Skip to main content

Abstract

Contrary to contemporary narratives, there is consistent evidence that many men who perpetrate intimate partner violence (IPV) desist during their lifetime. However, our understanding of how and under what circumstances IPV desistance occurs is very limited. Considering the evidence that traditional interventions that aim to prevent IPV reoffending, such as protection orders, are not effective under all circumstances, it is unlikely that when IPV desistance does occur that it is attributable to the impact of external interventions in all cases.

IPV has an important dyadic component; many victims-survivors of IPV are in long-term and committed relationships with perpetrators and interact with their partners repeatedly over an extended period of time. As such, victims-survivors are in a unique position to both observe and identify the reasons for change in their partner’s abusive behaviours, as well as affect their partner’s behaviours through their actions and inactions. The current study aims to understand the potential role of female victims-survivors in the desistance of male-perpetrated IPV by conducting interviews with women who did and did not experience the desistance of abuse perpetrated against them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The names of participants have been changed to protect their anonymity.

  2. 2.

    I acknowledge that there are ongoing debates within the desistance literature regarding terms that label individuals as inherently ‘deviant’, such as ‘abuser’, ‘perpetrator’ and/or ‘offender’. In the broader desistance literature, some have argued that we need to move beyond terms which define and label people by the behaviours we wish them to desist from, noting that these terms are stigmatising and more ‘person-first’ language should be used. These critiques are acknowledged, but I have chosen to retain these terms, as they reflect the terminology employed by the women I interviewed and are commonly adopted in the feminist and IPV literature that has informed this thesis.

  3. 3.

    The desistance literature emerged in response to increasing recognition that medical and specific deterrence explanations for the cessation of offending were unable to account for the majority of desistance. As Shadd Maruna argued:

    This well-known fact that ‘they’ frequently do ‘come back’ after being ‘corrected’ or ‘deterred’ is precisely the reason both stories have been assigned a minor role in the scientific understanding of desistance. Although no-one believes that the state plays no role in the desistance process of ex-abusers, criminologists tend to look elsewhere, to forces like the labor market, to the family, and to the abuser himself or herself, to account for this highly-predictable change in behavior. (2001, p. 2)

  4. 4.

    The victimology literature has consistently identified that the term ‘victims’ may not reflect the lived experiences of individuals who have experienced crime. However, ‘victims’ is used throughout this thesis to refer to individuals who have experienced crime as a broad category. Victims/survivors is used to refer to individuals who have lived experiences of IPV specifically.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boxall, H. (2023). Introduction. In: Reimagining Desistance from Male-Perpetrated Intimate Partner Violence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32951-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32951-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-32950-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-32951-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics