Abstract
The Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) brought disruptive technologies, dramatically changing the way businesses operate. Higher education institutions make use of learning management systems (LMS) primarily for teaching, learning and assessment. The COVID-19 pandemic has pushed the use of technology for academic continuity, resulting in institutions using LMS for virtual engagements with students, student collaborations, assessments, and as a repository for resources. Student behaviour on the LMS can be tracked, giving useful learning analytics which may be used to improve student success, retention, experience, and institutional performance. This paper is an exploration of institutional readiness for learning analytics. We adopted a qualitative approach, using purposive sampling to select the institution and initial participants. We used the snowball technique to recruit further participants. The personality traits stated in the Technology Readiness Index model were used to formulate interview questions. The findings show that the institution has systems in place to support students, which were launched to address insights from LMS-based learning analytics. The institution is ready for using learning analytics, with participants innovatively using the LMS, showing enthusiasm, and optimisation of the full potential of learning analytics. We recommend the use of learning analytics to come up with effective student support.
The first author received funding from the NRF.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, M., Smarandache, F.: An extension of neutrosophic AHP–SWOT analysis for strategic planning and decision-making. Symmetry 10(4), 116 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10040116
Adams, R., Fourie, W., Marivate, V., Plantinga, P.: Can AI and data support a more inclusive and equitable South Africa? Policy Action Network: AI and Data Series (2020)
Alyahyan, E., Düştegör, D.: Predicting academic success in higher education: literature review and best practices. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 17(1), 1–21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0177-7
Alzahrani, B., Bahaitham, H., Andejany, M., Elshennawy, A.: How ready is higher education for quality 4.0 transformation according to the LNS research framework? Sustainability 13(9), 5169 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095169
Arco-Tirado, J.L., Fernández-Martín, F.D., Hervás-Torres, M.: Evidence-based peer-tutoring program to improve students’ performance at the university. Stud. High. Educ. 45(11), 2190–2202 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1597038
Asif, R., Merceron, A., Pathan, M.K.: Predicting student academic performance at degree level: a case study. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. 7(1), 49–61 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5815/ijisa.2015.01.05
Batteux, E., Ferguson, E., Tunney, R.J.: Do our risk preferences change when we make decisions for others? A meta-analysis of self-other differences in decisions involving risk. PLoS ONE 14(5), e0216566 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216566
Bouwma-Gearhart, J., Collins, J.: What we know about data-driven decision making in higher education: informing educational policy and practice. In: Proceedings of International Academic Conferences (2015). https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/2805154.html. Accessed 3 Sept 2021
Bryman, A.: Social Research Methods. 4th edn. Oxford University Press (2012)
Bull, B.: 10 Approaches to Making Educational Decisions (2014). https://etale.org/main/2014/07/14/10-approaches-to-making-educational-decisions/. Accessed 16 June 2020
Cai, J., Morris, A., Hohensee, C., Hwang, S., Robison, V., Hiebert, J.: Using data to understand and improve students’ learning: empowering teachers and researchers through building and using a knowledge base. J. Res. Math. Educ. 49(4), 362–372 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.4.0362
Christensen, R., Knezek, G.: Readiness for integrating mobile learning in the classroom: challenges, preferences and possibilities. Comput. Hum. Behav. 76 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.014
Cid-López, A., Hornos, M.J., Carrasco, A., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A hybrid model for decision-making in the information and communications technology sector 21(5), 720–737 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2015.1056281
Cox, B.E., et al.: Lip service or actionable insights? Linking student experiences to institutional assessment and data-driven decision making in higher education. J. High. Educ. 88(6), 835–862 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1272320
Dalton, E.M., Lyner-Cleophas, M., Ferguson, B.T., McKenzie, J.: Inclusion, universal design and universal design for learning in higher education: South Africa and the United States. African J. Disabil. 8(1), 1–7 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v8i0.519
DHET: 2000 To 2016 First Time Entering Undergraduate Cohort Studies for Public Higher Education Institutions (2019). www.dhet.gov.za. Accesssed 15 Jan 2021
Elayyan, S.: The future of education according to the fourth industrial revolution. J. Educ. Technol. Online Learn. 4(1), 23–30 (2021). https://doi.org/10.31681/JETOL.737193
Engelbrecht, P., Nel, M., Smit, S., Van Deventer, M.: The idealism of education policies and the realities in schools: the implementation of inclusive education in South Africa. Int. J. Incl. Educ. 20(5), 520–535 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1095250
Francis, B.K., Babu, S.S.: Predicting academic performance of students using a hybrid data mining approach. J. Med. Syst. 43(6), 1–15 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1295-4
Jalil, N.A., Wong, M.E.L.: Learning Analytics in Higher Education: The Student Expectations of Learning Analytics. dl.acm.org. (November, 5), pp. 249–254 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3502434.3502463
Joo, Y.J., Kim, N., Kim, N.H.: Factors predicting online university students’ use of a mobile learning management system (m-LMS). Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 64(4), 611–630 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9436-7
Kadoić, N., Ređep, N.B., Divjak, B.: A new method for strategic decision-making in higher education. CEJOR 26(3), 611–628 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-017-0497-4
Kashada, A., Li, H., Kashadah, O.: The impact of user awareness on successful adoption of decision support system DSS in developing countries: the context of libyan higher education ministry. Am. Sci. Res. J. Eng. 16(1), 334–345 (2016). http://asrjetsjournal.org/. Accessed 26 Aug 2020
Kaushik, M.K., Agrawal, D.: Influence of technology readiness in adoption of e-learning. Int. J. Educ. Manag. 35(2), 483–495 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2020-0216/FULL/XML
Kovač, R., Oreški, D.: Educational data driven decision making: early identification of students at risk by means of machine learning. In: The Central European Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems, pp. 231–237 (2018)
Lai, P.C.: The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. JISTEM-J. Inform. Syst. Technol. Manage. 14(1), 21–38 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752017000100002
Lasater, K., Bengtson, E., Albiladi, W.S.: Data use for equity?: how data practices incite deficit thinking in schools. Stud. Educ. Eval. 69(100845) (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100845
Leiber, T., Stensaker, B., Harvey, L.C.: Bridging theory and practice of impact evaluation of quality management in higher education institutions: a SWOT analysis. Eur. J. High. Educ. 8(3), 351–365 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2018.1474782
Leitner, P., Khalil, M., Ebner, M.: Learning analytics in higher education—a literature review. In: Peña-Ayala, A. (ed.) Learning Analytics: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends. SSDC, vol. 94, pp. 1–23. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52977-6_1
Lepri, B., Oliver, N., Letouzé, E., Pentland, A., Vinck, P.: Fair, transparent, and accountable algorithmic decision-making processes. Philos. Technol. 31(4), 611–627 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0279-x
Liu, D.-T., Bartimote-Aufflick, K., Pardo, A., Bridgeman, A.J.: Data-driven personalization of student learning support in higher education. In: Peña-Ayala, A. (ed.) Learning Analytics: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends. SSDC, vol. 94, pp. 143–169. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52977-6_5
Lytras, M.D., Aljohani, N.R., Visvizi, A., Pablos, P.O.D., Gasevic, D.: Advanced decision-making in higher education: learning analytics research and key performance indicators. Behav. Inform. Technol. 37(10–11), 937–940 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1512940
Mngomezulu, B.R., Maposa, M.T.: The challenges facing academic scholarship in Africa in: knowledge and change in African universities. In: Knowledge and Change in African Universities, pp. 175–188 (2017). https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789463008457/BP000011.xml. Accessed 1 Janu 2021
Morano, S., Riccomini, P.J.: Reexamining the literature: the impact of peer tutoring on higher order learning. Prev. Sch. Fail. 61(2), 104–115 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2016.1204593
Mori Junior, R., Fien, J., Horne, R.: Implementing the UN SDGs in Universities: Challenges, Opportunities, and Lessons Learned, vol. 12(2), pp. 129–133 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1089/SUS.2019.0004, https://home.liebertpub.com/sus
Mufidah, I., Husaini, L.R., Caesaron, D.: Improving online learning through the use of learning management system platform: a technology acceptance model-technology readiness index combination model approach. Jurnal Teknik Industri 24(1), 61–72 (2022). https://doi.org/10.9744/JTI.24.1.61-72
Mwapwele, S.D., Marais, M., Dlamini, S., van Biljon, J.: Teachers’ ICT adoption in south african rural schools: a study of technology readiness and implications for the south africa connect broadband policy. African J. Inform. Commun. 24(24), 1–21 (2019). https://doi.org/10.23962/10539/28658
Nouri, J., et al.: Efforts in europe for data-driven improvement of education a review of learning analytics research in seven countries. Int. J. Learn. Anal. Artific. Intelli. Educ. 1(1), 8–27 (2019)
Nugrahani, U.R., Wahid, N.A.: Technology acceptance model and motivation-opportunity-ability theory influences on indonesian dota2 gamer customer to customer online know-how exchange. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1779(1), 012003 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1779/1/012003
Nusir, M., Law, E., Aldabbas, H.: Evaluating the adoption and acceptance of egovernment in developing countries: a case study of jordan. In: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Egovernment, vols 1 and 2 (2012)
Okoli, J.: Improving decision-making effectiveness in crisis situations: developing intuitive expertise at the workplace. Develop. Learn. Organ. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-08-2020-0169
Okoli, J., Watt, J.: Crisis decision-making: the overlap between intuitive and analytical strategies. Manag. Decis. 56(5), 1122–1134 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2017-0333
Parasuraman, A.: Technology readiness index (Tri): a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies 2(4), 307–320 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024001
Prenger, R., Schildkamp, K.: Data-based decision making for teacher and student learning: a psychological perspective on the role of the teacher. Educ. Psychol. 38(6), 734–752 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1426834
Pugatch, T., Wilson, N.: Nudging study habits: a field experiment on peer tutoring in higher education. Econ. Educ. 62, 151–161 (2018). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775717303849?casa_token=2KtEgUXFZFcAAAAA:YQKdG6CDzIl-La_zLQ91CIkp1O1MiJleBiE01UkR2GRJ-6EmThEm1zTA0RLEst00vvcRmbTuiA. Accessed 14 June 2022
Putra Kusuma, G.: Evaluation of e-government use among civil servants using unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model-a case of central mamberamo regency. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 8(09). www.ijstr.org. Accessed 16 Jan 2020
Ramlall, S.: The impact of the Fourth Industrial Revolution on the survival of employee skills sets in the retail environment (2020). http://iiespace.iie.ac.za/handle/11622/460. Accessed 4 Nov 2021
Saunders, M., Leweis, P., Thornhill, A.: Research Methods For Business Students. Fisth ed. Prentice Hall (2009)
Schildkamp, K., Datnow, A.: When data teams struggle: learning from less successful data use efforts. Leadership Policy Schools 1–20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2020.1734630
Schildkamp, K., Poortman, C., Luyten, H., Ebbeler, J.: Factors promoting and hindering data-based decision making in schools. Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv. 28(2), 242–258 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2016.1256901
Seale, O.: Building leadership and management capacity for deans in South African higher education (2015). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/188770461.pdf. Accessed 6 Sept 2021
Shonhe, L.: An assessment of the technology readiness of public librarians in Botswana. Global Knowl. Memory Commun. 68(4/5), 275–287 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-10-2018-0086
Siemens, G., Gasevic, D.: Guest editorial-learning and knowledge analytics. J. Educ. Technol. 15(3), 1–2 (2012). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohamed-Mourad-Lafifi/post/Could_anybody_point_out_good_references_book_or_other_manual_about_SIEMENS_FUM_Card_such_as_FUM_230_FUM_511_and_son_on/attachment/59d64c3f79197b80779a6180/AS%3A484047265767424%401492417269115/download/Journal+of+Educational+Technology+%26+Society.pdf#page=6. Accessed 4 June 2022
Sousa, E.B.G.D., Alexandre, B., Ferreira Mello, R., Pontual Falcão, T., Vesin, B., Gašević, D.: Applications of learning analytics in high schools: a systematic literature review. Front. Artific. Intell. 4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/FRAI.2021.737891/FULL
Tsai, Y., Gasevic, D.: Learning analytics in higher education—challenges and policies: a review of eight learning analytics policies. In: The Seventh International Learning Analytics, 233–242 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027400
University of Massachusetts: Decision-making process (2018). https://www.umassd.edu/fycm/decision-making/process/. Accessed 25 July 2020
Vanlommel, K., Van Gasse, R., Vanhoof, J., Van Petegem, P.: Teachers’ decision-making: data based or intuition driven? Int. J. Educ. Res. 83, 75–83 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.02.013
Vanlommel, K., Van Gasse, R., Vanhoof, J., Van Petegem, P.: Sorting pupils into their next educational track: how strongly do teachers rely on data-based or intuitive processes when they make the transition decision? Stud. Educ. Eval. 69 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100865
Viberg, O., Hatakka, M., Bälter, O., Behavior, A.M.-C.: The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education. Comput. Hum. Behav. 89, 98–110 (2018). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563218303492 . Accessed 31 May 2022
Visscher, A.J.: On the value of data-based decision making in education: the evidence from six intervention studies. Stud. Educ. Eval. 69 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100899
Warden, C.A., Yi-Shun, W., Stanworth, J.O., Chen, J.F.: Millennials’ technology readiness and self-efficacy in online classes. 59(2), 226–236 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1798269
Wong, B.T.M.: Learning analytics in higher education: an analysis of case studies. Asian Asso. Open Univ. J. 12(1), 21–40 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-01-2017-0009/FULL/HTML
Yadufashije, C.: Building reputable university system in Africa. SSRN Electron. J. (2017). (September, 20). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3032650
Zhao, Y., Watterston, J.: The changes we need: education post COVID-19. J. Educ. Change 22(1), 3–12 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09417-3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chomunorwa, S., van den Berg, C. (2023). Assessing Institutional Readiness for the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Using Learning Analytics to Improve Student Experiences. In: Masinde, M., Bagula, A. (eds) Emerging Technologies for Developing Countries. AFRICATEK 2022. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 503. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35883-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35883-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35882-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35883-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)