Abstract
Despite advancements in pollution control technology, air pollution and carbon emissions still drive global-scale health and climate impacts. Fortunately, our planet provides natural solutions to regulating the quality of the air in the atmosphere. These solutions include the deposition of gas and particulate pollution onto the surface of vegetation and the process of photosynthesis which converts carbon into biomass. To seek synergies between nature-based processes and technological systems, we must be able to account for the uptake rate of ecosystem services and compare it to the emissions related to human and industrial activity. In comparing the demand we place on ecosystem services with the available supply, sustainability becomes an absolute metric rather than relative. Approaches for valuating both the supply and demand of air quality regulating services are discussed in this chapter. Due to the inherent uncertainty that exists in nature, both spatial and temporal dynamics are considered and presented through both analysis and design applications. Further, the role of ecosystems in sustainable design is explored, including how system boundaries can expand to include landscapes in optimization programs. Although many challenges exist in the implementation of techno-ecological synergistic design, existing research highlights the value of ecological systems through their appreciation in value over time and simultaneous co-benefits.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Health Effects Institute. State of Global Air 2019. Special Report. Boston, MA: Health Effects Institute (2019).
American Lung Association. State of the Air 2016. American Lung Association (2016). arXiv:1011.1669v3.
UN Environment 2019. A Review of 20 Years’ Air Pollution Control in Beijing. Tech. Rep., United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya (2019). https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/27645/airPolCh_EN.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Ipcc fifth assessment report—synthesis report (2014).
Masson-Delmotte, V., Portner, H. O. & Roberts, D. IPCC Global warming of 1.5 C (2018). arXiv:1011.1669v3.
Ash, N. et al.Ecosystems and human well-being: a manual for assessment practitioners (2010). arXiv:1011.1669v3.
Lewis, S. L., Wheeler, C. E., Mitchard, E. T. & Koch, A. Restoring natural forests is the best way to remove atmospheric carbon. Nature (2019).
Gopalakrishnan, V., Ziv, G., Hirabayashi, S. & Bakshi, B. R. Nature-based solutions can compete with technology for mitigating air emissions across the united states. Environmental Science & Technology53, 13228–13237 (2019).
Gopalakrishnan, V., Bakshi, B. R. & Ziv, G. Assessing the capacity of local ecosystems to meet industrial demand for ecosystem services. AIChE Journal62, 3319–3333 (2016).
Global Footprint Network. World Ecological Footprint by Land Type. https://data.footprintnetwork.org/#/analyzeTrends?type=earth&cn=5001. [Online; accessed April 2022].
Global Footprint Network. Footprint Network Open Data Platform. http://data.footprintnetwork.org. [Online; accessed April 2022].
Tallis, H. et al. Working Paper: “Servicesheds” Enable Mitigation of Development Impacts on Ecosystem Services. Tech. Rep., New York: Mimeo (2012). http://www.naturalcapitalproject.org/decisions/servicesheds.html.
Charles, M., Ziv, G., Bohrer, G. & Bakshi, B. R. Connecting air quality regulating ecosystem services with beneficiaries through quantitative serviceshed analysis. Ecosystem Services41, 101057 (2020).
Nowak, D. & Crane, D. The urban forest effects (UFORE) model: quantifying urban forest structure and function. Integrated Tools Proceedings (1998).
United States Forest Service. UFORE Methods. https://www.itreetools.org/documents/53/UFORE%20Methods.pdf. [Online; accessed April 2022].
Gopalakrishnan, V., Hirabayashi, S., Ziv, G. & Bakshi, B. R. Air quality and human health impacts of grasslands and shrublands in the United States. Atmospheric Environment (2018).
Kimble, J. M. & Follett, R. F. The potential of US grazing lands to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect (CRC Press, 2000).
Kimble, J. M., Lal, R., Birdsey, R. & Heath, L. S. The potential of US forest soils to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect (CRC Press, 2002).
Lal, R., Kimble, J., Follett, R. & Cole, C. The potential of US cropland to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect (Sleeping Bear Press, 1998).
United States Environmental Protection Agency. National Emissions Inventory. https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/national-emissions-inventory-nei. [Online; accessed April 2022].
United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA Facility Level Information on Greenhouse Gases Tool. https://ghgdata.epa.gov/ghgp/main.do#. [Online; accessed April 2022].
European Commission Joint Research Centre Data Catalogue. Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR). https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/collection/edgar. [Online; accessed April 2022].
European Environment Agency. EEA Greenhouse Gases - Data Viewer. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/data-viewers/greenhouse-gases-viewer. [Online; accessed April 2022].
European Environment Agency. National Air Pollutant Emissions Data Viewer 1990–2019. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/dashboards/necd-directive-data-viewer-5. [Online; accessed April 2022].
Daniel, M., Ravi, S., Paula, M. et al. EPA air pollution control cost manual. Tech. Rep., United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning … (2002).
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Cost Analysis Models/Tools for Air Pollution Regulations - Control Strategy Tool. https://www.epa.gov/economic-and-cost-analysis-air-pollution-regulations/cost-analysis-modelstools-air-pollution. [Online; accessed April 2022].
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Interactive Map of Air Quality Monitors. https://www.epa.gov/outdoor-air-quality-data/interactive-map-air-quality-monitors. [Online; accessed April 2022].
Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium. National Land Cover Database. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/eros/science/national-land-cover-database. [Online; accessed April 2022].
United States Forest Service. iTree Tools. https://www.itreetools.org/. [Online; accessed April 2022].
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Revision to the Guideline on Air Quality Models: Enhancements to the AERMOD Dispersion Modeling System and Incorporation of Approaches to Address Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter. Federal Register (2017).
American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model Improvement Committee. AERMOD Modeling System. https://www.epa.gov/scram/air-quality-dispersion-modeling-preferred-and-recommended-models#aermod. [Online; accessed April 2022].
Exponent Engineering and Scientific Consulting. CALPUFF Modeling System. http://www.src.com/. [Online; accessed April 2022].
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program. https://www.epa.gov/benmap. [Online; accessed April 2022].
Fankhauser, S. & Pearce, D. W. The social costs of greenhouse gas emissions. OECD, 2, RUE ANDRE PASCAL, 75016 PARIS(FRANCE). 2–23 (1993).
Heath, L., Nichols, M., Smith, J. & Mills, J. FORCARB2: an updated version of the US Forest Carbon Budget Model (2010).
United States Forest Service. Tools - Carbon - USDA Forest Service. https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/carbon/tools/. [Online; accessed April 2022].
Charles, M. & Bakshi, B. R. Designing industrial landscapes for mitigating air pollution with spatially-explicit techno-ecological synergy. AIChE Journal67, e17347 (2021).
Gopalakrishnan, V., Ziv, G. & Bakshi, B. R. Role of Vegetation in Mitigating Air Emissions Across Industrial Sites in the US. ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering (2019).
Bair, L. S., Alig, R. J. et al.Regional Cost Information for Private Timberland: Conversion and Management (DIANE Publishing, 2007).
Shah, U. & Bakshi, B. R. Accounting for nature’s intermittency and growth while mitigating NO2 emissions by technoecological synergistic design—application to a chloralkali process. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing and Processing1, e10013 (2019).
Turner, M. C. et al. Long-term ozone exposure and mortality in a large prospective study. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine193, 1134–1142 (2016).
Charles, M. Applying Lessons from Nature to Advance Computational Sustainable Design: Designing Industrial Landscapes and Transitions towards Neutrality. Ph.D. thesis, The Ohio State University (2021).
Gopalakrishnan, V., Grubb, G. F. & Bakshi, B. R. Biosolids management with net-zero co 2 emissions: a techno-ecological synergy design. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy19, 2099–2111 (2017).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Charles, M. (2023). Demand and Supply of Air Quality Regulation Ecosystem Services. In: Bakshi, B.R. (eds) Engineering and Ecosystems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35692-6_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35692-6_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35691-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35692-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)