Abstract
This chapter employs several Marxist concepts to explore the role of high-stakes, standardized tests within capitalist-oriented reforms and policies in the United States. Starting with a materialist history of the rise of standardized testing within the context of capitalist schooling, this chapter then moves on to analyze the role of testing in the quantification of students, teaching, and learning for use within systems of educational policy built around quasi-free markets. This chapter then argues that, instead of measuring teaching and learning, modern-day high-stakes standardized tests actually measure what Marx referred to as socially necessary labor time. The conclusion of this chapter briefly discusses resistance to high-stakes, standardized testing and offers some suggestions for alternative assessments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adam, E. K., Heissel, J. A., Hittner, E. F., Doleac, J. L., Meer, J., & Figlio, D. (2017). Adolescent Cortisol Responses to High-Stakes Testing in School-Based Settings. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 83, 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.07.465
Amnesty International. (2016, January 19). Exposed: Child Labour Behind Smart Phone and Electric Car Batteries. Amnesty International. Retrieved October 27, 2021, from https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2016/01/child-labour-behind-smart-phone-and-electric-car-batteries/
Amrein-Beardsley, A. (2014). Rethinking Value-Added Models in Education: Critical Perspectives on Tests and Assessment-Based Accountability. Routledge.
Au, W. (2007). High-Stakes Testing and Curricular Control: A Qualitative Metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267.
Au, W. (2009). High-Stakes Testing and Discursive Control: The Triple Bind for Non-standard Student Identities. Multicultural Perspectives, 11(2), 65–71.
Au, W. (2011). Teaching Under the New Taylorism: High-Stakes Testing and the Standardization of the 21st Century Curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2010.521261
Au, W. (2016). Meritocracy 2.0: High-Stakes, Standardized Testing as a Racial Project of Neoliberal Multiculturalism. Educational Policy, 30(1), 39–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904815614916
Au, W. (2018). A Marxist Education: Learning to Change the World. Haymarket Books.
Au, W. (2023). Unequal by Design: High-Stakes Testing and the Standardization of Inequality (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Berlak, H. (2000). Cultural Politics, the Science of Assessment and Democratic Renewal of Public Education. In A. Filer (Ed.), Assessment: Social Practice and Social Product (pp. 189–207). RoutledgeFalmer.
Berliner, D. C. (2013). Effects of Inequality and Poverty vs. Teachers and Schooling on America’s Youth. Teachers College Record, 115(12). https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311501203
Blanton, C. K. (2003). From Intellectual Deficiency to Cultural Deficiency: Mexican Americans, Testing, and Public School Policy in the American Southwest, 1920–1940. Pacific Historical Review, 72(1), 39–62.
Boeckenstedt, J. (2020, January 10). Some Final Thoughts on the SAT and ACT. Jon Boeckenstedt’s Admissions Weblog. Retrieved October 30, 2021, from https://jonboeckenstedt.net/2020/01/10/some-final-thoughts-on-the-sat-and-act/?fbclid=IwAR0ZBvh7hPkbbniDlD8Arnigl-xhKu5-ubb3fx2vlhvkefO42tPs9penL0c
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life (1st ed.). Basic Books.
Brosio, R. A. (1994). A Radical Democratic Critique of Capitalist Education (1st ed.). Peter Lang.
Bush, G. W. (1999, October 5). The Future of Educational Reform. Retrieved May 2, 2014, from http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/bush_speech.htm
Callahan, R. E. (1964). Education and the Cult of Efficiency: A Study of the Social Forces That Have Shaped the Administration of the Public Schools (First Phoenix Edition). University of Chicago Press.
Chang, T. Y., & Kajackaite, A. (2019). Battle for the Thermostat: Gender and the Effect of Temperature on Cognitive Performance. PLoS ONE, 14(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216362
Chapman, P. D. (1988). Schools as Sorters: Lewis M. Terman, Applied Psychology, and the Intelligence Testing Movement, 1890–1930. New York University Press.
Chen, Z., Hursh, D., & Lingard, B. (2021). The Opt-Out Movement in New York: A Grassroots Movement to Eliminate HGH-Stakes Testing and Promote Whole Child Public Schooling. Teachers College Record, 123(5), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812112300504
Counts, G. S. (1927). The Social Composition of Boards of Education: A Study in the Social Control of Public Education. Arno Press & The New York Times.
Creighton, J. V. (2006, March 13). It Doesn’t Test for Success. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2006-mar-13-oe-creighton13-story.html
Day, I. (2016). Alien Capital: Asian Racialization and the Logic of Settler Colonial Capitalism. Duke University Press.
De Lissovoy, N., & McLaren, P. (2003). Educational “accountability” and the Violence of Capital: A Marxian Reading. Journal of Educational Policy, 18(2), 131–143.
Fabricant, M., & Fine, M. (2013). The Changing Politics of Education: Privatization and the Dispossessed Lives Left Behind. Paradigm Publishers.
Garber, M. D., Stanhope, K. K., Cheung, P., & Gazmararian, J. A. (2018). Effect of Cardiorespiratory Fitness on Academic Achievement Is Stronger in High-SES Elementary Schools Compared to Low. Journal of School Health, 88(10), 707–716.
Gates Jr., B. (2009, July 21). Speech Delivered to the National Conference of State Legislatures. National Conference of State Legislatures. Retrieved May 5, 2014, from http://www.gatesfoundation.org/media-center/speeches/2009/07/bill-gates-national-conference-of-state-legislatures-ncsl
Goodman, J., Hurwitz, M., Park, J., & Smith, J. (2018). Heat and Learning. Working Paper No. 24639. National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w24639
Gould, S. J. (1996). The Mismeasure of Man (Rev. and expanded.). Norton.
Hagopian, J. (2014). Our Destination Is Not on the MAP. In More Than a Score: The New Uprising Against High-Stakes Testing (pp. 31–47). Haymarket Books.
Haney, W. (1984). Testing Reasoning and Reasoning About Testing. Review of Educational Research, 54(4), 597–654.
Heissel, J. A., Adam, E. K., Doleac, J. L., Figlio, D., & Meer, J. (2021). Testing, Stress, and Performance: How Students Respond Physiologically to High-Stakes Testing. Education Finance and Policy, 16(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00306
Hikida, M., & Taylor, L. A. (2020). “As the test collapses in”: Teaching and Learning Amid High-Stakes Testing in Two Urban Elementary Classrooms. Urban Education, 1–29. https://doi.org/org/10.1177/0042085920902263
Jennings, J. L., & Bearak, J. M. (2014). “Teaching to the test” in the NCLB Era: How Test Predictability Affects Our Understanding of Student Performance. Educational Researcher, 43(8), 381–389. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14554449
Jones, G. M., Jones, B. D., & Hargrove, T. Y. (2003). The Unintended Consequences of High-Stakes Testing. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Karp, S. (2006). Bandaids Or Bulldozers?: What’s Next for NCLB. Rethinking Schools, 20(3). Retrieved May 2, 2014, from https://rethinkingschools.org/articles/band-aids-or-bulldozers/
Karp, S. (2014). The Problems with the Common Core. Rethinking Schools, 28(2). Retrieved May 2, 2014, from http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/28_02/28_02_karp.shtml
Karp, S. (2016). ESSA: NCLB Repackaged. Rethinking Schools, 30(3). Retrieved February 17, 2017, from http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/30_03/30-3_karp.shtml
Katwala, A. (2018, May 8). The Spiralling Environmental Cost of Our Lithium Battery Addiction. Wired. Retrieved October 27, 2021, from https://www.wired.co.uk/article/lithium-batteries-environment-impact
Kidder, W. C., & Rosner, J. (2002). How the SAT Creates “built-in headwinds”: An Educational and Legal Analysis of Disparate Impact. Santa Clara Law Review, 43, 131–212.
Kornhaber, M. L., & Orfield, G. (2001). High-Stakes Testing Policies: Examining Their Assumptions and Consequences. In G. Orfield & M. L. Kornhaber (Eds.), Raising Standards Or Raising Barriers?: Inequality and High-Stakes Testing in Public Education (pp. 1–18). Century Foundation Press.
Kuo, M., Browning, M. H. E. M., Sachdeva, S., Lee, K., & Westphal, L. (2018). Might School Performance Grown on Trees? Examining the Link Between “greenness” and Academic Achievement in Urban, High-Poverty Schools. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(1669), 1–14.
Lapayese, Y. V. (2007). Understanding and Undermining the Racio-Economic Agenda of No Child Left Behind: Using Critical Race Methodology to Investigate the Labor of Bilingual Children. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 10(3), 309–321.
Lemann, N. (1999). The Big Test: The Secret History of the American Meritocracy. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Lipman, P. (2004). High Stakes Education: Inequality, Globalization, and Urban School Reform. RoutledgeFalmer.
Marx, K. (1842). Debates on the Law on the Theft of Wood. Articles from the Rheinische Zeitung. Retrieved January 12, 2023, from https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/Marx_Rheinishe_Zeitung.pdf
Marx, K. (1967). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy (S. M. & E. Aveling, Trans.; Vol. 1). International Publishers.
Mayorga, E., Aggarwal, U., & Picower, B. (Eds.). (2020). What’s Race Got to Do with It: How Current School Reform Policy Maintains Racial and Economic Inequality (2nd ed.). Peter Lang.
McNeil, L. M. (2000). Contradictions of School Reform: Educational Costs of Standardized Testing. Routledge.
McNeil, L. M. (2005). Faking Equity: High-Stakes Testing and the Education of Latino Youth. In A. Valenzuela (Ed.), Leaving Children Behind: How “Texas-style” Accountability Fails Latino Youth (pp. 57–112). State University of New York.
Meier, D., & Knoester, M. (2017). Beyond Testing: Seven Assessments of Students and Schools More Effective Than Standardized Tests. Teachers College Press.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform (p. 65). United States Department of Education.
National Poverty Center. (2017). Poverty in the United States: Frequently Asked Questions. National Poverty Center: Poverty Facts. http://www.npc.umich.edu/poverty/
Nearing, S. (1917). Who’s Who on Our Boards of Education. School and Society, V.
Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2007). Collateral Damage: How High-Stakes Testing Corrupts America’s Schools. Harvard Education Press.
Pizmony-Levy, O., & Saraisky, N. G. (2016). Who Opts Out and Why? Results from a National Survey on Opting Out of Standardized Tests. Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved November 16, 2021, from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiZ0K6dwp30AhWGDjQIHdKhBwUQFnoECCEQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tc.columbia.edu%2Fmedia%2Fnews%2Fdocs%2FOpt_Out_National-Survey%2D%2D%2D%2DFINAL-FULL-REPORT.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1YySXYhIfgOv2LUV7sbY-k
Pizmony-Levy, O., & Saraisky, N. G. (2021). Why Did They Protest? Stability and Change in the Opt-Out Movement, 2016–2018. Teachers College Record, 123(5), 1–30. https://doi.org/0.1177/016146812112300503
Popham, W. J. (2001). The Truth About Testing: An Educator’s Call to Action. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Rosner, J. (2012). The SAT: Quantifying the Unfairness Behind the Bubbles. In J. A. Soares (Ed.), SAT Wars. Teachers College Press.
Santelices, M. V., & Wilson, M. (2010). Unfair Treatment?: The Case of Freedle, the SAT, and the Standardization Approach to Differential Item Functioning. Harvard Educational Review, 80(1), 106–133.
Selden, S. (1999). Inheriting Shame: The Story of Eugenics and Racism in America. Teachers College Press.
Sievertsen, H. H., Gino, F., & Piovesan, M. (2016). Cognitive Fatigue Influences Students’ Performance on Standardized Tests. PNAS, 113(10), 2621–2624. https://doi.org/www.pnas.org/cgi/doe/10.1073/pnas.1516947113
Terman, L. (1916). The Measure of Intelligence. Houghton Mifflin.
Timar, T., & Tyack, D. (1999). The Invisible Hand of Ideology: Perspectives from the History of School Governance (SE-99-3; p. 23). Education Commission of the States. http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/13/55/1355.doc
U.S. Department of Education. (2002). No Child Left Behind: A Desktop Reference. U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Under Secretary. Educational Resources and Information Center (ERIC).
U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Race to the Top Program Executive Summary. U.S.
Valenzuela, A., Prieto, L., & Hamilton, M. P. (2007). No Child Left Behind and Minority Youth: What the Qualitative Evidence Suggests. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 38(1), 1–8.
Viera, M. (2018, October 1). The History of HTE SAT Is Mired in Racism and Elitism. Teen Vogue. https://www.teenvogue.com/story/the-history-of-the-sat-is-mired-in-racism-and-elitism
Weber, M. (2016, April 27). The PARCC Silly Season. Jersey Jazzman. http://jerseyjazzman.blogspot.com/2016/04/the-parcc-silly-season.html
Wu, C.-D., McNeely, E., Cedeno-Laurent, J. G., Pan, W.-C., Adamkiewicz, G., Dominici, F., Lung, S.-C. C. L., Su, H.-J., & Spengler, J. D. (2014). Linking Student Performance in Massachusetts Elementary Schools with the “greenness” of School Surroundings Using Remote Sensing. PLoS ONE, 9(10), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108548
Disclosure Statement
The author received no financial support for this research and does not have any financial interest or benefit from the application of this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Au, W. (2023). Commodification, the Violence of Abstraction, and Socially Necessary Labor Time: A Marxist Analysis of High-Stakes Testing and Capitalist Education in the United States. In: Hall, R., Accioly, I., Szadkowski, K. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Marxism and Education. Marxism and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37252-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37252-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-37251-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-37252-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)