Abstract
How can a secular democratic state inform its fundamental values to migrants with past affiliation in societies marked by religious norms and values? In Sweden, migrants are offered a (non-compulsory) course in civic orientation. Research has shown a need for professionalization of this type of education.
A dimension of professionalization can, we urge, be described in terms of religious literacy. The development of a course in civic orientation, where norms and values are discussed with respect to human rights, presupposes that methods are developed to draw attention to the complexity, and the ambiguity, of relations between religious and secular ethical positions. Teachers need knowledge of religiously motivated beliefs in ethical issues and of ways in which these are made visible in the multidimensional practice of lived religion.
Sweden, perceived as a highly secular country, has taken in many migrants from countries with traditional religious values. Through interviews, the Institute for Future Studies has identified some areas where religiosity is one parameter for the way these people rethink ethically relevant perceptions. These are values of self-determination and the individual’s own choices – such as abortion, divorce, premarital sex and homosexuality, and with those contiguous rights that are perceived as non-negotiable in the secular democratic discourse.
This chapter analyses the secular state’s mission to inform new arrivals about democratic values in relation to human rights in the Swedish discourse. The analysis is based on a multidimensional understanding of the concept of religious literacy, with reference to a discussion about the distinction between having a right to live with or without religion. One aim is to explore challenges and opportunities to discern in the current discourse how religion can contribute to the development of the secular state and how secular value teaching can contribute to the development of religious approaches to human rights.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Åberg, L. (2020). Standardiseringsarbetets kollektiva praktik. En studie om att kvalitetssäkra integrationssatsningen Samhällsorientering för nyanlända [Developing standards as a collaborative practice. The case of civic orientation aimed at newly arrived immigrants]. Dissertation, University of Gothenburg.
Barnes, L. P. (2019). Crisis, controversy and the future of religious education. Routledge.
Biesta, Aldridge, Hannam, & Whittle (2019, June). Religious literacy: A way forward to religious education (p. 23). Brunel University London & Hampshire Inspection and Advisory Service (Religious-Literacy-Biesta-Aldridge-Hannam-Whittle-June-2019.pdf (reonline.org.uk).
Carlsson, D., & Thalén, P. (2015). Det postsekulära klassrummet. Mot ett vidgat religionskunskapsbegrepp [The post-secular classroom. Towards a broader concept of religious knowledge]. Swedish Science Press.
Castelli, M., & Chater, M. (2018). We need to talk about religious education. Manifestos for the future of RE (pp. 53–70). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Cooling, T. (2012). What is a controversial issue? Implications for the treatment of religious beliefs in education. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 33(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2012.694060
Cowan, P., & Maitles, H. (Eds.). (2012). Teaching controversial issues in the classroom key issues and debates. Continuum.
Cowan, P., & Maitles, H. (2018). Understanding and teaching holocaust education. SAGE.
Dinham, A., & Shaw, M. (2017). Religious literacy through religious education: The future of teaching and learning about religion and belief. Religion, 8, 119–132. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel18070119
Flensner, Larsson, & Säljö. (2020). Känsliga frågor, nödvändiga samtal: att lära om och av kontroverser [Sensitive issues, necessary conversations: Learning about and from controversies]. Studentlitteratur.
Franck, O. (2017). Highlighting ethics, subjectivity and democratic participation in sustainability education: Challenges and contributions. In O. Franck & C. Osbeck (Eds.), Ethical literacies and sustainable development: Young people, subjectivity and democratic participation. Palgrave/Macmillan.
Franck, O. (2020a). Critical dimensions of ethical competence in intercultural religious education: An analysis with special regard to three Scandinavian curricular arenas. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 76(1), a5829.
Franck, O.. (2020b). Ethics education in democratic pluralist school contexts. Educational Theory Special Issue: Education and Risk (Wiley), 70(1), 73–88.
Franck, O. (2021). Gateways to accessing powerful RE knowledge: A critical constructive analysis. Journal of Religious Education, 69, 161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-021-00133-x
Franck, & Thalén. (2020). Religious education in a post-secular age, case studies from Europe. Palgrave.
Habermas, J. (2006). Religion in the public sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14(1), 1–25.
Hajer, M., & Meestringa, T. (2020). Språkinriktad undervisning [Language-oriented teaching]. Hallgren och Fallgren Studieförlag AB.
Hand, M. (2008). What should we teach as controversial? Defense of the epistemic criterion. Educational Theory, 58(2), 213–228.
Hartsmar, N., & Liljefors Persson, B. (2013). Medborgerlig bildning: demokrati och inkludering för ett hållbart samhälle [Civic education: Democracy and inclusion for a sustainable society]. Studentlitteratur.
Liljefors Persson, B. (2009). Cultural encounters, co-existence and identity – Teaching religious education for a global and sustainable society. In A. Ross (Ed.), Human rights and citizenship education (pp. 223–228). CiCe.
Liljefors Persson, B. (2011). Temat Abrahams barn – om inkluderande undervisning utifrån kreativt samarbete och dialog [The theme of the children of Abraham: Inclusive education based on creative collaboration and dialogue]. In M. Löfstedt (Ed.), Religionsdidaktik, etik, livsfrågor och kulturmöten [Religious education, ethics, life issues and cultural meetings]. Studentlitteratur.
Liljefors Persson, B. (2018). The position of (S-) EXistential questions in religious education in school and in teacher education in Sweden. In J. Ristiniemi, G. Skeie, & K. Sporre (Eds.), Challenging life – Existential questions as a resource for education (Publication Serie 37. Religious diversity in Europe) (pp. 329–346). Waxmann.
Liljefors Persson, B. (2019). (S-)Existentiella frågor – ett angeläget ämne med relevans för ämnet religionskunskap. In O. Franck, E. Hall, & B. Liljefors Persson (red.), Religionskunskapsämnet i fokus – utmaningar och möjligheter (pp. 194–208). Föreningen lärare i religionskunskaps årsbok, Jubileumsbok.
Liljefors Persson, B. (2020). (S-)existential questions among students – Sexuality and relations education as part of controversial issues with importance for citizenship education. In B. Krzywosz-Rynkiewicz & V. Zorbas (Eds.), Citizenship at a crossroads: Rights, identity, and education (pp. 369–381). Charles University and Children’s Identity and Citizenship European Association. ISBN: 978-80-7603-104-3.
Liljefors Persson, B. (2021). Sex- och samlevnadsundervisning i svensk skola och lärarutbildning – ett kunskapsområde i vardande mellan styrdokument och klassrumsgolv [Sex education in Swedish schools and teacher training – an area of knowledge in the making between control documents and classroom floors]. In P. Ouis (Ed.), [Sexuality and migration in welfare work] (pp. 479–504). Studentlitteratur.
Maitles, H., & Gilchrist, I. (2006). Never too young to learn democracy!: A case study of a democratic approach to learning in a Religious and Moral Education (RME) secondary class in the West of Scotland. Educational Review, 58, 1.
Martinsson, & Reimers. (2020). Skola i normer [School in norms]. Gleerups.
Niemi, K. (2018). Religionsvetenskapliga tröskelbegrepp: stötestenar och språngbrädor vid utvecklingen av. ett ämnesperspektiv [Threshold concepts in religious studies: Stumbling blocks and springboards in the development of a subject perspective]. Nordidactica – Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education, 2, 1–22.
Prothero, S. (2008). Religious literacy. What every american needs to know – And doesn’t. HarperCollins.
Puranen, B. (2020). Med migranternas röst. Den subjektiva integrationen [With the migrants’ voices. The subjective integration]. Institute for Future Studies. Med migranternas röst. Den subjektiva integrationen | Institutet för Framtidsstudier | Institutet för Framtidsstudier är en självständig forskningsstiftelse som främjar framtidsperspektiv i forskning och samhällsdebatt (iffs.se).
Skeie, G. (2012). Education between formation and knowledge – A discussion based on recent English and Nordic research in religious education. Utbildning & Lärande, 6(2), 80–95.
Thalén. (2020). World view instead of religion. In O. Franck & P. Thalén (Eds.), Religious education in a post-secular age, case studies from Europe (pp. 157–178). Palgrave.
The National Agency for Education. (2022). Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet 2022 (Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and school-age educare).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Franck, O., Liljefors Persson, B. (2023). Democratic and Inclusive Religious Education in the Secular State – The Case of Sweden. In: Anthony, FV., Ziebertz, HG. (eds) Human Rights and the Separation of State and Religion. Religion and Human Rights, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33998-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33998-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-33997-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-33998-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)