Skip to main content

Assessing the Cost of Population Dynamics Design Options in a Microsimulation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Social Simulation (ESSA 2022)

Abstract

We explore microsimulation design options as a source of divergence in total population when using demographic statistics from the United Nations to model population dynamics in three countries between 1950 and 2100. We compare 176 unique model designs, which toggle options such as the time step, the initial sample size of agents, variance reduction, ordering of demographic events, and adjustments to risk assignment as appropriate to each statistic. Results indicate that small population samples and 1-year time steps can produce particularly high divergence from UN targets, even when other options known to reduce divergence are implemented. Small sample 1-year models with low divergence are possible, but the specific combinations of options interact with a country’s population dynamics in unpredictable ways, which prevents the design from being used in other country contexts. These findings are important for balancing efficiency, accuracy, realism, and generalizability in demographic microsimulation design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Van Imhoff, E., Post, W.: Microsimulation methods for population projection. In: Population: An English Selection, 97–138 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Müller, K., Axhausen, K.W.: Population synthesis for microsimulation: state of the art. Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs- Und Raumplanung, 638 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. United Nations. World Population Prospects 2019: Methodology of the United Nations Population Estimates and Projections (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marois, G., KC, S.: Converting a cohort component model into a microsimulation model. In: Marois, G., KC, S. (eds.) Microsimulation Population Projections with SAS: A Reference Guide, pp. 25–49 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bacon, R., Hodulik, G., Voas, D., Puga-Gonzalez, I., Wildman, W.: Stay on target: population projections and microsimulation design. Int. J. Microsimulation. 16(3), 1–19 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li, J., O’Donoghue, C.: A survey of dynamic microsimulation models: uses, model structure and methodology. Int. J. Microsimulation. 6(2), 3–55 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is funded in part by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation, “Modeling Religious Change” (#61074).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel J. Bacon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bacon, R.J., Hodulik, G., Wildman, W.J. (2023). Assessing the Cost of Population Dynamics Design Options in a Microsimulation. In: Squazzoni, F. (eds) Advances in Social Simulation. ESSA 2022. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34920-1_46

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics