Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of Project Implementation Methods and Models Throughout Risk Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Integrated Computer Technologies in Mechanical Engineering - 2022 (ICTM 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 657))

  • 131 Accesses

Abstract

In accordance with the purpose of the study, the stages of the formation of network planning methods taking into account risk factors up to modern technologies, powerfully supported by computer tools for calculations and visualization, are considered in the work. The main approaches to the classification of network models according to various criteria are analyzed and comparative results are obtained. It has been established that even at the present stage, the use of probabilistic and even more so alternative network models is associated with time-consuming routine operations. Microsoft Project and other similar systems support setting time estimates, but their capabilities are severely limited in the case of multicriteria tasks. As for the software for alternative models, we can state its deficiency. The stages of analysis for each task are given in detail and conclusions are drawn. Despite the shortcomings of each type of model, the following statement can be made. When performing the practical part, an estimate was made of the number of steps, calculations, and elementary operations. It has been established that manual optimization by the GERT method is characterized by high time costs. Therefore, the question of software tools for GERT analysis is acute.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lopez-Alcarria, A., Olivares-Vicente, A., Poza-Vilches, F.: A systematic review of the use of agile methodologies in education to foster sustainability competencies. Sustainability 11(10), 2915 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McGee, T.: Going agile? How to reduce your risk of failure. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2014—North America, Phoenix, AZ. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. Project Management Institute. https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/going-agile-how-reduce-risk-failure-9531. Accessed 26 Sept 2022

  3. Rafeek, M.A., Arbain, A.F., Sudarmilah, E.: Risk mitigation techniques in agile development processes. Int. J. Supply Chain Manage. 8(2), 1123–1127 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hofman, M., Grela, G.: Project portfolio risk identification – application of Delphi method. J. Bus. Econ. 6(11), 1857–1867 (2015). https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm060403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Taroun, A.: Towards a better modelling and assessment of construction risk: Insights from a literature review. Int. J. Project Manage. 32(1), 101–115 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Samman, T.A.S.A., Brahemi, R.M.R.A.: Fuzzy pert for project management. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Technol. 7(4), 1150–1159 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Madhuni, K.U., Siresha, S., Shamkar, N.R.: A new approach for solving fuzzy critical path problem using L-L fuzzy numbers. Appl. Math. Sci. 6(27), 1303–1324 (2012)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Berthod, O., Grothe-Hammer, M., Sydow, J.: Network ethnography: a mixed-method approach for the study of practices in interorganizational settings. Organ. Res. Methods 20(2), 299–323 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh, S.: Project management and strategic objectives of the organization. Univ. J. Industr. Bus. Manage. 5(1), 10–11 (2017). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujibm.2017.050102

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Tomomitsu, H.T.A., Carvalho, M.M.D., Moraes, R.D.O.: The evaluation of the relationship between project management and knowledge management: a bibliometric study. Gestão Produção 25(2), 354–369 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x3150-16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Feldman, M., Worline, M.: The practicality of practice theory. Acad. Manage. Learn. Educ. 15(2), 304–324 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2014.0356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shrivastava, S.V., Rathod, U.: A risk management framework for distributed agile projects. Inform. Softw. Technol. 85, 1–15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2016.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Buganová, K., Šimíčková, J.: Risk management in traditional and agile project management. Transp. Res. Procedia 40, 986–993 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Salama, M.: Event project management. In: Salama, M. (ed.) Risk Management and Agile Project Management, Chapter 4, pp. 73–76. Goodfellow Publishers, Oxford (2021). http://dx.doi.org/10.23912/9781911635734-4781

  15. Kischelewski, B., Richter, J.: Implementing large-scale agile – an analysis of challenges and success factors. In: Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS): An Online AIS Conference, 15–17 July 2020, Marrakech, Morocco (2020). https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2020_rp/176. Accessed 26 Sept 2022

  16. Baudrit, C., Taillandier, F., Tran, T.T.P., Breysse, D.: Uncertainty processing and risk monitoring in construction projects using hierarchical probabilistic relational models. Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 34(2), 97–115 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Panwar, A., Jha, K.N.: A many-objective optimization model for construction scheduling. Constr. Manage. Econ. 37(12), 727–739 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2019.1590615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Riahi, Y.: Project management: techniques and methodologies. Int. J. Sci. Res. 6(2), 465–469 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pradeepa Veerakumari, K., Resmi, R.: Designing optimum plan parameters for continuous sampling plan of type (CSP-2) through GERT analysis. J. Stat. Manage. Syst. 19(2), 303–311 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/09720510.2015.1116207

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Salama, M.: Risk Management and Agile Project Management, pp. 73–76. Goodfellow Publishers, Oxford (2021). http://dx.doi.org/10.23912/9781911635734-4781

  21. Prasad, V.C.: Compact form of Mason’s gain formula for signal flow graphs. Int. J. Electr. Eng. Educ. 47(4), 393–403 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wyrozebski, P.: Research on the needs of methodological support in project management. Organ. Manage. 5(148), 193–213 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ali, M.M., Elazouni, A.: Finance-based CPM/LOB scheduling of projects with repetitive non-serial activities. Constr. Manage. Econ. 27(9), 839–856 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190903191764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Leyman, P., Vanhoucke, M.: Payment models and net present value optimization for resource-constrained project scheduling. Comput. Industr. Eng. 91, 139–153 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Klimek, M., Łebkowski, P.: Financial optimisation of the scheduling for the multi-stage project. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci.: Tech. Sci. 65(6), 899–908 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Braun, T.: Configurations for interorganizational project networks: the interplay of the PMO and network administrative organization. Proj. Manag. J. 49(2), 1–10 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Aerospace University – Kharkiv Aviation Institute, Kharkiv, Ukraine

    Evgeniy Druzhinin

  2. Riga Technical University, Riseba University of Applied Science Riga, Riga, Latvia

    Bohdan Haidabrus

  3. Sumy State University, 2 Ryms’koho-Korsakova Street, Sumy, 40000, Ukraine

    Oleksandr Psarov

  4. Scientific Research Institute “Problems of Physical Modeling of Aircraft Flight Modes”, composed of National Aerospace University “KhAI”, Kharkiv, Ukraine

    Valeriy Cheranovskiy

Authors
  1. Evgeniy Druzhinin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bohdan Haidabrus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Oleksandr Psarov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Valeriy Cheranovskiy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evgeniy Druzhinin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. National Aerospace University "Kharkov Aviation Institute", Kharkov, Ukraine

    Mykola Nechyporuk

  2. National Aerospace University "Kharkov Aviation Institute", Kharkov, Ukraine

    Vladimir Pavlikov

  3. National Aerospace University – Kharki, Kharkov, Ukraine

    Dmitriy Kritskiy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Druzhinin, E., Haidabrus, B., Psarov, O., Cheranovskiy, V. (2023). Analysis of Project Implementation Methods and Models Throughout Risk Management. In: Nechyporuk, M., Pavlikov, V., Kritskiy, D. (eds) Integrated Computer Technologies in Mechanical Engineering - 2022. ICTM 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 657. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36201-9_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36201-9_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36200-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36201-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation