Skip to main content

Environmental, Social and Governance Criteria in the Netherlands: Interaction Between Government and the Courts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
ESG Integration and SRI Strategies in the EU

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance ((SIF))

  • 594 Accesses

Abstract

The author discusses the role of private law in achieving goals related to ESG (environmental, social and governance) criteria in the Netherlands, particularly in the context of climate change and energy transition. Private law can be used as a last resort when government and administrative law fail, influencing the policies of governments and companies. However, the author argues that recent developments challenge the trias politica, which is a cornerstone of the state's rule of law. Despite clear standards provided by international and EU law, companies and governments neglect court decisions, and appeal procedures delay action. Nonetheless, private law is starting to play a role, where banks refuse companies’ loans if their legal paperwork is not up to pace with the law, new forms of contracts regulating labor relations are bound to mandatory private law, and accountants put environmental hazards as legal hazards in annual reports, necessitating clients to contribute to environmental and climate improving measures. The author argues that innovative climate policy from the government is the most important route to change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, in the ‘Convenant Internationaal Maatschappelijk Verantwoord Beleggen in de verzekeringssector’ (5 July 2018) of the Dutch government and the Verbond van Verzekeraars en Zorgverzekeraars Nederland.

  2. 2.

    The research for this paper takes development up to November 2022 into account.

  3. 3.

    The Scope 2 Guidance standardizes how corporations measure emissions from purchased or acquired electricity, steam, heat and cooling.

  4. 4.

    ‘Shell achteruit op beurs na vonnis’, Telegraaf, 26 mei 2021. The company also announced they will leave The Netherlands.

  5. 5.

    Shell-vonnis dwingt bedrijf en accountant sneller werk te maken van klimaatdoelen, Financieel Dagblad, 7 juni 2021.

  6. 6.

    https://www.nba.nl/dashboard/maatschappij/niet-financiele-informatie-in-de-jaarverslagen-van-beursgenoteerde-bedrijven/.

  7. 7.

    https://www.randstad.com/s3fs-media/rscom/public/2020-06/randstad-ava2020-vragen-ss_spov.pdf.

  8. 8.

    Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended December 31, 2020, Royal Dutch Shell PLC.

  9. 9.

    Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended December 31, 2020, Royal Dutch Shell PLC, p. 203.

  10. 10.

    https://www.accountant.nl/discussie/opinie/2021/3/greenwashing-als-frauderisico-voor-de-jaarrekeningcontrole-van-de-accountant/.

  11. 11.

    Institute of Southern Director, King IV Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa (2016), www.iodsa.co.za/resource/resmgr/king_iv/King_IV_Report/IoDSA_King_IV_Report_-_WebVe.pdf (consulted on May 2, 2020), Principle 3.

  12. 12.

    Besluit bekendmaking van niet-financiële informatie (Nonfinancial reporting decree) and Besluit bekendmaking diversiteit (Diversity reporting decree).

  13. 13.

    The Dutch parliament is working on a proposal for a law on Responsible and Sustainable International Business.

  14. 14.

    When a civil servant has any conscientious objection to any form of insurance, the person can request not to have to participate in the ABP pension scheme. Chapter 11 Pensioenreglement ABP.

  15. 15.

    https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/fundament-pensioenstelsel-kraakt; https://www.uu.nl/opinie/blog-vertrek-uit-het-abp; EU Hof zaak 67/96 (Albany).

  16. 16.

    ‘Shell zoekt steun aandeelhouders voor beleid Zuid-Afrika’, NRC, 11 May 1988. S.A. Meijer & Kees Leidelmeijer, ‘Zuid-Afrika-vrij beleggen’, Economisch statistische berichten, 1990, 75(3739): pp. 18–19.

  17. 17.

    Komitee Zuid Afrika was an NGO with an active anti apartheid program, Novib is the Dutch branch of Oxfam, Pax Christi a World Peace organisation.

  18. 18.

    Trouw, 16 mei 2021.

  19. 19.

    ‘De meeste grote Nederlandse beleggers steunen Follow This, behalve pensioenreus ABP’, Volkskrant, 9 June 2021.

  20. 20.

    NRC, 25 April 2022.

  21. 21.

    Niet alles is acceptabel voor winstmaximalisatie’, NRC, 29 April 2022; ‘Milieudefensie wil bestuurders Shell persoonlijk …’, Volkskrant, 25 April 2022.

  22. 22.

    Annex 2 of the PAS, art. 2 of the Besluit grenswaarden and art. 2.12 Besluit natuurbescherming were declared not binding.

  23. 23.

    ‘450 boeren zonder vergunning: provincie wil wet niet handhaven’, https://www.omroepbrabant.nl, 20 April 2022.

  24. 24.

    Bakker and Timmer, ‘Wat er mis is met de stikstofaanpak?’, De Limburger, 23 April 2022. There is one main bank in the agricultural sector in The Netherlands, the Rabo bank.

  25. 25.

    Jaap Tielbeke, ‘Het Shell-vonnis heeft gevolgen voor grootvervuilers wereldwijd’. De Groene Amsterdammer, 2 June 2021.

References

  • 450 boeren zonder vergunning: provincie wil wet niet handhaven. https://www.omroepbrabant.nl, April 20, 2022.

  • Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended December 31, 2020, Royal Dutch Shell PLC, 203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A., & Timmer, E., Wat er mis is met de stikstofaanpak? De Limburger, April 21, 2022

    Google Scholar 

  • Besselink, L. (2022). The national and EU targets for reduction of greenhouse gas emissions infringe the ECHR: The judicial review of general policy objectives: Hoge Raad (Netherlands Supreme Court) 20 December 2019, Urgenda v the state of the Netherlands. European Constitutional Law Review, 18(1), 155–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bfinance. (2021, February). ESG asset owner survey: How are investors changing?

    Google Scholar 

  • Convenant Internationaal Maatschappelijk Verantwoord Beleggen in de verzekeringssector, July 5, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • De meeste grote Nederlandse beleggers steunen Follow This, behalve pensioenreus ABP. Volkskrant, June 9, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongh, J.M. de. (2020). Onderneming en maatschappij: naar een nieuw sociaal contract? De Loi PACTE als voorbeeld, Ondernemingsrecht 2020/80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Southern Director, King IV Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa. (2016). www.iodsa.co.za/resource/resmgr/king_iv/King_IV_Report/IoDSA_King_IV_Report_-_WebVe.pdf (consulted on May 2, 2020).

  • Kaplan, R., Soonawalla, K., & Stroehle, J. (2021). How to avoid greenwashing through audits? A framework for social and environmental assurance. Paper for the Said Business School Accounting Research Symposium. https://www.accountant.nl/discussie/opinie/2021/3/greenwashing-als-frauderisico-voor-de-jaarrekeningcontrole-van-de-accountant/

  • Klimaatplan 2021–2030. (2020). https://open.overheid.nl/documenten/ronl-c66c8a00-ac14-4797-a8ea-973a98c5bee0/pdf

  • Kloosterman, W., & Kuilman, M. (2018). Klimaatrisico’s, aansprakelijkheden en enkele toezichtrechtelijke aspecten. Maandblad voor Vermogensrecht. Aflevering 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krommendijk, J. (2022). Beyond Urgenda: The role of the ECHR and judgments of the ECtHR in Dutch environmental and climate litigation. Reciel, 31(1), 60–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, S. (2015). Het begin van het moderne Nederlandse poldermodel; De Hoge Raad van Arbeid van 1920 als eerste manifestatie van het Nederlandse tripartiete sociaaleconomische overlegmodel? (Nijmegen, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, B. (2022). The duty of care of fossil-fuel producers for climate change mitigation: Milieudefensie v. Royal Dutch Shell District Court of The Hague (The Netherlands). Transnational Environmental Law, 11(2), 407–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, C. (2013). Firm commitment: Why the corporation is failing us and how to restore trust in it. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, C. (2018). Prosperity: Better business makes the greater good. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, S. A., & Leidelmeijer, K. (1990). Zuid-Afrika-Vrij Beleggen. Economisch Statistische Berichten, 75(3739), 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, G. (2021). Applying roadmapping and conceptual modeling to the energy transition: A local case study. Sustainability, 13(7), 3683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neilan, J., Reilly, P., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2020, June 28). Time to rethink the S in ESG. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niet alles is acceptabel voor winstmaximalisatie, NRC, April 29, 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milieudefensie wil bestuurders Shell persoonlijk ..., Volkskrant, April 25, 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozemond, K. (2022). Opinie: Er woedt een juridische revolutie in Nederland. Het Parool, August 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • SER, Convenant Internationaal Maatschappelijk Verantwoord Beleggen Pensioenfondsen, December 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shell zoekt steun aandeelhouders voor beleid Zuid-Afrika. NRC, May 11, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spijkers, O. (2021). Friends of the Earth Netherlands (Milieudefensie) v Royal Dutch Shell. Chinese Journal of Environmental Law, 5(2), 237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stichting Pensioenfonds Essity, jaarverslag 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thinking Ahead Institute, Global Pension Assets Study, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tielbeke, J. (2021, June 2). Het Shell-vonnis heeft gevolgen voor grootvervuilers wereldwijd, De Groene Amsterdammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traub, J. (2020). There’s only one way for democracies to save the planet. Foreign Policy, December 21, 2019. Consulted on 21 Nov 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wewerinke-Singh, M., & McCoach, A. (2021). The state of the Netherlands v Urgenda Foundation: Distilling best practice and lessons learnt for future rights-based climate litigation. Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, 30, 275–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, J. W., et al. (2020). Naar een zorgplicht voor bestuurders en commissarissen tot verantwoordelijke deelname aan het maatschappelijk verkeer. Ondernemingsrecht 2020/86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zijlstra, W. (2018). Experimenteer om pensioendeelnemers te activeren, Wet en wetenschap bieden mogelijkheden, Pensioen & Praktijk, #1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bastiaan D. van der Velden .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

van der Velden, B.D. (2023). Environmental, Social and Governance Criteria in the Netherlands: Interaction Between Government and the Courts. In: Spataro, L., Quirici, M.C., Iermano, G. (eds) ESG Integration and SRI Strategies in the EU. Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36457-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36457-0_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36456-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36457-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics