Abstract
Lumboperitoneal shunt (LPS), a creative development based on the lumbar puncture technique used in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage test (tap test), is an increasingly popular treatment option around the world, but particularly in Japan, as it avoids an intervention on the brain, and even keeps the postsurgical scar not visible. It mainly avoids the risk of symptomatic intraparenchymal haematoma from ventricular catheter placement, which is seen in approximately 1% of the patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). However, LPS has not generally been favoured by neurosurgeons because of the relatively higher than the ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) failure rates and the possibility of symptomatic over-drainage. Another possible reason is that there is no reported standardized surgical technique, and the procedure is considered rather specific, out of the mainstream of neurosurgical operative routine skills. This understanding is in process of change.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CSF:
-
Cerebrospinal fluid
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- ICP:
-
Intracranial pressure
- iNPH:
-
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- LPS:
-
Lumboperitoneal shunt
- VPS:
-
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt
References
Ferguson AH. Intraperitoneal diversion of the cerebrospinal fluid in cases of hydrocephalus. N Y Med J. 1898;67:902–9.
Pudenz RH. The surgical treatment of hydrocephalus—an historical review. Surg Neurol. 1981;15:15–25.
Matson DD. Ventriculo-uretherostomy. J Neurosurg. 1951;8:398–404.
Jackson IJ, Snodgrass SR. Peritoneals shunts in the treatment of hydrocephalus and increased intracranial pressure. Four-year survey of 62 patients. J Neurosurg. 1955;12:216–222.
Jones RFC. Long-term results in various treatments of hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. 1967;26:313–5.
Murtagh F, Lehman R. Peritoneal shunts in the management of hydrocephalus 1967;202(11):98–102.
Spetzler RF, Wilson CB, Grollmus JM. Percutaneous lumboperitoneal shunt. Technical Note 1975;43(6):770–3.
Spetzler FR, Wilson, CB, Shulte R. Simplified percutaneous lumboperitoneal shunting. Surg Neurol. 1977; 25–9.
Aoki N. Lumboperitoneal shunt: clinical applications, complications, and comparison with venntriculoperitoneal shunt. Neurosurgery. 1990;26(6):998–1002.
Cui W, Sun T, Wu K, You C, Guan J. Comparison of ventriculoperitoneal shunt to lumboperitoneal shunt in the treatment of idiopathic: a monocentric, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Medicine 2021;100:31(e26691). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026691.
Wilson MH. Monro-Kellie 2.0: the dynamic vascular and venous pathophysiological components of intracranial pressure. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2016;36(8):1338–50.
Marmarou A, Shulman K, LaMorgese J. Compartmental analysis of compliance and outflow resistance of the cerebrospinal fluid system. J Neurosurg. 1975;43(5):523–34.
Marmarou A, Shulman K, Rosende RM. A nonlinear analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid system and intracranial pressure dynamics. J Neurosurg. 1978;48(3):332–44.
Alperin N, Lee SH, Sivaramakrishnan A, Hushek SG. Quantifying the effect of posture on intracranial physiology in humans by MRI flow studies. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;22(5):591–6.
Miyati T, Mase M, Banno T, Kasuga T, Yamada K, Fujita H, et al. Frequency analyses of CSF flow on cine MRI in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(5):1019–24.
Bulat M, Klarica M. Recent insights into a new hydrodynamics of the cerebrospinal fluid. Brain Res Rev. 2011;65(2):99–112.
Klarica M, Rados M, Erceg G, Petosic A, Jurjevic I, Oreskovic D. The influence of body position on cerebrospinal fluid pressure gradient and movement in cats with normal and impaired craniospinal communication. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(4): e95229.
Kikuta J, Kamagata K, Abe M, et al. Effects of arterial stiffness on cerebral WM integrity in older adults: a neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging and magnetization transfer saturation imaging study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022;43(12):1706–12.
Kilinc MC, Kahilogullari G, Dogan I, et al. Changes in callosal angle and Evans’ index after placing a lumboperitoneal shunt in patients with idiopathic-normal- pressure hydrocephalus. Turk Neurosurg. 2022;32(2):309–14.
Nakajima M, Miyajima M, Ogino I, Sugano H, Akiba C, Domon N, et al. Use of external lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage and lumboperitoneal shunts with strata NSC valves in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a single-center experience. World Neurosurg. 2015;83(3):387–93.
Miyajima M, Kazui H, Mori E, Ishikawa M. On behalf of the sinphoni-2 investigators. One-year outcome in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: comparison of lumboperitoneal shunt to ventriculoperitoneal shunt. J Neurosurg. 2016;125(6):1483–92. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.10.JNS151894.
Yerneni K, Karras CL, Larkin CJ, Weiss H, Hopkins B, Kesavabhotla K, et al. Lumboperitoneal shunts for the treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Clin Neurosc. 2021;86:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2020.12.031.
Todisco M, Picascia M, Pisano P, Zangaglia R, Minafra B, Vitali P, et al. Lumboperitoneal shunt in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective controlled study. J Neurol. 2020;267:2556–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-09844-x.
Goto Y, Oka H, Nishii S, Takagi Y, Yokoya S, Hino A. Lumboperitoneal shunt surgery via lateral abdominal laparotomy. J Neurosurg Spine 2020;32(4):548–53. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.10.SPINE19957.
Kawahara T, Tokimura H, Higa N, Hirano H, Bohara M, Hanaya R, et al. Surgical technique for preventing subcutaneous migration of distal lumboperitoneal shunt catheters. Innovative Neurosurg 2013;1(3–4):169–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/ins-2013-0016.
Xie D, Chen H, Guo X, Liu Y. Comparative study of lumboperitoneal shunt and ventriculoperitoneal shunt in the treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13(10):11917–924. www.ajtr.org /ISSN:1943-8141/AJTR0132277
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (grant numbers 16KK0187, 17K10908, 18H02916, 20K09398) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. Ethical approval Not required.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
1 Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the Electronic Supplementary Material.
Supplementary file1 (MP4 666582 kb)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nakajima, M., Karagiozov, K. (2023). Lumboperitoneal Shunt for iNPH. In: Bradac, O. (eds) Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36522-5_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36522-5_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36521-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36522-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)