Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Green Liveable Urban Futures: The Integration of Nature-Based Solutions into Planning as a Strategy for Regreening the Post-oil City

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Future of Liveable Cities

Part of the book series: Footprints of Regional Science ((VRS))

  • 133 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter identifies nature-based solutions and their possible implementation in the urban system. It discusses the numerous health benefits that result from applying the concepts of urban renaturalisiation and regreening, and explores the question: How can cities best integrate nature-based solutions to confront the challenges posed by unhealthy conditions, including decreasing air quality, the loss of biodiversity, and excessive urban heat? The chapter discusses the opportunities and benefits of applying the concept of renaturalisiation through nature-based solutions (NBS) in urban planning with the aim to enhance urban resilience and curb species extinction, which can be applied in two areas: through the conception of new green neighbourhoods; and the regeneration and regreening of existing but neglected parts of the city, such as postindustrial brownfields or economically weak districts. The chapter is structured in three parts. Firstly, it consists of a brief critical review of the literature and examples of urban planning conducted in this sense. Given the renewed interest in green space in cities—for physical and mental health, sport, enjoyment, relief from extreme high temperatures (moderating heat islands) and improving air quality, the chapter then articulates the definition of the specific problem. Finally, it introduces a strategic planning approach for NBS through proposals for action to solve the problem and apply best practices. Urban greenery has the potential to improve the environmental performance of public space and neighbourhoods; however, choosing the most effective specimen of trees and vegetation is important as it contributes to the resilience of urban green spaces and to the general health and well-being in cities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akbari, H., Pomerantz, M., & Taha, H. (2001). Cool surfaces and shade trees to reduce energy use and improve air quality in urban areas. Solar Energy, 70, 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberti, M., & Marzluff, J. (2004). Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems: Linking urban patterns to human and ecological functions. Urban Ecosystem, 7(3), 241–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASHRAE. (2010). Guideline 10P. Public Review, ASHRAE, Atlanta, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astell-Burt, T., & Xiaoqi, F. (2021, June 9). People’s Odds of Loneliness Could Fall by Up to Half if Cities Hit 30% Green Space Targets. The Conversation. Available Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benyus, J. (2002). Biomimicry-innovation inspired by nature. Harper Collins Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, D., Buyung-Ali, L., Knight, T. M., et al. (2010). Urban Greening to cool towns and cities: A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landscape Urban Planning, 97(3), 147–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Penguin Modern Classic.

    Google Scholar 

  • CPRE. (2018). State of Brownfield: An analysis demonstrating the potential of Brownfield Land for housing. Campaign to Protect Rural England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronon, W. (1995). The trouble with wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong nature. In William Cronon (Ed.), Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature (pp. 69–90). W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1637). Discourse on Method (Original: Discours de la Méthode pour bien Conduire sa Raison et Chercher la Verité dans les Sciences), Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doick, K., Peace, A., & Hutchings, T. R. (2014). The role of one large greenspace in mitigating London’s nocturnal urban heat island. Science Total Environment, 493, 662–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Union Commission, DG Research and Innovation. (2015). Towards an EU Research and Innovate Policy Agenda for Nature-based Solutions and Re-naturing Cities. Horizon 2020 Expert group on ‘Nature-based Solutions and Re-naturing Cities’ (p. 70). European Commission, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union Commission. (2017). Nature-based solutions: Innovating with nature. European Commission, Brussels (accessed 10 July 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union Commission. (2019). EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: Bringing back Nature into our Lives, European Commission, Brussels (accessed 10 November 2020), A Comprehensive List of NBS Measures with a Link to the NBS Atlas, Available Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2020). Nature-based solutions—State of the art in EU-funded projects; 2020 Report. https://ec.europa.eu/info/news/new-publication-what-nature-based-solutions-can-do-us-2020-jul-16_en

  • Fairchild, T. (1722). The city gardener. T. Woodward, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, B. (2021). How to avoid a climate disaster, the solutions we have and the breakthroughs we need. A. Knopf Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girardet, H. (2008). Cities, people, planet: Urban development and climate change (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinde, B., & Patil, G. G. (2009). Biophilia: Does visual contact with nature impact on health and well-being? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6(9), 2332–2343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand, K., Freeman, C., Seddon, P. J., & van Heezik, Y. (2017). The importance of urban gardens in supporting children’s biophilia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 114(2), 274–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawken P., Lovins A., & Lovins H. (1999). Natural capitalism. Creating the next industrial revolution. Little Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal, M. R., Kumar, P., & Harrison, R. M. (2012). Particles, air quality, policy and health. Chemical Society Reviews, 41(19), 6606–6630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (IEA). (2018). World Energy Outlook 2018, Paris, report. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2018 (accessed 10 November 2020).

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of GlobalWwarming of 1.5°C above Pre-industrial Levels.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). (2019). Global Standard for nature-based solutions: A user-friendly framework. https://www.iucn.org/theme/nature-based-solutions

  • Kabisch, N., Frantzeskaki, N., Pauleit, S., & Naumann, S. (2016). Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: Perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and oppurtunities for action. Ecololy and Society, 21(2), 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S. (2011). Biophilic design. The architecture of life. Movie, Tamarack Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, S. (2010). The principles of green urbanism. Transforming the city for sustainability. Earthscan, London (Chinese Edition, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, S. (2015). Urban microclimates: Mitigating urban heat stress. In S. Lehmann (Ed.), Low carbon cities: Transforming urban systems (p. 251f). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, S. (2017). The challenge of transforming a low-density city into a compact city. In J. H. P. Bay, & S. Lehmann (Eds.), Growing compact. Urban form, density and sustainability (pp. 69–93). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, S. (2018, June). Implementing the urban nexus approach for improved resource-efficiency of developing cities in Southeast-Asia. Journal of City, Culture and Society, 13(6), 46–56. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2017.10.003 (accessed 10 November 2020).

  • Lehmann, S. (2019a). Urban regeneration: A manifesto for transforming UK cities in the age of climate change. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, S. (2019b). Reconnecting with nature: Developing urban spaces in the age of climate change. Emerald Open Research. Sustainable Cities Gateway.: https://emeraldopenresearch.com/articles/1-2 (accessed 10 April 2021).

  • Lennon, M., & Scott, M. (2014). Delivering ecosystems services via spatial planning: Reviewing the possibilities and implications of a green infrastructure approach. Town Planning Review, 85(5), 63–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennon, M. (2014). Green infrastructure and planning policy: A critical assessment. International Journal of Justice Sustainability, 20, 957–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, J. E. (1979). Gaia, a new look at life on Earth. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, J., & Jacobs, S. (2017). Nature-based solutions for Europe’s Sustainable Development. Conservation Letters, 10(1), 121–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHarg, I. (1969). Design with nature. Doubleday/Natural History Press; Falcon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D., Meadows, D. L., Randers J., & Behrens III, W. (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books (1971 Report/1972 Book).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining Urban Resilience, a review. Landscape Urban Planning, 147, 38–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mell, I. C. (2017). Green infrastructure: Reflections on past, present and future praxis. Landscape Research, 42(2), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1250875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell T., & Harris, K. (2012). Resilience: A risk management approach. Background Note ODI, Overseas Development Institute, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neves, J., & Francke, I. (2012). Creative product design using biomimetics. Design and Nature VI: Comparing Design in Nature with Science and Engineering, 4, 149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics. (2016). Small area population estimates 2015. Office for National Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauleit S., Jones N., Nyhuus S., Pirnat, J., & Salbitano, F. (2005). Urban forest resources in European Cities. In C. Konijnendijk, K. Nilsson, T. Randrup (Eds.), Urban forests and trees. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrotti, D., & Stremke, S. (2018, September). Can urban metabolism models advance green infrastructure planning? Environment and Planning, 47(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808318797131

  • Rachel, K., & Stephen, K. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Register, R. (1987). Eco-city Berkeley: Building cities for a healthy future. North Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, N. (2018). Losing Earth: The decade we almost stopped climate change. New York Times (accessed 10 August 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi, A. R., Baig S., & Verdone M. (2015). Ecosystems based adaptation: Knowledge gaps in making an economic case for investing in nature based solutions for climate change. IUCN 48, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, M., & Mell, I. (2013). Negotiating value and priorities: Evaluating the demands of green infrastructure development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(5), 650–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roger, U. (1993). Biophobia, S.B.; Landscapes, N. In S. A. Kellert & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The Biophilia Hypothesis. Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sailor, D. J. (2014). A holistic view of the effects of urban heat island mitigation. In S. Lehmann (Ed.), Low carbon cities: Transforming urban systems (pp. 270–281). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santamouris, M., & Osmond, P. (2020). Increasing green infrastructure in cities: Impact on ambient temperature, air quality and heat-related mortality and morbidity. Buildings, 10, 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10120233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, K., Fragkias, M., & Boone, C. G. (2015). Trees grow on money: Urban tree canopy cover and environmental justice. PLoS ONE, 10(4), e0122051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, D. F., Lin, B. B., Bush, R., Gaston, K. J., Dean, J. H., Barber, E., & Fuller, R. A. (2015). Toward improved public health outcomes from urban nature. American Journal for Public Health, 105(3), 470–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharifi, E., Lehmann, S., & Zawarus, P. (2021). Optimisation of urban cooling strategies for parking lots in hot and dry climates: Case Study of Las Vegas and Adelaide. In M. Santamouris, U. Eicker & N. Enteria (Eds.),Urban heat island mitigation. Hot and humid regions (pp. 169–182). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, F., Weller, R., McCloskey, K., & Fleming, B. (Eds.). (2019). Design with nature now. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudjic, D., & Sayer, P. (1993). 100-mile city. Mariner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansley, A. G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16(3), 284–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN-Habitat. (2020). The Value of Sustainable Urbanization, World Cities Report. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat), Nairobi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, J. (2018). Domino-effect of climate events could move Earth into a ‘Hothouse’ state. The Guardian. London (accessed 10 August 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1984). The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woo, F., Wortmann J., Schurig S., & Leidreiter, A. (2014). Regenerative urban development: A roadmap to the city we need. World Future Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, N. H., & Yu, C. (2005). Study of green areas and urban heat island in a tropical city. Habitat International, 29(3), 547–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Forum on Natural Capital. (2018). What is natural capital? (accessed 10 July 2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, H. (2011). Understanding green infrastructure: The development of a contested concept in England. Local Environment, 16(10), 1003–1019. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2011.631993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xing, Y., Jones, P., & Donnison, I. (2017). Characterisation of nature-based solutions for the built environment. Sustainability, 9, 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010149

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Architecture, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA

    Steffen Lehmann

Authors
  1. Steffen Lehmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffen Lehmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Research on Innovation and Services for Development (IRISS)—National Research Council (CNR), Naples, Italy

    Luigi Fusco Girard

  2. Faculty of Management, The Open University, Heerlen, The Netherlands

    Karima Kourtit

  3. Faculty of Management, The Open University, Heerlen, The Netherlands

    Peter Nijkamp

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lehmann, S. (2023). Green Liveable Urban Futures: The Integration of Nature-Based Solutions into Planning as a Strategy for Regreening the Post-oil City. In: Fusco Girard, L., Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P. (eds) The Future of Liveable Cities. Footprints of Regional Science(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37466-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation