Abstract
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is an environmental impact assessment method which captures all the stages of the life cycle of a commercial product. However, conventional LCA does not account for the role played by ecosystems in supporting human activities. Techno-ecological synergy (TES) is developed to bridge the gap between human and natural systems. Techno-ecological synergy life cycle assessment (TES-LCA) includes ecosystem services (ES) in conventional LCA which quantifies ecosystem services as an absolute reference value. Absolute environmental sustainability (AES) provides insight into the transgression level of human activities as compared to nature’s carrying capacity. TES-LCA is a multiscale framework which assesses ESs from local to global levels using biophysical models and brings in high geospatial resolution. Public and private ownership of ESs is considered separate which illustrates the contributions of stakeholders at different levels. This framework is applied to the soybean biodiesel with a focus on carbon sequestration and water-provisioning services. The local scale, where the production site is located, is considered along with regional and global scales. This case study illustrates that compared to conventional LCA and other AES assessment methods, TES-LCA is more robust and encourages nature-positive actions like ecosystem restoration.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakshi, B. R., G. Ziv, and M. D. Lepech. 2015. Techno-ecological synergy: A framework for sustainable engineering. Environmental Science & Technology 49(3): 1752–1760.
Bjørn, Anders, and Michael Z. Hauschild. Absolute versus Relative Environmental Sustainability: What can the cradle-to-cradle and eco-efficiency concepts learn from each other?. Journal of Industrial Ecology 17.2 (2013): 321–332.
CONCAWE (Oil Companies’ European Association for Environment, Health and Safety in Refining and Distribution, but the acronym is derived from “CONservation of Clean Air and Water in Europe”), Joint Research Centre of the EU Commission, and European Council for Automotive R&D, 2004. Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Future Automotive Fuels and Powertrains in the European Context, Version 1b, January, 60 pp., http://ies.jrc.cec.eu.int/Download/eh.
Göran Finnveden, Hauschild, M. Z., Ekvall, T., Jeroen Guinée, Heijungs, R., & Hellweg, S., et al. (2010). Recent developments in life cycle assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1), 1–21.
Huo, H. , Wang, M. , Bloyd, C. , & Putsche, V. . (2009). Life-cycle assessment of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of soybean-derived biodiesel and renewable fuels. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(3), 750–756.
Koc, A. Bulent, Mudhafer Abdullah, and Mohammad Fereidouni. Soybeans processing for biodiesel production. Soybean-application and technology 19 (2011): 32.
Le Quere C, Andres RJ, Boden T, Conway T, Houghton RA, House JI, Marland G, Peters GP, Van der Werf G, Ahlström A, et al. 2012. The global carbon budget 1959–2011. Earth System Science Data Discussions 5(2): 1107–1157.
Liu, X., Bakshi, B.R., 2018. Ecosystem services in life cycle assessment while encouraging techno-ecological synergies. J. Ind. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12755.
Liu, Xinyu, and Bhavik R. Bakshi. Ecosystem services in life cycle assessment while encouraging techno-ecological synergies. Journal of Industrial Ecology 23.2 (2019): 347–360.
MEA. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Wetlands and water. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
National Centers for Environmental Prediction. https://www.noaa.gov/jetstream/ncep. Accessed: 2022-05-10
Panichelli, Luis, and Edgard Gnansounou. GIS-based approach for defining bioenergy facilities location: A case study in Northern Spain based on marginal delivery costs and resources competition between facilities. Biomass and Bioenergy 32.4 (2008): 289–300.
Panichelli, L. , Dauriat, A. , & Gnansounou, E. (2009). Life cycle assessment of soybean-based biodiesel in Argentina for export. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 14(2), 144–159.
Pradhan, A. , Shrestha, D. S. , Mcaloon, A. , Yee, W. , Haas, M. , & Duffield, J. A. . (2011). Energy life-cycle assessment of soybean biodiesel revisited. Transactions of the ASABE, 54(3), 1031–1039.
Schmidheiny, S. and B. Stigson. 2000. Eco-efficiency: creating more value with less impact. World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
Steffen, W., K. Richardson, J. Rockstro öm, S. E. Cornell, I. Fetzer, E. M. Bennett, R. Biggs, S. R. Carpenter, W. de Vries, C. A. de Wit, C. Folke, D. Gerten, J. Heinke, et al. 2015. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347(6223): 1259855.
Tallis, Heather, et al. A global system for monitoring ecosystem service change. Bioscience 62.11 (2012): 977–986.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/. Accessed: 2022_05–10
USDA. 2010a. Economic research service: Arms farm financial and crop production practices. http://www.ers.usda.gov/ data-products/arms-farm-financial-and-crop-production-practices/ tailored-reports-crop-production-practices.aspx. Accessed March 2016.
USDA. 2010b. National agricultural statistics service. https://www.nass.usda.gov/. Accessed: 2022–03–20
USEPA. 2011a. Greenhouse gas emissions from large facilities. https://ghgdata.epa.gov/ghgp/main.do Accessed: 2022-03-20
USEPA. 2011b. National emissions inventory data. https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/2011-national-emissions-inventory-nei-data. Accessed: 2022-03-20.
USGS. 2010a. Geo data portal. http://cida.usgs.gov/gdp/. Accessed: 2022-03-20.
USGS. 2010b. Water use in the United States. http://water.usgs.gov/watuse/. Accessed: 2022-03-20.
Johan Rockstrom, Will Steffen, Kevin Noone, Asa Persson, F Stuart Chapin III, Eric Lambin, Timothy M Lenton, Marten Scheffer, Carl Folke, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, et al. Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and society, 14(2), 2009.
Wallner, Heinz Peter, Michael Narodoslawsky, and F. Moser. Islands of sustainability: a bottom-up approach towards sustainable development. Environment and Planning A 28.10 (1996): 1763–1778.
Wang, Michael, et al. Summary of Expansions and Updates in GREET® 2021. No. ANL/ESD-21/16. Argonne National Lab.(ANL), Argonne, IL (United States), 2021.
Wernet, G., Bauer, C., Steubing, B., Reinhard, J., Moreno-Ruiz, E., and Weidema, B., 2016. The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, [online] 21(9), pp.1218–1230. Available at: <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8> [Accessed 01/13/2022].
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation [grant numbers SBES-1739909 and CBET-1804943].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Xue, Y., Zhao, R., Bakshi, B.R. (2023). Assessing Techno-Ecological Synergies in the Life Cycle of Biofuels. In: Bakshi, B.R. (eds) Engineering and Ecosystems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35692-6_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35692-6_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35691-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35692-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)