Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Preliminary Analysis of Twitter’s LGBTQ+ Discussions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Management and Big Data (SIMBig 2022)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1837))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 311 Accesses

Abstract

Social media platforms play a significant role in the lives of LGBTQ+ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and others) individuals, where they have to tackle the challenge of managing their sexual and gender identities. In addition, social media have been leveraged as the go-to platform for a significant proportion of LGBTQ+ communities to come out and participate in discussions related to their rights and the discrimination faced. Twitter, in particular, has been analyzed to understand online behaviors towards LGBTQ+ communities, an example being how online Twitter discussions can reveal discriminatory behavior towards them. However, a macro-level analysis of LGBTQ+ tweets since the early days of Twitter has been understudied. In this research, we present a preliminary macro-analysis of users and tweets since 2006 to gather insights into queries such as: What emotions and toxicity levels are more prevalent in LGBTQ+ discussions? Do the emotions and toxicity levels in tweets change over time? What do we know about the users who have frequently been tweeting about LGBTQ+-related topics since 2006? Upon our analyses, we find that emotions such as joy and anger and toxicity such as identity attacks and threats are more prevalent in the negative user-bios and tweets. We also see a significant increase in activity on Twitter over the years for both overall and positive emotions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/Shuv0Khan/TweetApp.

References

  1. Albadi, N., Kurdi, M., Mishra, S.: Deradicalizing Youtube: characterization, detection, and personalization of religiously intolerant Arabic videos. arXiv preprint (2022). arxiv:2207.00111

  2. Almerekhi, H., Kwak, H., Jansen, B.J., Salminen, J.: Detecting toxicity triggers in online discussions. In: Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, pp. 291–292 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alper, M., Katz, V.S., Clark, L.S.: Researching children, intersectionality, and diversity in the digital age. J. Child. Media 10(1), 107–114 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2015.1121886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Andalibi, N., Haimson, O.L., Choudhury, M.D., Forte, A.: Social support, reciprocity, and anonymity in responses to sexual abuse disclosures on social media. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (TOCHI) 25(5), 1–35 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Andalibi, N., Haimson, O.L., De Choudhury, M., Forte, A.: Understanding social media disclosures of sexual abuse through the lenses of support seeking and anonymity. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3906–3918 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Best-Hashtags: Best-hashtags (2022). https://best-hashtags.com/

  7. Bond, B.J., Miller, B.: Youtube as my space: the relationships between Youtube, social connectedness, and (collective) self-esteem among LGBTQ individuals. New Media Soc. 14614448211061830 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Booten, K.: Hashtag drift: tracing the evolving uses of political hashtags over time. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2401–2405 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Branson-Potts, H.: L.A. Pride Parade Morphs into ResistMarch, as tens of thousands hit the streets (2022). https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-pride-resist-march-20170611-story.html. Accessed 07 Aug 2022

  10. Clark, K.A., Cochran, S.D., Maiolatesi, A.J., Pachankis, J.E.: Prevalence of bullying among youth classified as LGBTQ who died by suicide as reported in the national violent death reporting system, 2003–2017. JAMA Pediatr. 174(12), 1211–1213 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Craig, S.L., McInroy, L.: You can form a part of yourself online: the influence of new media on identity development and coming out for LGBTQ youth. J. Gay Lesbian Mental Health 18(1), 95–109 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Garg, S., et al.: Detecting risk level in individuals misusing fentanyl utilizing posts from an online community on reddit. Internet Interv. 26, 100467 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goyal, N., Kivlichan, I., Rosen, R., Vasserman, L.: Is your toxicity my toxicity? Exploring the impact of rater identity on toxicity annotation. arXiv preprint (2022). arxiv:2205.00501

  14. Hashtagify: Hashtagify (2022). https://hashtagify.me/manual/api

  15. Hswen, Y., Sewalk, K.C., Alsentzer, E., Tuli, G., Brownstein, J.S., Hawkins, J.B.: Investigating inequities in hospital care among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals using social media. Soc. Sci. Med. 215, 92–97 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kai: The deep connections between pride and black lives matter (2022). https://www.nyclu.org/en/news/deep-connections-between-pride-and-black-lives-matter. Accessed 07 Aug 2022

  17. Karami, A., Webb, F., Kitzie, V.L.: Characterizing transgender health issues in Twitter. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 55(1), 207–215 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., Moon, S.: What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 591–600 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, C., Ostergard, R.L., Jr.: Restricted access measuring discrimination against LGBTQ people: a cross-national analysis. In: Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 39, pp. 37–72. JHU University Press (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Luo, J., Du, J., Tao, C., Xu, H., Zhang, Y.: Exploring temporal suicidal behavior patterns on social media: insight from Twitter analytics. Health Inform. J. 26(2), 738–752 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mahmud, M.S., Bonny, A.J., Saha, U., Jahan, M., Tuna, Z.F., Al Marouf, A.: Sentiment analysis from user-generated reviews of ride-sharing mobile applications. In: 2022 6th International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC), pp. 738–744. IEEE (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  22. McConnell, E., Néray, B., Hogan, B., Korpak, A., Clifford, A., Birkett, M.: “Everybody puts their whole life on Facebook’’: identity management and the online social networks of LGBTQ youth. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15(6), 1078 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McDonald, K.: Social support and mental health in LGBTQ adolescents: a review of the literature. Issues Ment. Health Nurs. 39(1), 16–29 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mousavi, P., Ouyang, J.: Detecting hashtag hijacking for hashtag activism. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on NLP for Positive Impact, pp. 82–92 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nimmi, K., Janet, B., Selvan, A.K., Sivakumaran, N.: Pre-trained ensemble model for identification of emotion during Covid-19 based on emergency response support system dataset. Appl. Soft Comput. 122, 108842 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pascual-Ferrá, P., Alperstein, N., Barnett, D.J., Rimal, R.N.: Toxicity and verbal aggression on social media: polarized discourse on wearing face masks during the Covid-19 pandemic. Big Data Soc. 8(1), 20539517211023532 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Paudel, P., Blackburn, J., Cristofaro, E.D., Zannettou, S., Stringhini, G.: An early look at the Gettr social network. CoRR abs/2108.05876 (2021). https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.05876

  28. Perspective: Using machine learning to reduce toxicity online (2022). https://www.perspectiveapi.com/. Accessed 07 Aug 2022

  29. Rafiq, R.I., Hosseinmardi, H., Han, R., Lv, Q., Mishra, S.: Identifying differentiating factors for cyberbullying in vine and Instagram. In: Lossio-Ventura, J.A., Valverde-Rebaza, J.C., Díaz, E., Alatrista-Salas, H. (eds.) SIMBig 2020. CCIS, vol. 1410, pp. 348–361. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76228-5_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Rafiq, R.I., Hosseinmardi, H., Han, R., Lv, Q., Mishra, S., Mattson, S.A.: Careful what you share in six seconds: detecting cyberbullying instances in vine. In: 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), pp. 617–622. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rivers, C.M., Lewis, B.L.: Ethical research standards in a world of big data. F1000Research 3(38), 38 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Russell, S.T.: Queer in America: citizenship for sexual minority youth. Appl. Dev. Sci. 6(4), 258–263 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., Wolf, T.: DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter. CoRR abs/1910.01108 (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.01108

  34. Saravia, E., Liu, H.C.T., Huang, Y.H., Wu, J., Chen, Y.S.: CARER: contextualized affect representations for emotion recognition. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 3687–3697 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Scipy: Scipy Peak Find (2022). https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.signal.find_peaks.html. Accessed 07 Aug 2022

  36. Steinke, J., Root-Bowman, M., Estabrook, S., Levine, D.S., Kantor, L.M.: Meeting the needs of sexual and gender minority youth: formative research on potential digital health interventions. J. Adolesc. Health 60(5), 541–548 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sutter, M., Perrin, P.B.: Discrimination, mental health, and suicidal ideation among LGBTQ people of color. J. Couns. Psychol. 63(1), 98 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Twitter: Twitter API documentation (2022). https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/twitter-api

  39. Weimann, G., Masri, N.: Research note: spreading hate on Tiktok. Stud. Conflict Terrorism 1–14 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wikipedia: Twitter Inc. (2022). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter_Inc. Accessed 07 June 2022

  41. Yuan, Y., Verma, G., Keller, B., Aledavood, T.: The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on LGBTQ online communitie. arXiv preprint (2022). arxiv:2205.09511

  42. Zannettou, S., et al.: What is gab: a bastion of free speech or an alt-right echo chamber. In: Companion Proceedings of the the Web Conference 2018, pp. 1007–1014 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Grand Valley State University, Allendale, USA

    Abu Naweem Khan & Rahat Ibn Rafiq

Authors
  1. Abu Naweem Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rahat Ibn Rafiq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahat Ibn Rafiq .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Juan Antonio Lossio-Ventura

  2. Visibilia, Sao Carlos, Brazil

    Jorge Valverde-Rebaza

  3. Peruvian University of Applied Sciences, Lima, Peru

    Eduardo Díaz

  4. Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, Lima, Peru

    Hugo Alatrista-Salas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Khan, A.N., Rafiq, R.I. (2023). A Preliminary Analysis of Twitter’s LGBTQ+ Discussions. In: Lossio-Ventura, J.A., Valverde-Rebaza, J., Díaz, E., Alatrista-Salas, H. (eds) Information Management and Big Data. SIMBig 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1837. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35445-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35445-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35444-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35445-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation