Abstract
In this chapter, we confront the critique directed at the universality and relativity of human rights as allegedly imposed by Western modernist thought. We present various viewpoints about the universality and nature of human rights as well as criticism and objections coming from a relativist perspective. In the discussion on the purported Western roots of human rights, we also speak up and offer arguments in favor of non-Western viewpoints on their genesis. Pluriversal values in the decolonization of social work may yet offer a position that can transcend the limits of universal or relative perspectives on human rights.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Anthropological Association. (1947). Statement on human rights. American Anthropologist, New Series, 49(4), 539–543.
Baxi, U. (2006). The future of human rights (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Bhambra, G. (2007). Rethinking modernity, postcolonialism and the sociological imagination. Palgrave McMillan.
Bonnet, S. (2015). Overcoming eurocentrism in human rights: Postcolonial critiques – Islamic answers? Muslim World Journal of Human Rights, 12(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/mwjhr-2014-0010
Chakrabarty, D. (2008). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton University Press.
Deng, F., An-Na’im, A., Ghai, Y., & Baxi, U. (2009). Human rights: Southern voices. Cambridge University Press.
Donnelly, J. (1982). Human rights and human dignity: An analytic critique of non-Western conceptions of human rights. American Political Science Review, 76(2), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961111
Escobar, A., & Frye, D. L. (2020). Pluriversal politics: The real and the possible. Duke University Press.
FitzGerald, M. (2022a). Care and the pluriverse: Rethinking global ethics (1st ed.). Bristol University Press.
FitzGerald, M. (Ed.). (2022b). Bristol studies in international theory. In Care and the pluriverse: Rethinking global ethics. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2rh2c37
Freeman, M. (2022). Human rights (4th ed.). Polity.
Gawin, M., Markiewicz, B., Nogal, A., & Wonicki, R. (2016). Prawa człowieka i obywatelaw zglobalizowanym świecie [Human and citizen rights in a globalized world]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Gellner, E., & Breuilly, J. (2008). Nations and nationalism. Cornell University Press.
Goodale, M. (2021). After international law: Anthropology beyond the “Age of human rights”. AJIL Unbound, 115, 289–293. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2021.42
Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (1988). Dialectic of enlightenment. Continuum.
Johansson Dahre, U. (2017). Searching for a middle ground: Anthropologists and the debate on the universalism and the cultural relativism of human rights. The International Journal of Human Rights, 21(5), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2017.1290930
Klein, E. (2021). On limits and restrictions of human rights: A systematic attempt. In J. David, Y. Ronen, Y. Shany, & J. Weiler (Eds.), Strengthening human rights protections in Geneva, Israel, the West Bank and beyond (pp. 10–39). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108973069.002
Kothari, A., Salleh, A., Escobar, A., Demaria, F., & Acosta, A. (2019). Pluriverse: A postdevelopment dictionary. Tulika Books.
Kymlicka, W. (1989). Liberalism, community, and culture. Clarendon Press.
Marcos, S. (2022). Zapatista stories for dreaming another world. PM Press.
Mende, J. (2021). Are human rights Western—And why does it matter? A perspective from international political theory. Journal of International Political Theory, 17(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088219832992
Mercier, C. T. (2019). Uses of “the pluriverse” - Cosmos interrupted - or the others of humanities. Ostium, 15(2). https://ostium.sk/language/sk/uses-of-the-pluriverse-cosmos-interrupted-or-the-others-of-humanities/
Messer, E. (2002). Anthropologists in a W\world with and without human rights. In J. MacClancy (Ed.), Exotic no more: Anthropology on the front lines (pp. 319–335). Chicago University Press.
Mignolo, W. D. (2011). The darker side of Western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Duke University Press.
Mignolo, W. D. (2018). On decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, praxis. Duke University Press.
Namli, E. (2018). Critique of human rights universalism. In M. Stenmark, S. Fuller, & U. Zackariasson (Eds.), Relativism and post-truth in contemporary society: Possibilities and challenges. Palgrave Macmillan.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development. Cambridge University Press.
Pedersen, L., & Cliggett, L. (2021). The sage handbook of cultural anthropology. Sage.
Querejazu, A. (2016). Encountering the pluriverse: Looking for alternatives in other worlds. Revista Brasileira De Política Internacional, 59(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201600207
Reiter, B. (Ed.). (2018). Constructing the pluriverse: The geopolitics of knowledge. Duke University Press.
Rorty, R. (2011). Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Cambridge University Press.
Williams, H. M., & Bermeo, M. (2020). A Decolonial Imperative: Pluriversal rights education. International Journal of Human Rights Education, 4(1). https://repository.usfca.edu/ijhre/vol4/iss1/1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boryczko, M., Leung, J.M., Madew, M. (2023). Relativism, Universalism, and Pluriversality in Human Rights. In: Madew, M., Boryczko, M., Lusk, M. (eds) Decolonized Approaches to Human Rights and Social Work. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33030-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33030-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-33029-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-33030-8
eBook Packages: Social Sciences