Skip to main content

Cognitive Computing for the Internet of Medical Things

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrating Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence for Industry 4.0 Innovations

Part of the book series: EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing ((EAISICC))

  • 213 Accesses

Abstract

The fourth industrial revolution was led by Industry 4.0, which turned traditional into smart factories controlled by the Internet of Things (IoT). Because of the high incidence of work-related accidents and losses, the building industry faces a range of problems and is regarded as a high-risk industry. These difficulties often lead to higher-level problems such as overruns of cost, schedule expansion, and failure of the project. As a result, construction research has decided to identify best practices for enhancing safety, performance, and efficiency. The characteristics of portable devices, as well as safety criteria that can be used to forecast safety, efficiency, and organization practices are recognized and analysed. Adoption of recommender systems will result in significant improvements in terms of protection, reliability, and productivity, as well as a reduction in the risk of falling. Individual portable sensors or devices combined for multiparameter safety output monitoring based on their characteristics can be used effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Demirkesen, S., & Arditi, D. (2015). Construction safety personnel’s perceptions of safety training practices. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 1160–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hallowell, M. R. (2012). Safety-knowledge management in American construction organizations. Journal of Management in Engineering, 28(2), 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, T., Migliaccio, G. C., Teizer, J., & Gatti, U. C. (2013). Data fusion of real-time location sensing and physiological status monitoring for ergonomics analysis of construction workers. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 27(3), 320–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, D., Jin, Z., & Gambatese, J. (2020). Scenarios for integrating IPS–IMU system with BIM Technology in construction safety control. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 25(1), 05019007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, Q., Brannen, L., Rasoulkhani, K., Mostafavi, A., Stoa, R., Chowdhury, S., et al. (2020). Regulatory adaptation in the construction industry: Case study of the OSHA update to the respirable crystalline silica standard. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 12(4), 06520003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dai, J., Goodrum, P. M., & Maloney, W. F. (2009). Construction craft workers’ perceptions of the factors affecting their productivity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(3), 217–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohammadi, A., Tavakolan, M., & Khosravi, Y. (2018). Factors influencing safety performance on construction projects: A review. Safety Science, 109, 382–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mitropoulos, P., Abdelhamid, T. S., & Howell, G. A. (2005). A systems model of construction accident causation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(7), 816–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hwang, S., & Lee, S. (2017). Wristband-type wearable health devices to measure construction workers’ physical demands. Automation in Construction, 83, 330–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lu, Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications, and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 6, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Borgia, E. (2014). The Internet of Things vision: Key features, applications, and open issues. Computer Communications, 54, 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cai, F., Yi, C., Liu, S., Wang, Y., Liu, L., Liu, X., et al. (2016). Ultrasensitive, passive, and wearable sensors for monitoring human muscle motion and physiological signals. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 77, 907–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, W., Seto, E., Lin, K. Y., & Migliaccio, G. C. (2017). An evaluation of wearable sensors and their placements for analyzing construction worker’s trunk posture in laboratory conditions. Applied Ergonomics, 65, 424–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, W., Lin, K. Y., Seto, E., & Migliaccio, G. C. (2017). Wearable sensors for monitoring on-duty and off-duty worker physiological status and activities in construction. Automation in Construction, 83, 341–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Park, J. S., Robinovitch, S., & Kim, W. S. (2015). A wireless wristband accelerometer for monitoring of rubber band exercises. IEEE Sensors Journal, 16(5), 1143–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Krey, M., Schlatter, U., Mahadevan, D. A., Derungs, K., & Oehler, J. K. (2020). Wearable technology in healthcare. Journal of Advances in Information Technology, 11(3), 172–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Almusawi, H. A., Durugbo, C. M., & Bugawa, A. M. (2021). Innovation in physical education: Teachers’ perspectives on readiness for wearable technology integration. Computers & Education, 167, 104185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Awolusi, I., Nnaji, C., & Okpala, I. (2020, Nov). Success factors for the implementation of wearable sensing devices for safety and health monitoring in construction. In Construction research congress 2020: Computer applications (pp. 1213–1222). American Society of Civil Engineers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Morcos, M. W., Teeter, M. G., Somerville, L. E., & Lanting, B. (2020). Correlation between hip osteoarthritis and the level of physical activity as measured by wearable technology and patient-reported questionnaires. Journal of Orthopedics, 20, 236–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Blount, D. S., McDonough, D. J., & Gao, Z. (2021). Effect of wearable technology-based physical activity interventions on breast cancer survivors’ physiological, cognitive, and emotional outcomes: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(9), 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Parthiban, L., Latchoumi, T.P., Balamurugan, K., Raja, K., Parthiban, R. (2024). Cognitive Computing for the Internet of Medical Things. In: Goundar, S., Anandan, R. (eds) Integrating Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence for Industry 4.0 Innovations. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35751-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35751-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35750-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35751-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics