Skip to main content

Demand and Supply of Air Quality Regulation Ecosystem Services

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Engineering and Ecosystems
  • 216 Accesses

Abstract

Despite advancements in pollution control technology, air pollution and carbon emissions still drive global-scale health and climate impacts. Fortunately, our planet provides natural solutions to regulating the quality of the air in the atmosphere. These solutions include the deposition of gas and particulate pollution onto the surface of vegetation and the process of photosynthesis which converts carbon into biomass. To seek synergies between nature-based processes and technological systems, we must be able to account for the uptake rate of ecosystem services and compare it to the emissions related to human and industrial activity. In comparing the demand we place on ecosystem services with the available supply, sustainability becomes an absolute metric rather than relative. Approaches for valuating both the supply and demand of air quality regulating services are discussed in this chapter. Due to the inherent uncertainty that exists in nature, both spatial and temporal dynamics are considered and presented through both analysis and design applications. Further, the role of ecosystems in sustainable design is explored, including how system boundaries can expand to include landscapes in optimization programs. Although many challenges exist in the implementation of techno-ecological synergistic design, existing research highlights the value of ecological systems through their appreciation in value over time and simultaneous co-benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Health Effects Institute. State of Global Air 2019. Special Report. Boston, MA: Health Effects Institute (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Lung Association. State of the Air 2016. American Lung Association (2016). arXiv:1011.1669v3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. UN Environment 2019. A Review of 20 Years’ Air Pollution Control in Beijing. Tech. Rep., United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya (2019). https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/27645/airPolCh_EN.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

  4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Ipcc fifth assessment report—synthesis report (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Masson-Delmotte, V., Portner, H. O. & Roberts, D. IPCC Global warming of 1.5 C (2018). arXiv:1011.1669v3.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ash, N. et al.Ecosystems and human well-being: a manual for assessment practitioners (2010). arXiv:1011.1669v3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lewis, S. L., Wheeler, C. E., Mitchard, E. T. & Koch, A. Restoring natural forests is the best way to remove atmospheric carbon. Nature (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gopalakrishnan, V., Ziv, G., Hirabayashi, S. & Bakshi, B. R. Nature-based solutions can compete with technology for mitigating air emissions across the united states. Environmental Science & Technology53, 13228–13237 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gopalakrishnan, V., Bakshi, B. R. & Ziv, G. Assessing the capacity of local ecosystems to meet industrial demand for ecosystem services. AIChE Journal62, 3319–3333 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Global Footprint Network. World Ecological Footprint by Land Type. https://data.footprintnetwork.org/#/analyzeTrends?type=earth&cn=5001. [Online; accessed April 2022].

    Google Scholar 

  11. Global Footprint Network. Footprint Network Open Data Platform. http://data.footprintnetwork.org. [Online; accessed April 2022].

  12. Tallis, H. et al. Working Paper: “Servicesheds” Enable Mitigation of Development Impacts on Ecosystem Services. Tech. Rep., New York: Mimeo (2012). http://www.naturalcapitalproject.org/decisions/servicesheds.html.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Charles, M., Ziv, G., Bohrer, G. & Bakshi, B. R. Connecting air quality regulating ecosystem services with beneficiaries through quantitative serviceshed analysis. Ecosystem Services41, 101057 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nowak, D. & Crane, D. The urban forest effects (UFORE) model: quantifying urban forest structure and function. Integrated Tools Proceedings (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  15. United States Forest Service. UFORE Methods. https://www.itreetools.org/documents/53/UFORE%20Methods.pdf. [Online; accessed April 2022].

  16. Gopalakrishnan, V., Hirabayashi, S., Ziv, G. & Bakshi, B. R. Air quality and human health impacts of grasslands and shrublands in the United States. Atmospheric Environment (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kimble, J. M. & Follett, R. F. The potential of US grazing lands to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect (CRC Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kimble, J. M., Lal, R., Birdsey, R. & Heath, L. S. The potential of US forest soils to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect (CRC Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lal, R., Kimble, J., Follett, R. & Cole, C. The potential of US cropland to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect (Sleeping Bear Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  20. United States Environmental Protection Agency. National Emissions Inventory. https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/national-emissions-inventory-nei. [Online; accessed April 2022].

  21. United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA Facility Level Information on Greenhouse Gases Tool. https://ghgdata.epa.gov/ghgp/main.do#. [Online; accessed April 2022].

  22. European Commission Joint Research Centre Data Catalogue. Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR). https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/collection/edgar. [Online; accessed April 2022].

  23. European Environment Agency. EEA Greenhouse Gases - Data Viewer. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/data-viewers/greenhouse-gases-viewer. [Online; accessed April 2022].

  24. European Environment Agency. National Air Pollutant Emissions Data Viewer 1990–2019. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/dashboards/necd-directive-data-viewer-5. [Online; accessed April 2022].

  25. Daniel, M., Ravi, S., Paula, M. et al. EPA air pollution control cost manual. Tech. Rep., United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning … (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  26. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Cost Analysis Models/Tools for Air Pollution Regulations - Control Strategy Tool. https://www.epa.gov/economic-and-cost-analysis-air-pollution-regulations/cost-analysis-modelstools-air-pollution. [Online; accessed April 2022].

  27. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Interactive Map of Air Quality Monitors. https://www.epa.gov/outdoor-air-quality-data/interactive-map-air-quality-monitors. [Online; accessed April 2022].

  28. Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium. National Land Cover Database. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/eros/science/national-land-cover-database. [Online; accessed April 2022].

  29. United States Forest Service. iTree Tools. https://www.itreetools.org/. [Online; accessed April 2022].

  30. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Revision to the Guideline on Air Quality Models: Enhancements to the AERMOD Dispersion Modeling System and Incorporation of Approaches to Address Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter. Federal Register (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model Improvement Committee. AERMOD Modeling System. https://www.epa.gov/scram/air-quality-dispersion-modeling-preferred-and-recommended-models#aermod. [Online; accessed April 2022].

  32. Exponent Engineering and Scientific Consulting. CALPUFF Modeling System. http://www.src.com/. [Online; accessed April 2022].

  33. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program. https://www.epa.gov/benmap. [Online; accessed April 2022].

  34. Fankhauser, S. & Pearce, D. W. The social costs of greenhouse gas emissions. OECD, 2, RUE ANDRE PASCAL, 75016 PARIS(FRANCE). 2–23 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Heath, L., Nichols, M., Smith, J. & Mills, J. FORCARB2: an updated version of the US Forest Carbon Budget Model (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  36. United States Forest Service. Tools - Carbon - USDA Forest Service. https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/carbon/tools/. [Online; accessed April 2022].

  37. Charles, M. & Bakshi, B. R. Designing industrial landscapes for mitigating air pollution with spatially-explicit techno-ecological synergy. AIChE Journal67, e17347 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gopalakrishnan, V., Ziv, G. & Bakshi, B. R. Role of Vegetation in Mitigating Air Emissions Across Industrial Sites in the US. ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bair, L. S., Alig, R. J. et al.Regional Cost Information for Private Timberland: Conversion and Management (DIANE Publishing, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shah, U. & Bakshi, B. R. Accounting for nature’s intermittency and growth while mitigating NO2 emissions by technoecological synergistic design—application to a chloralkali process. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing and Processing1, e10013 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Turner, M. C. et al. Long-term ozone exposure and mortality in a large prospective study. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine193, 1134–1142 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Charles, M. Applying Lessons from Nature to Advance Computational Sustainable Design: Designing Industrial Landscapes and Transitions towards Neutrality. Ph.D. thesis, The Ohio State University (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gopalakrishnan, V., Grubb, G. F. & Bakshi, B. R. Biosolids management with net-zero co 2 emissions: a techno-ecological synergy design. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy19, 2099–2111 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Charles .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Charles, M. (2023). Demand and Supply of Air Quality Regulation Ecosystem Services. In: Bakshi, B.R. (eds) Engineering and Ecosystems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35692-6_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics