Abstract
The use of standard oxygen therapy has long been the first-line therapy in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF), though this oxygenation strategy does not lead to a reduction in work of breathing and the FiO2 delivered to the patient does not usually overstep 70%. Moreover, gas provided by standard oxygen therapy tools is markedly dry and may be irritating for airways. All these disadvantages may lead to failure of the technique and subsequent need for intubation. The use of non-invasive Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is one of the main alternatives to standard oxygen in patients with ARF, before endotracheal intubation. However, tolerance to CPAP is sometimes poor due to a tight-fitting mask and to frequent leaks around the interface, leading to patient–ventilator asynchronies. High-flow CPAP is a more recent technique that could have many beneficial effects and overcome some of the limitations of both standard oxygen therapy and non-invasive CPAP.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kushida CA, Chediak A, Berry RB, Brown LK, Gozal D, Iber C, Parthasarathy S, Quan SF, Rowley JA. Clinical guidelines for the manual titration of positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Positive airway pressure titration task force of the American Academy of sleep medicine. J Clin Sleep Med. 2008;4:157–71.
Evans TW, Albert RK, Angus DC, et al. International consensus conferences in intensive care medicine: noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:283–91.
Bello G, De Santis P, Antonelli M. Non-invasive ventilation in cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6(18):355. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2018.04.39.
Ireland CJ, Chapman TM, Mathew SF, Herbison GP, Zacharias M. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during the postoperative period for prevention of postoperative morbidity and mortality following major abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(8):CD008930. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008930.pub2.
Campbell D, Shah P, Shah V, et al. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure from high flow cannula versus infant flow for preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2006;26:546–9.
Campbell EJ, Baker MD, Crites-Silver P. Subjective effects of humidification of oxygen for delivery by nasal cannula. A prospective study. Chest. 1988;93(2):289–93.
Chanques G, Contantin JM, Sauter M, Jung B, Sebbane M, Verzilli D. Discomfort associated with underhumidified high-flow oxygen therapy in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(6):996–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-009-1456-x.
Frat JP, Thille AW, Mercat A, et al. High-flow oxygen through nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(23):2185–96.
Sim MA, Dean P, Kinsella J, et al. Performance of oxygen delivery devices when the breathing pattern of respiratory failure is simulated. Anaesthesia. 2008;63(9):938–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05536.x.
Katz JA, Marks JD. Inspiratory work with and without continuous positive airway pressure in patients with acute respiratory failure. Anesthesiology. 1985;63(6):598–607. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-198512000-00008.
Ricard J-D. The high flow nasal oxygen in acute respiratory failure. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78(7):836–41.
Masclans JR, Roca O. High-flow oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure. Clin Pulm Med. 2012;19:127–30.
Parke RL, Eccleston ML, SP MG. The effects of flow on airway pressure during nasal high-flow oxygen therapy. Respir Care. 2011;56(8):1151–5. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01106.
Roca O, Riera J, Torres F, Masclans J. High-flow oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure. Respir Care. 2010;55(4):408–13.
Tiruvoipati R, Lewis D, Haji K, Botha J. High-flow nasal oxygen vs high-flow face mask: a randomized crossover trial in extubated patients. J Crit Care. 2010;25(3):463–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.06.050.
Chanques G, Constantin J, Sauter M, et al. Discomfort associated with underhumidified highflow oxygen therapy in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(6):996–1003.
Sztrymf B, Messika J, Bertrand F, et al. Beneficial effects of humidified high flow nasal oxygen in critical care patients: a prospective pilot study. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(11):1780–6.
Parke RL, SP MG, Eccleston ML. A preliminary randomized controlled trial to assess effectiveness of nasal high-flow oxygen in intensive care patients. Respir Care. 2011;56(3):265–70. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.00801.
Chikata Y, Izawa M, Okuda N, Itagaki T, Nakataki E, Onodera M, et al. Humidification performances of two high flow nasal cannula devices: a bench study. Respir Care. 2014;59(8):1186–90. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.02932.
Lenglet H, Sztrymf B, Leroy C, Brun P, Dreyfuss D, Ricard J. Humidified high flow nasal oxygen during respiratory failure in the emergency department: feasibility and efficacy. Respir Care. 2012;57(11):1873–8.
Millar J, Lutton S, O’Connor P. The use of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy in the management of hypercarbic respiratory failure. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2014;8(2):63–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753465814521890.
Chatila W, Nugent T, Vance G, Gaughan J, Criner GJ. The effects of high-flow vs low-flow oxygen on exercise in advanced obstructive airways disease. Chest. 2004;126(4):1108–15. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.126.4.1108.
Sztrymf B, Messika J, Bertrand F, Hurel D, Leon R, Dreyfuss D, et al. Beneficial effects of humidified high flow nasal oxygen in critical care patients: a prospective pilot study. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(11):1780–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-011-2354-6.
Maggiore SM, Idone FA, Vaschetto R, Festa R, Cataldo A, Antonicelli F, et al. Nasal high-flow versus Venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190(3):282–8. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201402-0364OC.
Vourc’h M, Asfar P, Volteau C, et al. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen during endotracheal intubation in hypoxemic patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(9):1538–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-3796-z.
Lucangelo U, Vassallo FG, Marras E, et al. High-flow nasal interface improves oxygenation in patients undergoing bronchoscopy. Crit Care Res Pract. 2012;2012:506382. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/506382.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Iacovazzo, C., Veropalumbo, C., Servillo, G. (2023). Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: High Flow CPAP. In: Servillo, G., Vargas, M. (eds) Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Critical Care, Anesthesiology and Palliative Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36510-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36510-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36509-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36510-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)