Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From Analogue to Digital: Evolution of Building Machines Towards Reforming Production and Customization of Housing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Architecture and Design for Industry 4.0

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

  • 587 Accesses

Abstract

The construction of edifices is all about lifting, moving and setting components according to predefined patterns. The magnitude of nineteenth century industrialization produced all manner of machines, lifts and earthmovers to facilitate construction, in addition to easing the pressures on manual labor. Along the same tactical interests, the Bessemer converter and gantry cranes were invented for advancing manufacturing and facilitating standardization of building parts. Robert Le Tourneaux’s Tournalayer, perhaps the most unique building machine, made it possible to mold buildings like a mega-cookie cutter by casting reinforced concrete in moveable steel formwork. The outcome of such experiments cultivated transformations in the building process, even if they were not widely utilized. Recent advancements in digital fabrication machines in the form of Computer Numerically Controlled (CNC) cutting and milling tools, bricklaying drones, and large-scale 3D printing robots, coupled with computational design processes, are driving new possibilities in design and construction. Multiple levels of design variation are feasible, reforming standardized industrial models into user-centric, and contextually driven singular designs. The chapter aims to critically examine how contemporary digitally controlled building machines are part of a spectrum of devices linked to mechanization and how they present potentials for the democratization of housing provision. Accompanied by an analysis of how the fourth industrial revolution is impacting construction, we present a detailed overview of the evolution of building machines, with a specific focus on concrete casting machines used to produce dwellings. Then, we critically analyze the parallels between traditional casting equipment invented for mass production and today's robotic fabrication to deliver inhabitable prototypes. As a conclusion to the chapter and an opening to further research, a generative framework that stems from linking digital design with production machines is proposed for implementing customization in the industrialized housing sector, one that has long been connoted by the lack of design personalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hwang, D., Yao, K.-T., Yeh, Z., Khoshnevis, B.: Mega-scale fabrication by contour crafting. Int. J. Ind. Syst. Eng. 1(3), 301–320 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. n.d. Apis cor. Accessed Dec 2021. https://www.apis-cor.com/dubai-project

  3. n.d. Batiprint3D. Accessed 2020. https://www.batiprint3d.com/en

  4. Begić, H., Galić, M.: A systematic review of construction 4.0 in the context of the BIM 4.0 premise. Buildings 11(8), 337 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bessemer, H.: (1865). USA Patent US49055A

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boissonneault, T.: A tour of the 3D printed houses in Sharjah, UAE built with CyBe. (2019). Accessed Feb 2022. https://www.3dprintingmedia.network/cybe-construction-3d-print-houses-sharjah-uae/

  7. Bos, F., Wolfs, R., Ahmed, Z., Salet, T.: Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 11(3), 209–225 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bredt, R.: Catalogue of cranes. Ludwig Stuckenholz publisher, Düsseldorf (1894)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davies, C.: The prefabricated home. Reaktion Books, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, H.: The culture of building. Oxford University Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dini, E.: D shape: The 21st century revolution in building technology has a name. (2009). http://www.cadblog.pl/podcasty/luty_2012/d_shape_presentation.pdf. Accessed 2018

  12. Dini, E.: Method and Device for the automatic construction of conglomerate building structures. (2008). Italy Patent ITPI20050031

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dini, E., Nannini, R., Chiarugi, M.: WIPO (PCT) Patent WO2006100556A2, (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Duarte, J.P.: A discursive grammar for customizing mass housing: the case of Siza’s houses at Malagueira. Autom. Constr. 14, 265–275 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Customizing mass housing: a discursive grammar for Siza's Malagueira houses. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Duarte, J.P.: Towards the mass customization of housing: the grammar of Siza’s houses at Malagueira. Environ. Plann. B. Plann. Des. 32, 347–380 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Edison, Thomas. 1917. Process of constructing concrete buildings. United States Patent 1219272.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Eid Mohamed, B., Carbone, C.: Mass customization of housing: A framework for harmonizing individual needs with factory produced housing. Buildings 12, 955 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  19. El Jazzar, M., Urban, H., Schranz, C. and Nassereddine, H.: Construction 4.0: A roadmap to shaping the future of construction. In: Proceedings of the 37th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2020), pp. 1314–1321. Kitakyushu, Japan (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  20. El-Sayegh, S., Romdhane, L., Manjikian, S.: A critical review of 3D printing in construction: benefits, challenges, and risks. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 20 (34). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-020-00038-w

  21. Emerging objects. (n.d.). Accessed Dec 2021. http://emergingobjects.com/project/quake-column/

  22. Everett E., Henderson Jr.: Making the tool to make the thing: The production of R.G. Letourneau’s prefabricated concrete homes. Offsite: Theory and practice of Architectural Production, pp. 145–148. ACSA Fall Conference Proceedings, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  23. Finch3D. (n.d.). Accessed March 2022. https://finch3d.com/

  24. Figliola, A.: Envision the construction sector in 2050. Technological innovation and verticality. Firenze University Press, TECHNE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fitchen, J.: Building construction before mechanization. MIT Press, Cambridge (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gramazio, F., Kohler, M., Willmann, J.: The robotic touch: how robots change architecture. Park Books, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hammond, Jr John Hays.: United States Patent US2499498A. (1947)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hennebique, F.: France Patent 223546. (1892)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Icon. (n.d.). Accessed February 2022. https://www.iconbuild.com/

  30. Jr., Henderson, E.: Making the tool to make the thing: The production of R.G. Letourneau’s prefabricated concrete homes. In: Quale, J., Ng, R., Smith, R.E. (eds.) Offsite: Theory and practice of Architectural Production, ACSA Fall conference proceedings

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kagermann, H. and Wahlster, W.: Ten years of industrie 4.0. Sci 4(3), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/sci4030026

  32. Khoshnevis, B.: Automated construction by contour crafting—Related robotics and information technologies. Autom. Constr. 13, 5–19 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Khoshnevis, B., Dutton, R.: Innovative rapid prototyping process makes large sized, smooth surfaced complex shapes in a wide variety of materials. Mater. Technol. 13(2), 53–56 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lambot, Joseph-Louis.: France (1855)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Langenberg, E.: Mapping 20 years of 3D printing in architecture. (2015). Accessed 2021. https://www.elstudio.nl/?p=1904

  36. Larson, K., Tapia, M.A. and PintoDuarte, J.: A new epoch: automated design tools for the mass customization of housing. A+U 366, 116–121 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Leatherbarrow, D.: Uncommon ground: architecture, technology, and topography. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Letourneau, R.G.: Outer form for house form assembly. United States Patent US2717436A. (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  39. MakerBot.: Mechanical hands from a makerbot: The magic of robohand. 3/22. (2013). Accessed 13 April 2021

    Google Scholar 

  40. www.makerbot.com. https://www.makerbot.com/stories/engineering/robohand/.

  41. McSweeney, E.: Automation finds home in building design. Financial Times. (2020). https://www.ft.com/content/e36ba45e-f973-11e9-a354-36acbbb0d9b6.

  42. Merwood-Salisbury, J.: Chicago 1890: The Skyscraper and the modern city. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Monier, J.: France Patent 77165. (1867)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Monteyne, D.: Framing the American Dream. J. Arch. Educ. 58(1), 24–34 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nervi, P-L.: Structural prefabrication. Italy Patent 377969. (1939)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Paolini, A., Kollmannsberger, S., Rank, E.:Additive manufacturing in construction: A review on processes, applications, and digital planning methods. Addit. Manuf. 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100894

  47. Perrier, N., Bled, A., Bourgault, M., Cousin, N., Danjou, C., Pellerin, R., Roland, T.: Construction 4.0: a survey of research trends. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 25, 416–437 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Piroozfar, P.A.E., Piller, F.T.: Mass customisation and personalisation in architecture and construction. Routledge, New York (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. Sartipi, F., Sartipi, A.: Brief review on advancements in construction additive manufacturing. J. Constr. Mater. 2 (4), (2020). https://doi.org/10.36756/JCM.v1.2.4

  50. Sharples.: Manufacturing material effects: Rethinking design and making in architecture. In: Kolarevic, B., Klinger, K. (eds.). Routledge, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Slaton, A.E.: Reinforced concrete and the modernization of american building, 1900–1930. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Stephens, A.A.: United States Patent US3357685A. (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Tay, Y.W., Daniel, B.P., Paul, S.C., Mohamed, A.N.N., Tan, M.J., Leong, K.F.: 3D printing trends in building and construction industry: a review. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 12(3), 261–276 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Tracoba.: Tunnel Form concrete formwork. France Patent FR1337089. (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Neff, W.: United States Patent US2335300A. (1941)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Neff, W.: Building construction. United States Patent US2335300A. (1941)

    Google Scholar 

  57. WASP. (n.d.). Accessed Sep 2020. https://www.3dwasp.com/en/giant-3d-printer-bigdelta-wasp-12mt/#bigdelta

  58. Winsun builders. (n.d.). https://www.winsun3dbuilders.com/project/3d-printed-office-in-dubai/

  59. Van Wuyckhuyse, H.J.: Machine for shaking moulds filled with concrete. United States Patent 3357685. (1967)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculté Des Arts, UQÀM, École de Design, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Carlo Carbone & Carlo Carbone

  2. College of Arts and Creative Enterprises, Zayed University, Abu Dhabi, UAE

    Basem Eid Mohamed

Authors
  1. Carlo Carbone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Basem Eid Mohamed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlo Carbone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Meccanica, Matematica e Management, Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy

    Maurizio Barberio

  2. Dipartimento di Architettura, Costruzione e Design, Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy

    Micaela Colella

  3. Dipartimento di Pianificazione, Design e Tecnologia dell’Architettura, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy

    Angelo Figliola

  4. Dipartimento di Pianificazione, Design e Tecnologia dell’Architettura, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy

    Alessandra Battisti

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Carbone, C., Mohamed, B.E. (2024). From Analogue to Digital: Evolution of Building Machines Towards Reforming Production and Customization of Housing. In: Barberio, M., Colella, M., Figliola, A., Battisti, A. (eds) Architecture and Design for Industry 4.0. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36922-3_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36922-3_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36921-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36922-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation