Abstract
The fourth industrial revolution was led by Industry 4.0, which turned traditional into smart factories controlled by the Internet of Things (IoT). Because of the high incidence of work-related accidents and losses, the building industry faces a range of problems and is regarded as a high-risk industry. These difficulties often lead to higher-level problems such as overruns of cost, schedule expansion, and failure of the project. As a result, construction research has decided to identify best practices for enhancing safety, performance, and efficiency. The characteristics of portable devices, as well as safety criteria that can be used to forecast safety, efficiency, and organization practices are recognized and analysed. Adoption of recommender systems will result in significant improvements in terms of protection, reliability, and productivity, as well as a reduction in the risk of falling. Individual portable sensors or devices combined for multiparameter safety output monitoring based on their characteristics can be used effectively.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Demirkesen, S., & Arditi, D. (2015). Construction safety personnel’s perceptions of safety training practices. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 1160–1169.
Hallowell, M. R. (2012). Safety-knowledge management in American construction organizations. Journal of Management in Engineering, 28(2), 203–211.
Cheng, T., Migliaccio, G. C., Teizer, J., & Gatti, U. C. (2013). Data fusion of real-time location sensing and physiological status monitoring for ergonomics analysis of construction workers. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 27(3), 320–335.
Liu, D., Jin, Z., & Gambatese, J. (2020). Scenarios for integrating IPS–IMU system with BIM Technology in construction safety control. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 25(1), 05019007.
Li, Q., Brannen, L., Rasoulkhani, K., Mostafavi, A., Stoa, R., Chowdhury, S., et al. (2020). Regulatory adaptation in the construction industry: Case study of the OSHA update to the respirable crystalline silica standard. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 12(4), 06520003.
Dai, J., Goodrum, P. M., & Maloney, W. F. (2009). Construction craft workers’ perceptions of the factors affecting their productivity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(3), 217–226.
Mohammadi, A., Tavakolan, M., & Khosravi, Y. (2018). Factors influencing safety performance on construction projects: A review. Safety Science, 109, 382–397.
Mitropoulos, P., Abdelhamid, T. S., & Howell, G. A. (2005). A systems model of construction accident causation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(7), 816–825.
Hwang, S., & Lee, S. (2017). Wristband-type wearable health devices to measure construction workers’ physical demands. Automation in Construction, 83, 330–340.
Lu, Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications, and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 6, 1–10.
Borgia, E. (2014). The Internet of Things vision: Key features, applications, and open issues. Computer Communications, 54, 1–31.
Cai, F., Yi, C., Liu, S., Wang, Y., Liu, L., Liu, X., et al. (2016). Ultrasensitive, passive, and wearable sensors for monitoring human muscle motion and physiological signals. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 77, 907–913.
Lee, W., Seto, E., Lin, K. Y., & Migliaccio, G. C. (2017). An evaluation of wearable sensors and their placements for analyzing construction worker’s trunk posture in laboratory conditions. Applied Ergonomics, 65, 424–436.
Lee, W., Lin, K. Y., Seto, E., & Migliaccio, G. C. (2017). Wearable sensors for monitoring on-duty and off-duty worker physiological status and activities in construction. Automation in Construction, 83, 341–353.
Park, J. S., Robinovitch, S., & Kim, W. S. (2015). A wireless wristband accelerometer for monitoring of rubber band exercises. IEEE Sensors Journal, 16(5), 1143–1150.
Krey, M., Schlatter, U., Mahadevan, D. A., Derungs, K., & Oehler, J. K. (2020). Wearable technology in healthcare. Journal of Advances in Information Technology, 11(3), 172–180.
Almusawi, H. A., Durugbo, C. M., & Bugawa, A. M. (2021). Innovation in physical education: Teachers’ perspectives on readiness for wearable technology integration. Computers & Education, 167, 104185.
Awolusi, I., Nnaji, C., & Okpala, I. (2020, Nov). Success factors for the implementation of wearable sensing devices for safety and health monitoring in construction. In Construction research congress 2020: Computer applications (pp. 1213–1222). American Society of Civil Engineers.
Morcos, M. W., Teeter, M. G., Somerville, L. E., & Lanting, B. (2020). Correlation between hip osteoarthritis and the level of physical activity as measured by wearable technology and patient-reported questionnaires. Journal of Orthopedics, 20, 236–239.
Blount, D. S., McDonough, D. J., & Gao, Z. (2021). Effect of wearable technology-based physical activity interventions on breast cancer survivors’ physiological, cognitive, and emotional outcomes: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(9), 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parthiban, L., Latchoumi, T.P., Balamurugan, K., Raja, K., Parthiban, R. (2024). Cognitive Computing for the Internet of Medical Things. In: Goundar, S., Anandan, R. (eds) Integrating Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence for Industry 4.0 Innovations. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35751-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35751-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35750-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35751-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)