Skip to main content

In-Against-Beyond Metrics-Driven University: A Marxist Critique of the Capitalist Imposition of Measure on Academic Labor

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave International Handbook of Marxism and Education

Part of the book series: Marxism and Education ((MAED))

Abstract

This chapter addresses the metrics-driven university through the lens of Marxist critique. Contemporary university is discussed as metrics-driven due to the increasing role of metrics in coordinating academic endeavor on a global scale. This coordination of activities within the science and higher education sector through measure is at the same time discussed as a precondition for the capitalist structurization of contemporary university. This is because the imposition of capitalist relations within the university is tantamount to the process of leveling and making the heterogenous reality of science and higher education commensurate and ready for valorization. Thus, Marxist critique is introduced in stark contrast with other critical approaches to measure operating within the sector, for which capital’s presence is a blind spot. In particular, two specific positions that to a great degree monopolized the discussion on the measure: the reformist approach, highlighting the need to develop responsible use of metrics; and the rejectionist approach, which focuses on the need to refute quantitative metrics. In contrast to these two approaches, Marxist critique is discussed as an integral perspective that approaches the problem of measure on several interconnected levels. First, it discusses assumptions underpinning the presence of capitalist measure to better understand what image of science and higher education is produced and naturalized. Second, it engages with the critique of the political economy of measure in the sector. Third, Marxian critique follows struggles over measure. Finally, it asks what may lie beyond the capitalist measure. By discussing these levels, Marxian critique of the capitalist imposition of measure on academic labor is introduced as a way out of limitations caused by the deadlock of reformist and rejectionist approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, G. (2008). Mapping Academic Resistance in the Managerial University. Organization, 15(2), 251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arboledas-Lérida, L. (2020). Capital and the Scientific Endeavour. An Appraisal of Some Marxist Contributions to the Debate on the Commodification of Science. Critique, 48(4), 321–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arboledas-Lérida, L. (2021). On the Coercive Nature of Research Impact Metrics: The Case Study of Altmetrics and Science Communication. Social Epistemology, 35(5), 461–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balibar, E. (2017). The Philosophy of Marx. Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, D. (2016). Metric Power. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, M., & Seeber, B. K. (2016). The Slow Professor: Challenging the Culture of Speed in the Academy. University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bernal, J. D. (2012). Science in History. Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brembs, B., Huneman, P., Schönbrodt, F., Nilsonne, G., Susi, T., Siems, R., et al. (2021). Replacing Academic Journals. Zenodo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, R. (2012). Living with the H-Index? Metric Assemblages in the Contemporary Academy. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 355–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, H. (1994). Reading Capital Politically. Antitheses Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Angelis, M. (2017). Omnia Sunt Communia: On the Commons and the Transformation to Postcapitalism. Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Angelis, M., & Harvie, D. (2009). ‘Cognitive Capitalism’ and the Rat-Race: How Capital Measures Immaterial Labour in British Universities. Historical Materialism, 17(3), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2016). Engines of anxiety: Academic rankings, reputation, and accountability. Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (1998). Commensuration as a Social Process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 313–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Z., & Sandoval, M. (2018). Metric Power and the Academic Self: Neoliberalism, Knowledge and Resistance in the British University. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 16(1), 214–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, L. (1935). Scientific Observation and Perception in General (Eds. R. S. Cohen & Th. Schnelle), 1986, pp. 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flink, T., & Peter, T. (2018). Excellence and Frontier Research as Travelling Concepts in Science Policymaking. Minerva, 56, 431–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2005). The Order of Things. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, G., & McLaughlin, P. (Eds.). (2009). The Social and Economic Roots of the Scientific Revolution: Texts by Boris Hessen and Henryk Grossmann. Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, B. (2006a). On the Origins of Bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 68(1), 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godin, B. (2006b). The Knowledge-Based Economy: Conceptual Framework or Buzzword? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godin, B. (2007). From Eugenics to Scientometrics: Galton, Cattell, and Men of Science. Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 691–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current Market Rates for Scholarly Publishing Services [Version 2; Peer Review: 2 Approved]. F1000Research, 10, 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. (2014). On the Abolition of Academic Labour: The Relationship Between Intellectual Workers and Mass Intellectuality. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 12(2), 822–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R., & Bowles, K. (2016). Re-Engineering Higher Education: The Subsumption of Academic Labour and the Exploitation of Anxiety. Workplace: A Journal for Academic Labor, 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, J., & Ringel, L. (2023). The Discursive Resilience of University Rankings. Higher Education, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2011). Commonwealth. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2013). A companion to Marx’s Capital, volume II. Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, A., & Curry, S. (2018). Evaluation Woes: We’re on it, Responds DORA. Nature, 559(7712), 32–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazelkorn, E. (2011). Measuring World-Class Excellence and the Global Obsession with Rankings. In Handbook on Globalization and Higher Education. Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., De Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. (2015). Read Capital: The First Sentence; or, Capital Starts with Wealth, Not with the Commodity. Historical Materialism, 23(3), 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2008). A Cultural Political Economy of Competitiveness and Its Implications for Higher Education. In Education and the Knowledge-Based Economy in Europe (pp. 11–39). Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzeski, J. (2021). How to Imagine a Non-Capitalist Measure? Going Beyond the Value Production with Spinoza’s Concept of Expression. Critique, 49(3–4), 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krzeski, J. (2022). Power and Agency Within the Evaluative State: A Strategic–Relational Approach to Quantification of Higher Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzeski, J., Szadkowski, K., & Kulczycki, E. (2022). Creating Evaluative Homogeneity: Experience of Constructing a National Journal Ranking. Research Evaluation, 31(3), 410–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kula, W. (2014). Measures and Men. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M. (2009). How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era. PLoS One, 10(6), e0127502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarato, M. (1996). Immaterial Labor. Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics, 1996, 133–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebowitz, M. A. (2003). Beyond Capital? Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lebowitz, M. A. (2021). Between Capitalism and Community. Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lordon, F. (2014). Willing Slaves of Capital: Spinoza and Marx on Desire. Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (2016). The Quantified Self. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1969). Theses on Feuerbach. In Marx/Engels Selected Works (Vol. 1). Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1978). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume One (Trans. B. Fowkes). Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezzadra, S. (2018). In the Marxian Workshops: Producing Subjects. Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S., Neylon, C., Paul Eve, M., Paul O’Donnell, D., & Pattinson, D. (2017). “Excellence R Us”: University Research and the Fetishisation of Excellence. Palgrave Communications, 3(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münch, R. (2014). Academic Capitalism: Universities in the Global Struggle for Excellence. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neary, M., & Winn, J. (2016). Beyond Public and Private: A Framework for Co-Operative Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (2012). The Evaluative State, Institutional Autonomy and Re-Engineering Higher Education in Western Europe: The Prince and His Pleasure. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Negri, A. (1991). Marx Beyond Marx: Lessons on the Grundrisse. Autonomedia/Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, H. (Ed.). (2006). Cultures of Technology and the Quest for Innovation (Vol. 9). Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posada, A., & Chen, G. (2018). Inequality in Knowledge Production: The Integration of Academic Infrastructure by Big Publishers. ELPUB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puehringer, S., Rath, J., & Griesebner, T. (2021). The Political Economy of Academic Publishing: On the Commodification of a Public Good. PLoS One, 16(6), e0253226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, J. (2022). The Production of Subjectivity: From Transindividuality to the Commons. In The Production of Subjectivity: Marx and Philosophy (pp. 342–363). Brill.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Readings, B. (1996). The University in Ruins. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitz, T. (2017). Academic Hierarchies in Neo-Feudal Capitalism: How Status Competition Processes Trust and Facilitates the Appropriation of Knowledge. Higher Education, 73, 871–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roggero, G. (2011). The Production of Living Knowledge: The Crisis of the University and the Transformation of Labor in Europe and North America. Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. (2018). Another Science is Possible: A Manifesto for Slow Science. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szadkowski, K. (2016a). Socially Necessary Impact/Time: Notes on the Acceleration of Academic Labor, Metrics and the Transnational Association of Capitals.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szadkowski, K. (2016b). Towards an Orthodox Marxian Reading of Subsumption (s) of Academic Labour Under Capital. Workplace: A Journal for Academic Labor, 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szadkowski, K. (2019). An Autonomist Marxist Perspective on Productive and Un-Productive Academic Labour. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 17(1), 111–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szadkowski, K., & Krzeski, J. (2019a). In, Against, and Beyond: A Marxist Critique for Higher Education in Crisis. Social Epistemology, 33(6), 463–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szadkowski, K., & Krzeski, J. (2019b). Political Ontologies of the Future University: Individual, Public, Common. Philosophy and Theory in Higher Education, 1(3), 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szadkowski, K., & Krzeski, J. (2022). Conceptualizing Capitalist Transformations of Universities: Marx’s Relevance for Higher Education Research. Critique, 50(1), 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Slow Science Academy. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. http://slow-science.org/slow-science-manifesto.pdf

  • Toscano, A. (2011). Divine management. Angelaki, 16(3), 125–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vostal, F. (2016). Accelerating Academia: The Changing Structure of Academic Time. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, J. (2021). Stratifying Academia: Ranking, Oligarchy and the Market-Myth in Academic Audit Regimes. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie sociale, 29(4), 907–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbers, S., & Brankovic, J. (2021). The Emergence of University Rankings: A Historical-Sociological Account. Higher Education, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilsdon, J. (2016). The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winn, J. (2015). The Co-Operative University: Labour, Property and Pedagogy. Power and Education, 7(1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, P. (1999). The Citation Culture. Universiteit van Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff, S. (2020). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

I want to express deep gratitude to editors for their comments and support. Special thanks are due to Krystian Szadkowski for an ongoing critical dialogue that inspired and continue to inspire me in different academic endeavors. All standard caveats apply.

Disclosure Statement

The author has no financial interest or benefit that has arisen from the direct applications of this research.

Funding

The work of Jakub Krzeski was financially supported by the National Science Centre in Poland (NCN), Grant number UMO-2019/33/N/HS6/00434

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jakub Krzeski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Krzeski, J. (2023). In-Against-Beyond Metrics-Driven University: A Marxist Critique of the Capitalist Imposition of Measure on Academic Labor. In: Hall, R., Accioly, I., Szadkowski, K. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Marxism and Education. Marxism and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37252-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37252-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-37251-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-37252-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics