Abstract
Medical imaging is a valuable clinical tool which has led to its growing utilization. Errors in radiology may occur anywhere along the course of a study being ordered, through its acquisition, interpretation, and communication. One specific area of focus for safety in radiology is exposure to ionizing radiation, which has associated immediate and long-term exposure risk.
The importance of ordering the correct diagnostic test for a given clinical scenario is critical in maximizing the clinical information provided from the test and minimizing harm from inadequate sensitivity for the indication sought or unnecessary exposure to radiation or other test related risks. When in doubt, consider direct consultation with a radiologist or published appropriateness criteria guidelines.
Understanding true risk of radiation exposure is important for achieving ALARA principles but also prevents inappropriate avoidance of exposure when important clinical information needs to be and can be obtained through imaging.
Many types of error can occur during the image interpretation process, and understanding the root causes can be helpful in learning from and for creating process improvement efforts. Radiology is a technology intensive field and one that is often at the leading edge of technology development and deployment. Recognizing limitations in technology is important and requires an expert human to determine clinical validity and applicability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Smith-Bindman R, Kwan ML, Marlow EC, Theis MK, Bolch W, Cheng SY, et al. Trends in use of medical imaging in US health care systems and in Ontario, Canada, 2000-2016. JAMA. 2019;322(9):843–56. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.11456.
Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH. Utilization of radiology services in the United States: levels and trends in modalities, regions, and populations. Radiology. 2005;234(3):824–32. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2343031536.
Rao VM, Levin DC, Parker L, Frangos AJ, Sunshine JH. Trends in utilization rates of the various imaging modalities in emergency departments: nationwide Medicare data from 2000 to 2008. J Am Coll Radiol. 2011;8(10):706–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2011.04.004.
IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Radiation. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2012;100(Pt D):7–303.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. NCRP Report No. 160. 2009;142–146.
Hart D, Wall BF, Hillier MC. Frequency and collective dose for medical and dental X-ray examinations in the UK, 2008. Oxfordshire: National Radiological Protection Board; 2010.
Radiation safety. Acr.org. [cited 2020 Nov 18]. https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Radiology-Safety/Radiation-Safety.
Salmela MB, Mortazavi S, Jagadeesan BD, Broderick DF, Burns J, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria® cerebrovascular disease. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(5S):S34–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.051.
American College of Radiology. Clinical decision support for appropriate ordering of imaging. 2021. https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/NOINDEX/Advocacy/CDS-Downloadable-Talk-Updated-August-13-2020.pptx.
Huber TC, Krishnaraj A, Patrie J, Gaskin CM. Impact of a commercially available clinical decision support program on provider ordering habits. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(7):951–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.045.
Duque GA, Mohney S. Appendicitis in pregnancy. StatPearls Publishing; 2021 [cited 2022 May 4]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551642/.
Huda W. Review of radiologic physics. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2016.
Home: Oxford English dictionary. Oed.com. [cited 2022 Jan 3]. https://www.oed.com/.
Kumar R, De Jesus O. Radiation effects on the fetus. StatPearls Publishing; 2021 [cited 2022 May 4]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK564358/.
Arbique GM, Guild JB, Chason DP, Anderson JA. The fluoroscopic sentinel event: what to do? J Am Osteopath Coll Radiol. 2014;3(3):8–20. https://www.jaocr.org/articles/the-fluoroscopic-sentinel-event-what-to-do.
McCollough CH, Schueler BA, Atwell TD, Braun NN, Regner DM, Brown DL, et al. Radiation exposure and pregnancy: when should we be concerned? Radiographics. 2007;27(4):909–17; discussion 917–8. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.274065149.
Bauhs JA, Vrieze TJ, Primak AN, Bruesewitz MR, McCollough CH. CT dosimetry: comparison of measurement techniques and devices. Radiographics. 2008;28(1):245–53. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.281075024.
American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology. ACR Practice guideline for imaging pregnant or potentially pregnant adolescents and women with ionizing radiation. 2018. https://www.acr.org/-/media/acr/files/practice-parameters/pregnant-pts.pdf.
American Cancer Society. Lifetime risk of developing or dying from cancer. Cancer.org. 2020 [cited 2022 Jan 5]. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-basics/lifetime-probability-of-developing-or-dying-from-cancer.html.
Jain C. ACOG committee opinion no. 723: Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(1):186. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003049.
MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM, Lee KS, Leung ANC, Mayo JR, et al. Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology. 2017;284(1):228–43. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017161659.
Committee on Practice Parameters of the ACR Commission on General, Small, Emergency, and/or Rural Practice. ACR practice parameter for communication of diagnostic imaging findings. 2020. https://www.acr.org/-/media/acr/files/practice-parameters/communicationdiag.pdf.
Hartung MP, Bickle IC, Gaillard F, Kanne JP. How to create a great radiology report. Radiographics. 2020;40(6):1658–70. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2020200020.
Calculator: solitary pulmonary nodule malignancy risk in adults (Brock University cancer prediction equation). UpToDate. [cited 2022 Jan 5]. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/calculator-solitary-pulmonary-nodule-malignancy-risk-in-adults-brock-university-cancer-prediction-equation.
Garland LH. On the scientific evaluation of diagnostic procedures: presidential address thirty-fourth annual meeting of the radiological society of North America. Radiology. 1949;52(3):309–28. https://doi.org/10.1148/52.3.309.
Berlin L. Accuracy of diagnostic procedures: has it improved over the past five decades? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(5):1173–8. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.1270.
Berlin L. Radiologic errors, past, present and future. Diagnosis (Berl). 2014;1(1):79–84. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2013-0012.
Bruno MA, Walker EA, Abujudeh HH. Understanding and confronting our mistakes: the epidemiology of error in radiology and strategies for error reduction. Radiographics. 2015;35(6):1668–76. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015150023.
Renfrew DL, Franken EA Jr, Berbaum KS, Weigelt FH, Abu-Yousef MM. Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 182 cases presented at a problem case conference. Radiology. 1992;183(1):145–50. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.183.1.1549661.
Kim YW, Mansfield LT. Fool me twice: delayed diagnoses in radiology with emphasis on perpetuated errors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(3):465–70. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11493.
Croskerry P, Singhal G, Mamede S. Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii65–72. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001713.
Gawande A. The checklist manifesto: how to get things right. Metropolitan Books; 2010.
Ganeshan D, Duong P-AT, Probyn L, Lenchik L, McArthur TA, Retrouvey M, et al. Structured reporting in radiology. Acad Radiol. 2018;25(1):66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2017.08.005.
Ware DE, Huda W, Mergo PJ, Litwiller AL. Radiation effective doses to patients undergoing abdominal CT examinations. Radiology. 1999;210(3):645–50. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.210.3.r99mr05645.
International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1990 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. Ann ICRP. 1991;21(1–3):1–201. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2053748.
Hernanz-Schulman M. Pediatric CT and image gently. Imagewisely.org. 2017 [cited 2021 Dec 23]. https://www.imagewisely.org/Imaging-Modalities/Computed-Tomography/Pediatric-CT-and-Image-Gently.
American College of Radiology, Radiological Society of North America, American Society of Radiologic Technologists, and American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Image wisely campaign. Image Wisely. [cited 2021 Dec 23]. https://www.imagewisely.org/.
Image Gently Alliance. Image gently campaign. Image gently. 2007 [cited 2021 Dec 23]. http://imagegently.org/About-Us/The-Alliance.
Yee KM. Report emerges of second serious global MRI accident. Aunt Minnie Europe. 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 24]. https://www.auntminnieeurope.com/index.aspx?sec=ser&sub=def&pag=dis&ItemID=620730.
ACR Committee on MR Safety. ACR manual on MR safety. Acr.org. 2020 [cited 2021 Dec 24]. https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Radiology-Safety/MR-Safety/Manual-on-MR-Safety.pdf.
Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science. 2019;366(6464):447–53. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342.
Futoma J, Simons M, Panch T, Doshi-Velez F, Anthony CL. The myth of generalizability in clinical research and machine learning in health care. Lancet Digital Health. 2020;9:489–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30186-2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ding, A., Joshi, J., Tiwana, E. (2023). Patient Safety in Radiology and Medical Imaging. In: Agrawal, A., Bhatt, J. (eds) Patient Safety. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35933-0_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35933-0_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35932-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35933-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)