of the Dairy Sector and its Future Prospects. Athenry.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA. 2019. Submission on Proposed Strategy for the Irish Agri-Food Sector to 2030. Wexford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garzon, I. 2006. Reforming the Common Agricultural Policy: A History of Paradigm Change. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giraud, E.H. 2019. What Comes after Entanglements? Activism, Anthropocentrism, and an Ethics of Exclusion. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D. 2004. Rural Europe Redux? Reflections on Alternative Agro-Food Networks and Paradigm Change. Sociologia Ruralis 44 (1): 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00258.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D., B. Sorj, and J. Wilkinson. 1987. From Farming to Biotechnology: A Theory of Agro-Industrial Development. New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houser, M., and D. Stuart. 2020. An Accelerating Treadmill and An Overlooked Contradiction in Industrial Agriculture: Climate Change and Nitrogen Fertilizer. Journal of Agrarian Change 20 (2): 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, C., and M. Murphy. 2015. Building a Resilient, Flourishing, Internationally Competitive Dairy Industry in Ireland. Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFA. 2015a. Liquid Milk Handbook. Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFA. 2015b. Towards a ‘Milk Wise 2025’ Strategy for Irish Produced Fresh Milk. Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A. 2020. Is it Just About Grazing? UK Citizens Have Diverse Preferences for How Dairy Cows Should be Managed. Journal of Dairy Science 103(4). American Dairy Science Association: 3250–3263. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17111.

  • Kautsky, K. 1988. The Agrarian Question. Michigan: Zwan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingshay. 2018. Dairy Production Systems Report 2018. Glastonbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, T., Heasman, M. 2004. Food Wars: The Global Battle for Mouths, Minds and Markets. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leip, A., F. Weiss, T. Wassenaar, et al. 2010. Evaluation of the Livestock Sector’s Contribution to the EU Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GGELS)—Final Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levidow, L. 2008. European quality agriculture as an alternative bio-economy. In: Reconstructing biotechnologies: critical social analyses, 2008, pp. 185–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levidow, L., K. Birch, and T. Papaioannou. 2013. Divergent Paradigms of European Agro-Food Innovation: The Knowledge-Based Bio-Economy (KBBE) as an R&D Agenda. Science, Technology & Human Values 38: 94–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912438143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, P., A. Woods, A. Liddon, et al. 2009. Strategic Land Use For Ecosystem Services. In What Is Land For? The Food, Fuel and Climate Change Debate, ed. Winter, M., and M. Lobley, London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maarten, H. 2003. Policy Without Polity Policy Analysis and the Institutional Void. Policy Sciences: 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024834510939

  • March, M.D., M.J. Haskell, M.G.G. Chagunda, et al. 2014. Current trends in British dairy management regimens. Journal of Dairy Science 97(12). Elsevier: 7985–94. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8265.

  • Marsden, T., R. Munton, S. Whatmore, et al. 1986. Towards a Political Economy of Capitalist Agriculture: A British Perspective. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 4: 498–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, T.K., R. Munton, S. Whatmore, et al. 1989. Strategies for Coping in Capitalist Agriculture: An Examination of the Responses of Farm Families in British Agriculture. Geoforum 20 (1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R., and A. Macken-Walsh. 2016. An Actor-Oriented Approach to Understanding Dairy Farming in a Liberalised Regime: A Case Study of Ireland’s New Entrants’ Scheme. Land Use Policy 58(November 2016): 537–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.025

  • Miele, M., I. Veissier, A. Evans, et al. 2011. Animal Welfare: Establishing a Dialogue Between Science and Society. Animal Welfare 20: 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J., T. Marsden, and J. Banks. 2000. Quality, Nature, and Embeddedness : Some Theoretical Considerations in the Context of the Foods. Economic Geography 76 (2): 107–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Milk Agency. 2016. Annual Report and Accounts 2016. Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, T. 2015. Dairy Advisory Services Since the Introduction of EU Milk Quotas. Athenry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, S. 2017. Ireland Agriculture Emissions are Uniquely High in Europe. Dubiln. Available at: https://www.irishtimes.com/news/environment/ireland-s-agriculture-emissions-are-uniquely-high-in-europe-1.2973873 (Accessed 11 August 2021)

  • Potter, C., Tilzey, M. 2005. Agricultural policy discourses in the European post-Fordist transition: neoliberalism, neomercantilism and multifuntionality. Progress in Human Geography 581: 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Promar International Limited. 2003. Strategic Development Plan for the Irish Dairy Processing Sector. Stapeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, C. 2017. The Imperative for Regenerative Agriculture. Science Progress 100 (1): 80–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, J., and S.A. Garner. 2014. Industrial Farm Animal Production: A Comprehensive Moral Critique. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (3): 479–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-014-9497-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, K.A. 2013. Animal Machines : The Public Response to Intensification in Great Britain , c . Animal Machines : The Public Response to Intensification in Great Britain , c . 1960-c . 1973. Agricultural History (September 2013): 473–501. https://doi.org/10.3098/ah.2013.87.4.473.

  • Shortall, O.K., and A. Lorenzo-Arribas . 2022. Dairy Farmer Practices and Attitudes Relating to Pasture-Based and Indoor Production Systems in Scotland. PLoS ONE 17(2 February): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262268.

  • Shortall, O. 2019. Cows Eat Grass, Don’t They? Contrasting Sociotechnical Imaginaries of the Role of Grazing in the UK and Irish Dairy Sectors. Journal of Rural Studies 72(September). Elsevier: 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.004.

  • Sonnino, R., Marsden, T. 2006. Beyond the divide: rethinking relationships between alternative and conventional food networks in Europe. Journal of Economic Geography 6(2): 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbi006

  • Stuart, D., and M. Houser. 2018. Producing Compliant Polluters: Seed Companies and Nitrogen Fertilizer Application in U.S. Corn Agriculture. Rural Sociology 83 (4): 857–881. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.B. 1995. The Spirit of the Soil. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.B. 2008a. Agrarian Philosophy and Ecological Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (4): 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9094-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.B. 2008b. The Agricultural Ethics of Biofuels: A First Look. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (2): 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-007-9073-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.B. 2010. The Agrarian Vision: Sustainability and Environmental Ethics. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.B., and J. Otieno Ouko. 2008. The Ethics of Agricultural Intensification: An Interdisciplinary and International Conversation. In The Ethics of Intensification: Agricultural Development and Cultural Change. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventura, B., and C. Croney. 2019. To meet the ethical imperative of telos in modern dairy production: Societal concerns for naturalness, animal welfare and opportunities for resolution through science. In The Welfare of Cattle, ed. Engle, T., D.J. Klingbor, and B. E. Rollin, Boca Ranton: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, N. 1993. The Agricultural Treadmill and the Rural Environment in Teh Post-Productivist Era. Sociologia Ruralis XXXIII: 348–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G.A. 2007. Multifunctional Agriculture: A Transition Theory Perspective. Wallingford: CABI.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, M., M. Lobley, H. Chiswell, et al. 2016. Is There a Future For the Small Family Farm in the UK? London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, P. 2010. Beyond Industrial Agriculture? Some Questions about Farm Size, Productivity and Sustainability. Journal of Agrarian Change 10 (3): 437–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Animal Protection. 2016. Full Fact Milk Making the Right Choices. London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orla Shortall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shortall, O. (2023). What Do We Mean by ‘Industrial Agriculture’? The Example of the Irish Dairy Sector. In: Noll, S., Piso, Z. (eds) Paul B. Thompson's Philosophy of Agriculture. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol 34. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37484-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics