Abstract
Neural Networks (NNs) are used in various application areas to identify objects. Reliable behavior of NNs is an important aspect, especially for embedded systems. In this paper, we focus on the analysis of NNs to find correlations between their characteristics in order to be reliable and predictable in time, with the aim of making sugar beet recognition more transparent. Although obtaining promising results, as we are only going to focus on analysing models and finding correlations between some of their characteristics, this paper is only the first milestone towards using this correlation to optimize smart farming applications to improve the production and sustainability of the plantations around the world.
This research is supported by a grant from the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Industry, Climate Action and Energy of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia (MWIDE) as part of the 5G-Landwirtschaft-ML project in the context of the program 5G.NRW (01.05.2022 - 31.12.2024, grant number 005-2108-0039).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beyer, D., Löwe, S., Wendler, P.: Reliable benchmarking: requirements and solutions. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transfer 21(1), 1–29 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-017-0469-y
Bhadra, T., Paul, S.: Weed management in sugar beet: A review. Fundam. Appli. Agricult. 5, 1 (2020)
Canziani, A., Paszke, A., Culurciello, E.: An analysis of deep neural network models for practical applications. CoRR abs/ arXiv: 1605.07678 (2016)
Cioni, F., Maines, G.: Weed Control in Sugarbeet. Sugar Tech. 12(3–4), 243–255 (2010)
DeChant, C., Han, S., Lipson, H.: Predicting the accuracy of neural networks from final and intermediate layer outputs. In: ICML 2019 Workshop on Identifying and Understanding Deep Learning Phenomena (2019)
Frasconi, C., et al.: Design and full realization of physical weed control (PWC) automated machine within the RHEA project. In: Second International Conference on Robotics and associated High-technologies and Equipment for Agriculture and forestry (RHEA-2014)- New trends in mobile robotics, perception and actuation for agriculture and forestry, May 21–23 2014, Madrid, Spain New trends in mobile robotics, perception and actuation for agriculture and forestry, pp. 3–11 (2014)
Gao, J., French, A.P., Pound, M.P., He, Y., Pridmore, T.P., Pieters, J.G.: Deep convolutional neural networks for image-based Convolvulus sepium detection in sugar beet fields. Plant Meth. 16(1), 29 (2020)
Giselsson, T., Jørgensen, R., Jensen, P., Dyrmann, M., Midtiby, H.: A public image database for benchmark of plant seedling classification algorithms. arXiv: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Dec 2017)
Glaroudis, D., Iossifides, A., Chatzimisios, P.: Survey, comparison and research challenges of IoT application protocols for smart farming. Comput. Netw. 168, 107037 (2020)
Hendrycks, D., Dietterich, T.: Benchmarking neural network robustness to common corruptions and perturbations. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2019)
Hooker, S., Erhan, D., Kindermans, P.J., Kim, B.: A benchmark for interpretability methods in deep neural networks (2019)
Howard, J., Gugger, S.: Fastai: A layered api for deep learning. Information 11(2) (2020)
Ignatov, A., et al.: Ai benchmark: All about deep learning on smartphones in 2019. In: 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW), pp. 3617–3635 (2019)
Islam, N., Rashid, M.M., Pasandideh, F., Ray, B., Moore, S., Kadel, R.: A review of applications and communication technologies for internet of things (IoT) and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) based sustainable smart farming. Sustainability 13, 1821 (2021)
v. Kistowski, J., Arnold, J.A., Huppler, K., Lange, K.D., Henning, J.L., Cao, P.: How to build a benchmark. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering, ICPE 2015, p. 333–336. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2015)
Lottes, P., Hoeferlin, M., Sander, S., Muter, M., Schulze, P., Stachniss, L.C.: An effective classification system for separating sugar beets and weeds for precision farming applications. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 5157–5163. IEEE, Stockholm, Sweden (May 2016)
Lottes, P., Hoeferlin, M., Sander, S., Müter, M., Schulze, P., Stachniss, L.C.: An effective classification system for separating sugar beets and weeds for precision farming applications. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 5157–5163 (2016)
Luo, C., He, X., Zhan, J., Wang, L., Gao, W., Dai, J.: Comparison and benchmarking of ai models and frameworks on mobile devices (2020)
Machleb, J., Peteinatos, G.G., Sökefeld, M., Gerhards, R.: Sensor-based intrarow mechanical weed control in sugar beets with motorized finger weeders. Agronomy 11(8), 1517 (2021)
Martin, C.H., Mahoney, M.W.: Implicit self-regularization in deep neural networks: Evidence from random matrix theory and implications for learning. CoRR abs/ arXiv: 1810.01075 (2018)
May, M.J.: Economic consequences for UK farmers of growing GM herbicide tolerant sugar beet. Ann. Appli. Biol. 142, 41–48 (2003)
Milioto, A., Lottes, P., Stachniss, C.: Real-time blob-wise sugar beets vs weeds classification for monitoring fields using convolutional neural networks. ISPRS Ann. Photogram. Remote Sens. Spatial Inform. Sci. 4, 41–48 (2017)
Nasirahmadi, A., Wilczek, U., Hensel, O.: Sugar beet damage detection during harvesting using different convolutional neural network models. Agriculture 11(11) (2021)
Perugini, Engeler: Neural network learning time: effects of network and training set size. In: International 1989 Joint Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 2, pp. 395–401 (1989)
Raja, R., Nguyen, T.T., Slaughter, D.C., Fennimore, S.A.: Real-time robotic weed knife control system for tomato and lettuce based on geometric appearance of plant labels. Biosys. Eng. 194, 152–164 (2020)
Ramirez, W., Achanccaray, P., Mendoza, L.F., Pacheco, M.A.C.: deep convolutional neural networks for weed detection in agricultural crops using optical aerial images. In: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLII-3/W12-2020, pp. 551–555 (Nov 2020)
Reddi, V.J., et al.: Mlperf inference benchmark. In: 2020 ACM/IEEE 47th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA), pp. 446–459 (2020)
Russakovsky, O., et al.: ImageNet large scale visual recognition challenge. Int. J. Comput. Vision 115(3), 211–252 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y
Schweizer, E., Dexter, A.: Weed control in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris) in North America. Rev. Weed Sci. 3, 113–133 (1987)
Suh, H.K., IJsselmuiden, J., Hofstee, J.W., van Henten, E.J.: Transfer learning for the classification of sugar beet and volunteer potato under field conditions. Biosystems Eng. 174, 50–65 (2018)
Unterthiner, T., Keysers, D., Gelly, S., Bousquet, O., Tolstikhin, I.O.: Predicting neural network accuracy from weights. ArXiv abs/ arXiv: 2002.11448 (2020)
Wägemann, P., Distler, T., Eichler, C., Schröder-Preikschat, W.: Benchmark generation for timing analysis. In: 2017 IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium (RTAS), pp. 319–330 (2017)
Yang, R., Tian, H., Kan, J.: Classification of sugar beets based on hyperspectral and extreme learning machine methods. Appli. Eng. Agricul. 34, 891–897 (2018)
Zhu, H., et al.: Benchmarking and analyzing deep neural network training. In: 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization (IISWC), pp. 88–100 (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Brodo, L., Henkler, S., Rother, K. (2023). Analysing the Characteristics of Neural Networks for the Recognition of Sugar Beets. In: Henkler, S., Kreutz, M., Wehrmeister, M.A., Götz, M., Rettberg, A. (eds) Designing Modern Embedded Systems: Software, Hardware, and Applications. IESS 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 669. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34214-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34214-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34213-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34214-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)