Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Influence of Sensory Marketing on Consumers with Different Characteristics Regarding Physical Store Shopping

  • Chapter
The Garment Economy

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Business and Economics ((STBE))

  • 1024 Accesses

Abstract

The retail industry is highly exposed to the revolutionary changes imposed by the acceleration of digitalisation; it is an inevitable challenge for traditional physical stores in light of online channels continuing to grow and increasing market competition (Biron, The last decade was devastating for the retail industry. Here’s how the retail apocalypse played out, https://www.businessinsider.com/retail-apocalypse-last-decade-timeline-2019-12, 2022; Kumagai & Nagasawa, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34:1809, 2021). In response to this situation, it is essential to provide both theoretical and practical research support to help retailers elevate the offline shopping experience and win the heart of customers (Gauri et al., Journal of Retailing, 97:42–61, 2021). An enjoyable shopping experience is identified as a significant factor for consumers to choose physical store shopping over online shopping (Duong et al., Journal of Consumer Marketing, 39:218–229, 2022). More importantly, consumers’ passion and need for the physical store experience are not eliminated in the last decade (Creswell, The incredible shrinking sears (Published 2017), Nytimes.com, 2017; Kumagai & Nagasawa, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34:1809, 2021; Mintel, Beauty and personal care retailing—UK—2022: Consumer market research report | Mintel.com, 2022; PwC, Total retail survey: 10 retailer investments for an uncertain future, https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/assets/total-retail-2017.pdf, 2017). Even after COVID-19, when online shopping became compulsory during the period of lockdown, nearly half of the shoppers stated that they still prefer to shop cosmetics in the physical store, due to their ability to feel the product in real life (Eroglu et al., Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 64:102760, 2022; Mintel, Beauty and personal care retailing—UK—2022: Consumer market research report | Mintel.com, 2022; Wang et al., Frontiers in Psychology, 12:829696, 2022). Prior research on the physical store experience has concentrated on the influence of store atmosphere; sensory marketing; on the other hand, has been shown in recent studies to be important in providing a better consumer shopping experience (Duong et al., Journal of Consumer Marketing, 39:218–229, 2022; Shahid et al., Psychology & Marketing, 39:1398, 2022). Using sensory marketing to engage the customer through five sensations (visual, sound, smell, touch, and taste) is the unique advantage of physical store compared to online shopping; organisations could create an emotional bond between consumer, products, and services, rather than on a rational level only (Biswas, Journal of Retailing, 95:111–115, 2019; Hultén, Sensory Marketing, 1–23, 2015; Hultén et al., Sensory Marketing, 1–23, 2009; Hussain, International Journal of Management Studies, 2:32, 2018; Roy et al., Journal of Marketing Management, 36:299–333, 2020; Shahid et al., Psychology & Marketing, 39:1398, 2022; Yoganathan et al., Journal of Business Research, 96:386–396, 2019). The research aim of this study is to examine the impact of sensory marketing strategies on consumer in-store shopping experience, evaluate, and identify how consumers with different characteristics have different reactions and preferences on sensory marketing strategies. Retailers could provide better physical engagement to create customer value when selling deep products – that require ample inspection to make an informed decision (Zhang et al., Journal of Marketing, 86:166–185, 2021). Physical encounters are intimately linked to an individual’s five senses; using sensory marketing to engage them is the unique advantage of in-store experience compared to online shopping (Reid et al., International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 17:364–383, 2016; Vignali et al., International Journal of Business and Globalisation 13:387–418, 2014; Vignali & Reid, Technology driven sustainability: Innovation in the fashion supply chain, Springer, 2014); organisations could create an emotional bond between consumers, products, and services, rather than on a rational level only (Biswas, Journal of Marketing, 56:57, 2019; Hultén, Sensory marketing, Routledge, 2015; Krishna, Customer sense—how the 5 senses influence buying behavior, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013; Kumagai & Nagasawa, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34:1809, 2021; Labrecque, Psychology & Marketing, 37:1013–1018, 2020). Especially for luxury stores, which promise a sensorial shopping experience (Joshi & Garg, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45:259–272, 2021), the multisensory dimension serves as an integral feature of luxury brands and their related strategies (Shahid et al., Psychology & Marketing, 39:1398, 2022).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adomaviciute, K. (2014). Relationship between utilitarian and hedonic consumer behavior and socially responsible consumption. Economics and Management, 18(4), 754–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alhedhaif, S., Lele, U., & Kaifi, B. (2016). Brand loyalty and factors affecting cosmetics buying behavior of Saudi female consumers. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 7(3), 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, M., & Reynolds, K. (2012). Approach and avoidance motivation: Investigating hedonic consumption in a retail setting. Journal of Retailing, 88(3), 399–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babin, B., & Babin, L. (2001). Seeking something different? A model of schema typicality, consumer affect, purchase intentions and perceived shopping value. Journal of Business Research, 54(2), 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J., Grewal, D., & Parasuraman, A. (1994). The influence of store environment on quality inferences and store image. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(4), 328–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baptista, A. (2020). Consumer behavior in relation to cosmetics. South American Development Society Journal, 6(17), 426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbopoulos, I., & Johansson, L. (2016). A multi-dimensional approach to consumer motivation: Exploring economic, hedonic, and normative consumption goals. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(1), 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros, L., Petroll, M., Damacena, C., & Knoppe, M. (2019). Store atmosphere and impulse: A cross-cultural study. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 47(8), 817–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biron, B. (2022). The last decade was devastating for the retail industry. Here's how the retail apocalypse played out [online]. Business Insider. Accessed March 22, 2022, from https://www.businessinsider.com/retail-apocalypse-last-decade-timeline-2019-12

  • Biswas, D. (2019). Sensory aspects of retailing: Theoretical and practical implications. Journal of Retailing, 95(4), 111–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitner, M. (1992). Services capes: The impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blazquez, M., Boardman, R., & Xu, L. (2019). International flagship stores: An exploration of store atmospherics and their influence on purchase behaviour. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 22(1), 110–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, R., & McCormick, H. (2019). The impact of product presentation on decision-making and purchasing. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 22(3), 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borges, A., Herter, M., & Chebat, J. (2015). “It was not that long!”: The effects of the in-store TV screen content and consumers emotions on consumer waiting perception. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 22, 96–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. (2002). Technology and the customer interface: What consumers want in the physical and virtual store. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachero-Martínez, S., & Vázquez-Casielles, R. (2018). Developing the marketing experience to increase shopping time: The moderating effect of visit frequency. Administrative Sciences, 8(4), 77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, N. (2013). Multi-sensory retail: Why stores must appeal to all five senses [online]. The Guardian. Accessed May 1, 2021, from https://www.theguardian.com/media-network/media-network-blog/2013/aug/21/multi-sensory-retail-high-street

  • Celik, S. (2011). Characteristics and competencies for teacher educators: Addressing the need for improved professional standards in Turkey. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(4), 73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H., Eckman, M., & Yan, R. (2011). Application of the stimulus-organism-response model to the retail environment: The role of hedonic motivation in impulse buying behavior. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 21(3), 233–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chebat, J., & Michon, R. (2003). Impact of ambient odors on mall shoppers' emotions, cognition, and spending. Journal of Business Research, 56(7), 529–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. (2017). The incredible shrinking sears (Published 2017). [online] Nytimes.com. Accessed March 22, 2022, from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/11/business/the-incredible-shrinking-sears.html

  • Dash, G., Kiefer, K., & Paul, J. (2021). Marketing-to-millennials: Marketing 4.0, customer satisfaction and purchase intention. Journal of Business Research, 122, 608–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duong, V. C., Regolini, E., Sung, B., Teah, M., & Hatton-Jones, S. (2022). Is more really better for in-store experience? A psychophysiological experiment on sensory modalities. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 39(2), 218–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durmaz, Y. (2014). The impact of psychological factors on consumer buying behavior and an empirical application in Turkey. Asian Social Science, 10(6), 194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eroglu, S. A., Machleit, K. A., & Neybert, E. G. (2022). Crowding in the time of COVID: Effects on rapport and shopping satisfaction. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 64, 102760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Errajaa, K., Hombourger-Barès, S., & Audrain-Pontevia, A. F. (2022). Effects of the in-store crowd and employee perceptions on intentions to revisit and word-of-mouth via transactional satisfaction: A SOR approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 68, 103087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, F., Grimmer, L., & Grimmer, M. (2022). Consumer orientations of secondhand fashion shoppers: The role of shopping frequency and store type. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 67, 102991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M., Jamal, A., & Foxall, G. (2013). Consumer behaviour (pp. 28–57). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eze, S., & Bello, A. (2016). Factors influencing consumers buying behaviour within the clothing industry. British Journal of Marketing Studies, 4(7), 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, C., Sands, S., & Brace-Govan, J. (2016). The role of fashionability in second-hand shopping motivations. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 32, 262–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauri, D., Jindal, R., Ratchford, B., Fox, E., Bhatnagar, A., Pandey, A., Navallo, J., Fogarty, J., Carr, S., & Howerton, E. (2021). Evolution of retail formats: Past, present, and future. Journal of Retailing, 97(1), 42–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. S., & Mukherjee, J. (2022). Long-term changes in consumers' shopping behavior post-pandemic: An exploratory study. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 50(12), 1518–1534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, A. (2017). FENTY beauty at Harvey Nichols [online]. Alex Head. Accessed April 21, 2021, from https://alexhead.co.uk/blog/fenty-beauty-harvey-nichols/

  • Hidalgo-Baz, M., Martos-Partal, M., & González-Benito, Ó. (2017). Attitudes vs. purchase behaviors as experienced dissonance: The roles of knowledge and consumer orientations in organic market. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M., & Hirschman, E. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hultén, B. (2015). Sensory marketing. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hultén, B., Broweus, N., & van Dijk, M. (2009). What is sensory marketing? Sensory Marketing, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, S. (2018). Brand image and customer loyalty through sensory marketing strategies - a study on international fast food chain restaurants. International Journal of Management Studies, 2(7), 32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, V., Stoel, L., & Brantley, A. (2011). Mall attributes and shopping value: Differences by gender and generational cohort. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, G., Im, C., & Kim, M. (2017). The effect of brand experience provider on brand experience: Focus on Korean cosmetic brand shop. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 33(6), 1205–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, R., & Garg, P. (2021). Role of brand experience in shaping brand love. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(2), 259–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaltcheva, V., & Weitz, B. (2006). When should a retailer create an exciting store environment? Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, H., 2016. How retailers manipulate sight, smell, and sound to trigger purchase behavior in consumers – Shopify [online]. Shopify. Accessed May 1 2021, from https://www.shopify.com/retail/119926083-how-retailers-manipulate-sight-smell-and-sound-to-trigger-purchase-behavior-in-consumers

  • Kim, S., Park, G., Lee, Y., & Choi, S. (2016). Customer emotions and their triggers in luxury retail: Understanding the effects of customer emotions before and after entering a luxury shop. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5809–5818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondo, F. N., & Okubo, T. (2022). Understanding multi-channel consumer behavior: A comparison between segmentations of multi-channel purchases by product category and overall products. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 64, 102792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (1973). Atmospherics as a marketing tool. Journal of Retailing, 49(4), 48–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2012). Principles of marketing (13th ed.). Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, A. (2013). Customer sense - how the 5 senses influence buying behavior. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumagai, K., & Nagasawa, S. Y. (2021). Hedonic shopping experience, subjective well-being and brand luxury: A comparative discussion of physical stores and e-retailers. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34, 1809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labrecque, L. (2020). Stimulating the senses: An introduction to part two of the special issue on sensory marketing. Psychology & Marketing, 37(8), 1013–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmi, Y., & Babu, M. (2019). Study of factors that influence the consumer behaviour towards cosmetics - conceptual frame work. IRE Journals, 2(7), 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, C. (2015). Selling through the senses: Sensory appeals in the fashion retail environment. The Journal of Design, 7(1), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzano, R., Serra, T. & Gavilán, D., 2019. Sensory marketing: Straight to the emotions | IE Insights [online]. IE Insights. Accessed April 21, 2021, from https://www.ie.edu/insights/articles/sensory-marketing-straight-to-the-emotions/

  • Mintel. (2022). Beauty and personal care retailing - UK - 2022: Consumer market research report | Mintel.com [online]. Mintel Store. Available at: https://reports.mintel.com/display/1101265/?fromSearch=%3Ffreetext%3Dcosmetic%2520physical%2520store&resultPosition=9

  • Nghiêm-Phú, B. (2017). Sensory marketing in an outdoor out-store shopping environment – An exploratory study in Japan. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 29(5), 994–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngoh, C., & Groening, C. (2022). The effect of COVID-19 on consumers’ channel shopping behaviors: A segmentation study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 68, 202209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, A. (2011). Atmosphere in fashion stores: Do you need to change? Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 15(4), 428–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perumal, S., Ali, J., & Shaarih, H. (2021). Exploring nexus among sensory marketing and repurchase intention: Application of S-O-R model. Management Science Letters, 1527–1536.

    Google Scholar 

  • PWC. (2017). Total retail survey: 10 retailer investments for an uncertain future [online]. PWC. Accessed August 5, 2021, from https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/assets/total-retail-2017.pdf

  • Reid, L. F., Ross, H., & Vignali, G. (2016). An exploration of the relationship between product selection criteria and engagement with ‘show-rooming’ and ‘web-rooming’ in the consumer’s decision-making process. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 17(3), 364–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodas-Areiza, J., & Montoya-Restrepo, L. (2018). Methodological proposal for the analysis and measurement of sensory marketing integrated to the consumer experience. DYNA, 85(207), 54–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, S., Balaji, M., & Nguyen, B. (2020). Consumer-computer interaction and in-store smart technology (IST) in the retail industry: The role of motivation, opportunity, and ability. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(3–4), 299–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satti, Z., Babar, S., & Ahmad, H. (2019). Exploring mediating role of service quality in the association between sensory marketing and customer satisfaction. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 719–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarpi, D. (2020). Hedonism, utilitarianism, and consumer behavior (1st ed.). Springer International Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scarpi, D. (2021). A construal-level approach to hedonic and utilitarian shopping orientation. Marketing Letters, 32(2), 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarpi, D., Pizzi, G., & Visentin, M. (2014). Shopping for fun or shopping to buy: Is it different online and offline? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(3), 258–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahid, S., Paul, J., Gilal, F. G., & Ansari, S. (2022). The role of sensory marketing and brand experience in building emotional attachment and brand loyalty in luxury retail stores. Psychology & Marketing, 39, 1398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soars, B. (2009). Driving sales through shoppers' sense of sound, sight, smell and touch. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 37(3), 286–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, M., Askegaard, S., Hogg, M., & Bamossy, G. (2019). Consumer behaviour (7th ed.). Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, C. (2022). Experimental atmospherics: A multi-sensory perspective. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal. (ahead-of-print).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, C., Puccinelli, N., Grewal, D., & Roggeveen, A. (2014). Store atmospherics: A multisensory perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 31(7), 472–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statista. (2020). Cosmetics: Market value 2009–2019 in Great Britain | Statista [online]. Statista. Accessed May 3, 2021, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/289762/market-value-of-cosmetics-in-great-britain/

  • Stoel, L., Wickliffe, V., & Lee, K. (2004). Attribute beliefs and spending as antecedents to shopping value. Journal of Business Research, 57(10), 1067–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P., & Heitmeyer, J. (2008). Looking at Gen Y shopping preferences and intentions: Exploring the role of experience and apparel involvement. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(3), 285–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turley, L., & Milliman, R. (2000). Atmospheric effects on shopping behavior. Journal of Business Research, 49(2), 193–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, J. (2018). Sears has filed for bankruptcy and announced it would close more than 140 stores, but it isn't the only department store that has struggled recently—here’s why [online]. Business Insider. Accessed April 30, 2021, from https://www.businessinsider.com/why-department-stores-sears-jcpenney-are-struggling-2018-10

  • Vieira, V., & Torres, C. (2014). The effect of motivational orientation over arousal-shopping response relationship. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(2), 158–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vignali, G., & Reid, L. (2014). Analysing consumer motivation towards purchasing fashion online. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 13(2), 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vignali, G., Reid, L. F., Ryding, D., & Henninger, C. (2019). Technology driven sustainability: Innovation in the fashion supply chain. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vignali, G., & Vignali, C. (2009). Fashion marketing and theory. Access Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vignali, G., Vignali, C., & Ryding, D. (2010). The strategy process. Access Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vignali, G., Zhao, J., & Campaniolo, D. (2014). Analysing online shopping attributes to influence consumer purchasing for fashion products. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 13(3), 387–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade Clarke, D., Perry, P., & Denson, H. (2012). The sensory retail environment of small fashion boutiques. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 16(4), 492–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, T., & Rudolph, T. (2010). Towards a hierarchical theory of shopping motivation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 17(5), 415–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Ye, Y., Ning, B., Cheah, J., & Lim, X. (2022). Why do some consumers still prefer in-store shopping? An exploration of online shopping cart abandonment behaviour. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 829696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D., & Cliquet, G. (2013). In-store shopping experience in China and France. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 41(9), 706–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoganathan, V., Osburg, V., & Akhtar, P. (2019). Sensory stimulation for sensible consumption: Multisensory marketing for e-tailing of ethical brands. Journal of Business Research, 96, 386–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Chang, C., & Neslin, S. (2021). How physical stores enhance customer value: The importance of product inspection depth. Journal of Marketing, 86(2), 166–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Materials, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

    Enshang Shang, Gianpaolo Vignali & Claudia Henninger

Authors
  1. Enshang Shang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gianpaolo Vignali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Claudia Henninger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianpaolo Vignali .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Design School Kolding, Kolding, Denmark

    Michelle Brandstrup

  2. ICD Business School, Paris, France

    Léo-Paul Dana

  3. Department of Materials, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

    Daniella Ryding  & Gianpaolo Vignali  & 

  4. Faculty of Economics, Università degli Studi Internazionali di Roma - UNINT, Rome, Italy

    Myriam Caratù

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shang, E., Vignali, G., Henninger, C. (2023). The Influence of Sensory Marketing on Consumers with Different Characteristics Regarding Physical Store Shopping. In: Brandstrup, M., Dana, LP., Ryding, D., Vignali, G., Caratù, M. (eds) The Garment Economy. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33302-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation