Abstract
The recent explosion of technological innovations in mobile technology, virtual reality (VR), digital dissection, online learning platform, 3D printing, and augmented reality (AR) has provided new avenues for improving preclinical education, particularly in anatomy and histology education. Anatomy and histology are fundamental components of medical education that teach students the essential knowledge of human body structure and organization. However, these subjects are widely considered to be some of the most difficult disciplines for healthcare students. Students often face challenges in areas such as the complexity and overwhelming volume of knowledge, difficulties in visualizing body structures, navigating and identifying tissue specimens, limited exposure to learning materials, and lack of clinical relevance. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated the situation by reducing face-to-face teaching opportunities and affecting the availability of body donations for medical education.
To overcome these challenges, educators have integrated various educational technologies, such as virtual reality, digital 3D anatomy apps, 3D printing, and AI chatbots, into preclinical education. These technologies have effectively improved students’ learning experiences and knowledge retention. However, the integration of technologies into preclinical education requires appropriate pedagogical approaches and logistics to align with educational theories and achieve the intended learning outcomes.
The chapter provides practical guidance and examples for integrating technologies into anatomy, histology, and biochemistry preclinical education. The author emphasizes that every technology has its own benefits and limitations and is best suited to specific learning scenarios. Therefore, it is recommended that educators and students should utilize multiple modalities for teaching and learning to achieve the best outcomes. The chapter also acknowledges that cadaver-based anatomy education is essential and proposes that educational technologies can serve as a crucial complement for promoting active learning, problem solving, knowledge application, and enhancing conventional cadaver-based education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AbouHashem Y, Dayal M, Savanah S et al (2015) The application of 3D printing in anatomy education. Med Educ Online 20:1. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v20.29847
Ahmad K, Khaleeq T, Hanif U, Ahmad N et al (2020) Addressing the failures of undergraduate anatomy education: dissecting the issue and innovating a solution. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 61:81–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.024
Alasmari WA (2021) Medical students’ feedback of applying the virtual dissection table (Anatomage) in learning anatomy: a cross-sectional descriptive study. Adv Med Educ Pract 12:1303–1307. https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.S324520
Amer MG, Nemenqani DM (2020) Successful use of virtual microscopy in the assessment of practical histology during pandemic COVID-19: a descriptive study. J Microsc Ultrastruct 8(4):156–161. https://doi.org/10.4103/JMAU.JMAU_67_20
Amit Singh B, Surya Kumari N, Rani VS (2018) A study on student perception of virtual dissection table (Anatomage) at GSL Medical College. Rajahmundry Academia Anatomica Int 4(2). https://doi.org/10.21276/aanat.2018.4.2.8
Anand MK, Singel T (2017) A comparative study of learning with “anatomage” virtual dissection table versus traditional dissection method in neuroanatomy. Indian J Clin Anat Physiol 4(2):177–180
Anderson P, Ma M, Poyade M (2014) A haptic-based virtual reality head and neck model for dental education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54816-1_3
Backhouse S, Taylor D, Armitage JA (2019) Is this mine to keep? Three-dimensional printing enables active, personalized learning in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 12(5):518–528. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1840
Bartoletti-Stella A, Gatta V, Mariani GA et al (2021) Three-dimensional virtual anatomy as a new approach for medical student’s learning. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(24):13247. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413247
Baumgart DC, Wende I, Grittner U (2017) Tablet computer enhanced training improves internal medicine exam performance. PLoS One 12(4):e0172827. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172827
Bork F, Stratmann L, Enssle S et al (2019) The benefits of an augmented reality magic mirror system for integrated radiology teaching in gross anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 12(6):585–598. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1864
Chen S, Zhu J, Cheng C et al (2020) Can virtual reality improve traditional anatomy education programmes? A mixed-methods study on the use of a 3D skull model. BMC Med Educ 20(1):1–10
Cheung CC, Yang J (2021) Large-scale integration of virtual reality-enriched tasks (VRETs) in gross anatomy curriculum during the pandemic. FASEB J 35(S1). https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2021.35.S1.02295
Cheung CC, Cecot TS, Tipoe GL et al (2020) Using VR-enriched tasks (VRETs) to promote active learning in pre-clinical gross anatomy education. FASEB J 34(S1):1. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2020.34.s1.07575
Cheung CC, Bridges SM, Tipoe GL (2021a) Why is anatomy difficult to learn? The implications for undergraduate medical curricula. Anat Sci Educ 14(6):752–763. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2071
Cheung CC, Yang J, Tipoe GL (2021b) Multifactorial learning challenges in anatomy: what is the niche in current research? Anat Sci Educ 14(6):856–858. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2125
Chiou RJ, Tsai PF, Han DY (2017) Effects of a “silent mentor” initiation ceremony and dissection on medical students’ humanity and learning. BMC Res Notes 10(1):483. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2809-0. PMID: 28915916; PMCID: PMC5602928
Chytas D, Johnson EO, Piagkou M et al (2020) The role of augmented reality in anatomical education: an overview. Ann Anat 229:151463–151463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2020.151463
Codd AM, Choudhury B (2011) Virtual reality anatomy: is it comparable with traditional methods in the teaching of human forearm musculoskeletal anatomy? Anat Sci Educ 4(3):119–125
Cui D, Wilson TD, Rockhold RW et al (2017) Evaluation of the effectiveness of 3D vascular stereoscopic models in anatomy instruction for first year medical students. Anat Sci Educ 10(1):34–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1626
Custer T, Michael K (2015) The utilization of the anatomage virtual dissection table in the education of imaging science students. J Tomogr Simul 1:102. https://doi.org/10.4172/jts.1000102
Dee FR (2009) Virtual microscopy in pathology education. Hum Pathol 40(8):1112–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.010
Dobson D, Pearl R, Orsay C et al (2003) Virtual reality - new method of teaching anorectal and pelvic floor anatomy. Dis Colon Rectum 46:349–352. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DCR.0000054639.29160.9E
Douglas-Jones R (2017) ‘Silent mentors’: donation, education, and bodies in Taiwan. Med Anthropol Theory 4:69. https://doi.org/10.17157/mat.4.4.454
Drake RL, McBride JM, Pawlina W (2014) An update on the status of anatomical sciences education in United States medical schools. Anat Sci Educ 7(4):321–325
Ekstrand C, Jamal A, Nguyen R et al (2018) Immersive and interactive virtual reality to improve learning and retention of neuroanatomy in medical students: a randomized controlled study. Can Med Assoc Open Access J 6(1):E103–E109
Ellington DR, Shum PC, Dennis EA et al (2019) Female pelvic floor immersive simulation: a randomized trial to test the effectiveness of a virtual reality anatomic model on resident knowledge of female pelvic anatomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 26(5):897–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.003
Erolin C, Reid L, McDougall S (2019) Using virtual reality to complement and enhance anatomy education. J Vis Commun Med 42(3):93–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453054.2019.1597626
Farey JE, Bui DT, Townsend D et al (2018) Predictors of confidence in anatomy knowledge for work as a junior doctor: a national survey of Australian medical students. BMC Med Educ 18:174. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1280-5
Felszeghy SZ, Pasonen-Seppänen SM, Koskela et al (2017) Student-focused virtual histology education: do new scenarios and digital technology matter? MedEdPublish 6:10.15694/mep.2017.000154
Fredieu J, Kerbo J, Herron M et al (2015) Anatomical models: a digital revolution. Med Sci Educator 25:183–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-015-0115-9
Fruhstorfer BH, Palmer J, Brydges S, Abrahams PH (2011) The use of plastinated prosections for teaching anatomy: the view of medical students on the value of this learning resource. Clin Anat 24:246–252
Ganapathy A, Chen D, Elumalai A et al (2022) Guide for starting or optimizing a 3D printing clinical service. Methods 206:41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2022.08.003
García Martín J (2018) Possibilities for the use of anatomage (the anatomical real body-size table) for teaching and learning anatomy with the students. Biomed J Sci Tech Res 4. https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2018.04.0001094
Garcia J, Yang Z, Mongrain R et al (2018) 3D printing materials and their use in medical education: a review of current technology and trends for the future. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn 4(1):27–40. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000234
Ghosh SK (2017) Cadaveric dissection as an educational tool for anatomical sciences in the 21st century. Anat Sci Educ 10(3):286–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1649
Golenhofen N, Heindl F, Grab-Kroll C et al (2020) The use of a mobile learning tool by medical students in undergraduate anatomy and its effects on assessment outcomes. Anat Sci Educ 13(1):8–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1878
Hajj I, Dany M, Forbes W et al (2015) Perceptions of human cadaver dissection by medical students: a highly valued experience. Ital J Anat Embryol 120(3):162–171
Harmon DJ, Burgoon JM, Kalmar EL (2022) Development and assessment of an integrated anatomy mobile app. Clin Anat 35(5):686–696. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23895
Harris T, Leaven T, Heidger P et al (2001) Comparison of a virtual microscope laboratory to a regular microscope laboratory for teaching histology. Anat Rec 265(1):10–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1036
Heidger PM Jr, Dee F, Consoer D et al (2002) Integrated approach to teaching and testing in histology with real and virtual imaging. Anat Rec 269(2):107–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.10078
Hennessy CM, Kirkpatrick E, Smith CF et al (2016) Social media and anatomy education: using twitter to enhance the student learning experience in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 9(6):505–515. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1610
Iwanaga J, Loukas M, Dumont AS et al (2021a) A review of anatomy education during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: revisiting traditional and modern methods to achieve future innovation. Clin Anat 34(1):108–114
Iwanaga J, Terada S, Kim H-J et al (2021b) Easy three-dimensional scanning technology for anatomy education using a free cellphone app. Clin Anat 34(6):910–918. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23753
Izhakoff N, Abram J, Gomez F et al (2022) Utilization of virtual 3D anatomy platforms with prosected deceased donations in the teaching of female pelvic floor anatomy. FASEB J 36(S1). https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.S1.R5786
Javaid MA, Chakraborty S, Cryan JF et al (2018) Understanding neurophobia: reasons behind impaired understanding and learning of neuroanatomy in cross-disciplinary healthcare students. Anat Sci Educ 11(1):81–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1711
Jones JFX, McCaul C, Gorman L et al (2020) 3D printing in anatomy. In: Chan LK, Pawlina W (eds) Teaching anatomy: a practical guide. Springer International Publishing, pp 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43283-6_35
Kucuk S, Kapakin S, Göktaş Y (2016) Learning anatomy via mobile augmented reality: effects on achievement and cognitive load. Anat Sci Educ 9:411. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1603
Kumar RK, Freeman B, Velan GM et al (2006) Integrating histology and histopathology teaching in practical classes using virtual slides. Anat Rec B New Anat 289(4):128–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.b.20105
Lewis TL, Burnett B, Tunstall RG et al (2014) Complementing anatomy education using three-dimensional anatomy mobile software applications on tablet computers. Clin Anat 27(3):313–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22256
Li K, Kui C, Lee E et al (2017) The role of 3D printing in anatomy education and surgical training: a narrative review. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2017.000092
Little WB, Dezdrobitu C, Conan A et al (2021) Is augmented reality the new way for teaching and learning veterinary cardiac anatomy? Med Sci Educ 31(2):723–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01260-8
Lotfi F, Atouf A, Atlasi MA et al (2022) Creating three-dimensional anatomy models: effects on different aspects of learning anatomy, 27 October 2022, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2198122/v1.
Maity S, Nauhria S, Nayak N et al (2023) Virtual versus light microscopy usage among students: a systematic review and meta-analytic evidence in medical education. Diagnostics (Basel) 13(3):558. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030558
Mansouri M, Bigdeli S, Dehnad A et al (2020) Exploring the features of mobile phone application of anatomy in basic medical sciences: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ 20:231. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-0214
Maresky HS, Oikonomou A, Ali I et al (2019) Virtual reality and cardiac anatomy: exploring immersive three-dimensional cardiac imaging, a pilot study in undergraduate medical anatomy education. Clin Anat 32(2):238–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23292
McBride JM, Drake RL (2015) Student perceptions of an interprofessional educational experience: the importance of goal articulation. Anat Sci Educ 8:381–385
McBride JM, Drake RL (2018) National survey on anatomical sciences in medical education. Anat Sci Educ 11(1):7–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1760
Mcmenamin P, Quayle M, McHenry C et al (2014) The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Anat Sci Educ 7:479. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1475
Mills PC, Bradley AP, Woodall PF et al (2007) Teaching histology to first-year veterinary science students using virtual microscopy and traditional microscopy: a comparison of student responses. J Vet Med Educ 34(2):177–182. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.34.2.177
Mione S, Valcke M, Cornelissen M (2013) Evaluation of virtual microscopy in medical histology teaching. Anat Sci Educ 6(5):307–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1353
Mione S, Valcke M, Cornelissen M (2016) Remote histology learning from static versus dynamic microscopic images. Anat Sci Educ 9(3):222–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1572
Mitchell R, Batty L (2009) Undergraduate perspectives on the teaching and learning of anatomy. ANZ J Surg 79:118–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04826.x
Moro C, Štromberga Z, Raikos A et al (2017) The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 10(6):549–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1696
Moro C, Birt J, Stromberga Z et al (2021) Virtual and augmented reality enhancements to medical and science student physiology and anatomy test performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anat Sci Educ 14(3):368–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2049
Motsinger SK (2020) Complete anatomy. J Med Libr Assoc 108(1):155–157. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.853
Nakai K, Terada S, Takahara A et al (2022) Anatomy education for medical students in a virtual reality workspace: a pilot study. Clin Anat 35(1):40–44
Nguyen N, Wilson TD (2009) A head in virtual reality: development of a dynamic head and neck model. Anat Sci Educ 2(6):294–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.115
Onigbinde OA, Ajagbe AO, Oyeniran OI et al (2021) Post-COVID-19 pandemic: Standard operating procedures for gross anatomy laboratory in the new standard. Morphologie 105(350):196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.morpho.2020.10.004
Owolabi J, Bekele A (2021) Implementation of innovative educational technologies in teaching of anatomy and basic medical sciences during the COVID-19 pandemic in a developing country: the COVID-19 silver lining? Adv Med Educ Pract 12:619–625. https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.S295239
Pantanowitz L, Szymas J, Yagi Y et al (2012) Whole slide imaging for educational purposes. J Pathol Inform 3:46. https://doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.104908
Parikh M, Rasmussen M, Brubaker L et al (2004) Three dimensional virtual reality model of the normal female pelvic floor. Ann Biomed Eng 32:292–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ABME.0000012749.79488.d6
Patel S, Burke-Gaffney A (2018) The value of mobile tablet computers (iPads) in the undergraduate medical curriculum. Adv Med Educ Pract 10(9):567–570. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S163623
Patra A, Asghar A, Chaudhary P et al (2022) Integration of innovative educational technologies in anatomy teaching: new normal in anatomy education. Surg Radiol Anat 44(1):25–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-021-02868-6
Perez BA, von Isenburg MA, Yu M et al (2013) Exploring the impact of tablet computers on medical training at an academic medical center. J Med Libr Assoc 101(2):154–157. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.101.2.012
Periya SN, Moro C (2019) Applied learning of anatomy and physiology: virtual dissection tables within medical and health sciences education. Bangkok Med J 15(1):121–121
Preece D, Williams SB, Lam R et al (2013) “Let’s get physical”: advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 6(4):216–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1345
Rosas C, Rubí R, Donoso M et al (2012) Dental students’ evaluations of an interactive histology software. J Dent Educ 76(11):1491–1496
Santos VA, Barreira MP, Saad KR (2022) Technological resources for teaching and learning about human anatomy in the medical course: systematic review of literature. Anat Sci Educ 15(2):403–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2142
Saw A (2018) A new approach to body donation for medical education: the silent mentor programme. Malays Orthop J 12(2):68–72. https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1807.015
Scibora LM, Mead TP, Larson C (2018) The influence of iPads on course performance and student perceptions of learning in human anatomy. J Teaching Learn Technol 7(1):108–124. https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v7i1.23973
Singh R, Shane Tubbs R, Gupta K et al (2015) Is the decline of human anatomy hazardous to medical education/profession?—a review. Surg Radiol Anat 37(10):1257–1265
Smith DM, Oliker A, Carter CR et al (2007) A virtual reality atlas of craniofacial anatomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(6):1641–1646. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000282452.22620.25
Smith CF, Martinez-Álvarez C, McHanwell S (2014) The context of learning anatomy: does it make a difference? J Anat 224(3):270–278
Smith CF, Tollemache N, Covill D et al (2018) Take away body parts! An investigation into the use of 3D-printed anatomical models in undergraduate anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ 11(1):44–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1718
Stepan K, Zeiger J, Hanchuk S et al (2017) Immersive virtual reality as a teaching tool for neuroanatomy. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 7(10):1006–1013. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21986
Stirling AC, Moro C (2020) The use of virtual, augmented and mixed reality in anatomy education. In: Chan LK, Pawlina W (eds) Teaching anatomy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43283-6_36
Taylor L, Dyer T, Al-Azzawi M et al (2022) Extended reality anatomy undergraduate teaching: a literature review on an alternative method of learning. Ann Anatomy – Anat Anz 239:151817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2021.151817
Thomas DB, Hiscox JD, Dixon BJ et al (2016) 3D scanning and printing skeletal tissues for anatomy education. J Anat 229(3):473–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12484
Trelease RB (2016) From chalkboard, slides, and paper to e-learning: how computing technologies have transformed anatomical sciences education. Anat Sci Educ 9(6):583–602. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1620
Triola MM, Holloway WJ (2011) Enhanced virtual microscopy for collaborative education. BMC Med Educ 26(11):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-4
Turney BW (2007) Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89(2):104–107. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588407x168244
Yang J, Chan LK, Fok WWT et al (2019) Application of dissection peer-support system in preclinical gross anatomy education. Exp Biol 2019 Meeting Abstracts. FASEB J 33(S1). https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2019.33.1_supplement.605.4
Ye Z, Dun A, Jiang H et al (2020) The role of 3D printed models in the teaching of human anatomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ 20:335. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02242-x
Yuen J (2020) What is the role of 3D printing in undergraduate anatomy education? A scoping review of current literature and recommendations. Med Sci Educ 30(3):1321–1329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-00990-5
Zargaran A, Turki MA, Bhaskar J et al (2020) The role of technology in anatomy teaching: striking the right balance. Adv Med Educ Pract 11:259
Zhang Q, Deng J, Yan C et al (2020) Who is willing to donate their bodies in China? Perceptions, attitudes and influencing factors among citizens of Changsha. Ann Anat 229:151483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2020.151483
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yang, J. (2023). Technology-Enhanced Preclinical Medical Education (Anatomy, Histology and Occasionally, Biochemistry): A Practical Guide. In: Cui, D., Meyer, E.R., Rea, P.M. (eds) Biomedical Visualisation . Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1431. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36727-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36727-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36726-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36727-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)