Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Mathematical Engineering ((MATHENGIN))

  • 147 Accesses

Abstract

In the previous chapter, we have derived 1D models for blood flow and transport processes using Reynold’s transport theorem and averaging operations. These models have the form of PDEs, which can be assigned to the class of first order hyperbolic equations. Moreover, it turns out that these systems consist of non-linear equations that are strongly coupled to each other. Therefore, these systems of equations are generally not solvable by analytical methods, but only by the use of numerical methods. In order to compute the numerical solution of the 1D blood flow model and the transport equation, a variety of numerical solution methods have been developed in the past decades. These range from simple finite difference methods [1, 2] to neural networks [3]. In the following sections of this chapter, we will present some simple solution schemes. These are, on the one hand side the Lax-Wendroff method for the blood flow model and on the other hand side an implicit upwinding method for the transport equation. The choice of these methods is motivated as follows: The Lax-Wendroff method is a method that does not require an analytical expression of the characteristic variables. Therefore, the method can easily be applied to both flat velocity profiles \(\left( \alpha = 1\right) \) and other velocity profiles \(\left( \alpha \ne 1 \right) \). This is a major difference compared to other numerical methods, which require an explicit expression for the characteristic variables to incorporate boundary conditions. In order to decouple the simulation of flow and transport, we use an upwinding method combined with the implicit Euler method for time integration. The chapter contains the following sections: In the first section, we describe the construction of the two methods for a single vessel. We show that both methods can be considered as finite volume methods, where the fluxes at the respective cell interfaces are approximated by finite differences. Afterwards we consider the numerical treatment of the various boundary conditions. In the following section, the convergence behavior of the two methods is investigated. Section 4.4 contains a series of numerical experiments that confirm the theoretical results from the previous sections and chapters. We also discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed discretization methods and provide an overview on further discretization methods that have been applied to the blood flow model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lax P (1959) Systems of conservation laws. LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LAB NM

    Google Scholar 

  2. Collins JB, Estep D, Tavener S (2014) A posteriori error estimation for the Lax–Wendroff finite difference scheme. J Comput Appl Math 263:299–311. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kissas G, Yang Y, Hwuang E, Witschey W, Detre J, Perdikaris P (2020) Machine learning in cardiovascular flows modeling: Predicting arterial blood pressure from non-invasive 4D flow MRI data using physics-informed neural networks. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 358:112623. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  4. LeVeque R (1992) Numerical methods for conservation laws. 132. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kolachalama V, Bressloff N, Nair P, Shearman C (2007) Predictive haemodynamics in a one-dimensional human carotid artery bifurcation. Part I: Application to stent design. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54(5):802–812. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kolachalama V, Bressloff N, Nair P, Shearman C (2008) Predictive haemodynamics in a one-dimensional human carotid artery bifurcation. Part II: Application to graft design. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55(3):1176–1184. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  7. He Y, Liu H, Himeno R (2004) A one-dimensional thermo-fluid model of blood circulation in the human upper limb. Int J Heat Mass Transf 47:12–13, 2735–2745. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deuflhard P, Hohmann A (1991) Numerische Mathematik I. De Gruyter, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Liang F, Takagi S, Himeno R, Liu H (2009) Multi-scale modeling of the human cardiovascular system with applications to aortic valvular and arterial stenoses. Med Biol Eng Comput 47(7):743–755. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  10. Watt A (1990) Fundamentals of three-dimensional computer graphics. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc

    Google Scholar 

  11. Werner D (2018) VI Spektraltheorie kompakter Operatoren, Funktionalanalysis. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 279–343. isbn=978-3-662-55407-4, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55407-4_6

  12. Chen G-Q, Liu J-G (1997) Convergence of difference schemes with high resolution for conservation laws. Math Comput 66(219):1027–1053

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Varah J (1975) A lower bound for the smallest singular value of a matrix. Linear Algebra Appl 11(1):3–5. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  14. Čanić S, Kim E (2003) Mathematical analysis of the quasilinear effects in a hyperbolic model blood flow through compliant axi-symmetric vessels. Math Methods Appl Sci 26(14):1161–1186. Wiley Online Library

    Google Scholar 

  15. Acosta S, Puelz C, Rivière B, Penny D, Rusin C (2015) Numerical method of characteristics for one-dimensional blood flow. J Comput Phys 294:96–109. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kuzmin D (2013) Slope limiting for discontinuous Galerkin approximations with a possibly non-orthogonal Taylor basis. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 71(9):1178–1190. Wiley Online Library

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cockburn B, Shu C (1989) TVB Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws. II. General framework. Math Comput 52(186):411–435

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Krivodonova L (2007) Limiters for high-order discontinuous Galerkin methods. J Comput Phys 226(1):879–896. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  19. Masri R, Puelz C, Riviere B (2021) A reduced model for solute transport in compliant blood vessels with arbitrary axial velocity profile. Int J Heat Mass Transf 176:121379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Luo H, Baum JD, Löhner R (2008) A discontinuous Galerkin method based on a Taylor basis for the compressible flows on arbitrary grids, English. J Comput Phys 227:8875–8893

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Krivodonova L, Xin J, Remacle J, Chevaugeon N, Flaherty J (2004) Shock detection and limiting with discontinuous Galerkin methods for hyperbolic conservation laws. Appl Numer Math 48(3):323–338. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  22. Michalak K, Ollivier-Gooch C (2008) Limiters for unstructured higher-order accurate solutions of the Euler equations. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Forty-Sixth Aerospace Meeting

    Google Scholar 

  23. Köppl T, Wohlmuth B, Helmig R (2013) Reduced one-dimensional modelling and numerical simulation for mass transport in fluids. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 72(2):135–156. Wiley Online Library

    Google Scholar 

  24. Drzisga D, Köppl T, Pohl U, Helmig R, Wohlmuth B (2016) Numerical modeling of compensation mechanisms for peripheral arterial stenoses. Comput Biol Med 7:190–201. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  25. Koeppl T, Santin G, Haasdonk B, Helmig R (2018) Numerical modelling of a peripheral arterial stenosis using dimensionally reduced models and kernel methods. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 34(8):e3095. Wiley Online Library

    Google Scholar 

  26. Quarteroni A, Manzoni A, Negri F (2015) Reduced basis methods for partial differential equations: an introduction. 92, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  27. Santin G, Haasdonk B (2019) Kernel methods for surrogate modeling. Model Order Reduc 1:311–354

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Cai S, Mao Z, Wang Z, Yin M, Karniadakis G (2022) Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A review. Acta Mech Sinica 1–12. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  29. Formaggia L, Quarteroni A, Veneziani A (Eds) (2010) Cardiovascular mathematics: Modeling and simulation of the circulatory system, vol 1. Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  30. Acosta S, Puelz C, Rivière B, Penny D, Brady K, Rusin C (2017) Cardiovascular mechanics in the early stages of pulmonary hypertension: A computational study. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 16(6):2093–2112. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  31. Alastruey JPKH, Parker KH, Peiró J, Byrd SM, Sherwin SJ (2007) Modelling the circle of Willis to assess the effects of anatomical variations and occlusions on cerebral flows. J Biomech 40(8):1794–1805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Puelz C, Čanić S, Rivière B, Rusin C (2017) Comparison of reduced models for blood flow using Runge–Kutta discontinuous Galerkin methods. Appl Numer Math 115:114–141. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sherwin S, Formaggia L, Peiro J, Franke V (2003) Computational modelling of 1D blood flow with variable mechanical properties and its application to the simulation of wave propagation in the human arterial system. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 43(6–7):673–700. Wiley Online Library

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ismail M, Wall W, Gee M (2013) Adjoint-based inverse analysis of windkessel parameters for patient-specific vascular models. J Comput Phys 244:113–130. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  35. Burton AC (1965) Physiology and biophysics of the circulation. Acad Med 40:8. LWW

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Köppl .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Köppl, T., Helmig, R. (2023). Numerical Solution Methods. In: Dimension Reduced Modeling of Blood Flow in Large Arteries. Mathematical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33087-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33087-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-33086-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-33087-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics