Skip to main content

Predicting Wildlife Trafficking Routes with Differentiable Shortest Paths

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Integration of Constraint Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Operations Research (CPAIOR 2023)


Wildlife trafficking (WT), the illegal trade of wild fauna, flora, and their parts, directly threatens biodiversity and conservation of trafficked species, while also negatively impacting human health, national security, and economic development. Wildlife traffickers obfuscate their activities in plain sight, leveraging legal, large, and globally linked transportation networks. To complicate matters, defensive interdiction resources are limited, datasets are fragmented and rarely interoperable, and interventions like setting checkpoints place a burden on legal transportation. As a result, interpretable predictions of which routes wildlife traffickers are likely to take can help target defensive efforts and understand what wildlife traffickers may be considering when selecting routes. We propose a data-driven model for predicting trafficking routes on the global commercial flight network, a transportation network for which we have some historical seizure data and a specification of the possible routes that traffickers may take. While seizure data has limitations such as data bias and dependence on the deployed defensive resources, this is a first step towards predicting wildlife trafficking routes on real-world data. Our seizure data documents the planned commercial flight itinerary of trafficked and successfully interdicted wildlife. We aim to provide predictions of highly-trafficked flight paths for known origin-destination pairs with plausible explanations that illuminate how traffickers make decisions based on the presence of criminal actors, markets, and resilience systems. We propose a model that first predicts likelihoods of which commercial flights will be taken out of a given airport given input features, and then subsequently finds the highest-likelihood flight path from origin to destination using a differentiable shortest path solver, allowing us to automatically align our model’s loss with the overall goal of correctly predicting the full flight itinerary from a given source to a destination. We evaluate the proposed model’s predictions and interpretations both quantitatively and qualitatively, showing that the predicted paths are aligned with observed held-out seizures, and can be interpreted by policy-makers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Ahuja, R.K., Orlin, J.B.: Inverse optimization. Oper. Res. 49, 771–783 (2001).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Amos, B., Kolter, J.Z.: OptNet: differentiable optimization as a layer in neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 70, pp. 136–145. PMLR (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arroyave, F.J., Petersen, A.M., Jenkins, J., Hurtado, R.: Multiplex networks reveal geographic constraints on illicit wildlife trafficking. Appl. Netw. Sci. 5(1), 1–20 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Balghiti, O.E., Elmachtoub, A.N., Grigas, P., Tewari, A.: Generalization bounds in the predict-then-optimize framework. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Choi, S., Yeo, H., Kim, J.: Network-wide vehicle trajectory prediction in urban traffic networks using deep learning. Transp. Res. Rec. 2672(45), 173–184 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. CITES: ()

  7. Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime. The global organized crime index (2021).

  8. Elmachtoub, A., Liang, J.C.N., McNellis, R.: Decision trees for decision-making under the predict-then-optimize framework. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 2858–2867. PMLR (2020).

  9. Elmachtoub, A.N., Grigas, P.: Smart “predict, then optimize". Manage. Sci. 68(1), 9–26 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Feng, J., et al.: DeepMove: predicting human mobility with attentional recurrent networks. In: Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference, pp. 1459–1468 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fosgerau, M., Paulsen, M., Rasmussen, T.K.: A perturbed utility route choice model. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 136, 103514 (2022).,

  12. Gambs, S., Killijian, M.O., del Prado Cortez, M.N.: Next place prediction using mobility Markov chains. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Measurement, Privacy, and Mobility, pp. 1–6 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gholami, S., et al.: Adversary models account for imperfect crime data: forecasting and planning against real-world poachers (corrected version). In: 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gore, M.L., et al.: Transnational environmental crime threatens sustainable development. Nat. Sustain. 2(9), 784–786 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gore, M.L., Mwinyihali, R., Mayet, L., Baku-Bumb, G.D.M., Plowman, C., Wieland, M.: Typologies of urban wildlife traffickers and sellers. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 27, e01557 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gore, M.L., et al.: Voluntary consensus based geospatial data standards for the global illegal trade in wild fauna and flora. Sci. Data 9(1), 1–8 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Haas, T.C., Ferreira, S.M.: Finding politically feasible conservation policies: the case of wildlife trafficking. Ecol. Appl. 28(2), 473–494 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. IATA: Combating wildlife trafficking. Accessed 15 Aug 2022

  19. Kullback, S.: Information theory and statistics. Courier Corporation (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kurland, J., Pires, S.F.: Assessing us wildlife trafficking patterns: how criminology and conservation science can guide strategies to reduce the illegal wildlife trade. Deviant Behav. 38(4), 375–391 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Levenshtein, V.I., et al.: Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. In: Soviet Physics Doklady, vol. 10, pp. 707–710. Soviet Union (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Magliocca, N., et al.: Comparative analysis of illicit supply network structure and operations: cocaine, wildlife, and sand. J. Illicit Econ. Dev. 3(1), 50–73 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nguyen, T.H., et al.: Capture: a new predictive anti-poaching tool for wildlife protection. In: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems, pp. 767–775 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Niepert, M., Minervini, P., Franceschi, L.: Implicit MLE: backpropagating through discrete exponential family distributions. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34 (2021).

  25. Paszke, A., et al.: PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In: Wallach, H., Larochelle, H., Beygelzimer, A., d’Alché-Buc, F., Fox, E., Garnett, R. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32, pp. 8024–8035. Curran Associates, Inc. (2019).

  26. Pogančić, M.V., Paulus, A., Musil, V., Martius, G., Rolinek, M.: Differentiation of blackbox combinatorial solvers. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2020).

  27. Reddi, S.J., Kale, S., Kumar, S.: On the convergence of Adam and Beyond. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2018).

  28. ROUTES: How the aviation industry transformed to combat wildlife trafficking (2022). Accessed 15 Aug 2022

  29. Rudenko, A., Palmieri, L., Herman, M., Kitani, K.M., Gavrila, D.M., Arras, K.O.: Human motion trajectory prediction: a survey. Int. J. Robot. Res. 39(8), 895–935 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. skyscanner (2020).

  31. Smith, J.C., Song, Y.: A survey of network interdiction models and algorithms. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 283(3), 797–811 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Spevack, B.: Shared skies convergence of wildlife trafficking with other illicit activities in the aviation industry. In: C4ADS (2021).

  33. Stringham, O.C.: Text classification to streamline online wildlife trade analyses. PLoS ONE 16(7), e0254007 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stringham, O.C., et al.: Dataset of seized wildlife and their intended uses. Data Brief 39, 107531 (2021).

  35. Stringham, O.C., et al.: A guide to using the internet to monitor and quantify the wildlife trade. Conserv. Biol. 35(4), 1130–1139 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. TRAFFIC: Wildlife trade portal (2021).

  37. UNODC: Enhancing the Detection, Investigation, and Disruption of Illicit Financial Flows from Wildlife Crime (2017).

  38. Utermohlen, M., Baine, P.: In plane sight: wildlife trafficking in the air transport sector (2018). Accessed 15 Aug 2022

  39. Utermohlen, M.: Runway to extinction: wildlife trafficking in the air transport sector (2020). Accessed 15 Aug 2022

  40. Wilder, B., Dilkina, B., Tambe, M.: Melding the data-decisions pipeline: decision-focused learning for combinatorial optimization. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33, 1658–1665 (2019).

  41. Xu, L., Bondi, E., Fang, F., Perrault, A., Wang, K., Tambe, M.: Dual-mandate patrols: multi-armed bandits for green security. In: Thirty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-21) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang, J., Paschalidis, I.C.: Data-driven estimation of travel latency cost functions via inverse optimization in multi-class transportation networks. In: 2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control, CDC 2017, pp. 6295–6300 (2018).

  43. Ziebart, B.D., et al.: Planning-based prediction for pedestrians. In: 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3931–3936. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references


All authors were supported by U.S. NSF awards CMMI-1935451; Gore was also supported by IIS-2039951. The information contained herein does not represent the opinions of the U.S. Government or any author affiliations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron Ferber .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ferber, A., Griffin, E., Dilkina, B., Keskin, B., Gore, M. (2023). Predicting Wildlife Trafficking Routes with Differentiable Shortest Paths. In: Cire, A.A. (eds) Integration of Constraint Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Operations Research. CPAIOR 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13884. Springer, Cham.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-33270-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-33271-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics