Abstract
Digital sovereignty has gained interest in the political field and in the public discourse. This discussion paper addresses “digital sovereignty” from various academic disciplines in a holistic analysis approach: In the discussion of digital sovereignty, the question arises whose digital sovereignty is being addressed, what digital sovereignty means for the respective entities, how to increase digital sovereignty and how to build a digital sovereign civil society and its critical infrastructures. We present a layered model to conceptualize the meaning of digital sovereignty on three layers: (1) state or supranational institution, (2) organization, (3) individual as well as the relationships between the three layers. This model provides guidance for research and practice - including policy and decision making - on the complex subject of digital sovereignty. It is a living model and can also be expanded and adapted as more insight is added to this relatively new field. With this article, we share the model with the community and open it up for discussion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the General Motors film The Safest Place by Jam Handy.
- 2.
Search performed on Google Scholar - “digital sovereignty” (title only) from 2015 to 2022. Only four out of two hundred fifty seven results could fall into the category organizational digital sovereignty.
- 3.
Examples are the Minimum Cyber Security Standards (MCSS) in the United Kingdom or the BSI IT-Grundschutz in Germany.
- 4.
A specific term used to describe the benefits resulting from public sector funding.
- 5.
e.g. Check24 for financial offers, clevertanken.de for gas prices, Expedia for travel offers.
- 6.
For instance consumer protection agencies.
References
Gaia-X European Association for Data and Cloud AISBL: Gaia-X Dataspaces (2021). https://gaia-x.eu/what-is-gaia-x/deliverables/data-spaces/. Accessed 20 Apr 2022
Alam, K., Erdiaw-Kwasie, M.O., Shahiduzzaman, M., Ryan, B.: Assessing regional digital competence: digital futures and strategic planning implications. J. Rural. Stud. 60, 60–69 (2018)
Baischew, D., Kroon, P., Lucidi, S., Märkel, C., Sörries, B.: Digital sovereignty in Europe: a first benchmark. Wik-consult report, Bad Honnef (2020). http://hdl.handle.net/10419/251539
Barabási, A.L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. science 286(5439), 509–512 (1999)
Benedek, W.: International organizations and digital human rights. In: Wagner, B., Kettemann, M.C., Vieth, K. (eds.) Research Handbook in Human Rights and Digital Technology. Global Politics, Law and International Relations, pp. 364–375. Edward Elgar Publishing (2019)
Beyerer, J., Müller-Quade, J., Reussner, R.: Karlsruher Thesen zur Digitalen Souveränität Europas. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD 42(5), 277–280 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11623-018-0940-2
BITKOM: Digitale Souveränität. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD 42(5), 294–300 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11623-018-0944-y
Blossfeld, H.P., et al.: vbw – Vereinigung der Bayerischen Wirtschaft e.V. [Hrsg.]: Digitale Souveränität und Bildung. Gutachten (2019). https://doi.org/10.25656/01:16569
Bogenstahl, C., Zinke, G.: Digitale Souveränität - ein mehrdimensionales Handlungskonzept für die deutsche Wirtschaft. Digitale Souveränität, p. 65 (2017)
Braa, J., Hanseth, O., Heywood, A., Mohammed, W., Shaw, V.: Developing health information systems in developing countries: the flexible standards strategy. Mis Quarterly, pp. 381–402 (2007)
Bundesamt für Sicherheit und Informationstechnik: BSI warnt vor dem Einsatz von Kaspersky-Virenschutzprodukten (2022). https://bit.ly/3w6Zllo. Accessed 04 May 2022
Casalino, N., Saso, T., Borin, B., Massella, E., Lancioni, F.: Digital competences for civil servants and digital ecosystems for more effective working processes in public organizations. In: Agrifoglio, R., Lamboglia, R., Mancini, D., Ricciardi, F. (eds.) Digital Business Transformation. LNISO, vol. 38, pp. 315–326. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47355-6_21
CDU, CSU, SPD: Deutschlands Zukunft gestalten: Koaltionsvertrag zwischen CDU, CSU und SPD (2013)
Chin, Y.C., Li, K.: A comparative analysis of cyber sovereignty policies in China and the EU (2021). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3900752
Couture, S.: The diverse meanings of digital sovereignty (2020). https://bit.ly/3kCDVYa. Accessed 13 Apr 2022
Eichensehr, K.: Ukraine, cyberattacks, and the lessons for international law (2022)
European Political Strategy Centre (European Commission): Rethinking strategic autonomy in the digital age (2019). https://bit.ly/3MSarkW. Accessed 23 Apr 2022
Fang, B.: Cyberspace Sovereignty. Springer, Singapore (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0320-3
Fantino, D., Cannone, G.: Evaluating the efficacy of European regional funds for R &D. Evaluating the efficacy of European regional funds for R &D, pp. 165–196 (2014)
Frederking, V., Krommer, A.: Digitale Textkompetenz: Ein theoretisches wie empirisches Forschungsdesiderat im deutschdidaktischen Fokus (2019). https://bit.ly/38fJoRU
Friedrichsen, M., Bisa, P.J.: Digitale Souveränität. Vertrauen in der Netzwerkgesellschaft (2016)
Fries, I.: “In Code We Trust”? Zur Vertrauens-Verheißung der Blockchain-Technologie. Zeitschrift für Evangelische Ethik (2022)
Gegenfurtner, A., Schmidt-Hertha, B., Lewis, P.: Digital technologies in training and adult education. Int. J. Train. Dev. 24, 1–4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12172
Hartmann, E.A.: Digitale souveränität in der wirtschaft – gegenstandsbereiche, konzepte und merkmale. In: Hartmann, E.A. (ed.) Digitalisierung souverän gestalten, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62377-0_1
Hartmann, E.A.: Digitale souveränität: soziotechnische bewertung und gestaltung von anwendungen algorithmischer systeme. In: Hartmann, E.A. (ed.) Digitalisierung souverän gestalten II, pp. 1–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64408-9_1
Hummel, P., Braun, M., Dabrock, P.: Own data? Ethical reflections on data ownership. Philos. Technol. 34(3), 545–572 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00404-9
Wittpahl, V. (ed.): Digitale Souveränität. Springer, Heidelberg (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55796-9
Knopp, A.: Satellitenkommunikations-System: Vermutlicher Cyberangriff (2022). https://bit.ly/3w3I24S. Accessed 04 May 2022
Lee, C.W.: Participatory practices in organizations. Sociol. Compass 9(4), 272–288 (2015)
Lehmann, C., Dörr, L.: Digital souveräne gestaltung von services – ein marktfähiger mehrwert? In: Hartmann, E.A. (ed.) Digitalisierung souverän gestalten II, pp. 14–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64408-9_2
Merkel, A., Frederiksen, M., Marin, S., Kallas, K.: DE-DK-FI-EE: Letter to COM President on Digital Sovereignty (2021). https://politi.co/3FfWdrs
Moerel, L., Timmers, P.: Reflections on digital sovereignty. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3772777, Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY (2021). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3772777
Oberländer, M., Bipp, T.: Do digital competencies and social support boost work engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic? Comput. Hum. Behav. 130, 107172 (2022)
OECD: PISA 2009 results: students on line (2011). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264112995-en
OECD: Skills for a digital world. Tech. rep., OECD (2016)
Panusch, T., Büscher, J., Wöstmann, R., Deuse, J.: Konzept zur zielgerichteten kompetenzentwicklung für initiativen des maschinellen lernens. In: Hartmann, E.A. (ed.) Digitalisierung souverän gestalten II, pp. 93–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64408-9_8
Pentenrieder, A., Bertini, A., Künzel, M.: Digitale Souveränität als Trend? Digitalisierung souverän gestalten (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62377-0_2. Accessed 24 Mar 2022
Pohle, J.: Digitale Souveränität. Handbuch Digitalisierung in Staat und Verwaltung (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23669-4_21-1
Pohle, J., Thiel, T., et al.: Digital sovereignty. In: Practicing Sovereignty: Digital Involvement in Times of Crises, pp. 47–67. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag (2021)
Ranchordas, S.: Innovation-friendly regulation: the sunset of regulation, the sunrise of innovation. Jurimetrics 55, 201 (2014)
Regulation, G.D.P.: General data protection regulation (gdpr). Intersoft Consulting. Accessed 24 Jan 2018
Schieffer, A., Isaacs, D., Gyllenpalm, B.: The world café: Part pne. World Business Acad. 18(8), 1–9 (2004)
Scholz, O.: Koalitionsvertrag 2021–2025: Mehr Fortschritt Wagen (2021). https://bit.ly/3seGljP. Accessed 09 Apr 2022
Seidel, I., Bös, P.K.: Grundlagen, Inhalte und Implikationen 18(November) (2009)
Amedzro St-Hilaire, W.: Digital Risk Governance. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61386-0
Steinbach, J.: Souveränitätsfragmente. Ein Beitrag zur Literaturgeschichte der Souveränität und gegenwärtigen Herausforderungen der Rechtswissenschaften im Spiegel der Digitalisierung. Mohr Siebeck (2019)
Universität der Bundeswehr München: Störquellen: Setzt Russland Störangriffe gegen das GPS ein? (2022). https://bit.ly/3LKeLTt. Accessed 04 May 2022
Weber, H.: Digitale Souveränität. Informatik Spektrum 45, 62–69 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-022-01439-2
Acknowledgements and Contributions
The Project LIONS is funded by dtec.bw - Digitalization and Technology Research Center of the Bundeswehr which we gratefully acknowledge. We also thank the LIONS consortium and our research partners for their contributions to this research activity.
Authors have been listed in alphabetical order. The contributions can be attributed to the coauthors as described below:
– Isabelle Fries contributed additions from a philosophical point of view, as well as for general coherence, and mainly wrote the introduction.
– Maximilian Greiner moderated world café tables and contributed mainly the relationship between state and organization and the state layer.
– Manfred Hofmeier prepared and conducted the world café and contributed research design, discussion and limitations to this article.
– Razvan Hrestic co-organized the world café, and wrote mainly organization layer and relationship between the organization and the individual.
– Ulrike Lechner contributed to the research design, to data collection, data interpretation and the revisions of the article.
– Thomas Wendeborn contributed the individual layer and state of the art on digital sovereignty and definitions of digital sovereignty.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fries, I., Greiner, M., Hofmeier, M., Hrestic, R., Lechner, U., Wendeborn, T. (2023). Towards a Layer Model for Digital Sovereignty: A Holistic Approach. In: Hämmerli, B., Helmbrecht, U., Hommel, W., Kunczik, L., Pickl, S. (eds) Critical Information Infrastructures Security. CRITIS 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13723. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35190-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35190-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35189-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35190-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)