Skip to main content

Why Should Engineering Account for Ecosystems?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Engineering and Ecosystems
  • 220 Accesses

Abstract

Engineering activities, like all human activities, rely on goods and services from nature. Goods include minerals, fossil resources, water, and soil, while services include regulation of air and water quality, climate, and soil fertility. Even though it is widely accepted that human activities cannot be sustained without availability of such goods and services from nature, engineering, like most disciplines, has ignored this role of nature and taken it for granted. Traditionally, engineering decisions have not accounted for nature’s carrying capacity and implicitly assumed that nature has an infinite capacity to supply most goods and services. Engineering has also attempted to dominate nature by controlling its intermittence or homeorhesis. Reasons behind this ignorance of nature’s role in sustaining engineering and human activities can be traced to the development of the basic underlying scientific principles. These were developed over the last few centuries when human impact on the environment was relatively tiny, and nature seemed vast and almost infinite. Ignorance of nature is a root cause of many of the sustainability challenges faced by humanity today, including ecosystem degradation. This ignorance can also mean missed opportunities to develop innovative ways of satisfying human needs by developing techno-ecologically synergistic solutions that can meet human needs while protecting and restoring nature. Such nature-positive solutions are estimated to present billions of dollars’ worth of business opportunities and millions of jobs across the world. This book aims to encourage and enable this transformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    By “engineering” we mean activities and outputs of engineering disciplines. Other related terms are technological systems or technosphere.

References

  1. E. P. Odum and G. W. Barrett. Fundamentals of Ecology. Thomson Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA, 5th edition, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. R. Bakshi. Sustainable Engineering: Principles and Practice. Cambridge University Press, jun 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Joseph Fiksel. A systems view of sustainability: The triple value model. Environmental Development, 2:138–141, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Partha Dasgupta. Nature in economics. Environmental and Resource Economics, 39(1):1–7, dec 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jarmo J. Hukka and Tapio S. Katko. Appropriate pricing policy needed worldwide for improving water services infrastructure. Journal AWWA, 107(1):E37–E46, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rossiter W. Raymond. The new age. The Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, pages 249–251, March 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Herman Daly. Economics for a full world. http://www.greattransition.org/publication/economics-for-a-full-world, 2015.

  8. V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L.Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M. I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J. B. R.Matthews, T. K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou, editors. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment. Island Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Rockstrom, W. Steffen, K. Noone1, A. Persson, F. S. Chapin, E. F. Lambin, T. M. Lenton, M. Scheffer, C. Folke, H. J. Schellnhuber, B. Nykvist, C. A. de Wit, T. Hughes, S. van der Leeuw, H. Rodhe, S. Sörlin, P. K. Snyder, R. Costanza, U. Svedin, M. Falkenmark, L. Karlberg, R. W. Corell, V. J. Fabry, J. Hansen, B. Walker, D. Liverman, K. Richardson, P. Crutzen, and J. A. Foley. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263):472–475, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nicholas Z. Muller, Robert Mendelsohn, and William Nordhaus. Environmental accounting for pollution in the United States economy. American Economic Review, 101:1649–1675, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Human cost of disasters: An overview of the last 20 years, 2000–2019, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. C. D. Milly, Julio Betancourt, Malin Falkenmark, Robert M. Hirsch, Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz, Dennis P. Lettenmaier, and Ronald J. Stouffer. Stationarity is dead: Whither water management? Science, 319(5863):573–574, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harvey Locke, Johan Rockström, Peter Bakker, Manish Bapna, Mark Gough, Jodi Hilty, Marco Lambertini, Jennifer Morris, Paul Polman, Carlos M Rodriguez, et al. A nature-positive world: the global goal for nature, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Natural England, JNCC, Natural Resources Wales, NatureScot & Northern Ireland Environment Agency. Nature positive 2030 – summary report, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  16. World Economic Forum. New nature economy report series, 14 July 2020.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bhavik R. Bakshi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bakshi, B.R. (2023). Why Should Engineering Account for Ecosystems?. In: Bakshi, B.R. (eds) Engineering and Ecosystems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35692-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics