Skip to main content

Desistance Theory and Its Relevance to Intimate Partner Violence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reimagining Desistance from Male-Perpetrated Intimate Partner Violence
  • 187 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of commonly cited definitions of desistance and theoretical frameworks for understanding the cessation and reduction of offending behaviours: ontogenetic, sociogenic and agentic perspectives. The perceived relevance of these frameworks for understanding the desistance of intimate partner violence (IPV) is then discussed, referencing the ongoing criminological debates concerning the differences between acquisitive and expressive crimes, the role of gender inequity in IPV and the dyadic dimension of IPV. An overview of the role of social relationships and victims of crime in desistance processes, as described in the existing literature, is also providedĀ and a case for the inclusion of victims-survivors of crime more generally in desistance frameworks is made with a focus on restorative justice and routine activities theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Rocque (2015) noted that Sheldon and Eleanor Glueck actually wrote about the role of maturation in desistance in the 1940s and 1950s and that the authors at this point highlighted the need for additional research to define maturation with some level of specificity and to determine its ā€˜componentsā€™.

  2. 2.

    Giordano et al. (2002) suggest that this re-assessment occurs towards the end of the desistance process.

  3. 3.

    In light of the above-cited evidence, primary prevention policy and programs have aimed to reduce the onset of IPV by addressing gender inequity at a societal level through various mechanisms (see, e.g. Australiaā€™s National Action Plan to Reduce Violence against Women and their Children (Department of Social Services, 2019) and Goal 5 of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (United Nations, 2021).

  4. 4.

    Although desistance theory was initially developed based on studies drawn from the experiences of property abusers, the rational choice framework is only one of many theories that have been used to explain the desistance processes undergone by some offenders. For example, desistance scholars have explicitly situated their analyses in theories that have also been used to explore IPV. This includes feminism (Barr, 2019), symbolic interactionism (Anderson & Rouse, 1988; Paternoster & Bushway, 2009) and relational sociology.

  5. 5.

    Primitive defences include splitting, idealisation, devaluation and projective identification which could distort the individualā€™s view of othersā€™ motivations and behaviours. Reality testing refers to the ability of individuals to assess situations and behaviours based on social criteria of reality; low levels may mean that someone is unable to pick up on cues that a situation is escalating and impairs their ability to diffuse conflicts. Identity diffusion refers to difficulties that an individual may experience distinguishing between their own thoughts and feelings and those of others. High levels of identity diffusion impair someoneā€™s ability to identify causes of conflict or view the problem from someone elseā€™s perspective, which could lead to violence (Craparo et al., 2014; Maneta et al., 2013).

  6. 6.

    Attachment research has identified four types of attachment:

    • Dismissing (compulsive self-reliance and defensive downplaying of the importance of intimate relationships, minimises needs of others)

    • Fearful (afraid of intimacy, views self as unworthy of love and expects others to reject them, need for validation and closeness with others)

    • Preoccupied (low self-worth and esteem, dependence on others to validate self, demanding interpersonal style)

    • Secure (high self-esteem, able to maintain close bonds without losing a sense of self; Doumas et al., 2008; PĆ©loquin et al., 2011)

    Insecure attachment styles are dismissing, fearful and preoccupied.

  7. 7.

    Notably, the desisting offenders interviewed in Marunaā€™s (2001) seminal work scoffed at the idea that moving out of the area and not seeing their old friends was crucial for desistance. A number argued that if desistance was dependent on the individual not seeing anyone from ā€˜the life,ā€™ then they werenā€™t really committed to going straight.

  8. 8.

    Suitability is a nebulous concept, but encompasses a range of factors that increases an individualā€™s perceived susceptibility to crime or attractiveness as a target, including ā€˜valueā€¦physical visibility, access, and the inertia of a target against illegal treatment by abusersā€™ (Cohen & Felson, 1979, p. 591).

  9. 9.

    To date, RAT has been applied as a framework for predicting victimisation (and re-victimisation) for a range of crime types, including burglary (Johnson, 2008) and other property crime (Franklin et al., 2012), cybercrime (e.g. phishing) (Hutchings & Hayes, 2008), stalking (Mustaine & Tewksbury, 1999), non-spousal assault of women (Rodgers & Roberts, 1995), sexual assault (Franklin et al., 2012), homicide (Messner & Tardiff, 1985), IPV (Mannon, 1997) and animal poaching (Herbig & Warchol, 2011).

  10. 10.

    One of the most influential practical applications of RAT has been situational crime prevention. Situational crime prevention approaches aim to ā€˜prevent, constrain or disrupt criminal activityā€™ by reducing opportunities for crime to occur (Cornish, 1994, p. 153). This can be achieved through the implementation of strategies that increase the risk or efforts and/or reduce the rewards, provocations or excuses for offending.

  11. 11.

    Within the scholarship, there is a concern that including such goals would make RJ processes offender-centric and result in the downgrading of victimā€™s goals. This has been challenged somewhat by authors such as Claes and Shapland (2016) who have argued that RJ is not a ā€˜zero-sum equationā€™ where benefits for offenders result in a loss for victims (p. 303). Rather, many victims involved in RJ processes view their participation as contributing to desistance, which they view as a necessary component for inclusion in their conferences.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boxall, H. (2023). Desistance Theory and Its Relevance to Intimate Partner Violence. In: Reimagining Desistance from Male-Perpetrated Intimate Partner Violence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32951-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32951-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-32950-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-32951-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics