Skip to main content

Abstract

The use of standard oxygen therapy has long been the first-line therapy in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF), though this oxygenation strategy does not lead to a reduction in work of breathing and the FiO2 delivered to the patient does not usually overstep 70%. Moreover, gas provided by standard oxygen therapy tools is markedly dry and may be irritating for airways. All these disadvantages may lead to failure of the technique and subsequent need for intubation. The use of non-invasive Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is one of the main alternatives to standard oxygen in patients with ARF, before endotracheal intubation. However, tolerance to CPAP is sometimes poor due to a tight-fitting mask and to frequent leaks around the interface, leading to patient–ventilator asynchronies. High-flow CPAP is a more recent technique that could have many beneficial effects and overcome some of the limitations of both standard oxygen therapy and non-invasive CPAP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kushida CA, Chediak A, Berry RB, Brown LK, Gozal D, Iber C, Parthasarathy S, Quan SF, Rowley JA. Clinical guidelines for the manual titration of positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Positive airway pressure titration task force of the American Academy of sleep medicine. J Clin Sleep Med. 2008;4:157–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Evans TW, Albert RK, Angus DC, et al. International consensus conferences in intensive care medicine: noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:283–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bello G, De Santis P, Antonelli M. Non-invasive ventilation in cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6(18):355. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2018.04.39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ireland CJ, Chapman TM, Mathew SF, Herbison GP, Zacharias M. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during the postoperative period for prevention of postoperative morbidity and mortality following major abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(8):CD008930. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008930.pub2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell D, Shah P, Shah V, et al. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure from high flow cannula versus infant flow for preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2006;26:546–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell EJ, Baker MD, Crites-Silver P. Subjective effects of humidification of oxygen for delivery by nasal cannula. A prospective study. Chest. 1988;93(2):289–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chanques G, Contantin JM, Sauter M, Jung B, Sebbane M, Verzilli D. Discomfort associated with underhumidified high-flow oxygen therapy in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(6):996–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-009-1456-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Frat JP, Thille AW, Mercat A, et al. High-flow oxygen through nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(23):2185–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sim MA, Dean P, Kinsella J, et al. Performance of oxygen delivery devices when the breathing pattern of respiratory failure is simulated. Anaesthesia. 2008;63(9):938–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05536.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Katz JA, Marks JD. Inspiratory work with and without continuous positive airway pressure in patients with acute respiratory failure. Anesthesiology. 1985;63(6):598–607. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-198512000-00008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ricard J-D. The high flow nasal oxygen in acute respiratory failure. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78(7):836–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Masclans JR, Roca O. High-flow oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure. Clin Pulm Med. 2012;19:127–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Parke RL, Eccleston ML, SP MG. The effects of flow on airway pressure during nasal high-flow oxygen therapy. Respir Care. 2011;56(8):1151–5. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Roca O, Riera J, Torres F, Masclans J. High-flow oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure. Respir Care. 2010;55(4):408–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tiruvoipati R, Lewis D, Haji K, Botha J. High-flow nasal oxygen vs high-flow face mask: a randomized crossover trial in extubated patients. J Crit Care. 2010;25(3):463–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.06.050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chanques G, Constantin J, Sauter M, et al. Discomfort associated with underhumidified highflow oxygen therapy in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(6):996–1003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sztrymf B, Messika J, Bertrand F, et al. Beneficial effects of humidified high flow nasal oxygen in critical care patients: a prospective pilot study. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(11):1780–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Parke RL, SP MG, Eccleston ML. A preliminary randomized controlled trial to assess effectiveness of nasal high-flow oxygen in intensive care patients. Respir Care. 2011;56(3):265–70. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.00801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chikata Y, Izawa M, Okuda N, Itagaki T, Nakataki E, Onodera M, et al. Humidification performances of two high flow nasal cannula devices: a bench study. Respir Care. 2014;59(8):1186–90. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.02932.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lenglet H, Sztrymf B, Leroy C, Brun P, Dreyfuss D, Ricard J. Humidified high flow nasal oxygen during respiratory failure in the emergency department: feasibility and efficacy. Respir Care. 2012;57(11):1873–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Millar J, Lutton S, O’Connor P. The use of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy in the management of hypercarbic respiratory failure. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2014;8(2):63–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753465814521890.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chatila W, Nugent T, Vance G, Gaughan J, Criner GJ. The effects of high-flow vs low-flow oxygen on exercise in advanced obstructive airways disease. Chest. 2004;126(4):1108–15. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.126.4.1108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sztrymf B, Messika J, Bertrand F, Hurel D, Leon R, Dreyfuss D, et al. Beneficial effects of humidified high flow nasal oxygen in critical care patients: a prospective pilot study. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(11):1780–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-011-2354-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Maggiore SM, Idone FA, Vaschetto R, Festa R, Cataldo A, Antonicelli F, et al. Nasal high-flow versus Venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190(3):282–8. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201402-0364OC.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vourc’h M, Asfar P, Volteau C, et al. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen during endotracheal intubation in hypoxemic patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(9):1538–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-3796-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lucangelo U, Vassallo FG, Marras E, et al. High-flow nasal interface improves oxygenation in patients undergoing bronchoscopy. Crit Care Res Pract. 2012;2012:506382. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/506382.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Iacovazzo, C., Veropalumbo, C., Servillo, G. (2023). Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: High Flow CPAP. In: Servillo, G., Vargas, M. (eds) Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Critical Care, Anesthesiology and Palliative Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36510-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36510-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36509-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36510-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics