Abstract
Assessing a clubfoot deformity, especially in the neonatal period, requires an exhaustive checklist where inspection, palpation, and reducibility are the key points. However, clinical assessment should not be limited to a simple orthopedic evaluation of the foot as about 10% of clubfeet are nonidiopathic.
A severity scale is very useful to differentiate feet accurately, an initial reference is necessary to assess progress of treatment, and standardization of terms allows better exchanges of information.
Within the spectrum of all possible clubfoot conditions, there are different degrees of involvement, from the stiffest to the softest foot (benign, moderate, severe, and very severe). Classification is, therefore, essential to both score clubfoot at birth and assess the impact of treatment. However, all classification systems are necessarily arbitrary.
This chapter provides not only an overview of clubfoot classifications systems but also how classifications systems could potentially drive change. Further classification systems are needed to further guide post casting care and truly predict children in need of other modalities and/or treatment to minimize relapse.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dimeglio A. Le pied bot. Montpellier: Sauramps Médical diffusion Vigot; 1985.
Charles YP, Canavese F, Dimeglio A. Frühfunktionnelle Behandlung beim angeborenen Klumpfuß. Orthopade. 2006;35:665–74.
Dimeglio A, Canavese F. Pie zambo: revision de los tratamientos actuals. Rev Ortop Traumatol. 2006;50:156–63.
Dimeglio A, Canavese F. The French functional physical therapy method for the treatment of congenital clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2012;21:28–39.
Dimeglio A, Bensahel H, Souchet P, et al. Classification of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1995;4:129–36.
Ponseti IV, Smoley EN. Congenital club foot: the results of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1963;45:261–344.
Manes E, Costa CM, Innao V. Treatment of congenital clubfoot during the first year of life. Chir Organi Mov. 1975;62(3):301–14.
Harrold AJ, Walker CJ. Treatment and prognosis in congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983;65-B:8–11.
Catterall A. A method of assessment of the clubfoot deformity. Clin Orthop. 1991;264:48–53.
Wainwright AM, Auld T, Benson MK, Theologis TN. The classification of congenital talipes equinovarus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:1020–4.
Flynn JM, Donohoe M, Mackenzie WG. An independent assessment of two clubfoot classification systems. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1998;18:323–7.
Celebi L, Muratli HH, Aksahin E, Yagmurlu MF, Bicimoglu A. Evaluation of treated clubfoot: assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2006;15:34–6.
Pirani S, Outerbridge H, Moran M, Sawatsky B. A method of evaluating virgin clubfoot with substantial interobserver reliability. In: POSNA (Abstract); 1995
Tarraf Y, Carroll N. Analysis of the components of residual deformity in clubfeet presenting for reoperation. J Pediatr Orthop. 1992;12(2):207–16.
Dimeglio A. Le pied bot varus equin : regard sur le monde actuel. Acta Orthop Belg. 1998;64:80–2.
Goldner JL, Fitch RD. Classification and evaluation of congenital talipes equinovarus. In: Simons GW, editor. The clubfoot. The present and View of the future. Berlin: Springer; 1994. p. 120–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dimeglio, A., Canavese, F. (2023). Classification of Clubfoot. In: Dobbs, M.B., Johari, A.N., Williams, M.L. (eds) Clubfoot and Vertical Talus. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34788-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34788-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34786-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34788-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)