Skip to main content

Requirements of Machine Learning and Semantic Enrichment for BIM-Based Automated Code Compliance Checking: A Focus Group Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Information Technology in Civil and Building Engineering (ICCCBE 2022)

Abstract

Several regulations, standards, and requirements govern the lifecycle of the built environment. Such instances include legislations, government development control rules, environmental compliances, project and contractual requirements, and performance standards to be followed during construction. Compliance checking is a complex task that is often conducted manually, making it a resource-intensive, error-prone, and time-consuming affair. Past researchers have worked on methods and processes of automated compliance checking systems (ACCS); however, there has been a negligible adaptation in the industry. To this end, this study tries to recognize the reasons for the gap in the implementation of the pre-construction permit compliance systems in the Indian construction industry. The study understands the reasons from the end-user’s perspective through the means of a focus group study. Key findings indicate manual pre-processing of data is a significant hurdle in Building Information Models (BIM) for application in ACCS. ACCS applications developed are restricted in their area of usage due to the limitation in applicability beyond explicit building code clauses. Rule-based validation of regulation requires enriched structured data, which is generally absent from the models developed by architects in the design phase. The study indicates the necessity of automated data pre-processing step that includes intelligent model filling suggestions and semantic enrichment to increase the adoption of ACCS. This study points out that automatic semantic enrichment (SE) can be achieved by applying machine learning (ML). Areas of application of SE in ACCS are identified in the study, which can enhance the industry’s user experience and adaptation of ACCS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beach TH, Rezgui Y, Li H, Kasim T (2015) A rule-based semantic approach for automated regulatory compliance in the construction sector. Expert Syst Appl 42(12):5219–5231. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2015.02.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rastogi S (2019) Construction 4.0: the 4 generation revolution. In: Indian lean construction conference—ILCC 2017, February 2019

    Google Scholar 

  3. buildingSMART, “Industry Foundation Classes (IFC).” https://www.buildingsmart.org/standards/bsi-standards/industry-foundation-classes/. Accessed 10 July 2022

  4. Fenves SJ (1966) Tabular decision logic for structural design. J Struct Div 92(6):473–490. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0001567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ding L, Drogemuller R, Rosenman M, Marchant D, Gero J (2022) Automating code checking for building designs –designcheck. Fac Eng—Pap, January 2006. https://ro.uow.edu.au/engpapers/4842. Accessed 21 Mar 2022

  6. Eastman C, min Lee J, suk Jeong Y, kook Lee J (2009) Automatic rule-based checking of building designs. Autom Constr 18(8):1011–1033. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.07.002

  7. Tan X, Hammad A, Fazio P (2010) Automated code compliance checking for building envelope design. J Comput Civ Eng 24(2):203–211. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2010)24:2(203)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Amor R, Dimyadi J (2020) The promise of automated compliance checking. Dev Built Environ 5(December 2020):100039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2020.100039

  9. Greenwood D, Lockley S, Malsane S, Matthews J (2010) Automated code compliance checking using building information models. In: The construction, building and real estate research conference of the royal institution of chartered surveyors, September 2010

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bloch T (2022) Connecting research on semantic enrichment of BIM-review of approaches, methods and possible applications. J Inf Technol Constr 27. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2022.020

  11. Sacks R, Eastman C, Lee G, Teicholz P (2018) BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Designers, Engineers, Contractors, and Facility Managers, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Malsane S, Matthews J, Lockley S, Love PED, Greenwood D (2015) Development of an object model for automated compliance checking. Autom Constr 49(PA):51–58, January 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.10.004.

  13. Bloch T, Sacks R (2020) Clustering information types for semantic enrichment of building information models to support automated code compliance checking. J Comput Civ Eng 34(6):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Krijnen T, Tamke M (2015) Assessing implicit knowledge in BIM models with machine learning. In: Thomsen MR, Tamke M, Gengnagel C, Faircloth B, Scheurer F (eds) Modelling behaviour, Springer, Cham, pp 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24208-8_33.

  15. Liu H, Lu M, Al-Hussein M (2016) Ontology-based semantic approach for construction-oriented quantity take-off from BIM models in the light-frame building industry. Adv. Eng. Inf 30(2):190–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AEI.2016.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bloch T, Sacks R (2018) Comparing machine learning and rule-based inferencing for semantic enrichment of BIM models. Autom Constr 91(March):256–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Russell S, Norvig P (1955) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sacks R, Bloch T, Katz M, Yosef R (2019) Automating design review with intelligence and BIM: state of the art and research framework. Comput Civ Eng, no. Mvd, pp 353–360

    Google Scholar 

  19. Krueger RA, Casey MA (2015) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 5th ed.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Karmakar A, Delhi VSK (2021) Construction 4.0: what we know and where we are headed? J Inf Technol Constr 26:526–545. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2021.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ankan Karmakar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Karmakar, A., Delhi, V.S.K. (2024). Requirements of Machine Learning and Semantic Enrichment for BIM-Based Automated Code Compliance Checking: A Focus Group Study. In: Skatulla, S., Beushausen, H. (eds) Advances in Information Technology in Civil and Building Engineering. ICCCBE 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 357. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35399-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35399-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35398-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35399-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics