Skip to main content

Ethical Issues in Emergency Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Oncologic Surgical Emergencies

Abstract

Beyond religious and political beliefs, a general code of morality and ethics is somehow innate in the human soul and must guide each and every action of any surgeon, in elective and emergency conditions. In emergency, the application of moral principles is often stretched and critical due to time-sensitive conditions and procedures. There is a growing interest in the medical community about bioethics and its application in the clinical practice, in particular with respect to law and guidelines, but also in relation to religious beliefs and social conventions, in our more and more multicultural society. Specific situations and procedures, such as medical triage, informed consent and end-of-life care, request the doctor to be deeply acquainted with the principles and applications of medical ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF, editors. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kipnis K. Triage and ethics. Virtual Mentor. 2002;4:19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ryan JM. Triage: principles and pressures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2008;34:427–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. American College of Surgeons. Committee on Trauma. Advanced trauma life support. 9th edn. Chicago; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Repine TB, Lisagor P, Cohen DJ. The dynamics and ethics of triage: rationing care in hard times. Mil Med. 2005;170:505–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Netters S, Dekker N, van de Wetering K, Hasker A, Paasman D, de Groot JW, Vissers KCP. Pandemic ICU triage challenge and medical ethics. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021;11:133–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mental Capacity Act, UK Public General Acts, United Kingdom Government. 2005. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/contents. Accessed 16 Mar 2022.

  9. Faden RR, Beauchamp TL. A history and theory of informed consent. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Benn P. Ethics. 1st ed. London: UCL Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pavlikova B, van Dijk JP. Jehovah’s witnesses and their compliance with regulations on smoking and blood treatment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA. 1985. https://www.lawteacher.net/cases/gillick-v-west-norfolk.php. Accessed 14 Mar 2022.

  13. Yefimova M, Aslakson RA, Yang L, Garcia A, Boothroyd D, Gale RC, Giannitrapani K, Morris AM, Johanning JM, Shreve S, Wachterman MW, Lorenz KA. Palliative care and end-of-life outcomes following high-risk surgery. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(2):138–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Pawlik TM, Curley SA. Ethical issues in surgical palliative care: am I killing the patient by “letting him go”? Surg Clin North Am. 2005;85:273–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferguson HJM, Ferguson CI, Speakman J, Ismail T. Management of intestinal obstruction in advanced malignancy. Ann Med Surg. 2015;4:264–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Krouse RS, Easson AM, Angelos P. Ethical considerations and barriers to research in surgical palliative care. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196:469–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pearse W, Oprescu F, Endacott J, Goodman S, Hyde M, O’Neill M. Advance care planning in the context of clinical deterioration: a systematic review of the literature. Palliat Care. 2019;12:1178224218823509.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lichtenthal WG, Kissane DW. The management of family conflict in palliative care. Prog Palliat Care. 2008;16:39–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sales E, Schulz RM, Biegel DE. Predictors of strain in families of cancer patients: a review of the literature. J Psychosocial Oncol. 1992;10:1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Asadi-Lari M, Tamburini M, Gray D. Patients’ needs, satisfaction, and health related quality of life: towards a comprehensive model. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004;2:32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghandourh WA. Palliative care in cancer: managing patients’ expectations. J Med Radiat Sci. 2016;63:242–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lilley EJ, Cooper Z, Schwarze ML, Mosenthal AC. Palliative care in surgery: defining the research priorities. J Pall Med. 2017;20:702–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tulsky JA. Beyond advance directives. Importance of communication skills at the end of life. JAMA. 2005;294:359–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Karnik S, Kanekar A. Ethical issues surrounding end-of-life care: a narrative review. Healthcare. 2016;4:24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Aghabarary M, Dehghan Nayeri N. Medical futility and its challenges: a review study. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2016;9:11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Reilly BM. Don’t learn on me. Are teaching hospitals patient-centered? N Engl J Med. 2014;371:293–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Moore FD. Ethical problems special to surgery. Surgical teaching, surgical innovation, and the surgeon in managed care. Arch Surg. 2000;135:14–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bhanot K, Chang J, Grant S, Fecteau A, Camp M. Training surgeons and the informed consent discussion in paediatric patients: a qualitative study examining trainee participation disclosure. BMJ Open Qual. 2019;8:e000559.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. McAlister C. Breaking the silence of the switch. Increasing transparency about trainee participation in surgery. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2477–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kocher MS. Ghost surgery: the ethical and legal implications of who does the operation. J Bone Joint Surg. 2002;84:148–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. New Jersey. Supreme Court. Perna v. Pirozzi. Rep Cases Argued Determ Supreme Court N J N J Supreme Court. 1983;92:446–66. https://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/supreme-court/1983/92-n-j-446-0.html. Accessed 16 Mar 2022.

  32. Lin YK, Liu KT, Chen CW, Lee WC, Lin CJ, Shi L, Tien YC. How to effectively obtain informed consent in trauma patients: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics. 2019;20:8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Adedeji S, Sokol DK, Palser T, McKneally M. Ethics of surgical complications. World J Surg. 2009;33:732–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Girdler S, Girdler J, Tarpada S, Morris M. Nonmaleficence in medical training: balancing patient care and efficient education. Indian J Med Ethics. 2019;4:129133.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tarpada SP, Morris MT, Burton DA. E-learning in orthopedic surgery training: a systematic review. J Orthop. 2016;13:425–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Aggarwal R, Mytton OT, Derbrew M, Hananel D, Heydenburg M, Issenberg B, MacAulay C, Mancini ME, Morimoto T, Soper N, Ziv A, Reznick R. Training and simulation for patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(Suppl 2):i34–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hurwitz B. Legal and political considerations of clinical practice guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318:661–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Tebala GD. History of colorectal surgery. A comprehensive historical review from the ancient Egyptians to the surgical robot. Int J Colorect Dis. 2015;30:723–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Watson A. Medical malpractice law in ancient Rome. In Watson A. Failures of the legal imagination. University of Pennsylvania Press; 1988. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.9783/9781512821574-006/html. Accessed 13 Mar 2022.

  40. Bal BS. An introduction to medical malpractice in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:339–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Price K. The art of medicine. Towards a history of medical negligence. Lancet. 2010;375:192–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tebala GD, Slack Z, Fantini V, Masato S, Parla M, Cirocchi R, Di Saverio S. Professional responsibility between guidelines and customary practice. A conflict of interest? Med Hypotheses. 2022;158:110737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hurwitz B. How does evidence based guidance influence determinations of medical negligence? BMJ. 2004;329(7473):1024–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Albrighton vs Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, 1980 2 NSWLR 542(CA), 562. https://nswlr.com.au/view/1980-2-NSWLR-542. Accessed 16 Mar 2022.

  45. Montgomery vs Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11. https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2013-0136-judgment.pdf. Accessed 16 Mar 2022.

  46. Colbrook P. Can you ignore guidelines? BMJ. 2005;330:s143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Tebala GD. The Emperor’s new clothes: a critical appraisal of evidence-based medicine. Int J Med Sci. 2018;15:1397–405.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Sartelli M, Weber DG, Kluger Y, Ansaloni L, Coccolini F, Abu-Zidan F, et al. 2020 update of the WSES guidelines for the management of acute colonic diverticulitis in the emergency setting. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15:32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Hall J, Hardiman K, Lee S, Lightner A, Stocchi L, Paquette IM, Steele SR, Feingold DL. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of left-sided colonic diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020;63(6):728–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Okamoto K, Suzuki K, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, Endo I, Iwashita Y, Hibi T, Pitt HA, Umezawa A, Asai K, Han HS, Hwang TL, Mori Y, Yoon YS, Huang WS, Belli G, Dervenis C, Yokoe M, Kiriyama S, Itoi T, Jagannath P, Garden OJ, Miura F, Nakamura M, Horiguchi A, Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, de Santibañes E, Shikata S, Noguchi Y, Ukai T, Higuchi R, Wada K, Honda G, Supe AN, Yoshida M, Mayumi T, Gouma DJ, Deziel DJ, Liau KH, Chen MF, Shibao K, Liu KH, Su CH, Chan ACW, Yoon DS, Choi IS, Jonas E, Chen XP, Fan ST, Ker CG, Giménez ME, Kitano S, Inomata M, Hirata K, Inui K, Sumiyama Y, Yamamoto M. Tokyo guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25:55–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312(7023):71–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Charlier P, Huynh-Charlier I, Poupon J, Lancelot E, Campos PF, Favier D, Jeannel G-F, Bonati MR, de la Grandmaison GL, Hervé C. A glimpse into the early origins of medieval anatomy through the oldest conserved human dissection (Western Europe, 13(th) c. a.D.). Arch Med Sci. 2014;10:366–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Baker SM, Brawley OW, Marks LS. Effects of untreated syphilis in the negro male, 1932 to 1972: a closure comes to the Tuskegee study, 2004. Urology. 2005;65:1259–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Gray FD. The Tuskegee syphilis study: the real story and beyond. Montgomery: NewSouth Books; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Friesen P, Kearns L, Redman B, Caplan AL. Rethinking the Belmont report? Am J Bioeth. 2017;17:15–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Shuster E. Fifty years later: the significance of the Nuremberg code. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1436–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310:2191–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Skloot R. The immortal life of Henrietta Lacks. New York: Crown; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni D. Tebala .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tebala, G.D., Cirocchi, R., Lazzereschi, L., Livingstone, A., Slack, Z. (2023). Ethical Issues in Emergency Surgery. In: Tarasconi, A., Bui, S., Chirica, M., Roth, G., Nahmias, J. (eds) Oncologic Surgical Emergencies. Hot Topics in Acute Care Surgery and Trauma. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36860-8_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36860-8_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36859-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36860-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics