Skip to main content

Using WPBL to Improve Engineering Undergraduates’ Computational Thinking Performance in Flipped Classroom

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Blended Learning : Lessons Learned and Ways Forward (ICBL 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13978))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 438 Accesses

Abstract

With the continuous development of artificial intelligence, more and more attention has been paid to improving students’ computational thinking capability in K-12 and higher education. Lots of research has shown that there is a close relationship between engineering education and computational thinking. Engineering thinking and computational thinking intertwine to some extent. The cultivation of engineering students’ computational thinking ability could be integrated into engineering content learning. However, in current research, there is limited research on how to improve engineering students’ computational thinking in an integrated way. Therefore, this study adopted Web Problem-Based Learning (WPBL) in a flipped engineering undergraduate course with the aim of enhancing students’ computational thinking performance in an active way of engineering content learning. A total of 110 third-year undergraduates participated in this quasi-experimental study. The 55 students the experimental group who learned via WPBL in flipped classroom performed significantly better than the other 55 students in the control group who learned via Q and A, mini-lectures and data analysis as in-class learning activities in flipped classroom. Specifically, the experimental group scored significantly higher on the Abstraction and Algorithm Thinking dimensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Prottsman, K.: Computational Thinking Meets Student Learning: Extending the ISTE Standards, 1st edn. International Society for Technology in Education, USA (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wing, J.M.: Computational thinking. Commun. ACM 49(3), 33–35 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Magana, A.J., Silva Coutinho, G.: Modeling and simulation practices for a computational thinking-enabled engineering workforce. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 25(1), 62–78 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cesar, E., et al.: Introducing computational thinking, parallel programming and performance engineering in interdisciplinary studies. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 105, 116–126 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yin, Y., Hadad, R., Tang, X., Lin, Q.: Improving and assessing computational thinking in maker activities: the integration with physics and engineering learning. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 29, 189–214 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hacker, M.: Integrating computational thinking into technology and engineering education. Technol. Eng. Teach. 77(4), 8–14 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tseng, K.H., Chang, C.C., Lou, S.J.: The process, dialogues, and attitudes of vocational engineering high school students in a web problem-based learning (WPBL) system. Interact. Learn. Environ. 20(6), 547–562 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brennan, K., Resnick, M.: New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, p. 25. Vancouver, Canada (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shute, V.J., Sun, C., Asbell-Clarke, J.: Demystifying computational thinking. Educ. Res. Rev. 22, 142–158 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karakasis, C., Xinogalos, S.: BlocklyScript: design and pilot evaluation of an RPG platform game for cultivating computational thinking skills to young students. Inf. Educ. 19(4), 641–668 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wu, S.-Y., Su, Y.-S.: Visual programming environments and computational thinking performance of fifth-and sixth-grade students. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 59(6), 1075–1092 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hsieh, M.-C., Pan, H.-C., Hsieh, S.-W., Hsu, M.-J., Chou, S.-W.: Teaching the concept of computational thinking: a STEM-based program with tangible robots on project-based learning courses. Front. Psychol. 12, 828568 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Korkmaz, Ö., Çakir, R., Özden, M.Y.: A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS). Comput. Hum. Behav. 72, 558–569 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kukul, V., Karatas, S.: Computational thinking self-efficacy scale: development, validity and reliability. Inf. Educ. 18(1), 151–164 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dagienė, V., Futschek, G.: Bebras international contest on informatics and computer literacy: criteria for good tasks. In: Mittermeir, R.T., Sysło, M.M. (eds.) Informatics Education - Supporting Computational Thinking. LNCS, vol. 5090, pp. 19–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69924-8_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J.-C., Jiménez-Fernández, C.: Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the computational thinking test. Comput. Hum. Behav. 72, 678–691 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tekdal, M.: Trends and development in research on computational thinking. Educ. Inf. Technol. 26(5), 6499–6529 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10617-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ehsan, H., Rehmat, A.P., Cardella, M.E.: Computational thinking embedded in engineering design: capturing computational thinking of children in an informal engineering design activity. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 31(3), 441–464 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09562-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aslan, A.: Problem-based learning in live online classes: learning achievement, problem-solving skill, communication skill, and interaction. Comput. Educ. 171, 104237 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schell, R., Kaufman, D.: Critical thinking in a collaborative online PBL tutorial. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 41(2), 155–170 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ng, M.L., Bridges, S., Law, S.P., Whitehill, T.: Designing, implementing and evaluating an online problem-based learning (PBL) environment–a pilot study. Clin. Linguist. Phon. 28(1–2), 117–130 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bergmann, J., Sams, A.: Flip your classroom: reach every student in every class every day. In: International Society for Technology in Education. 1st edn. International Society for Technology in Education, the United States of America (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Abeysekera, L., Dawson, P.: Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 34(1), 1–14 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Akçayır, G., Akçayır, M.: The flipped classroom: a review of its advantages and challenges. Comput. Educ. 126, 334–345 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Steen-Utheim, A.T., Foldnes, N.: A qualitative investigation of student engagement in a flipped classroom. Teach. High. Educ. 23(3), 307–324 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chiquito, M., Castedo, R., Santos, A.P., López, L.M., Alarcón, C.: Flipped classroom in engineering: the influence of gender. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 28(1), 80–89 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li, C.T., Hou, H.T., Li, M.C., Kuo, C.C.: Comparison of mini-game-based flipped classroom and video-based flipped classroom: an analysis of learning performance, flow and concentration on discussion. Asia Pac. Educ. Res. 31, 321–332 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chi, M., et al.: Implementation of the flipped classroom combined with problem-based learning in a medical nursing course: a quasi-experimental design. Healthcare 10(12), 2572 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Luo, Y., Li, Y., Liu, M., Wang, L., Chen, D.: Application of flipped classroom in biochemistry teaching reform at basic medicine college based on PBL and multimedia technology. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1574, 012083 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu, J.: The application research of PBL for cultivating computational thinking take the “High School Information Technology” course as an example. Master Degree thesis, Central China Normal University (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kong, S.C., Wang, Y.Q.: Formation of computational identity through computational thinking perspectives development in programming learning: a mediation analysis among primary school students. Comput. Hum. Behav. 106, 106230 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Castro, L.M.C., Magana, A.J., Douglas, K.A., Boutin, M.: Analyzing students’ computational thinking practices in a first-year engineering course. IEEE Access 9, 33041–33050 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ye, H., Li, C.: Engineering education understanding expert decision system research and application. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2022, 10 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Muliyati, D., Tanmalaka, A.S., Ambarwulan, D., Kirana, D., Permana, H.: Train the computational thinking skill using problem-based learning worksheet for undergraduate physics student in computational physics courses. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1521, 022024 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen, J., Kolmos, A., Du, X.: Forms of implementation and challenges of PBL in engineering education: a review of literature. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 46(1), 90–115 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Manuaba, I.B.A.P., No, Y., Wu, C.-C.: The effectiveness of problem based learning in improving critical thinking, problem-solving and self-directed learning in first-year medical students: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 17(11), e0277339 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaomeng Zhu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chen, X., Long, T., Cheng, L., Gan, X., Zhu, X. (2023). Using WPBL to Improve Engineering Undergraduates’ Computational Thinking Performance in Flipped Classroom. In: Li, C., Cheung, S.K.S., Wang, F.L., Lu, A., Kwok, L.F. (eds) Blended Learning : Lessons Learned and Ways Forward . ICBL 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13978. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35731-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35731-2_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35730-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35731-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics