Skip to main content

Patient Safety in Radiology and Medical Imaging

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Patient Safety

Abstract

Medical imaging is a valuable clinical tool which has led to its growing utilization. Errors in radiology may occur anywhere along the course of a study being ordered, through its acquisition, interpretation, and communication. One specific area of focus for safety in radiology is exposure to ionizing radiation, which has associated immediate and long-term exposure risk.

The importance of ordering the correct diagnostic test for a given clinical scenario is critical in maximizing the clinical information provided from the test and minimizing harm from inadequate sensitivity for the indication sought or unnecessary exposure to radiation or other test related risks. When in doubt, consider direct consultation with a radiologist or published appropriateness criteria guidelines.

Understanding true risk of radiation exposure is important for achieving ALARA principles but also prevents inappropriate avoidance of exposure when important clinical information needs to be and can be obtained through imaging.

Many types of error can occur during the image interpretation process, and understanding the root causes can be helpful in learning from and for creating process improvement efforts. Radiology is a technology intensive field and one that is often at the leading edge of technology development and deployment. Recognizing limitations in technology is important and requires an expert human to determine clinical validity and applicability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Smith-Bindman R, Kwan ML, Marlow EC, Theis MK, Bolch W, Cheng SY, et al. Trends in use of medical imaging in US health care systems and in Ontario, Canada, 2000-2016. JAMA. 2019;322(9):843–56. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.11456.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH. Utilization of radiology services in the United States: levels and trends in modalities, regions, and populations. Radiology. 2005;234(3):824–32. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2343031536.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rao VM, Levin DC, Parker L, Frangos AJ, Sunshine JH. Trends in utilization rates of the various imaging modalities in emergency departments: nationwide Medicare data from 2000 to 2008. J Am Coll Radiol. 2011;8(10):706–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2011.04.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Radiation. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2012;100(Pt D):7–303.

    Google Scholar 

  5. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. NCRP Report No. 160. 2009;142–146.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hart D, Wall BF, Hillier MC. Frequency and collective dose for medical and dental X-ray examinations in the UK, 2008. Oxfordshire: National Radiological Protection Board; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Radiation safety. Acr.org. [cited 2020 Nov 18]. https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Radiology-Safety/Radiation-Safety.

  8. Salmela MB, Mortazavi S, Jagadeesan BD, Broderick DF, Burns J, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria® cerebrovascular disease. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(5S):S34–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. American College of Radiology. Clinical decision support for appropriate ordering of imaging. 2021. https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/NOINDEX/Advocacy/CDS-Downloadable-Talk-Updated-August-13-2020.pptx.

  10. Huber TC, Krishnaraj A, Patrie J, Gaskin CM. Impact of a commercially available clinical decision support program on provider ordering habits. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(7):951–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Duque GA, Mohney S. Appendicitis in pregnancy. StatPearls Publishing; 2021 [cited 2022 May 4]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551642/.

  12. Huda W. Review of radiologic physics. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Home: Oxford English dictionary. Oed.com. [cited 2022 Jan 3]. https://www.oed.com/.

  14. Kumar R, De Jesus O. Radiation effects on the fetus. StatPearls Publishing; 2021 [cited 2022 May 4]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK564358/.

  15. Arbique GM, Guild JB, Chason DP, Anderson JA. The fluoroscopic sentinel event: what to do? J Am Osteopath Coll Radiol. 2014;3(3):8–20. https://www.jaocr.org/articles/the-fluoroscopic-sentinel-event-what-to-do.

    Google Scholar 

  16. McCollough CH, Schueler BA, Atwell TD, Braun NN, Regner DM, Brown DL, et al. Radiation exposure and pregnancy: when should we be concerned? Radiographics. 2007;27(4):909–17; discussion 917–8. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.274065149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bauhs JA, Vrieze TJ, Primak AN, Bruesewitz MR, McCollough CH. CT dosimetry: comparison of measurement techniques and devices. Radiographics. 2008;28(1):245–53. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.281075024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology. ACR Practice guideline for imaging pregnant or potentially pregnant adolescents and women with ionizing radiation. 2018. https://www.acr.org/-/media/acr/files/practice-parameters/pregnant-pts.pdf.

  19. American Cancer Society. Lifetime risk of developing or dying from cancer. Cancer.org. 2020 [cited 2022 Jan 5]. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-basics/lifetime-probability-of-developing-or-dying-from-cancer.html.

  20. Jain C. ACOG committee opinion no. 723: Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(1):186. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003049.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM, Lee KS, Leung ANC, Mayo JR, et al. Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology. 2017;284(1):228–43. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017161659.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Committee on Practice Parameters of the ACR Commission on General, Small, Emergency, and/or Rural Practice. ACR practice parameter for communication of diagnostic imaging findings. 2020. https://www.acr.org/-/media/acr/files/practice-parameters/communicationdiag.pdf.

  23. Hartung MP, Bickle IC, Gaillard F, Kanne JP. How to create a great radiology report. Radiographics. 2020;40(6):1658–70. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2020200020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Calculator: solitary pulmonary nodule malignancy risk in adults (Brock University cancer prediction equation). UpToDate. [cited 2022 Jan 5]. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/calculator-solitary-pulmonary-nodule-malignancy-risk-in-adults-brock-university-cancer-prediction-equation.

  25. Garland LH. On the scientific evaluation of diagnostic procedures: presidential address thirty-fourth annual meeting of the radiological society of North America. Radiology. 1949;52(3):309–28. https://doi.org/10.1148/52.3.309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Berlin L. Accuracy of diagnostic procedures: has it improved over the past five decades? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(5):1173–8. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.1270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Berlin L. Radiologic errors, past, present and future. Diagnosis (Berl). 2014;1(1):79–84. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2013-0012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bruno MA, Walker EA, Abujudeh HH. Understanding and confronting our mistakes: the epidemiology of error in radiology and strategies for error reduction. Radiographics. 2015;35(6):1668–76. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015150023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Renfrew DL, Franken EA Jr, Berbaum KS, Weigelt FH, Abu-Yousef MM. Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 182 cases presented at a problem case conference. Radiology. 1992;183(1):145–50. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.183.1.1549661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim YW, Mansfield LT. Fool me twice: delayed diagnoses in radiology with emphasis on perpetuated errors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(3):465–70. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Croskerry P, Singhal G, Mamede S. Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii65–72. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001713.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gawande A. The checklist manifesto: how to get things right. Metropolitan Books; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ganeshan D, Duong P-AT, Probyn L, Lenchik L, McArthur TA, Retrouvey M, et al. Structured reporting in radiology. Acad Radiol. 2018;25(1):66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2017.08.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ware DE, Huda W, Mergo PJ, Litwiller AL. Radiation effective doses to patients undergoing abdominal CT examinations. Radiology. 1999;210(3):645–50. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.210.3.r99mr05645.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1990 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. Ann ICRP. 1991;21(1–3):1–201. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2053748.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hernanz-Schulman M. Pediatric CT and image gently. Imagewisely.org. 2017 [cited 2021 Dec 23]. https://www.imagewisely.org/Imaging-Modalities/Computed-Tomography/Pediatric-CT-and-Image-Gently.

  37. American College of Radiology, Radiological Society of North America, American Society of Radiologic Technologists, and American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Image wisely campaign. Image Wisely. [cited 2021 Dec 23]. https://www.imagewisely.org/.

  38. Image Gently Alliance. Image gently campaign. Image gently. 2007 [cited 2021 Dec 23]. http://imagegently.org/About-Us/The-Alliance.

  39. Yee KM. Report emerges of second serious global MRI accident. Aunt Minnie Europe. 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 24]. https://www.auntminnieeurope.com/index.aspx?sec=ser&sub=def&pag=dis&ItemID=620730.

  40. ACR Committee on MR Safety. ACR manual on MR safety. Acr.org. 2020 [cited 2021 Dec 24]. https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Radiology-Safety/MR-Safety/Manual-on-MR-Safety.pdf.

  41. Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science. 2019;366(6464):447–53. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Futoma J, Simons M, Panch T, Doshi-Velez F, Anthony CL. The myth of generalizability in clinical research and machine learning in health care. Lancet Digital Health. 2020;9:489–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30186-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Ding .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ding, A., Joshi, J., Tiwana, E. (2023). Patient Safety in Radiology and Medical Imaging. In: Agrawal, A., Bhatt, J. (eds) Patient Safety. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35933-0_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35933-0_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35932-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35933-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics