Skip to main content

10d Superstring Theories

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Introduction to String Theory

Part of the book series: Theoretical and Mathematical Physics ((TMP))

  • 945 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we construct and classify all superstring theories whose world-sheet theories have a (1, 1) superconformal algebra of gauge constraints. We discuss in detail the consistency conditions of the perturbative superstring theory, namely invariance under the mapping class group of the world-sheet and absence of dangerous tadpoles/divergences. To put things in a broader perspective, we start with a review of the mapping class group. Then we show that one-loop modular invariance implies an absence of global \(\textbf{Diff}^+\) anomalies to all loop orders. We study the conditions of modular invariance in full detail. Then we compute explicitly the path integrals for Weyl fermions on a torus \(T^2\) coupled to arbitrary flat line bundles. Finally, we work out the one-loop vacuum amplitudes for all 10d superstring models and check that they have indeed the required properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The presence of a non-zero tadpole means that the “vacuum” around which we expand is not a solution to the quantum corrected e.o.m. “Shifted away” means that we can deform a little bit the vacuum configuration and get a valid solution to the required perturbative order. If this is not possible, the theory cannot be consistently defined.

  2. 2.

    That is, locally on the world-sheet their algebra of world-sheet gauge constraints is the (1, 1) SCFT algebra generated by the chiral currents \(T_B(z)\), \(T_F(z)\), \(\tilde{T}_B(\bar{z})\), \(\tilde{T}_F(\bar{z})\), see Chap. 2.

  3. 3.

    We can always reduce to this case by going to the oriented double.

  4. 4.

    There are no tadpoles on the sphere by Eq. (2.180).

  5. 5.

    An integral bilinear form \(\langle \cdot ,\cdot \rangle \) on a lattice \(\Lambda \) is unimodular iff it induces an isomorphism (of free Abelian groups) \(\Lambda ^\vee \simeq \Lambda \). Let \(\{e_i\}\) be a set of generators of \(\Lambda \); the bilinear form \(\langle \cdot ,\cdot \rangle \) is unimodular iff \(\det \langle e_i,e_j\rangle =\pm 1\).

  6. 6.

    Lazy readers are referred to Sect. 1.4.2 of [6].

  7. 7.

    We us the block-matrix notation; each entry of the \(2\times 2\) “matrix” is a \(g\times g\) matrix.

  8. 8.

    Homology is a homotopy invariant so, if \(f:\Sigma \rightarrow \Sigma \) is a diffeomorphism and \(\alpha \) a representative of a class \([\alpha ]\in H_1(\Sigma , \mathbb {Z})\), the class \([f_*\alpha ]\in H_1(\Sigma ,\mathbb {Z})\) depends on f only through its homotopy class.

  9. 9.

    In view of the Minkowski theorem, this implies a strong result for the mapping class group:

    Theorem (Minkowski [11, 12]). Let \(\Gamma \subset GL(n,\mathbb {Z})\) be a finite subgroup. For \(m\ge 3\) an integer, let \(r_m:GL(n,\mathbb {Z})\rightarrow GL(n,\mathbb {Z}/m\mathbb {Z})\) be the reduction mod m map. \(r_m\) is injective.

    Corollary. \(\textsf{MCG}(\Sigma )\) contains a finite-index, torsion-less, normal subgroup.

  10. 10.

    \(*\) stands for the free non-Abelian product of groups.

  11. 11.

    I.e. the smallest normal subgroup of \(SL(2,\mathbb {Z})\) containing T.

  12. 12.

    Cf. Definition 4.1.

  13. 13.

    A closed curve is non-separating if cutting along it the surface \(\Sigma \) remains connected.

  14. 14.

    The symbol \(\Phi \) stands for the collection of all fields we integrate over in the path integral.

  15. 15.

    By local we mean that each operator is local with respect to all inserted operators (including itself) and also with respect to the BRST currents (left and right).

  16. 16.

    The argument shows invariance under the pure group \(\textsf{PMCG}(\Sigma )\). To show that it is invariant under the full mapping class group \(\textsf{MCG}(\Sigma )\), we have to show that it is also invariant under the symmetric group \(\mathfrak {S}_n\) permuting the n punctures. This amounts to showing that the inserted operators have bosonic statistics, i.e. (by the 2d Spin & Statistics theorem) that their 2d spins are integral. This is an automatic consequence of BRST invariance or of left-right matching conditions.

  17. 17.

    As before, \(\textbf{H}\) is the physical Hilbert space of the closed string.

  18. 18.

    The Abelianization \(G^\text {ab}\) of a group G is the quotient group \(G^\text {ab}\overset{\textrm{def}}{=}G/[G,G]\), where \([G,G]\triangleleft G\) is the normal subgroup generated by the commutators.

  19. 19.

    We use “fermion” and “spinor” interchangeably since one consequence of the analysis is that the Spin & Statistic Theorem holds in 10d, see box 5.3.

  20. 20.

    For the full non-linear form of the self-duality constraint, see Sect. 8.5.

  21. 21.

    Ad abundantiam we shall check absence of anomalies in IIB in Sect. 9.2 by direct computation.

  22. 22.

    More generally, with \(\alpha \in \mathbb {R}\). Making \(\alpha \rightarrow \alpha +2\) does not modify the periodic boundary conditions of \(\boldsymbol{\lambda }\), Eq. (5.65), but changes the reference Fermi sea as \(|\alpha /2\rangle \rightarrow |\alpha /2+1\rangle \) which modifies both the energy level \(h-c/24\) and the U(1) charge J. The map \(\alpha \rightarrow \alpha +2\)—which is a non-trivial isomorphism of the operator algebra—is called spectral flow..

  23. 23.

    For \(\lambda =1/2\) the gravitational anomaly of the U(1) current cancels; cf. Sect. 2.5.

  24. 24.

    We shall show in Sect. 6.3 that the Jacobi’s triple product identity is the mathematical statement of bosonization of massless fermions in 2d.

  25. 25.

    The symbols in the parenthesis specify the fermion b.c. on the torus for each spin-structure; first entry periodicity along the A-cycle, second periodicity along the B-cycle, with \(A=\) anti-periodic and \(P=\) periodic.

  26. 26.

    See also box 1.5.

  27. 27.

    Cf. Definition 4.1.

  28. 28.

    Times an overall length factor; the product of all these length factors over all directions produces the \(V_{10}\) in front of Eq. (5.97).

  29. 29.

    If the target space is Lorentzian (as contrasted to Euclidean) there is an extra overall factor i since the \(k_0^2\) term has the “wrong” sign and must be Wick rotated.

  30. 30.

    “Standard picture” corresponds to the ghosts’ sea of OCQ; cf. Sect. 3.3. In the text we are implicity using the isomorphism between the OCQ and light-cone Hilbert spaces. More in general, the covariant chirality operator is \((-1)^{F_\text {GSO}}\equiv (-1)^{\iota \cdot \lambda }\), with \(\lambda \) the SO(10, 2) weight; cf. Eq. (3.11).

  31. 31.

    We stress that due to the “wrong sign” projection (5.101) in the (which projects put the identity), \(Z^\pm _\psi \) is not the partition function of an algebra \(\mathfrak {A}\) hence its modular transformations are not given by Eq. (5.36) or rather are given by that expression only up to signs.

  32. 32.

    In particular it is required to justify restriction of the integration domain to \(F_0\).

  33. 33.

    In the presence of zero-modes, i.e. when \(\alpha =\beta =1\) the determinants are replaced by the primed determinants with the zero eigenvalues omitted, and the amplitude is non-zero only if there are enough Fermi-field insertions to soak up all zero-modes.

  34. 34.

    \(\textrm{Tr}^\prime _\alpha \) is the trace over the \(\alpha \) sector of the open string with the zero-modes of \(X^\mu \) omitted.

  35. 35.

    In Chaps. 6 and 12, we shall re-interpret these b.c. as due to the presence of N spacetime filling D9 branes. See Chaps. 6 and 12 for more details.

  36. 36.

    The analysis will show that the divergence of a planar insertion is the product of some disk amplitude times a tree-level tadpole; the tadpole will vanish if and only if both \(Z_0\), \(Z_1\) are finite.

  37. 37.

    We mean appropriate for a single bulk R-R insertion on the disk; the left/right-pictures \(q_L,q_R\in \tfrac{1}{2}+\mathbb {Z}\) satisfy \(q_L+q_R=-2\). The most canonical solution to these conditions is as in the text.

  38. 38.

    Alternatively we may write \(A=A^{(0)}+A^{(10)}\) where \(A^{(0)}=-i *A^{(10)}\). The equation \((d-\delta )A=0\) then yields the two equivalent conditions \(d*A^{(10)}= dA^{(0)}=0\).

  39. 39.

    Since the zero-momentum R vacua are not BRST trivial (see Chap. 3).

  40. 40.

    The crucial aspect here is the fact that we emphasized in Chap. 3: BRST cohomology at zero momentum is not the \(k_\mu \rightarrow 0\) limit of the non-zero momentum BRST cohomology which, in turn, is isomorphic to the light-cone Hilbert space.

  41. 41.

    In the standard jargon of string theory, one may call (5.135) a “Chern–Simons” coupling.

  42. 42.

    The torus does not contribute since the amplitude is finite, see Remark 5.4.

  43. 43.

    The overall minus sign reflects (from one-loop open channel viewpoint) that R sector open string states are fermions.

References

  1. Farb, B., Margalit, D.: A primer on Mapping Class Groups. Princeton University Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Spanier, E.H.: Algebraic Topology. Springer, Berlin (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Farkas, H.M., Kra, I.: Riemann Surfaces. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 71. Springer, Berlin (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Griffiths, P., Harris, J.: Principles of Algebraic Geometry. Wiley (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carlson, J., Müller-Stach, S., Peters, C.: Period Mappings and Period Domains, vol. 168, 2nd edn. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cecotti, S.: Supersymmetric Field Theories. Cambridge University Press, Geometric Structures and Dualities (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Helgason, S.: Differential Geometry, Lie Groups and Symmetric Spaces. Academic Press (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fay, J.D.: Theta Functions on Riemann Surfaces. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 352. Springer, Berlin (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dijkgraaf, R., Verlinde, E., Verlinde, H.: \(c=1\) conformal field theories on Riemann surfaces. Comm. Math. Phys. 115, 649–690 (1988)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Verlinde, E., Verlinde, H.: Multiloop calculations in covariant superstring theory. Phys. Lett. B 192, 95–102 (1987)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Borel, A.: Introduction aux Groupes Arithmétiques. Hermann (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Serre, J.-P.: Bounds for the orders of the finite subgroups of \(G(k)\). In: Geck, M., Testerman, D., Thévenaz, J. (eds.) Group Representation Theory. EPFL Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deser, S., Zumino, B.: Consistent supergravity. Phys. Lett. B 62, 335 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Coleman, S., Weinberg, E.: Radiative corrections as the origin of spontaneous symmetry breaking. Phys. Rev. D 7, 1888 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio Cecotti .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cecotti, S. (2023). 10d Superstring Theories. In: Introduction to String Theory. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36530-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics